As 2006 is quickly coming to a close I’ve taken a moment to think about what has been this year for Black Entertainment USA. There has been a lot said, on many different levels. I’ve tried to cover more the key thoughts, but some items stand out.
In this year I have discussed the death, shootings and arrests of several rappers. I’ve identified several television ads that seemed distasteful to me and I must say 2 have stood out. I’ve spoken about the major event in sports that have moved me, either through performance or controversy. I’ve acknowledged quality television programming (whether on broadcast or cable network television) and those that have brought it to us. I’ve reviewed books by quality authors, and restaurant.
I’ve shared the sadness of our losses of great entertainers and celebrities. I’ve defined my outrage and congradulations to those I feel deserved it. And I’ve imported thoughts I felt were vital to share from my other blog [though such thoughts had little to do with entertainment, and everything to do with being a Black American, Latino/Hispanic American and just an American]. And yes I’ve even done a bit of shameless self-promotion and advertising.
Rather than discuss all these items again, or qualify why I’ve held the position I took, I will just list the links here. I will arrange them by date and invite you to see what I thought in case you missed them.
I feel I have made an impact. I have reached tens of thousands this year. Hopefully I will reach hundreds of thousands in 2007. With your readership and support I’m sure I will.
2005 went bang, 2006 is alone...so far
Correction to Buger King Ad
What Dave Chappelle and James Lipton gave me
Olympic sideshow diminishes USA
From Oscars to Jail, via a pimp life
Getting back on track with Black White
The Jeffersons, and the end of proof
Harper Hill - success vs. dmx - airport arrest
Musings based on Mr. Bill Cosby's words
Both my countries won the opening World Cup matches
Red cards, shades of color onscreens, and inscribed original products
George Clooney pledges donation for African Debt Relief
Red cards, sportsmanship and ice fetish
Reflections on World Cup 2006
From Larwernce Fishburne to Jackie Chan to Syd Barrett in 24 hours
EUReKA, its a show worth watching on SciFi
Nick Cannon's Boost Mobile ads
Mel Gibson, strip poker, MTV and Harold Scott
Interview with author RM Johnson
More upcoming movies, Glenn Ford and a gas discount to notice
A sad goodbye, 9/11 documentary and Mos Def
Elton John says too much - 9.27.2006.1
J.Lo, television axed, alien lawsuits, and Tamara Dobson - 10.06.2006.2
The math of black influence and success - 10.03.2006.1
Bill Cosby fights the good fight - 10.31.2006.1
The sudden loss of Ed Bradley - 11.9.2006.1
Loss of visionary directors - 11.21.2006.1
Wesley Snipes, Michael Richards and John Pepper II - 11.26.2006.1
Sean Bell - 11.29.2006.1
Irresponsible NBA players - 12.18.2006.1
Sadness and joy - 12.25.2006.1
Sunday, December 31, 2006
Friday, December 29, 2006
What about Rocky? - 12.28.2006.1
Have you seen the latest Rocky movie? I haven’t, and I will probably pick it up as a DVD or from a bootleg. Given that I was watching a couple of programs and noticed a couple of things about the Rocky movies I started to wonder. The movies have been successful, and I have seen the first 4 in the series. I have enjoyed the ones I’ve seen. That said there are some things that I wonder about.
When I look at the latest movie trailers and I consider that there has not been a champion boxer that has been White in decades, is part of the success due to the dream (or wish) that it was true for the white patrons viewing the film? Is the entire Rocky series just wishful fulfillment for the millions of White Americans that have lost a connection with the boxers that have held titles for years now? It’s a deeper question than is seems to be. I think it also may be more accurate than it appears on the surface.
The ultimate way to view this is to ask ‘would Rocky still be the success it is if the lead character was black’? On top of that would the movies work if the black lead were fighting a white champion? Do either of these things change the movies?
To answer the first question the answer should be it makes no difference. But that answer would be rhetoric and untrue. It does make a difference. Envisioning the movies and placing a black lead does not fit, and it’s not because Mr. Sylvester Stallone was so great. There are many movies that anyone can envision another actor portraying as well if not better than the actual actor in the film. Only truly classic films, like It’s a Wonderful Life or The Godfather are examples of movies where either the acting or the storyline (or a combination of both) prevent seeing another in that role. Rocky is not a classic film, good but not classic and there are other actors that could have done it.
So why does that make a difference? Because it wouldn’t be an underdog story. If this were a movie done in the era of the 1930’s or so it wouldn’t work. It wouldn’t work with a black champion or lead. It’s just too unbelievable. Which is sad because it should be able to work.
Yet I cab understand the need to feel connected. I would imagine millions of Black Americans have no connection to most of the programs on television, like I do. While there are good shows out there I’ve noticed that shows where there is some type of diversity tend to attract my attention more than others. The Blade series, the Shield, Eureka, House, CSI and other shows have character(s) that I can empathize with more and in part I want to see how those character fare in those series. Shows like Seinfeld, Friends, Will & Grace did not, and I viewed them occasionally but never felt a connection to them. [Shows like Cheer, Frasier, Moonlighting and others were favorites without connection to similar characters.]
This also feeds into the desire of connection with the film. An audience needs to feel connected to the characters and/or the situation. While there is no denying that fans of all races and nationalities enjoy boxing today, there is also no denying that many would like to see a White champion. It’s natural. They can connect with that character. It’s no different than the millions of African Americans that connected with Mr. Muhammad Ali, or Mr. Tiger Woods as they took the world stage by storm. Even in basketball this is true, though to a lesser extent, and in football with quarterbacks like Mr. Warren Moon and others. The fans can see themselves as that figure and can connect more completely with their success. It’s wish fulfillment.
In terms of Rocky, the success of non-White athletes is not an underdog story but somewhat of a given as there have been decades of champions without a White contender. I think the last real shot was Mr. Cooney some time ago. I could be wrong and please let me know if I am.
So Is Rocky really a great series of films, or a good film propelled by the desires that are unrealized in the real world? And what does that mean about the psyche of America? Does that mean a White champion would make more money just because of his skin color? That a so-so contender would be paid more, and propelled up the ranks faster just to give fans a new dream?
Given that there is no direct connection between reality and the movies, it’s interesting how close the character of Apollo is to Mr. Ali and Mr. Joe Frasier. The character of Clubber Lang (the début film for former bouncer Mr. T) seems eerily like Mr. Mike Tyson, thought the release pre-dates Mr. Tyson by 4 years.
I realize that the film is regarded as a classic by many, and that it won 3 Oscar Awards. I understand that it made over 100 million dollars in profit. Even so, it is not on the caliber of the Marathon Man, The Sting, and others. The question remains in my mind what is behind the great performance of these movies (the 3rd and 4th movies were not nearly as good as the first 2 and made more money). And what does that mean if I am correct.
Or am I just letting my mind wander too much?
This is what I think, what do you think?
When I look at the latest movie trailers and I consider that there has not been a champion boxer that has been White in decades, is part of the success due to the dream (or wish) that it was true for the white patrons viewing the film? Is the entire Rocky series just wishful fulfillment for the millions of White Americans that have lost a connection with the boxers that have held titles for years now? It’s a deeper question than is seems to be. I think it also may be more accurate than it appears on the surface.
The ultimate way to view this is to ask ‘would Rocky still be the success it is if the lead character was black’? On top of that would the movies work if the black lead were fighting a white champion? Do either of these things change the movies?
