Finishing the thought in Sean Bell part 2...
But what is it that makes it alright to go to such extremes. And it must be alright on some level because across the nation Black American men are assaulted like this often. I don’t recall a single white male that was attacked in a similar manner once in my entire life. I’m not talking about a shootout with officers, or hostage taking. I mean beatings by half a dozen officers, being fired at enough times to necessitate reloading firearms, and abuses that even the prisoners at Abu Ghraib have not received.
How many White American men have had guns placed in their face by a police officer once in their life? To my knowledge I know of 5 in my life that have had it happen once, two of them being criminals that were being arrested. That’s out of maybe a couple of hundred White American males I have known in my life across this nation. Again this is versus virtually every African American male I have ever known, regardless of age. And I would not be surprised if it happens a couple of dozen more times over the rest of my life.
The question is not if this one incident was excessive. The anger is not over this happening to one group of men. The fact is that this is a pattern, systemically happening across this nation for more than the almost 4 decades I have been alive. So the question is, why?
If I seem angry, I am. If I seem disappointed in the system, I am. If the question is if I respect police officers, the answer is in general I do. I’ve known several I call friends (of all nationalities and race). But beyond all that is fear. For my brothers, my friends, and myself. Because even though we all may avoid drugs, escape the ‘ghetto fabulous’ mentality, earn an education, and struggle to become successful in careers we may still be killed by those enforcing the laws of the nation for nothing more than a speeding ticket or getting our wallet out to identify ourselves.
What more do I need to say?
This is what I think, what do you think?
Wednesday, November 29, 2006
Sean Bell in NYC - 11.29.2006.2
Continued from Sean Bell part 1 ...
My best friend and I were on a business trip. We were going to Delaware for a meeting. My friend, Mike, was driving his mini-van. We both were dressed in business attire; He was more casual I was in a suit. We drove from New York City through New Jersey on the turnpike and so on. We were doing about 70-75 on the turnpike and were in the middle lane, keeping up with the flow of traffic, not exceeding it. 2 State troopers pulled us over, again guns drawn. This time I had to have my hands on the dash. We were given a ticket for speeding, as at least 5 cars passed by at what seemed to be about 70+ and one was doing what looked like 80 or 90. It was the middle of the day on a Tuesday. I was 31 or 32, Mike is one year younger.
I can go on, but I don’t think I need to. It has been my experience that the police can be as potentially deadly as a crackhead. As a matter of fact, I’ve had fewer problems with crackheads than officers. It doesn’t make a difference how I am dressed (suits or jeans – I never dress in the thuggish style), my age, my education, or where I have lived. I’ve had 2 occasions where someone has drawn a gun on me and they were not police officers. I’ve had at least 10 times where police officers have drawn guns on me.
I am hardly unique. Every Black American I know can describe several similar situations throughout their lives. I live with the fear that one day I will be shot by police officers, probably without cause. Events like the ones I mentioned in the onset don’t make me feel any less likely to be killed.
I say all that for a reason. Mr. Sean Bell and his friends were fired at 51 times. One officer fired 31 times another 11 times. The tires of the car were not shot out. Deadly force was used, though it was against official policy. I have seen reports that say that the first officer on the scene identified himself, and did not fire as Mr. Bell tried to drive away – brushing against the officer. As Mr. Bell continued to attempt to get away the officer seems to have become fearful for his life and the results were one dead another shot 23 times and the third shot 11 times.
Was it excessive? Imagine that this was a car full of white males. If that would be excessive then this must be. The bigger question I have always had is why such force needs to be used solely against African American men. Mr. Rodney King had 5 or 6 officers beating him; Mr. Diallo had 41 shots from 4 officers [at least one shot was through his foot after he was laying on the ground dead]. In each case the officers walked away without a single charge. Mr. Louima was violated in a police station with a plunger. Given these facts, my own experiences and those of friends, if I had a chance to get away from a police officer in a touchy situation I’d try to run as well. It’s not about guilt, it’s about survival.
Continued in the final part ...
My best friend and I were on a business trip. We were going to Delaware for a meeting. My friend, Mike, was driving his mini-van. We both were dressed in business attire; He was more casual I was in a suit. We drove from New York City through New Jersey on the turnpike and so on. We were doing about 70-75 on the turnpike and were in the middle lane, keeping up with the flow of traffic, not exceeding it. 2 State troopers pulled us over, again guns drawn. This time I had to have my hands on the dash. We were given a ticket for speeding, as at least 5 cars passed by at what seemed to be about 70+ and one was doing what looked like 80 or 90. It was the middle of the day on a Tuesday. I was 31 or 32, Mike is one year younger.
I can go on, but I don’t think I need to. It has been my experience that the police can be as potentially deadly as a crackhead. As a matter of fact, I’ve had fewer problems with crackheads than officers. It doesn’t make a difference how I am dressed (suits or jeans – I never dress in the thuggish style), my age, my education, or where I have lived. I’ve had 2 occasions where someone has drawn a gun on me and they were not police officers. I’ve had at least 10 times where police officers have drawn guns on me.
I am hardly unique. Every Black American I know can describe several similar situations throughout their lives. I live with the fear that one day I will be shot by police officers, probably without cause. Events like the ones I mentioned in the onset don’t make me feel any less likely to be killed.
I say all that for a reason. Mr. Sean Bell and his friends were fired at 51 times. One officer fired 31 times another 11 times. The tires of the car were not shot out. Deadly force was used, though it was against official policy. I have seen reports that say that the first officer on the scene identified himself, and did not fire as Mr. Bell tried to drive away – brushing against the officer. As Mr. Bell continued to attempt to get away the officer seems to have become fearful for his life and the results were one dead another shot 23 times and the third shot 11 times.
Was it excessive? Imagine that this was a car full of white males. If that would be excessive then this must be. The bigger question I have always had is why such force needs to be used solely against African American men. Mr. Rodney King had 5 or 6 officers beating him; Mr. Diallo had 41 shots from 4 officers [at least one shot was through his foot after he was laying on the ground dead]. In each case the officers walked away without a single charge. Mr. Louima was violated in a police station with a plunger. Given these facts, my own experiences and those of friends, if I had a chance to get away from a police officer in a touchy situation I’d try to run as well. It’s not about guilt, it’s about survival.
Continued in the final part ...
Sean Bell - 11.29.2006.1
While I normally save my non-entertainment related posts for my www.mvass.com site I do on occasion make an exception. This is one such case.
Rodney King, Amidou Diallo, Sean Bell. Each of these names evoke an image to everyone who hears them, and for many of us a feeling as well. For me it evokes fear. It’s just that simple. I’m not unique many Black Americans, especially males, share this fear.
Face it, life is not the most fun as an African American male in these days if there ever was a time that it was. Let me explain. I have never been arrested or charged with a crime (I did get a ticket once though). I have never dealt drugs, though I grew up with many that have. I’m from the Bronx, and my family was far from rich. I have seen more than half of my friends and associates die or jailed by the time I left high school. That’s not a glorious thing, nothing to take pride in, just the facts.
The first time I had a run-in with the police that I can easily recall was in a train station. The officer (Black) was busting my testicles about my train pass (a day old) and made me pay full fare, which irritated me and I started to argue with him. His response was to reach for his gun and told me to go on my way. I was with 4 friends, 3 of them women, who dragged me away [I was a bit of a hot head back then, but not violent]. I was 17, in high school and taking classes at City College, 5’ 9”-ish and weighed about 110 pounds or less. [Yes I was skinny; some might say I still am] I was equal no threat to a full grown, armed police officer yet he was preparing to bring out his gun on me just because of my words.
In college I was walking down a street at about 12 midnight or a bit later. I was going to get some cigarettes at the newspaper stand which was the only store open at the time. As I was crossing a well-lit main street a police car pulled up, 2 officers (white) popped out the car, drew their guns and started to question me. As I was being questioned the radio was blaring about the suspect they were actually looking for. A white male, about 6’ tall with blond hair, who was wearing the same color jacket as my pants, and was in site of another police officer 5 blocks away from me. Say what you might, but I don’t look like a blond white male, and considering I was under a street lamp at the time, with an open jacket and 22 I’m not sure why then felt the need to have drawn guns on me in the first 5 seconds they saw me.
In Los Angeles, a few months after the Rodney King riots as I recall, officers pulled over a car I was in. I was in the passenger side seat, the driver was a Korean American friend of mine named Danny. In the back seat were 2 of our other friends from work and they happened to be white guys. We all were about 24-26. It was Friday night, about 10 or 11pm, and we were driving down Hollywood Blvd. Once we were pulled over I had an officer immediately by the door, gun pointing at my face, telling me to put my hands on the ceiling of the car. Danny was treated to a similar reaction, then he had to get his identification, all the while I had my hands on the ceiling of the car. Several times throughout this process the officer on my side kept asking the 2 white guys in the backseat if they were ok. Once the officers were sure the car wasn’t stolen, and that neither Danny nor I had any warrants we were told we could go. When we asked why we were pulled over, we were told we were driving suspiciously. We were on our way out to go to a bar, hadn’t had a drink yet, and had circled the block once looking for a parking spot. I guesstimate we had been on Hollywood Blvd. a total of 5-7 minutes and did not hold up any traffic. [Probable reason, which everyone in the car agreed on, was that they thought we had jacked the car and they didn’t like the look in the way we were seated]
To be continued...
Rodney King, Amidou Diallo, Sean Bell. Each of these names evoke an image to everyone who hears them, and for many of us a feeling as well. For me it evokes fear. It’s just that simple. I’m not unique many Black Americans, especially males, share this fear.
Face it, life is not the most fun as an African American male in these days if there ever was a time that it was. Let me explain. I have never been arrested or charged with a crime (I did get a ticket once though). I have never dealt drugs, though I grew up with many that have. I’m from the Bronx, and my family was far from rich. I have seen more than half of my friends and associates die or jailed by the time I left high school. That’s not a glorious thing, nothing to take pride in, just the facts.
The first time I had a run-in with the police that I can easily recall was in a train station. The officer (Black) was busting my testicles about my train pass (a day old) and made me pay full fare, which irritated me and I started to argue with him. His response was to reach for his gun and told me to go on my way. I was with 4 friends, 3 of them women, who dragged me away [I was a bit of a hot head back then, but not violent]. I was 17, in high school and taking classes at City College, 5’ 9”-ish and weighed about 110 pounds or less. [Yes I was skinny; some might say I still am] I was equal no threat to a full grown, armed police officer yet he was preparing to bring out his gun on me just because of my words.