To answer the first question the answer should be it makes no difference. But that answer would be rhetoric and untrue. It does make a difference. Envisioning the movies and placing a black lead does not fit, and it’s not because Mr. Sylvester Stallone was so great. There are many movies that anyone can envision another actor portraying as well if not better than the actual actor in the film. Only truly classic films, like It’s a Wonderful Life or The Godfather are examples of movies where either the acting or the storyline (or a combination of both) prevent seeing another in that role. Rocky is not a classic film, good but not classic and there are other actors that could have done it.
So why does that make a difference? Because it wouldn’t be an underdog story. If this were a movie done in the era of the 1930’s or so it wouldn’t work. It wouldn’t work with a black champion or lead. It’s just too unbelievable. Which is sad because it should be able to work.
Yet I cab understand the need to feel connected. I would imagine millions of Black Americans have no connection to most of the programs on television, like I do. While there are good shows out there I’ve noticed that shows where there is some type of diversity tend to attract my attention more than others. The Blade series, the Shield, Eureka, House, CSI and other shows have character(s) that I can empathize with more and in part I want to see how those character fare in those series. Shows like Seinfeld, Friends, Will & Grace did not, and I viewed them occasionally but never felt a connection to them. [Shows like Cheer, Frasier, Moonlighting and others were favorites without connection to similar characters.]
This also feeds into the desire of connection with the film. An audience needs to feel connected to the characters and/or the situation. While there is no denying that fans of all races and nationalities enjoy boxing today, there is also no denying that many would like to see a White champion. It’s natural. They can connect with that character. It’s no different than the millions of African Americans that connected with Mr. Muhammad Ali, or Mr. Tiger Woods as they took the world stage by storm. Even in basketball this is true, though to a lesser extent, and in football with quarterbacks like Mr. Warren Moon and others. The fans can see themselves as that figure and can connect more completely with their success. It’s wish fulfillment.
In terms of Rocky, the success of non-White athletes is not an underdog story but somewhat of a given as there have been decades of champions without a White contender. I think the last real shot was Mr. Cooney some time ago. I could be wrong and please let me know if I am.
So Is Rocky really a great series of films, or a good film propelled by the desires that are unrealized in the real world? And what does that mean about the psyche of America? Does that mean a White champion would make more money just because of his skin color? That a so-so contender would be paid more, and propelled up the ranks faster just to give fans a new dream?
Given that there is no direct connection between reality and the movies, it’s interesting how close the character of Apollo is to Mr. Ali and Mr. Joe Frasier. The character of Clubber Lang (the début film for former bouncer Mr. T) seems eerily like Mr. Mike Tyson, thought the release pre-dates Mr. Tyson by 4 years.
I realize that the film is regarded as a classic by many, and that it won 3 Oscar Awards. I understand that it made over 100 million dollars in profit. Even so, it is not on the caliber of the Marathon Man, The Sting, and others. The question remains in my mind what is behind the great performance of these movies (the 3rd and 4th movies were not nearly as good as the first 2 and made more money). And what does that mean if I am correct.
Or am I just letting my mind wander too much?
This is what I think, what do you think?
Wednesday, December 27, 2006
Movies for 2007 and beyond - 12.27.2006.5
Even as the year ends and we mourn the surprising losses of political, artistic and musical giants some things keep moving ahead. There have definitely been losses that will be felt in every medium. Mr. Peter Boyle, Mr. Joe Barbera, Mr. James Brown, and most recently Mr. Gerald Ford have all passed in this month, and signaling a changing world. Yet there are some things in the works to help us keep our memories of these great figures alive.
Much like the cartoons of Hanna/Barbera (and the generous license taken by the likes of the creators of Harvey Birdman - Attorney at Law), the syndication and movies with Mr. Boyle (Young Frankenstein and Everyone Love Raymond), and the Oscar winning cinematic portrayal of Mr. Ray Charles and Mr. Malcolm X, the life of Mr. James Brown is already in the works. Mr. Charles had already been working with noted producer Brian Grazer. Adding to the excitement of the project is the fact that renown director Mr. Spike Lee has taken the helm. Mr. Lee is no novice to creating a biopic movie, the acclaimed Malcolm X film starring Mr. Denzel Washington was his creation. [Why that film did not get an Oscar nomination, nor did Mr. Washington get one escapes me completely.]
This is a film that I look forward to seeing. I can’t imagine right now who might be portrayed as Mr. Brown. There are few Black actors that have enough skill to sing the part (that I know of), and there is no singer that has the acting ability (with the exception of Mr. Will Smith but I don’t think he looks the part and he is more of a rapper than singer). Yet given the fact that Mr. Lee has an eye for talent there may be a new surprise for everyone in this role.
On the other spectrum of upcoming films is the news that Mr. Willie Nelson will be lending a hand for Ms. Jessica Simpson’s latest film. Of course the film is to be a remake, or “revisioning” of an older film – Working Girl. I am left without any anticipation or interest in this latest endeavor. It’s not just that I think that Ms. Simpson has little acting talent, but that the film being copied is not classic enough to warrant a redo. It was a decent film, helped in large part by the abilities of Ms. Melanie Griffith, Ms. Sigourney Weaver and Mr. Harrison Ford. Taking out these highly talented entertainers and replacing them with the comparatively pop fluff likes of Ms. Simpson and Mr. Luke Wilson (who was quite good in The Royal Tenenbaums), and Mr. Andy Dick.
I especially have no love for the work of Mr. Dick nor his recent actions [What I feel about Andy Dick - 12.6.2006.2]. Perhaps if Mr. Dick were completely absent, and the role of Ms. Simpson were miniscule I would consider seeing this film. That is not the case though. I’m sure the concept of the film will be interesting enough to the 15-24 demographic of women movie-goers to capture a profit. Perhaps even a sequel. Yet I still have to think it will just be another addition to the extremely long list of remakes and flops once it arrives.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Much like the cartoons of Hanna/Barbera (and the generous license taken by the likes of the creators of Harvey Birdman - Attorney at Law), the syndication and movies with Mr. Boyle (Young Frankenstein and Everyone Love Raymond), and the Oscar winning cinematic portrayal of Mr. Ray Charles and Mr. Malcolm X, the life of Mr. James Brown is already in the works. Mr. Charles had already been working with noted producer Brian Grazer. Adding to the excitement of the project is the fact that renown director Mr. Spike Lee has taken the helm. Mr. Lee is no novice to creating a biopic movie, the acclaimed Malcolm X film starring Mr. Denzel Washington was his creation. [Why that film did not get an Oscar nomination, nor did Mr. Washington get one escapes me completely.]
This is a film that I look forward to seeing. I can’t imagine right now who might be portrayed as Mr. Brown. There are few Black actors that have enough skill to sing the part (that I know of), and there is no singer that has the acting ability (with the exception of Mr. Will Smith but I don’t think he looks the part and he is more of a rapper than singer). Yet given the fact that Mr. Lee has an eye for talent there may be a new surprise for everyone in this role.
On the other spectrum of upcoming films is the news that Mr. Willie Nelson will be lending a hand for Ms. Jessica Simpson’s latest film. Of course the film is to be a remake, or “revisioning” of an older film – Working Girl. I am left without any anticipation or interest in this latest endeavor. It’s not just that I think that Ms. Simpson has little acting talent, but that the film being copied is not classic enough to warrant a redo. It was a decent film, helped in large part by the abilities of Ms. Melanie Griffith, Ms. Sigourney Weaver and Mr. Harrison Ford. Taking out these highly talented entertainers and replacing them with the comparatively pop fluff likes of Ms. Simpson and Mr. Luke Wilson (who was quite good in The Royal Tenenbaums), and Mr. Andy Dick.