In college I was walking down a street at about 12 midnight or a bit later. I was going to get some cigarettes at the newspaper stand which was the only store open at the time. As I was crossing a well-lit main street a police car pulled up, 2 officers (white) popped out the car, drew their guns and started to question me. As I was being questioned the radio was blaring about the suspect they were actually looking for. A white male, about 6’ tall with blond hair, who was wearing the same color jacket as my pants, and was in site of another police officer 5 blocks away from me. Say what you might, but I don’t look like a blond white male, and considering I was under a street lamp at the time, with an open jacket and 22 I’m not sure why then felt the need to have drawn guns on me in the first 5 seconds they saw me.
In Los Angeles, a few months after the Rodney King riots as I recall, officers pulled over a car I was in. I was in the passenger side seat, the driver was a Korean American friend of mine named Danny. In the back seat were 2 of our other friends from work and they happened to be white guys. We all were about 24-26. It was Friday night, about 10 or 11pm, and we were driving down Hollywood Blvd. Once we were pulled over I had an officer immediately by the door, gun pointing at my face, telling me to put my hands on the ceiling of the car. Danny was treated to a similar reaction, then he had to get his identification, all the while I had my hands on the ceiling of the car. Several times throughout this process the officer on my side kept asking the 2 white guys in the backseat if they were ok. Once the officers were sure the car wasn’t stolen, and that neither Danny nor I had any warrants we were told we could go. When we asked why we were pulled over, we were told we were driving suspiciously. We were on our way out to go to a bar, hadn’t had a drink yet, and had circled the block once looking for a parking spot. I guesstimate we had been on Hollywood Blvd. a total of 5-7 minutes and did not hold up any traffic. [Probable reason, which everyone in the car agreed on, was that they thought we had jacked the car and they didn’t like the look in the way we were seated]
To be continued...
Sunday, November 26, 2006
Wesley Snipes, Michael Richards and John Pepper II - 11.26.2006.1
In more relevant news there is the response by Mr. Wesley Snipes to the charges of tax fraud and the supposition of the media that he might be in hiding or evading. As I had mentioned before, Mr. Snipes has not been hiding, but in fact was in Namibia filming a movie. [Could this be part of the Black Panther film that has been mentioned he wanted to do?] If you may recall the media frenzy, there were various news and celebrity television shows that questioned where Mr. Snipes was after federal authorities indicted him on failure to pay $12 million in taxes for 1996-7.
For all the personnel and resources that these corporations and the government has it seems that I was the first to mention that perhaps Mr. Snipes was out of the country on vacation or on a job. In 2 days, perhaps 3, of all the various talking heads wondering and suspecting motives of Mr. Snipes my supposition was never mentioned. It was about a week later that Mr. Snipes mentioned he was in fact on a job outside the country and that he would deal with this when he returned. That news was barely mentioned for about half a day. Something you probably never heard about, and I didn’t notice covered at all, was the fact that Mr. Snipes recently stated he believes he is being used as a scapegoat. It is his claim that “I'm to be the scapegoat, because there's more public interest in `celebrities gone bad' than `rich people being taken advantage of”.
Well I’m not sure if Mr. Snipes is exactly innocent, but I do agree that he is being railroaded. The media has worked hard to portray him negatively, though there have been no facts to go on. If there was any unbiased media then the news of Mr. Snipes comments would have gotten equal time and it has not. That is just frustrating to me, and I imagine worse for Mr. Snipes.
In a bit of sad news I mention that Mr. John R. Pepper II has passed away. Many may not be familiar with this pioneer. Mr. Pepper former the first nationwide radio station that provided a format targeting a Black American audience. That may not sound like a big deal to some, but imagine this. Prior to the creation of WDIA-AM in the 1940’s there was no station in the South with an all Black American on-air staff. Without this B.B. King might never have gotten started. It’s possible that stations featuring R&B and Rap don’t exist without the efforts of Mr. Pepper. It’s important to remember what those before us have done, especially when they pass on. My condolences to the family and friends of Mr. Pepper.
Lastly I want to touch upon the continuing matter of Mr. Michael Richards. It seems that 2 men that Mr. Richards berated in the now infamous stand-up show at the Laugh Factory are looking for a personal apology and perhaps money. I agree that there should be an apology of a personal nature. That I feel is required. Speaking on television shows is a start but does not impact those directly assaulted properly. It’s the least Mr. Richards can do.
I fear though that this will become about money. If the media does its generally poor job, this will be shaped as an elaborate scheme to seek money from a rich and famous individual rather than what it was. Nothing should detract from the offensive nature of this tirade. Compensation in terms of money is not unwarranted though. It may provide an additional sting to remind Mr. Richards that speaking in such a manner, evoking such thoughts with the intent of malice and the infliction of pain, is never acceptable. But if the media make this a farce then all its impact will be lost. This should not be about the money, and so far it is not. But let’s not lose sight of what created this situation.
Too often there are distractions made by the media to lessen or divert attention for what the real news story is. This is one case where the attention needs to remain on subject. But I have no doubt that there will be some attempt to change the focus. To try to make many Americans feel less uncomfortable about what happened. But being uncomfortable is what this is about. Appeasing some is not worth reducing the impact and distaste of this incident.
This is what I think, what do you think?
For all the personnel and resources that these corporations and the government has it seems that I was the first to mention that perhaps Mr. Snipes was out of the country on vacation or on a job. In 2 days, perhaps 3, of all the various talking heads wondering and suspecting motives of Mr. Snipes my supposition was never mentioned. It was about a week later that Mr. Snipes mentioned he was in fact on a job outside the country and that he would deal with this when he returned. That news was barely mentioned for about half a day. Something you probably never heard about, and I didn’t notice covered at all, was the fact that Mr. Snipes recently stated he believes he is being used as a scapegoat. It is his claim that “I'm to be the scapegoat, because there's more public interest in `celebrities gone bad' than `rich people being taken advantage of”.
Well I’m not sure if Mr. Snipes is exactly innocent, but I do agree that he is being railroaded. The media has worked hard to portray him negatively, though there have been no facts to go on. If there was any unbiased media then the news of Mr. Snipes comments would have gotten equal time and it has not. That is just frustrating to me, and I imagine worse for Mr. Snipes.
In a bit of sad news I mention that Mr. John R. Pepper II has passed away. Many may not be familiar with this pioneer. Mr. Pepper former the first nationwide radio station that provided a format targeting a Black American audience. That may not sound like a big deal to some, but imagine this. Prior to the creation of WDIA-AM in the 1940’s there was no station in the South with an all Black American on-air staff. Without this B.B. King might never have gotten started. It’s possible that stations featuring R&B and Rap don’t exist without the efforts of Mr. Pepper. It’s important to remember what those before us have done, especially when they pass on. My condolences to the family and friends of Mr. Pepper.
Lastly I want to touch upon the continuing matter of Mr. Michael Richards. It seems that 2 men that Mr. Richards berated in the now infamous stand-up show at the Laugh Factory are looking for a personal apology and perhaps money. I agree that there should be an apology of a personal nature. That I feel is required. Speaking on television shows is a start but does not impact those directly assaulted properly. It’s the least Mr. Richards can do.
I fear though that this will become about money. If the media does its generally poor job, this will be shaped as an elaborate scheme to seek money from a rich and famous individual rather than what it was. Nothing should detract from the offensive nature of this tirade. Compensation in terms of money is not unwarranted though. It may provide an additional sting to remind Mr. Richards that speaking in such a manner, evoking such thoughts with the intent of malice and the infliction of pain, is never acceptable. But if the media make this a farce then all its impact will be lost. This should not be about the money, and so far it is not. But let’s not lose sight of what created this situation.
Too often there are distractions made by the media to lessen or divert attention for what the real news story is. This is one case where the attention needs to remain on subject. But I have no doubt that there will be some attempt to change the focus. To try to make many Americans feel less uncomfortable about what happened. But being uncomfortable is what this is about. Appeasing some is not worth reducing the impact and distaste of this incident.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Saturday, November 25, 2006
Something new in Singapore - 11.25.2006.1
I’m hope everyone had a great Thanksgiving, and I had a quiet holiday myself. But it’s time to get back to work for me. For those that are into shopping I suggest my online store as an alternative to the manic lines and crowds that are rampant in this holiday season. I’m sure there is something for everyone. If not go to my survey and let me know what you might want. I’ll do my best to help you out. And thank you for the support in visiting my online store and doing the survey [by the way I can’t get any of the information if the survey continue button is not hit].
What is the weekend without the unusual news? There always seems to be an odd bit here or there and this weekend is no different. But this item is unique. Mostly because of where it takes place. Swinging is not a new even, though hardly a universally accepted idea. Online sites, clubs and restaurants (at least one in NYC) are hardly invisible. And vacation spots to resorts are wildly popular, across most of the world. Given the sexuality of most nations, this is no surprise. But considering the renown of Singapore as a prudish nation finding swingers there is eye-opening.
Yes those from Singapore rate more prudish than even the British, at least out in the open. But behind closed doors it seems that there is more than what was imagined. As some would say its not the open lively status found in Europe but its hardly staid. And it seems the trend is growing.
Now the real question I have is how did someone figure out that this needed reporting? And since this is a relatively new thing there, who was the first one to bring it up and start the sites, or clubs going? That had to be a very bold person I think. That couple would have to be quite the extroverts. I just find it amusing. Especially that first couple getting a few other people involved for the first time. I would imagine that some of the expressions would have been priceless.
Not much else going on in the wild and wacky news. More serious stuff to be posted shortly.
This is what I think, what do you think?
What is the weekend without the unusual news? There always seems to be an odd bit here or there and this weekend is no different. But this item is unique. Mostly because of where it takes place. Swinging is not a new even, though hardly a universally accepted idea. Online sites, clubs and restaurants (at least one in NYC) are hardly invisible. And vacation spots to resorts are wildly popular, across most of the world. Given the sexuality of most nations, this is no surprise. But considering the renown of Singapore as a prudish nation finding swingers there is eye-opening.
Yes those from Singapore rate more prudish than even the British, at least out in the open. But behind closed doors it seems that there is more than what was imagined. As some would say its not the open lively status found in Europe but its hardly staid. And it seems the trend is growing.
Now the real question I have is how did someone figure out that this needed reporting? And since this is a relatively new thing there, who was the first one to bring it up and start the sites, or clubs going? That had to be a very bold person I think. That couple would have to be quite the extroverts. I just find it amusing. Especially that first couple getting a few other people involved for the first time. I would imagine that some of the expressions would have been priceless.
Not much else going on in the wild and wacky news. More serious stuff to be posted shortly.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Tuesday, November 21, 2006
Michael Richards at the Laugh Factory - 11.21.2006.3
Continued from Michael Richards ....
Mr. Richards may not be a racist, but he played the part well. That may be a harsh statement but it is the feeling he has evoked in me. I do believe that he feels sorry for the actions he has taken; he seems genuinely upset in the on-air apology. But it’s not enough. It’s not that he just did this meltdown. He went on-stage Saturday (a fact that is being severely downplayed) without apology. It wasn’t until the show appeared on the internet that he came out and apologized. Maybe he was advised to let it go and see if it would pass by, if so it was bad advice. He should have made a statement before the internet release, on Saturday when he took the stage, or early Monday as the news hit. He still needs to go to the Laugh Factory and apologize. All of this needs to be done by him, not with him and Mr. Seinfeld (who I understand is a good friend of his – and has done a decent job of standing by his friend as well as protecting the Seinfeld television show value).
There is no excuse for such words. For all the kids that think the N-word has no meaning or that they have taken control of it, listen to Mr. Richards’s use of it and tell me you still think that. The word has lost no power or meaning. In addition to couple this with a threat of a lynching brings up anger and rage like no White person can understand. Sympathize maybe, but understand no. And to say all of that was no accident. Perhaps Mr. Richards is no racist; I would like to think he wasn’t. But the words were chosen for their impact, meaning, and ability to inflict pain. It was his choice to use these words, and to make the threat and any sense of humor were not in them. Mr. Richards is correct when he said in his apology that there was rage and anger in his words. He needs to see someone about this because he opened a valve on that stage, and this is what poured out.
How dare he do this. He is a professional and knows better. Yes he may be a neophyte at stand-up and thin-skinned when it comes to dealing with a heckler. Yet he made the choice to go on that stage. He placed himself in a position to have to deal with that, no one else forced him to. I would have wanted to hit him had I been there. The lynching comment would have put me over the edge. Perhaps as some have said he was trying to use that as a skit, trying for humor, but few can pull of such a skit. There is a lot of pain attached to that thought. I don’t need a family tree made to know that some of my ancestors were lynched, for little to no reason, in a nation that at the time regarded them as little better than furniture. Were his family so easily discarded and disgraced for centuries I think he would be sure of the comedic potential of the joke before ever trying to broach it.
I had to stop for a while as my anger has been rising as I am writing this. While I do not use vulgar language on this site I wish I could think of an example that could convey the anger the N-word brings out in me. Especially when it is used to inflict pain. There is no equivalent for any other racial or ethnic group in English that I am aware of. It’s that bad, and thus his comments are that enraging. Perhaps the closest thing I know is in Russian, Ne Pizdi (it doesn’t translate into English, but say it to a Russian/Soviet Georgian and you will start a serious fight).
I think Mr. Richards has ruined his career, or severely limited his ability to succeed for quite some time. I don’t know what else to say. Time has not shed more light on this, nor provided a reason that makes sense to me. That may be sad, but the situation was far worse.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Mr. Richards may not be a racist, but he played the part well. That may be a harsh statement but it is the feeling he has evoked in me. I do believe that he feels sorry for the actions he has taken; he seems genuinely upset in the on-air apology. But it’s not enough. It’s not that he just did this meltdown. He went on-stage Saturday (a fact that is being severely downplayed) without apology. It wasn’t until the show appeared on the internet that he came out and apologized. Maybe he was advised to let it go and see if it would pass by, if so it was bad advice. He should have made a statement before the internet release, on Saturday when he took the stage, or early Monday as the news hit. He still needs to go to the Laugh Factory and apologize. All of this needs to be done by him, not with him and Mr. Seinfeld (who I understand is a good friend of his – and has done a decent job of standing by his friend as well as protecting the Seinfeld television show value).
There is no excuse for such words. For all the kids that think the N-word has no meaning or that they have taken control of it, listen to Mr. Richards’s use of it and tell me you still think that. The word has lost no power or meaning. In addition to couple this with a threat of a lynching brings up anger and rage like no White person can understand. Sympathize maybe, but understand no. And to say all of that was no accident. Perhaps Mr. Richards is no racist; I would like to think he wasn’t. But the words were chosen for their impact, meaning, and ability to inflict pain. It was his choice to use these words, and to make the threat and any sense of humor were not in them. Mr. Richards is correct when he said in his apology that there was rage and anger in his words. He needs to see someone about this because he opened a valve on that stage, and this is what poured out.
How dare he do this. He is a professional and knows better. Yes he may be a neophyte at stand-up and thin-skinned when it comes to dealing with a heckler. Yet he made the choice to go on that stage. He placed himself in a position to have to deal with that, no one else forced him to. I would have wanted to hit him had I been there. The lynching comment would have put me over the edge. Perhaps as some have said he was trying to use that as a skit, trying for humor, but few can pull of such a skit. There is a lot of pain attached to that thought. I don’t need a family tree made to know that some of my ancestors were lynched, for little to no reason, in a nation that at the time regarded them as little better than furniture. Were his family so easily discarded and disgraced for centuries I think he would be sure of the comedic potential of the joke before ever trying to broach it.
I had to stop for a while as my anger has been rising as I am writing this. While I do not use vulgar language on this site I wish I could think of an example that could convey the anger the N-word brings out in me. Especially when it is used to inflict pain. There is no equivalent for any other racial or ethnic group in English that I am aware of. It’s that bad, and thus his comments are that enraging. Perhaps the closest thing I know is in Russian, Ne Pizdi (it doesn’t translate into English, but say it to a Russian/Soviet Georgian and you will start a serious fight).
I think Mr. Richards has ruined his career, or severely limited his ability to succeed for quite some time. I don’t know what else to say. Time has not shed more light on this, nor provided a reason that makes sense to me. That may be sad, but the situation was far worse.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Michael Richards - 11.21.2006.2
I wanted to wait a while before speaking about the Mr. Michael Richards incident at the Laugh Factory last Friday. There were a few things I wanted to hear about and understand before forming a comment. Obviously when I heard via the media that Mr. Richards had made a tirade, using the n-word and other equally derogatory words, I was incensed. But I wanted to hear more, to get a full understanding, because we all know the media is hardly above sensationalizing a story, and slow to admit a mistake or retract a commentary. [See my comments about a Fox News comment at Letter to Fox News on Duke rape case news - 10.30.2006.1]
So as I worked today, I had the news on (like usual) and heard as things developed. I did not see the apology on the David Letterman Show last night. I have not heard Mr. Jerry Seinfeld’s comments. But I have heard the comments of Mr. Richards, and portions of his apology.
The news of this came out Monday, the show it happened on was Friday, and Mr. Richards performed another show on Saturday. I have not heard of him apologizing on stage Saturday for the previous meltdown. Mr. Richards was being heckled harshly while doing a stand-up routine. He is not a professional stand-up comedian, nor is he seasoned at it. In trying to go after the hecklers Mr. Richards lost it and hurled racial epitaphs including the N-word and a reference to being a klansman lynching a Black American. As he continued this barrage, the crowd which included many Latinos/Hispanics and African Americans became insulted and walked out. The owner of the Laugh Factory gave everyone a refund of their money, which was the first time he has done so in 20 years (according to his comments on Fox News with Mr. Neil Cavuto A 5:00 pm). According to the owner, speaking with Mr. Richards afterwards Mr. Richards wanted to go on-stage and apologize, he had tears and felt badly on what happened, and was told not to go out as right then it an apology would not be received well.
Those are the facts that I have been able to discern in various media so far.
I do not condone the actions of Mr. Michael Richards. I do not accept the excuse that Mr. Richards is inexperienced at stand-up comedy and had little practice dealing with hecklers. While Mr. Seinfeld’s belief of Mr. Richards not being a racist may be true, it is no excuse. I agree with Mr. Paul Rodriguez and many others in denouncing the manner in which Mr. Richards acted.
To be continued in part 2....
So as I worked today, I had the news on (like usual) and heard as things developed. I did not see the apology on the David Letterman Show last night. I have not heard Mr. Jerry Seinfeld’s comments. But I have heard the comments of Mr. Richards, and portions of his apology.
The news of this came out Monday, the show it happened on was Friday, and Mr. Richards performed another show on Saturday. I have not heard of him apologizing on stage Saturday for the previous meltdown. Mr. Richards was being heckled harshly while doing a stand-up routine. He is not a professional stand-up comedian, nor is he seasoned at it. In trying to go after the hecklers Mr. Richards lost it and hurled racial epitaphs including the N-word and a reference to being a klansman lynching a Black American. As he continued this barrage, the crowd which included many Latinos/Hispanics and African Americans became insulted and walked out. The owner of the Laugh Factory gave everyone a refund of their money, which was the first time he has done so in 20 years (according to his comments on Fox News with Mr. Neil Cavuto A 5:00 pm). According to the owner, speaking with Mr. Richards afterwards Mr. Richards wanted to go on-stage and apologize, he had tears and felt badly on what happened, and was told not to go out as right then it an apology would not be received well.
Those are the facts that I have been able to discern in various media so far.
I do not condone the actions of Mr. Michael Richards. I do not accept the excuse that Mr. Richards is inexperienced at stand-up comedy and had little practice dealing with hecklers. While Mr. Seinfeld’s belief of Mr. Richards not being a racist may be true, it is no excuse. I agree with Mr. Paul Rodriguez and many others in denouncing the manner in which Mr. Richards acted.
To be continued in part 2....
Loss of visionary directors - 11.21.2006.1
Ok, so there are a few things to speak about. First I want to give my condolences to the family and friends of director Mr. Robert Altman. For those not familiar with his work, Mr. Altman was the director for the films M.A.S.H and The Player. Both are great films. Those who are younger may not realize this but it was the film that was the inspiration for the television series M.A.S.H. Mr. Altman had a manner to capture the oddity in life in his films, whether that oddity deals with war or the movie industry. While these were not his only films they are favorites of mine. His ability to convey such themes will be missed as far to few escape the ‘cookie cutter’ themes found in today’s landscape.