I especially have no love for the work of Mr. Dick nor his recent actions [What I feel about Andy Dick - 12.6.2006.2]. Perhaps if Mr. Dick were completely absent, and the role of Ms. Simpson were miniscule I would consider seeing this film. That is not the case though. I’m sure the concept of the film will be interesting enough to the 15-24 demographic of women movie-goers to capture a profit. Perhaps even a sequel. Yet I still have to think it will just be another addition to the extremely long list of remakes and flops once it arrives.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Worst films of 2006 - 12.27.2006.4
Now onto the Worst films. I won’t bother to describe how awful all these films are. Basically we had a slew of remakes, re-visionings, and sequels. Sadly almost every one of them was a waste of time and money, especially if you went to the theatre. It’s one thing to remake a classic, trying for a homage. It’s completely another to just copy a film with modern actors (the Omen), or make your own version that really has nothing to do with the original beyond the name (the Pink Panther, the Wicker Man). I hate when movie studios think that audiences aren’t smart – or old – enough to realize they are re-treading material.
Other losing films of the type mentioned above are The Dukes of Hazard, X-men 3, Basic Instinct 2, The Hills have Eyes, Posieden, Van Wilder 2, Ultraviolet (It’s supposed to be a futuristic Gloria), All the Kings Men, The Fast and the Furious 3 (did they have to make a 3?), The Hitcher (oops, that will be out in 2007) and others. Yes every one of the above is an idea from someone else a long time ago. Every one of these ideas was done better and more interesting the first time. At least one thing is sure, since Ms. Sharon Stone was only able to draw in 7 million with her sequel there won’t be another, and hopefully the studios will learn from that. Of course considering that the Hitcher is a remake of a C. Thomas Howell and Rutger Hauer 1986 film I think they haven’t.
Other films that you should hope you haven’t seen and won’t waste your money on renting (if you bought the DVD use it as a Frisbee for any movie on this list except the original Hitcher) :
Phat Girlz, My Super ex-Girlfriend, Larry the Cable Guy, Little Man (Possibly this years Soul Plane), Zoom, She’s the Man, Death of a President (envisioning someone killing a current living President?! Sick), John Tucker Must Die, The Break-up, Freedomland, A Good Year, and American Dreamz just to name a few.
Other copies or unending stories –
Ice Age 2, Jackass 2 (maybe people are as numb as movie producers think – please let this be the end)
Well what do you think of the lists?
Best films of 2006
Best and Worst Video Games 2006
Other losing films of the type mentioned above are The Dukes of Hazard, X-men 3, Basic Instinct 2, The Hills have Eyes, Posieden, Van Wilder 2, Ultraviolet (It’s supposed to be a futuristic Gloria), All the Kings Men, The Fast and the Furious 3 (did they have to make a 3?), The Hitcher (oops, that will be out in 2007) and others. Yes every one of the above is an idea from someone else a long time ago. Every one of these ideas was done better and more interesting the first time. At least one thing is sure, since Ms. Sharon Stone was only able to draw in 7 million with her sequel there won’t be another, and hopefully the studios will learn from that. Of course considering that the Hitcher is a remake of a C. Thomas Howell and Rutger Hauer 1986 film I think they haven’t.
Other films that you should hope you haven’t seen and won’t waste your money on renting (if you bought the DVD use it as a Frisbee for any movie on this list except the original Hitcher) :
Phat Girlz, My Super ex-Girlfriend, Larry the Cable Guy, Little Man (Possibly this years Soul Plane), Zoom, She’s the Man, Death of a President (envisioning someone killing a current living President?! Sick), John Tucker Must Die, The Break-up, Freedomland, A Good Year, and American Dreamz just to name a few.
Other copies or unending stories –
Ice Age 2, Jackass 2 (maybe people are as numb as movie producers think – please let this be the end)
Well what do you think of the lists?
Best films of 2006
Best and Worst Video Games 2006
Best Films of 2006 - 12.27.2006.3
So perhaps you are a bit too old for video games (whatever that means, I’m almost 39 and Mr. Samuel Jackson is older than me) or you just don’t find them interesting (truly a shame). Well perhaps you enjoy movies. Cinema is perhaps one of the largest forms of entertainment on the planet (I know that someone wants to debate that, but I’m going with it for the moment).
Sadly that also means that there is probably the most money in this form of entertainment. Where there is money there are bean counter trying to reign in costs and corporations looking for profit-centers (reigning in ideas). Occasionally this war of numbers works out and we get some decent films, maybe a surprise and rarely something everyone must see. Most of the time we get different flavors of feces, sometimes hot, some cold and more than a handful that make you wish you could throw up just so it would be more entertaining than the movie. The movies of 2006 is no different.
So let’s look at what was good. This is a short list, mostly because it seems that Hollywood is afraid of new idea (or they just won’t spend money on a new one). Casino Royale and Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest are at the top. My preference is for Mr. Johnny Depp. Who wouldn’t want to take a trip to Tortuga with Capitain Jack Sparrow via a broken compass?
United 93 is a trip in time that makes the realities of yesterday come to life again. It’s hard to watch without the emotional connection to that day. Even more difficult for those of us in New York City and in the area that day.
Feast shows that Operation Greenlight can work. Director John Gullagher makes a movie that shows he has a vision. Worth the wait, though I think they should have given it its national big screen debut it deserved and many of us waited for.
Superman Returns and Apocalypto are 2 movies I didn’t see. I won’t see Superman because the entire theme of the character is uninteresting and annoying to me. Superman doesn’t represent me nor does his values of truth justice and the American way (all based on the themes of early 20th century America that did not see me as part of those themes). Unfair as that is I can’t separate the movie from the origin.
Apocalypto is a movie I have yet to have a chance to see. I plan on it though. Mr. Mel Gibson may have many issues but his ability to convey sweeping themes in his movies are unquestioned. From what I’ve been able to see the visuals are stunning, and I’ve long held that if the movie is well acted the language is unimportant. It would seem that many agree with my assessment.
Mission Impossible III was more bang for the buck. Finally we get to see an IMF TEAM in action. Closer to the concept of the original series, well worth the admission price.
Also worth noting though probably less familiar to the general population are The King of Scotland, This Film is Not Yet Rated, and Thank You For Smoking. Also DreamGirls which just came out and should be counted for 2007.
Continued in Worst films of 2006
Sadly that also means that there is probably the most money in this form of entertainment. Where there is money there are bean counter trying to reign in costs and corporations looking for profit-centers (reigning in ideas). Occasionally this war of numbers works out and we get some decent films, maybe a surprise and rarely something everyone must see. Most of the time we get different flavors of feces, sometimes hot, some cold and more than a handful that make you wish you could throw up just so it would be more entertaining than the movie. The movies of 2006 is no different.
So let’s look at what was good. This is a short list, mostly because it seems that Hollywood is afraid of new idea (or they just won’t spend money on a new one). Casino Royale and Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest are at the top. My preference is for Mr. Johnny Depp. Who wouldn’t want to take a trip to Tortuga with Capitain Jack Sparrow via a broken compass?
United 93 is a trip in time that makes the realities of yesterday come to life again. It’s hard to watch without the emotional connection to that day. Even more difficult for those of us in New York City and in the area that day.
Feast shows that Operation Greenlight can work. Director John Gullagher makes a movie that shows he has a vision. Worth the wait, though I think they should have given it its national big screen debut it deserved and many of us waited for.