Another loss, though not as great, is the news that Mr. Peter Jackson has been bumped from the production of The Hobbit. If you are not familiar with the book, it is the first story in the Lord of the Rings books. This book is the one that starts things off, introducing Bilbo Baggins (Frodo’s uncle) and introducing the One Ring and Golum and the ring’s power in the fateful battle versus Smog. [Yes I read all 4 books back when I was a young teen] Considering that Mr. Jackson garnered 3 billion dollars in movie receipts for the 3 films, and numerous awards for each film, while introducing millions of new fans to the original JRR Tolkein books I don’t know what New Line Cinema is thinking. Of the many attempts to tell these stories this has been the only one to actually get it right. Directors have been trying for decades, using every format you can imagine and not one was successful prior to Mr. Jackson. While I was looking forward to The Hobbit, I now fear what it will be. This may well be a failure of a film on a level New Line Cinema can’t imagine (much like the profit from the 3 films). We shall see.
The next thing I will speak about may take a lot more space, it’s Mr. Michael Richards. Yes I’m going to address the Laugh Factory incident.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Another loss, though not as great, is the news that Mr. Peter Jackson has been bumped from the production of The Hobbit. If you are not familiar with the book, it is the first story in the Lord of the Rings books. This book is the one that starts things off, introducing Bilbo Baggins (Frodo’s uncle) and introducing the One Ring and Golum and the ring’s power in the fateful battle versus Smog. [Yes I read all 4 books back when I was a young teen] Considering that Mr. Jackson garnered 3 billion dollars in movie receipts for the 3 films, and numerous awards for each film, while introducing millions of new fans to the original JRR Tolkein books I don’t know what New Line Cinema is thinking. Of the many attempts to tell these stories this has been the only one to actually get it right. Directors have been trying for decades, using every format you can imagine and not one was successful prior to Mr. Jackson. While I was looking forward to The Hobbit, I now fear what it will be. This may well be a failure of a film on a level New Line Cinema can’t imagine (much like the profit from the 3 films). We shall see.
The next thing I will speak about may take a lot more space, it’s Mr. Michael Richards. Yes I’m going to address the Laugh Factory incident.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Thursday, November 16, 2006
Comic Relief and the comicly sad - 11.16.2006.2
From the glad to the terminally sad. Of the things in the news of late I’m happy to hear that Comic Relief will be back and raising funds for Hurricane Katrina victims. Some may recall the program, which this year will be simulcast on HBO and TBS simultaneously. I have been a fan of this charity fundraiser since it’s inception in the 80’s. Mr. Billy Crystal, Mr. Robin Williams and Ms. Whoppi Goldberg should all be commended for their efforts.
It is often rare to see a true benefit show done by stars, especially of the caliber of these 3. There is no question that any one of them can command top dollar ticket prices to put on a show. And yet unlike other entertainers and benefit concerts, every dollar raised actually goes to help people. Originally the program was a way to help the homeless, a group of people often forgotten about here in America. Too often no one notices those that need the most help, or ego interfere with getting the money to where it will do the most good. I feel that this is not true in this case. Sadly the only other televised fundraising program I believe in is the Jerry Lewis MS marathon. So on Saturday take a moment and laugh, then take one more to make a donation and help those who need it. Remember it could just as easily have been you in need.
On a far less serious note, and quite sad is something I saw and had to check out. There is a guy who is selling his soul online. Yes That is what he is doing, www.winmysoul.com . It’s not some kind of devil worship site or anything bizarre like that. Well not as bizarre anyway.
This guy is giving up the right to make certain decisions for himself, taking orders and direction for his life from the winner of the bidding process. This isn’t some joke site. The guy was on Fox News today being interviewed about this. It is his opinion that this is his last option in improving his life.
The guy is a loser, in my opinion. Anyone who is so desperate and without self-respect as to give up on guiding their own life and allowing people to bid on controlling it needs Social Darwinism. In other words his genes should not be allowed to continue to pollute the human gene pool. How does someone just give up like this?
I don’t care how bad things are, all anyone needs to do is to make a decision and then stick to it. There are few things in life that can’t be changed by 90 days of directed action. If this guy can’t do that then nothing else will work either, I think.
And as far as I can tell this isn’t some desire for 15 minutes of fame. Though if it were I think it would only be marginally better than what it is. I won’t link to his site, but you can go there if you wish. As for me, my advice is free because I really don’t want his soul or a connection to him. Spend 90 minutes and set some realistic goals, then spend the next 90 days trying to achieve them. If he were to really try, I’m sure his life would improve.
This is what I think, what do you think?
It is often rare to see a true benefit show done by stars, especially of the caliber of these 3. There is no question that any one of them can command top dollar ticket prices to put on a show. And yet unlike other entertainers and benefit concerts, every dollar raised actually goes to help people. Originally the program was a way to help the homeless, a group of people often forgotten about here in America. Too often no one notices those that need the most help, or ego interfere with getting the money to where it will do the most good. I feel that this is not true in this case. Sadly the only other televised fundraising program I believe in is the Jerry Lewis MS marathon. So on Saturday take a moment and laugh, then take one more to make a donation and help those who need it. Remember it could just as easily have been you in need.
On a far less serious note, and quite sad is something I saw and had to check out. There is a guy who is selling his soul online. Yes That is what he is doing, www.winmysoul.com . It’s not some kind of devil worship site or anything bizarre like that. Well not as bizarre anyway.
This guy is giving up the right to make certain decisions for himself, taking orders and direction for his life from the winner of the bidding process. This isn’t some joke site. The guy was on Fox News today being interviewed about this. It is his opinion that this is his last option in improving his life.
The guy is a loser, in my opinion. Anyone who is so desperate and without self-respect as to give up on guiding their own life and allowing people to bid on controlling it needs Social Darwinism. In other words his genes should not be allowed to continue to pollute the human gene pool. How does someone just give up like this?
I don’t care how bad things are, all anyone needs to do is to make a decision and then stick to it. There are few things in life that can’t be changed by 90 days of directed action. If this guy can’t do that then nothing else will work either, I think.
And as far as I can tell this isn’t some desire for 15 minutes of fame. Though if it were I think it would only be marginally better than what it is. I won’t link to his site, but you can go there if you wish. As for me, my advice is free because I really don’t want his soul or a connection to him. Spend 90 minutes and set some realistic goals, then spend the next 90 days trying to achieve them. If he were to really try, I’m sure his life would improve.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Online Shopping ideas - 11.16.2006.1
Great news for the holidays. I’m sure many of you have thought “that t-shirt would be a great gift” or “I know someone that would love that Inspire Journal.” But the holidays were far off and of course shipping was a problem. There is nothing worse than the added cost of shipping, especially when shopping online.
Well there is something that may help you out. For the holidays there is no shipping cost when you order $50 worth of consumer goods found at my www.cafepress.com/nova68 online store. That’s right, you can ship within the United States for free standard shipping as long as the total bought is $50 or more (after discounts and/or coupons). Now that is a great deal.
So if you wanted to send out the
journal to your sister in Los Angeles, or the <><>jewelry box to you niece or mother in Chicago, or perhaps the 
You’ll Do T-shirt for your girlfriend or wife in Miami – better yet sending all of the above – now is your chance.
And don’t forget the men in your life. Your dad or boyfriend who’s been hoping for the
I am The Myth sweatshirt. Your brother in college will stand out in a Character is Forever long-sleeve tshirt while in that dorm up north.
And what Black African American man would not want the
I Rejoice framed poster and mug?
When you can take a look and get that holiday shopping done. I’m sure there is something for everyone you know. And remember there is something new almost every month in either the MISC., MEN’S or WOMEN’S sections, so check back often.
If you have any ideas or comments about the online store or the site please let me know on the survey found via the sitemap, or email me via the contact information.
Thank you for your support.
Well there is something that may help you out. For the holidays there is no shipping cost when you order $50 worth of consumer goods found at my www.cafepress.com/nova68 online store. That’s right, you can ship within the United States for free standard shipping as long as the total bought is $50 or more (after discounts and/or coupons). Now that is a great deal.
So if you wanted to send out the
journal to your sister in Los Angeles, or the <><>jewelry box to you niece or mother in Chicago, or perhaps the You’ll Do T-shirt for your girlfriend or wife in Miami – better yet sending all of the above – now is your chance.And don’t forget the men in your life. Your dad or boyfriend who’s been hoping for the
I am The Myth sweatshirt. Your brother in college will stand out in a Character is Forever long-sleeve tshirt while in that dorm up north. And what Black African American man would not want the
I Rejoice framed poster and mug?When you can take a look and get that holiday shopping done. I’m sure there is something for everyone you know. And remember there is something new almost every month in either the MISC., MEN’S or WOMEN’S sections, so check back often.
If you have any ideas or comments about the online store or the site please let me know on the survey found via the sitemap, or email me via the contact information.
Thank you for your support.
Wednesday, November 15, 2006
What is O J Simpson thinking - 11.15.2006.1
What in the hell is wrong with O.J. Simpson? I have a lot of mixed feelings on him and the murder of his ex-wife. If there is one subject that polarizes the nation definitively along racial lines this is it. And this has been the case since the arrest. It’s not getting better with this recent book or television special.
Now I recall working at a brokerage firm when O.J. was chased by police on television. I recall how many felt he had to be guilty right then and there, because he was running from the police. I recall vividly the anger the trial sparked, as O.J. claimed innocence – which was the source of the anger. I remember when the decision came down and a brokerage meeting stopped to hear it. When he was announced innocent I can still see the anger and rage that swept the office, except for me.
In the years since I have had many conversations with colleagues and friends as well as other people on the case. In virtually every case most of those who were White Americans were upset and most who were Black Americans were not. Several found the case to be unfair and rigged, others expect that it was the ideal showcase of the legal system.
Personally I will say this. The charges were wrong and the police failed in the investigation. I mean that I feel one person could not commit the murders in the time allotted without creating noise and gaining the attention of neighbors. This was a 2 person job. Also little things bother me about the evidence. One item that always stuck in my head is the single bloody sock. If a sock is soaked with blood, so therefore are the feet, and if this sock is found next to a bed on a white carpet where are the bloody footprints? Where is the other sock? How many times do you only take one sock off? As for the trial, it was an example of what money can do for a person. If this were a rich white athlete or other entertainer, I don’t see there being quite the same outrage. The defense did what they were paid for, and many other entertainers and celebrities have won cases in the same manner. And I have not said O.J. Simpson is innocent, just that the charges and investigation were flawed.
Of course the outrage over the trial lead to a civil suit that I feel was a farce. The families won because of the anger felt by White Americans across the nation, a way to make them feel like they still could get some justice. Sadly I have rarely ever seen this same morale conviction in cases with Black Americans. Many complained when Mr. Rodney King sued L.A. saying he was getting too much money. The outrage has never died either. Even today newscasters openly state how they feel O.J. is guilty of the crime, though he was found innocent. They directly state how they wish that no money from any endeavor should reach O.J. That is far from an impassionate presentation of the news.