Superman Returns and Apocalypto are 2 movies I didn’t see. I won’t see Superman because the entire theme of the character is uninteresting and annoying to me. Superman doesn’t represent me nor does his values of truth justice and the American way (all based on the themes of early 20th century America that did not see me as part of those themes). Unfair as that is I can’t separate the movie from the origin.
Apocalypto is a movie I have yet to have a chance to see. I plan on it though. Mr. Mel Gibson may have many issues but his ability to convey sweeping themes in his movies are unquestioned. From what I’ve been able to see the visuals are stunning, and I’ve long held that if the movie is well acted the language is unimportant. It would seem that many agree with my assessment.
Mission Impossible III was more bang for the buck. Finally we get to see an IMF TEAM in action. Closer to the concept of the original series, well worth the admission price.
Also worth noting though probably less familiar to the general population are The King of Scotland, This Film is Not Yet Rated, and Thank You For Smoking. Also DreamGirls which just came out and should be counted for 2007.
Continued in Worst films of 2006
My best/worst video games of 2006 - 12.27.2006.2
**My comments on the passing of President Ford can be found at www.mvass.com**
Well it’s that time of year again. Time for the best and worst of what was 2006. I’ve already mentioned some of my thoughts about the year previously, now for some lists. Come on we all love a good list, sometimes even a bad one. Hopefully I will have the former and not the latter.
First off are video games. Yes, the bane of wives, mothers and girlfriends. A good game is worth it’s weight in coffee, or caffeinated drinks if you prefer, and then some. A bad game makes you think the ladies are right (unless you are Mr. Samuel Jackson – his wife loves them and so he married her or so he said at the Spike Video Game Awards). My preference is PC games, though I have a PS2 as well. My thoughts on other systems is culled from Gamespot.com, a site I find to be quite accurate and useful.
The number one game I played this year has to be Worldwide Soccer Manager. Most may not have heard of this one, it’s a European game but it’s fantastic. Very addictive and fills the time until the next World Cup, or the next version, quite well. If you love soccer (football to the rest of the world) you need this. It’s not a action game, but watching the matches play out is so close to the real thing you will be caught in it’s web quickly.
Guitar Hero is the second best game of the year to me. Yes I know that Guitar Hero II is out, and I have that as well. But I like the music on the original better. There is nothing like rocking to a classic rock song and feeling like you are playing it yourself. It’s as close to being in a rock band as I will ever get. If you want to do well on expert I suggest extreme practice or knowing how to play a guitar, I’m still not near that point yet.
Third for me is Elder Scrolls IV : Oblivion. Immersive, graphically beautiful and open-ended. It’s hard to ask for more. There is little better than doing what you want in a world you can master. For the casual gamer it’s better than a MMO (massively multiplayer online game), and for those that are cheap. Expect to dedicate days and weeks to the game, looking for that better piece of armor, or sneaking into that one room to rob.
The new Wii system demands to be discussed as the sports are easily the best new innovation in some time. The Legend of Zelda has been a constant favorite since I was in college and the latest is no different.
On the other end are the games we really don’t want to ever remember playing.
First I must mention my hate of all the GTA rip offs. I find them to be playing to the worst stereotypes and making them glamorous. I dislike the thought and the intention. There is no benefit or justification of these games.
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas. The kids all want this, and none of them should see it. Unless you hope for your child to become a buffed up, ignorant, pimp-drug dealing- gang member. I have nothing against violent games. I will not say that any game should not be made. But I don’t like this and never will.
Torino 2006. Like virtually any game that tries to cash in on a theme this fails. What more do I need to say than curling?
Superman Returns. Decent movie, crappy game. This helps to reinforce the idea that you never buy a game that is based on a movie. It’s just a way for the movie makes to suck away more of your money, regardless if the movie was good or not.
Infinity: The quest for earth. I’m not sure when this popped up. It’s supposed to be a free MMO, based in space. Of course like many of the new MMO’s (especially the free ones) it’s broken. Or not yet finished. Why it should exist as only part of a game I don’t understand.
2007 should be interesting. A lot of MMO’s are supposed to be coming out. Vanguard is the first one I think I will be checking out. That is after it launches and the bugs are found. Give it a month from launch and look for a review.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Well it’s that time of year again. Time for the best and worst of what was 2006. I’ve already mentioned some of my thoughts about the year previously, now for some lists. Come on we all love a good list, sometimes even a bad one. Hopefully I will have the former and not the latter.
First off are video games. Yes, the bane of wives, mothers and girlfriends. A good game is worth it’s weight in coffee, or caffeinated drinks if you prefer, and then some. A bad game makes you think the ladies are right (unless you are Mr. Samuel Jackson – his wife loves them and so he married her or so he said at the Spike Video Game Awards). My preference is PC games, though I have a PS2 as well. My thoughts on other systems is culled from Gamespot.com, a site I find to be quite accurate and useful.
The number one game I played this year has to be Worldwide Soccer Manager. Most may not have heard of this one, it’s a European game but it’s fantastic. Very addictive and fills the time until the next World Cup, or the next version, quite well. If you love soccer (football to the rest of the world) you need this. It’s not a action game, but watching the matches play out is so close to the real thing you will be caught in it’s web quickly.
Guitar Hero is the second best game of the year to me. Yes I know that Guitar Hero II is out, and I have that as well. But I like the music on the original better. There is nothing like rocking to a classic rock song and feeling like you are playing it yourself. It’s as close to being in a rock band as I will ever get. If you want to do well on expert I suggest extreme practice or knowing how to play a guitar, I’m still not near that point yet.
Third for me is Elder Scrolls IV : Oblivion. Immersive, graphically beautiful and open-ended. It’s hard to ask for more. There is little better than doing what you want in a world you can master. For the casual gamer it’s better than a MMO (massively multiplayer online game), and for those that are cheap. Expect to dedicate days and weeks to the game, looking for that better piece of armor, or sneaking into that one room to rob.
The new Wii system demands to be discussed as the sports are easily the best new innovation in some time. The Legend of Zelda has been a constant favorite since I was in college and the latest is no different.
On the other end are the games we really don’t want to ever remember playing.
First I must mention my hate of all the GTA rip offs. I find them to be playing to the worst stereotypes and making them glamorous. I dislike the thought and the intention. There is no benefit or justification of these games.
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas. The kids all want this, and none of them should see it. Unless you hope for your child to become a buffed up, ignorant, pimp-drug dealing- gang member. I have nothing against violent games. I will not say that any game should not be made. But I don’t like this and never will.
Torino 2006. Like virtually any game that tries to cash in on a theme this fails. What more do I need to say than curling?
Superman Returns. Decent movie, crappy game. This helps to reinforce the idea that you never buy a game that is based on a movie. It’s just a way for the movie makes to suck away more of your money, regardless if the movie was good or not.
Infinity: The quest for earth. I’m not sure when this popped up. It’s supposed to be a free MMO, based in space. Of course like many of the new MMO’s (especially the free ones) it’s broken. Or not yet finished. Why it should exist as only part of a game I don’t understand.
2007 should be interesting. A lot of MMO’s are supposed to be coming out. Vanguard is the first one I think I will be checking out. That is after it launches and the bugs are found. Give it a month from launch and look for a review.
This is what I think, what do you think?
My inspiration, and dream, for 2007 - 12.27.2006.1
I hope there were a few people watching the Cartoon Network’s Adult Swim programming tonight. Rather than the normal line-up of various programs, each night this week the entire time slots are dedicated to just one program. Yesterday it was the Venture Bros. marathon, tonight it was the Boondocks.
Many should be aware of the Boondocks cartoon, based on a comic strip of the same name that has national syndication. This show is political and Afrocentric and filled with biting sarcasm that hits the mark each time. This one program is probably the best item on television to highlight some of the absurdities that is the Black culture in America today. Had I children I’d tape every episode and make them watch each one at least monthly. Yes, I feel that it makes that much of an impact. No, this isn’t the first time I’ve discussed the program in this blog.
But perhaps the one thing I wish young African Americans (and almost as importantly older Blacks) could see is the episode about Dr. Martin Luther King. It was an episode based on a dream that Dr. King lived (though in a coma for 30 years). Through out the episode Dr. King is just trying to adjust to the world and yet still carry the beliefs he had in the 60’s. But this is not a world based on the efforts of the Civil Rights Movement, or the sacrifices of Dr. King, Mr. Malcolm X and thousands if not millions of others.
The most telling part of this episode is when Dr. King finally loses his patience. He rightly addresses a large crowd of Black African Americans, and television media, and says what is really happening. He admonishes the Black culture for the failures that are glorified today, and the common usage of a term that “is the ugliest word in the English language.” He addresses the lunacy of black-oriented television (as it exists on a particular cable network) and so much more.
And amazingly the African Americans of this dream episode reacted, positively. Finally there was unified action. Education became important, athletes lived up to the role-model status they have, laws changed and the revolution that was demanded in the 1960’s finally happened (without bloodshed).
The potential that so many sacrificed for, that so many more waste today, became a reality. It was a dream of course. Even in the cartoon it was acknowledged that this isn’t close to reality in any form. But it’s quite a dream, one worth having or at the least seeing. Just as the Black men and women of the cartoon’s world opened their eyes, so must we all. I think one line from this television program summed it all up in a neatness that is eloquent – The people are waiting for Dr. Martin Luther King to come back, but it’s not going to happen.
Maybe 2007 will be the year this sinks in. Maybe the culture will understand that there is no such thing as “ghettofabulous” and that denigrating friends and family with a hateful and derogatory term is vicious and not loving. Perhaps the youth will understand that without an education there is no foundation to build a better life on. In 2007 we may finally get to see the Black community band together and use the most valuable asset we have that no one can take, but that we can destroy ourselves, our minds.
Maybe I’m dreaming of a 2007 that won’t happen, but it can. And that’s what dreams are for, right?
This is what I think, what do you think?
Many should be aware of the Boondocks cartoon, based on a comic strip of the same name that has national syndication. This show is political and Afrocentric and filled with biting sarcasm that hits the mark each time. This one program is probably the best item on television to highlight some of the absurdities that is the Black culture in America today. Had I children I’d tape every episode and make them watch each one at least monthly. Yes, I feel that it makes that much of an impact. No, this isn’t the first time I’ve discussed the program in this blog.
But perhaps the one thing I wish young African Americans (and almost as importantly older Blacks) could see is the episode about Dr. Martin Luther King. It was an episode based on a dream that Dr. King lived (though in a coma for 30 years). Through out the episode Dr. King is just trying to adjust to the world and yet still carry the beliefs he had in the 60’s. But this is not a world based on the efforts of the Civil Rights Movement, or the sacrifices of Dr. King, Mr. Malcolm X and thousands if not millions of others.
The most telling part of this episode is when Dr. King finally loses his patience. He rightly addresses a large crowd of Black African Americans, and television media, and says what is really happening. He admonishes the Black culture for the failures that are glorified today, and the common usage of a term that “is the ugliest word in the English language.” He addresses the lunacy of black-oriented television (as it exists on a particular cable network) and so much more.
And amazingly the African Americans of this dream episode reacted, positively. Finally there was unified action. Education became important, athletes lived up to the role-model status they have, laws changed and the revolution that was demanded in the 1960’s finally happened (without bloodshed).
The potential that so many sacrificed for, that so many more waste today, became a reality. It was a dream of course. Even in the cartoon it was acknowledged that this isn’t close to reality in any form. But it’s quite a dream, one worth having or at the least seeing. Just as the Black men and women of the cartoon’s world opened their eyes, so must we all. I think one line from this television program summed it all up in a neatness that is eloquent – The people are waiting for Dr. Martin Luther King to come back, but it’s not going to happen.
Maybe 2007 will be the year this sinks in. Maybe the culture will understand that there is no such thing as “ghettofabulous” and that denigrating friends and family with a hateful and derogatory term is vicious and not loving. Perhaps the youth will understand that without an education there is no foundation to build a better life on. In 2007 we may finally get to see the Black community band together and use the most valuable asset we have that no one can take, but that we can destroy ourselves, our minds.
Maybe I’m dreaming of a 2007 that won’t happen, but it can. And that’s what dreams are for, right?
This is what I think, what do you think?
Monday, December 25, 2006
Sadness and joy - 12.25.2006.1
On this Christmas day I hope that all is well dear readers. I want to speak about a couple of thoughts, but first I must share some sad news. Mr. James Brown has passed away at the age of 73. The hardest working man in show business will now get a chance to rest and we will all miss him.
There is no question that the music world has taken a great loss. Whether it’s soul, rap, hip hop, disco or rock Mr. Brown touched them all. Like few entertainers before or since Mr. Brown inspired decades of music. Dance moves, singing style, music and lyrics have all endured the test of time, gaining new fans in each generation. It’s been said that the music of Mr. James Brown is the most sampled and therefore most heard music in the last quarter century at least. And there is no secret that many of the top performers has copied his dance moves as much as his music and lyrical style. Truly we will miss him, and I take solace in that he will never know the pressures and pain that he endured in life.
In happier news it’s been announced that Bono will become a Knight. While there is no equivalent in America, I’d compare it to marrying into the Rockerfeller or Kennedy families. In becoming a knight Bono becomes royalty, even if the title is only honorary. As a Irishman Bono, who’s birth name is Mr. Paul Hewson, cannot use the title Sir as only British citizens can. In addition this rare honor is given to few, and fewer non-Britons, but due to the politics of the Irish-British relations it is quite rare. I’m only aware of Mr. Bob Geldof as the other recipient of such an honor that was Irish and accepted.
Bono joins an exclusive group though, which includes Mr. Geldof, Mr. Bill Gates, Mr. Steven Spielberg, and Mr. Rudy Guliani. That’s a group worth joining I think. And as part of such a group the activities that Bono supports, namely aid to African nations among others, are given more political clout and power. I’m always glad to mention when an entertainer strives to help others in the world, and Bono has done a great deal for Africa. With this knighthood I can only expect him to continue his work and hope for even greater success.
On a more personal note I want to wish all of my readers, and their families and friends, the very best of holidays. I hope you all enjoy this time and find it filled with peace, joy and success. I hope that these gifts follow you all into the new year, 2007.
This is what I think, what do you think?
There is no question that the music world has taken a great loss. Whether it’s soul, rap, hip hop, disco or rock Mr. Brown touched them all. Like few entertainers before or since Mr. Brown inspired decades of music. Dance moves, singing style, music and lyrics have all endured the test of time, gaining new fans in each generation. It’s been said that the music of Mr. James Brown is the most sampled and therefore most heard music in the last quarter century at least. And there is no secret that many of the top performers has copied his dance moves as much as his music and lyrical style. Truly we will miss him, and I take solace in that he will never know the pressures and pain that he endured in life.