Of course O.J. Simpson is feeding such fires. I cannot imagine what would compel him to write a ‘what if’ book. Any reasonable consideration of the ramifications of the book leads on to realize that it will just incite rage against him. And by default against other African Americans defending themselves. This interview and book give a false vindication to the way that Black entertainers and celebrities are viewed by the media, especially if there are charges.
Other than rappers, who seem to delight and gain sales from charges, there is no benefit from such biased coverage. Examples of this are the failure to note the on-going efforts of Mr. Bill Cosby and others, and the wide attention noted to Mr. Wesley Snipes. Beyond that I just find the ‘mental masturbation’ of the ‘what if’ book and televised interview distasteful. Gaining income or infamy from describing the murder of innocents is wrong. To promote such is objectionable. They may have a right to do so, under the Amendments, but that doesn’t mean that they should do it.
Like many things these days, it’s an example of something we can do but really just shouldn’t.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Now I recall working at a brokerage firm when O.J. was chased by police on television. I recall how many felt he had to be guilty right then and there, because he was running from the police. I recall vividly the anger the trial sparked, as O.J. claimed innocence – which was the source of the anger. I remember when the decision came down and a brokerage meeting stopped to hear it. When he was announced innocent I can still see the anger and rage that swept the office, except for me.
In the years since I have had many conversations with colleagues and friends as well as other people on the case. In virtually every case most of those who were White Americans were upset and most who were Black Americans were not. Several found the case to be unfair and rigged, others expect that it was the ideal showcase of the legal system.
Personally I will say this. The charges were wrong and the police failed in the investigation. I mean that I feel one person could not commit the murders in the time allotted without creating noise and gaining the attention of neighbors. This was a 2 person job. Also little things bother me about the evidence. One item that always stuck in my head is the single bloody sock. If a sock is soaked with blood, so therefore are the feet, and if this sock is found next to a bed on a white carpet where are the bloody footprints? Where is the other sock? How many times do you only take one sock off? As for the trial, it was an example of what money can do for a person. If this were a rich white athlete or other entertainer, I don’t see there being quite the same outrage. The defense did what they were paid for, and many other entertainers and celebrities have won cases in the same manner. And I have not said O.J. Simpson is innocent, just that the charges and investigation were flawed.
Of course the outrage over the trial lead to a civil suit that I feel was a farce. The families won because of the anger felt by White Americans across the nation, a way to make them feel like they still could get some justice. Sadly I have rarely ever seen this same morale conviction in cases with Black Americans. Many complained when Mr. Rodney King sued L.A. saying he was getting too much money. The outrage has never died either. Even today newscasters openly state how they feel O.J. is guilty of the crime, though he was found innocent. They directly state how they wish that no money from any endeavor should reach O.J. That is far from an impassionate presentation of the news.
Of course O.J. Simpson is feeding such fires. I cannot imagine what would compel him to write a ‘what if’ book. Any reasonable consideration of the ramifications of the book leads on to realize that it will just incite rage against him. And by default against other African Americans defending themselves. This interview and book give a false vindication to the way that Black entertainers and celebrities are viewed by the media, especially if there are charges.
Other than rappers, who seem to delight and gain sales from charges, there is no benefit from such biased coverage. Examples of this are the failure to note the on-going efforts of Mr. Bill Cosby and others, and the wide attention noted to Mr. Wesley Snipes. Beyond that I just find the ‘mental masturbation’ of the ‘what if’ book and televised interview distasteful. Gaining income or infamy from describing the murder of innocents is wrong. To promote such is objectionable. They may have a right to do so, under the Amendments, but that doesn’t mean that they should do it.
Like many things these days, it’s an example of something we can do but really just shouldn’t.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Sunday, November 12, 2006
The unusual, the stupid and the shocking - 11.12.2006.1
So did anyone see the latest game by the Scarlet Knights? This is the college football team for Rutgers University. [I went there] It’s amazing. The team never could get past .600 when I went there. Every year there were exclamations about how the team could go the distance. Now, some 20 years later they are finally doing it. The team is now rated #6, which is a great thing. Now if the university administration could only improve. Last I heard being in undergrad there was still the old R U screw. I guess I can’t expect everything to improve at once.
Another odd item for this weekend was the fact that a suicide attempt sparked a bit of a fight. Now there is no question that kids in America are screwed up, in general. It seems that we are not alone in this aspect though. As a young woman was contemplating jumping of a roof in Germany, a group of teens were shouting for her to jump. Call it rude or whatever it’s just sad. Perhaps even worse is that the crowd that had over 100 people, including the teens, did nothing to stop the kids. The only ones to speak up were homeless people. I’ll say it again, only the homeless people bothered to try to correct the teens. Somehow this lead to a fight involving some 40 people. After the fight was over the woman was talked off the roof. Maybe the German teens thought this was part of filming of a European version of Jackass. I’m trying to give them the benefit of the doubt. I have no answer for the other adults in the crowd. Cheers to the homeless that chided them. The town this happened in should by them all a nice 3-course dinner for their efforts, at the least.
In the line of odd events here is something really rare and weird. 2 rappers actually had gun charges dropped. Yes they actually are not going to be charged with gun possession; though they were in a van with others that did possess loaded weapons. Of course David Brown does have a stabbing charge (that he plead no contest to) to his credit. Remember that he is part of G-Unit, how could you not expect them to have some kind of criminal arrest. I mean they couldn’t sell any records if they didn’t have a rap sheet (document of criminal record in police database – for the wannabe fans/criminals/rappers).
A weekend of surprises I must say.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Another odd item for this weekend was the fact that a suicide attempt sparked a bit of a fight. Now there is no question that kids in America are screwed up, in general. It seems that we are not alone in this aspect though. As a young woman was contemplating jumping of a roof in Germany, a group of teens were shouting for her to jump. Call it rude or whatever it’s just sad. Perhaps even worse is that the crowd that had over 100 people, including the teens, did nothing to stop the kids. The only ones to speak up were homeless people. I’ll say it again, only the homeless people bothered to try to correct the teens. Somehow this lead to a fight involving some 40 people. After the fight was over the woman was talked off the roof. Maybe the German teens thought this was part of filming of a European version of Jackass. I’m trying to give them the benefit of the doubt. I have no answer for the other adults in the crowd. Cheers to the homeless that chided them. The town this happened in should by them all a nice 3-course dinner for their efforts, at the least.
In the line of odd events here is something really rare and weird. 2 rappers actually had gun charges dropped. Yes they actually are not going to be charged with gun possession; though they were in a van with others that did possess loaded weapons. Of course David Brown does have a stabbing charge (that he plead no contest to) to his credit. Remember that he is part of G-Unit, how could you not expect them to have some kind of criminal arrest. I mean they couldn’t sell any records if they didn’t have a rap sheet (document of criminal record in police database – for the wannabe fans/criminals/rappers).
A weekend of surprises I must say.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Friday, November 10, 2006
Happy Birthday Marine Corps - 11.10.2006.1
Just a quick thought here. To all the Marines of the nation, past or present, I wish you a happy birthday. Today the Marine Corps is 231 years old. Throughout this time the Marines have safeguarded the nation.
Regardless of what any citizen may think, Marines have defended the ability of citizens to question and argue about the politics of the nation. It is the sweat and blood of all the armed forces that allows the freedoms all citizens enjoy.
So for all those that have given the ultimate sacrifice, or served with the knowledge that such a sacrifice may be needed, I say thank you. Like my father and myself, the fact that this is the greatest nation on the planet has not been unnoticed.
For all the problems that may exist here I am glad that this is the nation of freedom. I’m glad that there are still some of us that are willing to do whatever it takes to ensure the nation continues.
So to all the armed forces and the Marines directly, I wish you a great day. You are not forgotten and you are appreciated. Thank you for what you do. I could not have this blog, nor convey my thoughts without you.
Happy Birthday Marine Corps. Simply said “God, Country, Corps, Family.” Or in other words Semper Fi.
Regardless of what any citizen may think, Marines have defended the ability of citizens to question and argue about the politics of the nation. It is the sweat and blood of all the armed forces that allows the freedoms all citizens enjoy.
So for all those that have given the ultimate sacrifice, or served with the knowledge that such a sacrifice may be needed, I say thank you. Like my father and myself, the fact that this is the greatest nation on the planet has not been unnoticed.
For all the problems that may exist here I am glad that this is the nation of freedom. I’m glad that there are still some of us that are willing to do whatever it takes to ensure the nation continues.
So to all the armed forces and the Marines directly, I wish you a great day. You are not forgotten and you are appreciated. Thank you for what you do. I could not have this blog, nor convey my thoughts without you.
Happy Birthday Marine Corps. Simply said “God, Country, Corps, Family.” Or in other words Semper Fi.
Thursday, November 09, 2006
The sudden loss of Ed Bradley - 11.9.2006.1
“Because when it gets to the point where it's not fun anymore, I've always hoped that I would have the courage to say goodbye and walk away from it.” – Ed Bradley
Today is a sad day. It has nothing to do with the democratic win, or the preference of the media to hype any negative news affecting Black Americans, Latinos/Hispanics or other minorities. [Comments on all that can be seen at Where is Bill Cosby's good news coverage? - 11.8.2006.1, What may the next 2 years look like? - 11.8.2006.1]
Today we all lost a strong voice for knowledge and integrity. I am speaking of the loss of Mr. Ed Bradley. It was a sudden loss, with no warning for most people including many of those that worked with him. I’ve heard reports that the cause of Mr. Bradley’s death was a recurrence of his leukemia that had been in remission. If the reports are correct it came back with a vengeance, taking him from the world in just 3 days.
That is a shame though. It gave us no time to prepare. But Mr. Bradley has let us all many memories to recall him by. Whether it is his work in Cambodia, or Paris peace talks, or with President Carter, or his last piece on the Duke rape case we have all had chances to see and learn about ourselves and the world via Mr. Bradley.
Because of his work ethic, inspired by both of his parents, we have learned about events not only worldwide but from the past as well. The 1923 Rosewood Massacre became part of the social consciousness for many due to his landmark reporting. It was reports such as this that earned him 6 duPont Awards, 19 Emmys, 4 George Foster Peabody’s, a Robert F. Kennedy Journalism Award, and a lifetime achievement award from the National Association of Black Journalists among other awards and achievements.