In happier news it’s been announced that Bono will become a Knight. While there is no equivalent in America, I’d compare it to marrying into the Rockerfeller or Kennedy families. In becoming a knight Bono becomes royalty, even if the title is only honorary. As a Irishman Bono, who’s birth name is Mr. Paul Hewson, cannot use the title Sir as only British citizens can. In addition this rare honor is given to few, and fewer non-Britons, but due to the politics of the Irish-British relations it is quite rare. I’m only aware of Mr. Bob Geldof as the other recipient of such an honor that was Irish and accepted.
Bono joins an exclusive group though, which includes Mr. Geldof, Mr. Bill Gates, Mr. Steven Spielberg, and Mr. Rudy Guliani. That’s a group worth joining I think. And as part of such a group the activities that Bono supports, namely aid to African nations among others, are given more political clout and power. I’m always glad to mention when an entertainer strives to help others in the world, and Bono has done a great deal for Africa. With this knighthood I can only expect him to continue his work and hope for even greater success.
On a more personal note I want to wish all of my readers, and their families and friends, the very best of holidays. I hope you all enjoy this time and find it filled with peace, joy and success. I hope that these gifts follow you all into the new year, 2007.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Friday, December 22, 2006
What does Eddie Murphy make you think of? - 12.22.2006.1
As Christmas and the new year approach, and I watch Mr. Eddie Murphy on Inside the Actors Studio I come upon several thoughts. First I am caught by the poise that Mr. Murphy presents in the program, and how quiet and reserved he his. It’s not quite the same as the mental image I have for the man though he obviously is not the same as the 20-something that burst into movies and stand-up and national attention.
I am also drawn to the movie Dreamgirls, the play of which I saw back during high school. I’ll speak on the movie later, but the clips of Mr. Murphy singing (yes it’s his voice) and doing his Motown-esque routine are captivating and well done. The movie allows a great range to be displayed and from what can be seen of the non-performance clips it delivers.
But I am also drawn to another thought. I believe that no actor (with the exception of perhaps Mr. Frank Oz and Mr. Jim Henson – though muppets are not quite actors) has ever played so many roles in one film, or has been in as many movies portraying separate characters. I’m not talking about playing a twin, like Mr. Jeremy Irons did so well, but completely separate and realistic characters. In 5 films he has played a total of 24 characters, I don’t think anyone else has ever played more multiple characters. To his credit, these were not knock off characters or bad acting roles. Each of the Klumps, or the old men in Coming to America, or any other character was a real and well done role. Some done so well as to seem like a completely different person was that actor.
While there are those who have asked about the potential of Mr. Murphy to go into dramatic roles, I think his portrayal in Dreamgirls will answer that. Some have questioned his efforts to help break African Americans into the Hollywood machine. I think he has, though not in the way that was requested. Mr. Murphy has inspired many who are stars today including Mr. Martin Lawrence and Mr. Chris Rock. The cumulative effect of his presence and ability should not be overlooked. Inspiration is a powerful tool for those that wish to achieve a thing.
The inspiration that he provides is not limited to his stand-up or comedic roles. Mr. Murphy has directed (Harlem Nights), produced (13 films including Life and the upcoming Johnny Blaze), written (10 productions not including the various skits for Saturday Night Live), and sang (10 including Shrek and Dreamgirls) as well as being a recording artist. He was the first novice movie star to receive 1 million dollars in his first film and he is perhaps the most successful SNL star (Mr. John Belushi may have been if he lived, Mr. Dan Ackroyd has not been as successful, and Mr. Will Ferrell may get there in time but is not currently). That is quite inspiring from any actor.
I have to say I just never thought about it till I saw this episode of Inside the Actor’s Studio. Reflection brings interesting revelations sometimes.
This is what I think, what do you think?
I am also drawn to the movie Dreamgirls, the play of which I saw back during high school. I’ll speak on the movie later, but the clips of Mr. Murphy singing (yes it’s his voice) and doing his Motown-esque routine are captivating and well done. The movie allows a great range to be displayed and from what can be seen of the non-performance clips it delivers.
But I am also drawn to another thought. I believe that no actor (with the exception of perhaps Mr. Frank Oz and Mr. Jim Henson – though muppets are not quite actors) has ever played so many roles in one film, or has been in as many movies portraying separate characters. I’m not talking about playing a twin, like Mr. Jeremy Irons did so well, but completely separate and realistic characters. In 5 films he has played a total of 24 characters, I don’t think anyone else has ever played more multiple characters. To his credit, these were not knock off characters or bad acting roles. Each of the Klumps, or the old men in Coming to America, or any other character was a real and well done role. Some done so well as to seem like a completely different person was that actor.
While there are those who have asked about the potential of Mr. Murphy to go into dramatic roles, I think his portrayal in Dreamgirls will answer that. Some have questioned his efforts to help break African Americans into the Hollywood machine. I think he has, though not in the way that was requested. Mr. Murphy has inspired many who are stars today including Mr. Martin Lawrence and Mr. Chris Rock. The cumulative effect of his presence and ability should not be overlooked. Inspiration is a powerful tool for those that wish to achieve a thing.
The inspiration that he provides is not limited to his stand-up or comedic roles. Mr. Murphy has directed (Harlem Nights), produced (13 films including Life and the upcoming Johnny Blaze), written (10 productions not including the various skits for Saturday Night Live), and sang (10 including Shrek and Dreamgirls) as well as being a recording artist. He was the first novice movie star to receive 1 million dollars in his first film and he is perhaps the most successful SNL star (Mr. John Belushi may have been if he lived, Mr. Dan Ackroyd has not been as successful, and Mr. Will Ferrell may get there in time but is not currently). That is quite inspiring from any actor.
I have to say I just never thought about it till I saw this episode of Inside the Actor’s Studio. Reflection brings interesting revelations sometimes.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Thursday, December 21, 2006
The odd and dumb before the holiday - 12.21.2006.2
Usually I have found that the odd and bizarre tends to appear throughout the weekend, but last weekend there really wasn’t anything. Now this week seems to be making up for that and may well take care of the holiday weekend as well. The odd and dumb are in abundance, so much so that I’m not sure where I will start.
Well perhaps the news that a Komodo dragon is capable of virgin births. Yes it’s true; the big lizards can reproduce without any help from a mate. Nature is just way smarter than us, as scientist had no clue this was possible. But like it was said in Jurassic Park Nature always finds a way. I doubt this spontaneous birthing is as big a deal for Komodo dragons though, and I’d imagine a whole lot less fun.
With the pleasant news done, Miss USA is up. The thing I don’t understand is how this took up so much time. Coverage by news stations was enormous. Almost as much time was given to whether this girl would lose her title as was given to cover several forest fires. Seriously, this was a full day of news with coverage of Mr. Donald Trump giving the girl a second chance. Now compare that to how much attention is being to the letter by Rep. Goode about Muslims. If that’s not odd and sad I’m not sure what is.
For the record, Mr. Trump should have removed her. All this has proven is that if you can bat your eyes enough and cry well you can get away with anything. That is if you are a pretty girl. Not drop dead gorgeous just pretty and young. Try that in the real world and see what happens. It’s not like she did anything to deserve a second chance. All she had to do was show up at events and look pretty, maybe say a couple of words. Tough job.
Millions of women (maybe not that many) move to the city every year. Many are form smaller, well all of them are from smaller cities now that I think about it and they don’t go berserk drinking and allegedly doing drugs and missing work. At least they don’t if they expect to keep their places and have food to eat. She made the choices; she should have reaped the consequences.
Before I mentioned that the attention given Miss USA was sad and what could be worse. I thought about it. The ongoing name calling by Ms. Rosie O’Donnell and Mr. Trump is worse. It deserves even less time that the Miss USA slap on the wrist that sparked it. This is simple, Ms. O’Donnell
is wrong. She attacked Mr. Trump on a personal level. She questioned his morality (which was never an issue nor involved in what he was doing) and fidelity (also totally off subject). There was no call for it.
Mr. Trump responded more harshly than needed. But I can understand. She made a personal attack and it hit him. I wouldn’t stand for something like that myself, if I were a celebrity or entertainer. And of course she had to respond. Do we really need hourly reports on this? Is this so important that it all couldn’t be summed up during the evening news?
I’ll say it again, where is the coverage of important items? If the news about a politician essentially claiming that only certain religions should be allowed in the nation, and that only European immigrants should be allowed in this nation, is too real or serious perhaps something else could be covered in this time. There’s always the news that Mr. Stephen Colbert ‘won’ the guitar solo greenscreen battle against the Decemberists. Of course he got a bit of help from Mr. Peter Frampton, but I feel the truthiness of it was all the vindication Mr. Colbert needed. And there would be enough time left over to mull the impact of a tell-all book on Oprah, like it really matters. Or maybe another chance to view the basketball fight and mention the pitiful ‘penalty’ issued to the irresponsible NBA players. Or is that too serious again?
This is what I think, what do you think?
Well perhaps the news that a Komodo dragon is capable of virgin births. Yes it’s true; the big lizards can reproduce without any help from a mate. Nature is just way smarter than us, as scientist had no clue this was possible. But like it was said in Jurassic Park Nature always finds a way. I doubt this spontaneous birthing is as big a deal for Komodo dragons though, and I’d imagine a whole lot less fun.
With the pleasant news done, Miss USA is up. The thing I don’t understand is how this took up so much time. Coverage by news stations was enormous. Almost as much time was given to whether this girl would lose her title as was given to cover several forest fires. Seriously, this was a full day of news with coverage of Mr. Donald Trump giving the girl a second chance. Now compare that to how much attention is being to the letter by Rep. Goode about Muslims. If that’s not odd and sad I’m not sure what is.
For the record, Mr. Trump should have removed her. All this has proven is that if you can bat your eyes enough and cry well you can get away with anything. That is if you are a pretty girl. Not drop dead gorgeous just pretty and young. Try that in the real world and see what happens. It’s not like she did anything to deserve a second chance. All she had to do was show up at events and look pretty, maybe say a couple of words. Tough job.
Millions of women (maybe not that many) move to the city every year. Many are form smaller, well all of them are from smaller cities now that I think about it and they don’t go berserk drinking and allegedly doing drugs and missing work. At least they don’t if they expect to keep their places and have food to eat. She made the choices; she should have reaped the consequences.
Before I mentioned that the attention given Miss USA was sad and what could be worse. I thought about it. The ongoing name calling by Ms. Rosie O’Donnell and Mr. Trump is worse. It deserves even less time that the Miss USA slap on the wrist that sparked it. This is simple, Ms. O’Donnell
is wrong. She attacked Mr. Trump on a personal level. She questioned his morality (which was never an issue nor involved in what he was doing) and fidelity (also totally off subject). There was no call for it.Mr. Trump responded more harshly than needed. But I can understand. She made a personal attack and it hit him. I wouldn’t stand for something like that myself, if I were a celebrity or entertainer. And of course she had to respond. Do we really need hourly reports on this? Is this so important that it all couldn’t be summed up during the evening news?
I’ll say it again, where is the coverage of important items? If the news about a politician essentially claiming that only certain religions should be allowed in the nation, and that only European immigrants should be allowed in this nation, is too real or serious perhaps something else could be covered in this time. There’s always the news that Mr. Stephen Colbert ‘won’ the guitar solo greenscreen battle against the Decemberists. Of course he got a bit of help from Mr. Peter Frampton, but I feel the truthiness of it was all the vindication Mr. Colbert needed. And there would be enough time left over to mull the impact of a tell-all book on Oprah, like it really matters. Or maybe another chance to view the basketball fight and mention the pitiful ‘penalty’ issued to the irresponsible NBA players. Or is that too serious again?
This is what I think, what do you think?
Michelangelo’s Resturant review - 12.21.2006.1
Here is something for those living closer to where I am, or visiting the area. Few things are more enjoyable than a nice meal. One of the better meals I’ve had out in the Binghamton area is an Italian restaurant called Michelangelo’s. This restaurant recently re-opened after having to renovate due to the flooding that swept the area earlier this year.
While there are many Italian restaurants in every city, this is the one that stands out to me for this area. The interior of the restaurant is completely new and quite stylish. There is nothing that would indicate that over 5 feet of water had filled the place. The walls are a pleasant rust color with several paintings in the main dining area. The tables and chairs are a nice dark wood and as attractive as they are comfortable. There is plenty of space to accommodate large groups and couples or individuals, even when the restaurant fills up. The lighting is quite nice as well. Large windows capture the sun during the day and after the sun sets the soft indoor lighting is set at a level that compliments the décor. There is also a small but well stocked bar that can seat about 6 – 8 people while they wait for a table to open.
While the interior is attractive, the draw is the food of course. The menu has a decent selection of favorites and staple dishes. And there are daily specials that are equally appealing. Whether it’s chicken, veal, pasta or a combination of these choices, the portions are more than enough to fill a person. In particular I found the veal to be an excellent choice.
My most recent outing gave me a chance to enjoy a personal favorite. One of the specials was chicken francese, and I requested if veal francese (it’s not on the menu) could be made instead. The chef indulged me and made a fantastic meal. The presentation was topped off with seared lemons. I mention this meal in particular because it’s a hard dish to make and sadly is not very common these days. The lemon sauce is difficult to get right, with many places putting in too much lemon, or using store-bought lemon juice instead of fresh lemons. When it’s done wrong you can tell in the first bite, but when it’s done right as it was in this case it’s a delight.
The wine selection is quite nice and the house reds are a wonderful accent to the meal or just as a drink by itself. If you lean to stronger drinks the top shelf selection is quite large for a small bar. The scotch selections include my favorite; Glenlivet (just the 12 year old) which makes Michelangelo’s only the 3 place in the area to carry it (to my knowledge).
Overall I found the entire experience to be pleasant and enjoyable. I wasn’t the only one to think so, as the restaurant quickly filled between 5 and 6:30. I would strongly suggest reservations if you expect to be going here Wednesday to Sunday in the evening. Don’t plan on late night dining here though as the hours are about 11-9 during the weekday. And at about $25 per person (including 2 glasses of wine) the cost is quite reasonable. So for an enjoyable meal that is perfect for a date, an evening away from the kids, or a family outing I would suggest Michelangelo’s.
While there are many Italian restaurants in every city, this is the one that stands out to me for this area. The interior of the restaurant is completely new and quite stylish. There is nothing that would indicate that over 5 feet of water had filled the place. The walls are a pleasant rust color with several paintings in the main dining area. The tables and chairs are a nice dark wood and as attractive as they are comfortable. There is plenty of space to accommodate large groups and couples or individuals, even when the restaurant fills up. The lighting is quite nice as well. Large windows capture the sun during the day and after the sun sets the soft indoor lighting is set at a level that compliments the décor. There is also a small but well stocked bar that can seat about 6 – 8 people while they wait for a table to open.