Mr. Bradley broke ground in many ways. He was the first African American correspondent to the White House, the first Black American to be on air in New York City in 1968, and was one of the first Black journalists of fame in the nation. He was known for his intelligence, integrity, and dedication.
There are 2 quotes from Mr. Bradley that I want to close with:
Be prepared, work hard, and hope for a little luck. Recognize that the harder you work and the better prepared you are, the more luck you might have.
and
You know, I think I still have a sense that no matter what you do, no matter what you achieve, no matter how much success you have, no matter how much money you have, relationships are important.
I think his words say more than I can.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Today is a sad day. It has nothing to do with the democratic win, or the preference of the media to hype any negative news affecting Black Americans, Latinos/Hispanics or other minorities. [Comments on all that can be seen at Where is Bill Cosby's good news coverage? - 11.8.2006.1, What may the next 2 years look like? - 11.8.2006.1]
Today we all lost a strong voice for knowledge and integrity. I am speaking of the loss of Mr. Ed Bradley. It was a sudden loss, with no warning for most people including many of those that worked with him. I’ve heard reports that the cause of Mr. Bradley’s death was a recurrence of his leukemia that had been in remission. If the reports are correct it came back with a vengeance, taking him from the world in just 3 days.
That is a shame though. It gave us no time to prepare. But Mr. Bradley has let us all many memories to recall him by. Whether it is his work in Cambodia, or Paris peace talks, or with President Carter, or his last piece on the Duke rape case we have all had chances to see and learn about ourselves and the world via Mr. Bradley.
Because of his work ethic, inspired by both of his parents, we have learned about events not only worldwide but from the past as well. The 1923 Rosewood Massacre became part of the social consciousness for many due to his landmark reporting. It was reports such as this that earned him 6 duPont Awards, 19 Emmys, 4 George Foster Peabody’s, a Robert F. Kennedy Journalism Award, and a lifetime achievement award from the National Association of Black Journalists among other awards and achievements.
Mr. Bradley broke ground in many ways. He was the first African American correspondent to the White House, the first Black American to be on air in New York City in 1968, and was one of the first Black journalists of fame in the nation. He was known for his intelligence, integrity, and dedication.
There are 2 quotes from Mr. Bradley that I want to close with:
Be prepared, work hard, and hope for a little luck. Recognize that the harder you work and the better prepared you are, the more luck you might have.
and
You know, I think I still have a sense that no matter what you do, no matter what you achieve, no matter how much success you have, no matter how much money you have, relationships are important.
I think his words say more than I can.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Wednesday, November 08, 2006
Where is Bill Cosby's good news coverage? - 11.8.2006.1
I find it interesting that there was noticeable coverage on Mr. Bill Cosby today. By now I’m sure most have heard that Mr. Cosby settled the lawsuit from a woman alleging sexual assault. I won’t get into the terms of the case; it’s not relevant to what I am interested in. What could I be interested in? The coverage itself.
Take a moment and think of when you hear about today’s news. The coverage may have been short, 35 seconds to a minute or so, depending on your station but the coverage was national. To my knowledge every station mentioned this, and while I don’t watch the gossip television shows I imagine they had a small spot on it as well.
Now think back and tell me when you first heard about Mr. Cosby in Los Angeles? For those that need more help remembering the announcement, he was there on October 29, 2006 and I wrote about it Bill Cosby fights the good fight - 10.31.2006.1 on the 31st. Now how much coverage did that get? I don’t recall hearing a single thing about it. That pisses me off. How about you?
The media is far too ready to mention the downfalls of any entertainer or celebrity. In my opinion when that individual is of color, any color, they are even more persistent in their actions. But let there be a positive action and there is nothing said. I may get on the case of various entertainers and celebrities, but I try to mention the positives as well, even if I don’t agree with it. Whether that is Madonna’s charity to children, Ms. Oprah Winfrey’s various comments and contributions overseas and in the nation, Mr. Michael J. Fox’s support of stem cell research, or the innovative programs by Ice Cube. I’m only one man, they are multinational media conglomerates.
What is wrong with the media that positive news, about change and improvement of the lives of children as well as adults, is not worth spending time on. When things go wrong there is no end to the coverage, especially if there if a famous name attached. But they can barely be bothered to mention good news for 30 seconds more than once in a day. When that news involves African Americans, Latinos, or any other minority group (perhaps with the exception of women – which I don’t see as a minority anyway) it’s even more rare, even if they are celebrities or entertainers. At least in my memory.
[If anyone has hard numbers or facts that disputes, or confirms, my thoughts above please post them or at least send me an email.]
I just find it frustrating. What about you?
This is what I think, what do you think?
Take a moment and think of when you hear about today’s news. The coverage may have been short, 35 seconds to a minute or so, depending on your station but the coverage was national. To my knowledge every station mentioned this, and while I don’t watch the gossip television shows I imagine they had a small spot on it as well.
Now think back and tell me when you first heard about Mr. Cosby in Los Angeles? For those that need more help remembering the announcement, he was there on October 29, 2006 and I wrote about it Bill Cosby fights the good fight - 10.31.2006.1 on the 31st. Now how much coverage did that get? I don’t recall hearing a single thing about it. That pisses me off. How about you?
The media is far too ready to mention the downfalls of any entertainer or celebrity. In my opinion when that individual is of color, any color, they are even more persistent in their actions. But let there be a positive action and there is nothing said. I may get on the case of various entertainers and celebrities, but I try to mention the positives as well, even if I don’t agree with it. Whether that is Madonna’s charity to children, Ms. Oprah Winfrey’s various comments and contributions overseas and in the nation, Mr. Michael J. Fox’s support of stem cell research, or the innovative programs by Ice Cube. I’m only one man, they are multinational media conglomerates.
What is wrong with the media that positive news, about change and improvement of the lives of children as well as adults, is not worth spending time on. When things go wrong there is no end to the coverage, especially if there if a famous name attached. But they can barely be bothered to mention good news for 30 seconds more than once in a day. When that news involves African Americans, Latinos, or any other minority group (perhaps with the exception of women – which I don’t see as a minority anyway) it’s even more rare, even if they are celebrities or entertainers. At least in my memory.
[If anyone has hard numbers or facts that disputes, or confirms, my thoughts above please post them or at least send me an email.]
I just find it frustrating. What about you?
This is what I think, what do you think?
Tuesday, November 07, 2006
Defending Keep A Child Alive, Neil P. Harris - 11.7.2006.4
What is going on these days? Why is it important for people to know the sexual preferences of entertainers and celebrities? I’m speaking about the minor controversy on the sexuality of the Grey’s Anatomy star (I think it was Mr. T.R. Knight but I may be wrong) and Mr. Neil Patrick Harris. Does it really matter? Does it change their ability to entertain us in any way?
I mean really, what changes. Mr. Harris has announced he is gay. Good for him, I really don’t care. This fact changes nothing in my life. I had the same reaction hearing about Ms. Rosie O’Donnell, Mr. Freddy Mercury, Mr. Ian McKellen, Mr. George Takei, Ms. Amanda Bearse or anyone else. It really means nothing, until someone makes a big deal of it. Good singers sing, good actors act and so on. Sexuality is not a factor in ability to entertain; it deals with individual personal lives only. Personally I’d rather not hear about it. That includes the sexuality of heterosexual couples. I’m not involved with the celebrity or entertainer so it doesn’t matter.
If I start dating Ms. Janet Jackson, then I’ll be interested in her choices, otherwise that doesn’t matter. Teens will still dream of dating whomever, so will older fans obsessed with the looks of whomever. I’m just tired of hearing about it, or about this entertainer divorcing X, or dating X. As a friend once said (about a separate subject) it’s just ‘mental masturbation’ to waste your time wondering and fretting over whom is sleeping with whom when they aren’t sleeping with you.
On a separate note, what is it with some people? Recently Ms. Alicia Keys had to defend her cause, Keep A Child Alive, due to criticism over celebrities giving aid to African nations. Now I realize there has been a lot said about Madonna and her quick, broken law adoption of an African child after donating $3 million. But that has nothing to do with helping those who need it.
Yes I took Madonna to task. Not because of the cause, but due to my feeling that the way the adoption worked out it felt like a purchase which is wrong. Yes I’ve mentioned that I think Ms. Oprah Winfrey could do more in the United States, but that does not mean I don’t respect what she does do or that she is doing a great think helping those people in South Africa. I equally am glad that Ms. Keys, Ms. Bowie (Iman), Mr. George Clooney and others are standing up and reminding people that millions around the world need help, and that they aren’t too far for us to reach out and lend a hand.
Yet I have to wonder when celebrities must defend their causes, because the media implies that their cause is a sham. I find that both 2-faced and detrimental. First to say entertainer X is increasing their sales for standing for a cause (I mean supporting it, not showing up and being paid to lend their name to a cause – like with the Hurricane Katrina events) is to belittle the cause. The other thought is where is that same level of criticism when a politician does the same thing? Like when Senator Clinton (who sadly won her re-election) jumped on the band wagon against video games, but has said nothing since the outcry, around the release of the latest Grand Theft Auto.
If that isn’t shallow and false what is? But to berate entertainers for something they truly believe in that’s bad. And for individuals to accept that treatment without checking into the cause and the entertainer or celebrity’s position is just lazy and mean. You don’t have to agree, or do anything, but they shouldn’t be maligned because they have.
This is what I think, what do you think?
I mean really, what changes. Mr. Harris has announced he is gay. Good for him, I really don’t care. This fact changes nothing in my life. I had the same reaction hearing about Ms. Rosie O’Donnell, Mr. Freddy Mercury, Mr. Ian McKellen, Mr. George Takei, Ms. Amanda Bearse or anyone else. It really means nothing, until someone makes a big deal of it. Good singers sing, good actors act and so on. Sexuality is not a factor in ability to entertain; it deals with individual personal lives only. Personally I’d rather not hear about it. That includes the sexuality of heterosexual couples. I’m not involved with the celebrity or entertainer so it doesn’t matter.
If I start dating Ms. Janet Jackson, then I’ll be interested in her choices, otherwise that doesn’t matter. Teens will still dream of dating whomever, so will older fans obsessed with the looks of whomever. I’m just tired of hearing about it, or about this entertainer divorcing X, or dating X. As a friend once said (about a separate subject) it’s just ‘mental masturbation’ to waste your time wondering and fretting over whom is sleeping with whom when they aren’t sleeping with you.
On a separate note, what is it with some people? Recently Ms. Alicia Keys had to defend her cause, Keep A Child Alive, due to criticism over celebrities giving aid to African nations. Now I realize there has been a lot said about Madonna and her quick, broken law adoption of an African child after donating $3 million. But that has nothing to do with helping those who need it.
Yes I took Madonna to task. Not because of the cause, but due to my feeling that the way the adoption worked out it felt like a purchase which is wrong. Yes I’ve mentioned that I think Ms. Oprah Winfrey could do more in the United States, but that does not mean I don’t respect what she does do or that she is doing a great think helping those people in South Africa. I equally am glad that Ms. Keys, Ms. Bowie (Iman), Mr. George Clooney and others are standing up and reminding people that millions around the world need help, and that they aren’t too far for us to reach out and lend a hand.
Yet I have to wonder when celebrities must defend their causes, because the media implies that their cause is a sham. I find that both 2-faced and detrimental. First to say entertainer X is increasing their sales for standing for a cause (I mean supporting it, not showing up and being paid to lend their name to a cause – like with the Hurricane Katrina events) is to belittle the cause. The other thought is where is that same level of criticism when a politician does the same thing? Like when Senator Clinton (who sadly won her re-election) jumped on the band wagon against video games, but has said nothing since the outcry, around the release of the latest Grand Theft Auto.
If that isn’t shallow and false what is? But to berate entertainers for something they truly believe in that’s bad. And for individuals to accept that treatment without checking into the cause and the entertainer or celebrity’s position is just lazy and mean. You don’t have to agree, or do anything, but they shouldn’t be maligned because they have.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Golf by Tiger Woods, Dr. House in trouble - 11.7.2006.3
Now this is something to look forward to. Fellow duffers rejoice, most of us may never be able to play a round of golf with Mr. Tiger Woods but there is something that is almost as good coming soon. If like myself you are far from a 0 handicap and you fail to have net assets in the 7 digits or better, then most likely you will have to go to a golf course designed by Mr. Woods to get a feel of how he sees the course. Yes that’s right, Mr. Woods will now follow in the footsteps of Mr. Arnold Palmer and Mr. Jack Nicklaus.
I can’t imagine what a course might be like that Mr. Woods finds fun or challenging. I do know that I want to play it though. I would suspect that it could have many of the challenges found on the best courses in the world, like Pebble Beach, Agusta National, St. Andrews, Pinehurst and others. Considering the chances of a 25-30 handicap playing all those courses, this may be my best chance. A suggestion though, once the course starts construction start requesting times because I think it will get booked fast. If it’s even open to the public that is.
Oh, has anyone seen the show House? A friend recently got me into watching it. A smart show that is quite compelling. Sadly its opposite Eureka (which is currently airing repeats thankfully) but it is worth watching. I love the sarcasm and bitter wit of the lead Dr. House. I’ve seen 2 episodes now and the current sub-storyline is interesting. The cop is definitely out to make a statement. Impressive acting. And Mr. Khadeem Hardison is now on the show. He looks good as the best defense lawyer in the city. Personally I’m glad to see him back on any screen, as I enjoyed the conversation I had with him back when I was working making music videos. The coming episodes should be good television.
This is what I think, what do you think?
I can’t imagine what a course might be like that Mr. Woods finds fun or challenging. I do know that I want to play it though. I would suspect that it could have many of the challenges found on the best courses in the world, like Pebble Beach, Agusta National, St. Andrews, Pinehurst and others. Considering the chances of a 25-30 handicap playing all those courses, this may be my best chance. A suggestion though, once the course starts construction start requesting times because I think it will get booked fast. If it’s even open to the public that is.
Oh, has anyone seen the show House? A friend recently got me into watching it. A smart show that is quite compelling. Sadly its opposite Eureka (which is currently airing repeats thankfully) but it is worth watching. I love the sarcasm and bitter wit of the lead Dr. House. I’ve seen 2 episodes now and the current sub-storyline is interesting. The cop is definitely out to make a statement. Impressive acting. And Mr. Khadeem Hardison is now on the show. He looks good as the best defense lawyer in the city. Personally I’m glad to see him back on any screen, as I enjoyed the conversation I had with him back when I was working making music videos. The coming episodes should be good television.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Kayne West & P. Diddy to large for life and awards - 11.7.2006.2
Ok, so some things are just too weird. I’m not sure what is worse, but the choices are pretty awful. The first is Kayne West. For some reason this man reminds me of my nephew at 4. The reason why? His actions at the European MTV Music Awards. [By the way MTV stands for Music TeleVision – not that they play music videos anymore.] IF this was not a tantrum I’m not sure what is.
Because Kayne West didn’t win best video he decided to jump onstage and berate the audience, some of which may be his fans, because he felt unappreciated. The fact he did win an award wasn’t good enough. With an ego seemingly that large one would have to wonder how it all fit on that stage.
Celebrities and entertainers are known for brash actions, given. Some are known for selfish acts and/or random acts of violence and crime. But there are few who are so brazen as to insult their fans and the public in general for not indulging them in their high self-opinion. Add to that the fact that this was the European awards, where several countries look at Americans as self-aggrandizing blowhards and you get Kanye West. At least this is how his actions make me feel. Had West more talent, perhaps I’d feel different. I doubt it though. Perhaps West should remember a line from an older rapper paraphrased from my memory as ‘sign an autograph because these kids are the fans.’
In another announcement of talent that escapes the masses, Mr. Shawn Combs (P. Diddy – a name on par with 50 cent), is declaring his desire to play James Bond. The fact that Mr. Combs would like to play the character is not a big deal, I too think that a Black James Bond could work. But considering the extensive body of acting that he has done I feel that such a role is a stretch, at the most complimentary. I mean 4 movie roles, none of which were inspiring, is not an acting career. Minor roles in major (and minor) theatrical films does not equate to one of the most popular serialized characters in motion pictures.
Why do rappers think that they can act because they have done a music video? While many may be acting to portray the images in their music videos and on stage [how many grew up in middle class homes with educations and families with money?] I have seen few that actually convey any ability.
A Black Bond is a great idea. Given that the character has changed several times, gotten older in successive films, and even been an American [one of the worse ever to be this character] there is no reason that a good British Black actor couldn’t be Bond. I think it could make the films connect more with many across the world. I’m sure for some it would add a certain sex appeal too. But it would have to be a British Actor, maybe a Canadian. The accent is a big thing, as well as having that essence of being British. A rapper, in particular Mr. Combs, is too far for me to suspend my sense of reality.
He may be able to throw a great party; he does dress well, but critical acting?
This is what I think, what do you think?
Because Kayne West didn’t win best video he decided to jump onstage and berate the audience, some of which may be his fans, because he felt unappreciated. The fact he did win an award wasn’t good enough. With an ego seemingly that large one would have to wonder how it all fit on that stage.
Celebrities and entertainers are known for brash actions, given. Some are known for selfish acts and/or random acts of violence and crime. But there are few who are so brazen as to insult their fans and the public in general for not indulging them in their high self-opinion. Add to that the fact that this was the European awards, where several countries look at Americans as self-aggrandizing blowhards and you get Kanye West. At least this is how his actions make me feel. Had West more talent, perhaps I’d feel different. I doubt it though. Perhaps West should remember a line from an older rapper paraphrased from my memory as ‘sign an autograph because these kids are the fans.’
In another announcement of talent that escapes the masses, Mr. Shawn Combs (P. Diddy – a name on par with 50 cent), is declaring his desire to play James Bond. The fact that Mr. Combs would like to play the character is not a big deal, I too think that a Black James Bond could work. But considering the extensive body of acting that he has done I feel that such a role is a stretch, at the most complimentary. I mean 4 movie roles, none of which were inspiring, is not an acting career. Minor roles in major (and minor) theatrical films does not equate to one of the most popular serialized characters in motion pictures.
Why do rappers think that they can act because they have done a music video? While many may be acting to portray the images in their music videos and on stage [how many grew up in middle class homes with educations and families with money?] I have seen few that actually convey any ability.
A Black Bond is a great idea. Given that the character has changed several times, gotten older in successive films, and even been an American [one of the worse ever to be this character] there is no reason that a good British Black actor couldn’t be Bond. I think it could make the films connect more with many across the world. I’m sure for some it would add a certain sex appeal too. But it would have to be a British Actor, maybe a Canadian. The accent is a big thing, as well as having that essence of being British. A rapper, in particular Mr. Combs, is too far for me to suspend my sense of reality.
He may be able to throw a great party; he does dress well, but critical acting?
This is what I think, what do you think?
The latest in the designer goods for you - 11.7.2006.1
Here are a few new photos for you all to see. From time to time I continue to do photo shoots of the new products for my online store. Here are some photos of the latest shoot, this time with just me, and some of the jewelry boxes, mugs, mousepads and other items by themselves. Let me know what you thin, or visit the store to get your own consumer goods.
Not merely a jewlery box, but an expression of your feelings.
Add a bit of flavor and personality to your computer space, at home or at work.
A journal for her, inscribed with a poem on the cover that matches the feelings you put within.
A great match. Just one expample of the great custom mugs and designer mouspads.
If it can look good on me, It will look great on you.
Not merely a jewlery box, but an expression of your feelings.
Add a bit of flavor and personality to your computer space, at home or at work.
A journal for her, inscribed with a poem on the cover that matches the feelings you put within.
A great match. Just one expample of the great custom mugs and designer mouspads.
If it can look good on me, It will look great on you.
Saturday, November 04, 2006
Thoughts on this season of CSI - 11.4.2006.1
I’ve been thinking about CSI: Crime Scene Investigation since the last episode on Thursday. While the program was quite compelling I’ve been trying to put together something else. In the season opening show we were left with a mystery on a killer that is incredibly detailed and efficient. This killer is in many ways a reflection of Gil Grissom, exacting and detailed, the miniatures reproducing the crime scene to the smallest detail.
The preview of the next episode shows the return of this killer, so we now have a mass murderer. And I think its one of the team. The big question of course is who it might be. But the reason I think its part of the team is because of the detail. Enough information is given to keep Grissom occupied, and yet there is no trace back to the killer. All of the information that the team looks for is missing, so the killer has to know their techniques. Plus the attention to detail is similar to the manner in which the team goes over a scene.
So far there have been clues given to support my belief that the killer is on the team. Grissom is becoming weary, perhaps having seen one crime too many. The migraines are just one expression of a potential battle in his own mind. Of course the split personality angle is a bit contrived, though I think the acting ability of Mr. William Peterson is up to such a challenge.
But Grissom is too obvious. So is Nick Stokes (Mr. George Eads). The fact that Nick has been stalked, had several guns pulled on him, kidnapped, and buried alive are enough to leave scars on anyone. His difficulty dealing with the job and the killers they track down is starting to show, like with the guys responsible for beating up Greg that he hit. Nick is perhaps the most emotional of the team, kind of the opposite of Grissom in his connection to the victims. Again I think he is too obvious a choice.
Of course Greg Sanders (Mr. Eric Szmanda) is a possibility. He’s been in an explosion caused by Katherine, held back in his promotion to a field member, lost out to Grissom in dating Sarah (especially since we got to see that they are now involved), recently beat-up trying to save a victim of a gang, and the time he has spent in the hospital matches the time the killer has been inactive. His knowledge of the lab and his work in the field combined with his attempts to mimic Grissom’s work habits are all factors.
And Sarah Sidle (Ms. Jorja Fox) is a possible too. As detailed and precise as Grissom, and possibly the most knowledgeable in techniques after him. Plus she would do anything to keep his attention, I think. She has been after him since the first episode, and jealous of anyone that is close to him. If Grissom is starting to lose his edge, I could see her doing whatever to keep him in the game, feeling like the strong man she is devoted to. Never doubt what a woman in love will do.
Katherine Willows (Mrs. Marg Helgenberger) doesn’t have the time, and she is a mom. Doesn’t match any profiles of mass murderers, and she is far to ambitious in her goals for career advancement. Warrick Brown (Mr. Gary Dourdan) doesn’t match either. As I recall there has never been a African American mass murderer on record. Well except for the Atlanta child killer, and its debatable if he was the killer (at least as some say). Plus Warrick is the most even-keeled, with the exception of his spontaneous and rocky marriage (I don’t think it will last).
So, fans of the show speak up. Do you think the miniature model killer is part of the team? IF so who do you think it is? Somehow I don’t think this will be a case they solve before the end of the year.
This is what I think, what do you think?
The preview of the next episode shows the return of this killer, so we now have a mass murderer. And I think its one of the team. The big question of course is who it might be. But the reason I think its part of the team is because of the detail. Enough information is given to keep Grissom occupied, and yet there is no trace back to the killer. All of the information that the team looks for is missing, so the killer has to know their techniques. Plus the attention to detail is similar to the manner in which the team goes over a scene.
So far there have been clues given to support my belief that the killer is on the team. Grissom is becoming weary, perhaps having seen one crime too many. The migraines are just one expression of a potential battle in his own mind. Of course the split personality angle is a bit contrived, though I think the acting ability of Mr. William Peterson is up to such a challenge.
But Grissom is too obvious. So is Nick Stokes (Mr. George Eads). The fact that Nick has been stalked, had several guns pulled on him, kidnapped, and buried alive are enough to leave scars on anyone. His difficulty dealing with the job and the killers they track down is starting to show, like with the guys responsible for beating up Greg that he hit. Nick is perhaps the most emotional of the team, kind of the opposite of Grissom in his connection to the victims. Again I think he is too obvious a choice.
Of course Greg Sanders (Mr. Eric Szmanda) is a possibility. He’s been in an explosion caused by Katherine, held back in his promotion to a field member, lost out to Grissom in dating Sarah (especially since we got to see that they are now involved), recently beat-up trying to save a victim of a gang, and the time he has spent in the hospital matches the time the killer has been inactive. His knowledge of the lab and his work in the field combined with his attempts to mimic Grissom’s work habits are all factors.
And Sarah Sidle (Ms. Jorja Fox) is a possible too. As detailed and precise as Grissom, and possibly the most knowledgeable in techniques after him. Plus she would do anything to keep his attention, I think. She has been after him since the first episode, and jealous of anyone that is close to him. If Grissom is starting to lose his edge, I could see her doing whatever to keep him in the game, feeling like the strong man she is devoted to. Never doubt what a woman in love will do.
Katherine Willows (Mrs. Marg Helgenberger) doesn’t have the time, and she is a mom. Doesn’t match any profiles of mass murderers, and she is far to ambitious in her goals for career advancement. Warrick Brown (Mr. Gary Dourdan) doesn’t match either. As I recall there has never been a African American mass murderer on record. Well except for the Atlanta child killer, and its debatable if he was the killer (at least as some say). Plus Warrick is the most even-keeled, with the exception of his spontaneous and rocky marriage (I don’t think it will last).
So, fans of the show speak up. Do you think the miniature model killer is part of the team? IF so who do you think it is? Somehow I don’t think this will be a case they solve before the end of the year.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Thursday, November 02, 2006
Video games get hip hop not a halo - 11.2.2006.1
Well here are a few tidbits that some may have missed. As video games become the next massive entertainment medium, involving both teenagers and the 18 – 35 year olds, other genres are being incorporated. The trend is as old as the comic book transition to theatrical movies, with similar successes and failures. (Remember Resident Evil? How about Street Fighter?) Of course some recent proposals seem destined to never happen.
One of the most anticipated transitions was Halo, the huge success for the Microsoft Xbox. I saw was because the deal is dead. It’s a shame as well too because the director was going to be none other than Mr. Peter Jackson. Can you imagine how good this film might have been? With Mr. Jackson’s ability to create immersive and believable environments the action and futuristic nature of Halo could have been this generations Star Wars.
Why has such a viable and anticipated deal stopped? Money of course. It seems that the potential cost and shared profits were too much for the studios. Universal Studios and 20th Century Fox both backed out earlier this month, leaving Microsoft alone on the deal. Now it seems Microsoft got the gitters too. I don’t understand it. Universal is owned by General Electric, Fox by News Corp. I think both can afford the money. Microsoft’s bankroll doesn’t even need to be mentioned. So I don’t think that backing the film was a question. Considering that the elements that made Lord of the Rings so wildly popular exist here, namely that there is a huge fan base that has already committed millions and eagerly awaiting more sequels plus they are covering the highly valued age groups, I believe the real sticking point was sharing the profits. I think that Mr. Jackson wanted more money on the backend than Microsoft would do. Still Microsoft is never one to walk away from a market they think will return a strong profit. My bet is that we will see a new game and then the movie will be on again.
For those that are not into the sci-fi arena, don’t fear there is something out there for you too. If hip-hop music and wrestling styled video games are more your thing then rejoice. Def Jam Records and EA have announced that March 2007 will be the debut of Def Jam Icon. Not only will you have the chance to fight as your favorite disreputable quasi-legal activities specialist (sorry meant talented rap artist) but you will get to listen to themes and music based on either the East coast, West coast or Atlanta styles.
There is nothing like beating someone down to popular songs advocating violence, sex, drugs and referencing men as criminals and women as objects. While I’m sure EA won’t let it contain anything too questionable, the idea will be there all the same. Of course I must admit that I don’t listen to rap since 90 roughly (except when I’m in a club of course) so Big Boi, Ludacris, Paul Wall, et al. may well be exceptions to the norm of todays celebrities. If so I stand corrected, but I honestly doubt that this is a probable outcome.
If you aren’t into video games yet, I think you will be soon. With each generation the games are getting more life-like, providing that feeling of superhuman prowess or an escape from the limitations of real-life. In addition the profits are too extreme for entertainment corporations to pass on. One successful game brings in millions, if not tens of millions (especially if you include sequels) at a cost of a fraction of a theatrical movie. Successful social games, like The Sims, grab not only males but females as well. Already advertisers are lining up to put ads into proven series. Give it 10 years and the new release of a game will be similar to a blockbuster movie premiere. I only hope that they might be more like the originality and visual complexity Halo brought than other more pandering (but popular and profitable) genres.
Ok, I’m tired and drifting. I was more focused in discussing the serious issues with Senator John Kerry today.
This is what I think, what do you think?
One of the most anticipated transitions was Halo, the huge success for the Microsoft Xbox. I saw was because the deal is dead. It’s a shame as well too because the director was going to be none other than Mr. Peter Jackson. Can you imagine how good this film might have been? With Mr. Jackson’s ability to create immersive and believable environments the action and futuristic nature of Halo could have been this generations Star Wars.
Why has such a viable and anticipated deal stopped? Money of course. It seems that the potential cost and shared profits were too much for the studios. Universal Studios and 20th Century Fox both backed out earlier this month, leaving Microsoft alone on the deal. Now it seems Microsoft got the gitters too. I don’t understand it. Universal is owned by General Electric, Fox by News Corp. I think both can afford the money. Microsoft’s bankroll doesn’t even need to be mentioned. So I don’t think that backing the film was a question. Considering that the elements that made Lord of the Rings so wildly popular exist here, namely that there is a huge fan base that has already committed millions and eagerly awaiting more sequels plus they are covering the highly valued age groups, I believe the real sticking point was sharing the profits. I think that Mr. Jackson wanted more money on the backend than Microsoft would do. Still Microsoft is never one to walk away from a market they think will return a strong profit. My bet is that we will see a new game and then the movie will be on again.
For those that are not into the sci-fi arena, don’t fear there is something out there for you too. If hip-hop music and wrestling styled video games are more your thing then rejoice. Def Jam Records and EA have announced that March 2007 will be the debut of Def Jam Icon. Not only will you have the chance to fight as your favorite disreputable quasi-legal activities specialist (sorry meant talented rap artist) but you will get to listen to themes and music based on either the East coast, West coast or Atlanta styles.
There is nothing like beating someone down to popular songs advocating violence, sex, drugs and referencing men as criminals and women as objects. While I’m sure EA won’t let it contain anything too questionable, the idea will be there all the same. Of course I must admit that I don’t listen to rap since 90 roughly (except when I’m in a club of course) so Big Boi, Ludacris, Paul Wall, et al. may well be exceptions to the norm of todays celebrities. If so I stand corrected, but I honestly doubt that this is a probable outcome.
If you aren’t into video games yet, I think you will be soon. With each generation the games are getting more life-like, providing that feeling of superhuman prowess or an escape from the limitations of real-life. In addition the profits are too extreme for entertainment corporations to pass on. One successful game brings in millions, if not tens of millions (especially if you include sequels) at a cost of a fraction of a theatrical movie. Successful social games, like The Sims, grab not only males but females as well. Already advertisers are lining up to put ads into proven series. Give it 10 years and the new release of a game will be similar to a blockbuster movie premiere. I only hope that they might be more like the originality and visual complexity Halo brought than other more pandering (but popular and profitable) genres.
Ok, I’m tired and drifting. I was more focused in discussing the serious issues with Senator John Kerry today.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)