While the interior is attractive, the draw is the food of course. The menu has a decent selection of favorites and staple dishes. And there are daily specials that are equally appealing. Whether it’s chicken, veal, pasta or a combination of these choices, the portions are more than enough to fill a person. In particular I found the veal to be an excellent choice.
My most recent outing gave me a chance to enjoy a personal favorite. One of the specials was chicken francese, and I requested if veal francese (it’s not on the menu) could be made instead. The chef indulged me and made a fantastic meal. The presentation was topped off with seared lemons. I mention this meal in particular because it’s a hard dish to make and sadly is not very common these days. The lemon sauce is difficult to get right, with many places putting in too much lemon, or using store-bought lemon juice instead of fresh lemons. When it’s done wrong you can tell in the first bite, but when it’s done right as it was in this case it’s a delight.
The wine selection is quite nice and the house reds are a wonderful accent to the meal or just as a drink by itself. If you lean to stronger drinks the top shelf selection is quite large for a small bar. The scotch selections include my favorite; Glenlivet (just the 12 year old) which makes Michelangelo’s only the 3 place in the area to carry it (to my knowledge).
Overall I found the entire experience to be pleasant and enjoyable. I wasn’t the only one to think so, as the restaurant quickly filled between 5 and 6:30. I would strongly suggest reservations if you expect to be going here Wednesday to Sunday in the evening. Don’t plan on late night dining here though as the hours are about 11-9 during the weekday. And at about $25 per person (including 2 glasses of wine) the cost is quite reasonable. So for an enjoyable meal that is perfect for a date, an evening away from the kids, or a family outing I would suggest Michelangelo’s.
Monday, December 18, 2006
Irresponsible NBA players - 12.18.2006.1
I realize that there was no news of the odd and unusual for this past weekend. There are to main reasons for that, the first being that there was no humorous and/or quirky information of once in a great while. At least not by my standards. The second thing is that with the end of year quickly approaching I am working on annual activities for 6+ websites. Part of the pitfalls of having a diversified business. Of course you might have noticed my letter, the first of several to be sent to various politicians, that I sent to Senator Clinton. But there were 2 things I did want to speak about.
The first is the NBA basketball game between the New York Knicks and Denver Nuggets. This is ridiculous. There is no excuse for it. This was supposed to be a basketball game, not a boxing match. These are supposed to be professionals, and they are paid exorbitantly well to be professionals. Yet there seems to be a trend growing of basketball player fighting in the middle of a game.
There is no reason for this. The foul was unnecessary. The reaction to the foul can’t be tolerated. All because one team kept its first string players in at the end of a game that was all but won. I don’t get it. The Knicks had lost, does it matter who was on the floor? How does it change anything? The knocks had the option to keep the first-string on the court, and chose not to. Deal with it. It’s part of being a professional and playing a sport. Sometimes you lose and sometimes that loss is embarrassing. In the same way that children would be punished for being a bad sport in a similar situation, these players seem to need to be scolded.
From what I understand several players will not be allowed to play for multiple games (ranging from 15 to 1) from both teams. It’s been said that this will affect the incomes these players will receive. At the 15 game penalty end it’s said that it equates to about $750,000. Now considering that this is for the top scorer of the NBA, whom I guess makes about 20-30 million over 5 years, it’s a slap but on the wrists. I don’t follow basketball, it’s not my game – reminding me of tennis with way too many people, but assuming I’m right that means the penalty will reduce the pay for this year to 3.25 million dollars. Sounds bad at first glance except it doesn’t take into account that I’m using the low end numbers for my guess. It also doesn’t factor in the advertising deals that this player has, which probably generate 2x his NBA paycheck.
In essence the money may prevent him from getting a new car or wasting it on a party, but beyond giving him a tax break, and a mini-vacation, it has no real affect. The more that these players get for individual performance, and advertising contracts on that same basis, the less they are team players and just businessmen for hire. So the effect on the team is not a priority. Were it up to me I’d make sure he lost half his pay for the year, banned from playing any games for half the year, and if he had any sponsorship deals something special. And company that ran an ad for the player in question would be banned by the NBA for one year (of course they would have a one week grace period to pull the ads), this would be in effect while the player was ineligible to play. That penalty applies to every player involved in a fight, no matter who starts it. If a player gets hit, they have to back off and not get into a fight [an exception for preventing being beaten to a pulp and merely defending yourself from repeated blows is allowed].
Sound harsh? Well I think its multi-million dollar responsibility harsh. They took the job, the pay, and the responsibility goes with it. I never heard of Mr. Michael Jordan in a fight, or Mr. Kareem Abdul Jabbar, or Mr. Larry Bird. The game is the same as then, only the players and their egos have changed. And how much money they make. There is no excuse.
And yes I left out the players names; I’m disgusted with their actions and chose not to speak of them by name.
I’ll mention the second item from the weekend in a little bit.
This is what I think, what do you think?
The first is the NBA basketball game between the New York Knicks and Denver Nuggets. This is ridiculous. There is no excuse for it. This was supposed to be a basketball game, not a boxing match. These are supposed to be professionals, and they are paid exorbitantly well to be professionals. Yet there seems to be a trend growing of basketball player fighting in the middle of a game.
There is no reason for this. The foul was unnecessary. The reaction to the foul can’t be tolerated. All because one team kept its first string players in at the end of a game that was all but won. I don’t get it. The Knicks had lost, does it matter who was on the floor? How does it change anything? The knocks had the option to keep the first-string on the court, and chose not to. Deal with it. It’s part of being a professional and playing a sport. Sometimes you lose and sometimes that loss is embarrassing. In the same way that children would be punished for being a bad sport in a similar situation, these players seem to need to be scolded.
From what I understand several players will not be allowed to play for multiple games (ranging from 15 to 1) from both teams. It’s been said that this will affect the incomes these players will receive. At the 15 game penalty end it’s said that it equates to about $750,000. Now considering that this is for the top scorer of the NBA, whom I guess makes about 20-30 million over 5 years, it’s a slap but on the wrists. I don’t follow basketball, it’s not my game – reminding me of tennis with way too many people, but assuming I’m right that means the penalty will reduce the pay for this year to 3.25 million dollars. Sounds bad at first glance except it doesn’t take into account that I’m using the low end numbers for my guess. It also doesn’t factor in the advertising deals that this player has, which probably generate 2x his NBA paycheck.
In essence the money may prevent him from getting a new car or wasting it on a party, but beyond giving him a tax break, and a mini-vacation, it has no real affect. The more that these players get for individual performance, and advertising contracts on that same basis, the less they are team players and just businessmen for hire. So the effect on the team is not a priority. Were it up to me I’d make sure he lost half his pay for the year, banned from playing any games for half the year, and if he had any sponsorship deals something special. And company that ran an ad for the player in question would be banned by the NBA for one year (of course they would have a one week grace period to pull the ads), this would be in effect while the player was ineligible to play. That penalty applies to every player involved in a fight, no matter who starts it. If a player gets hit, they have to back off and not get into a fight [an exception for preventing being beaten to a pulp and merely defending yourself from repeated blows is allowed].
Sound harsh? Well I think its multi-million dollar responsibility harsh. They took the job, the pay, and the responsibility goes with it. I never heard of Mr. Michael Jordan in a fight, or Mr. Kareem Abdul Jabbar, or Mr. Larry Bird. The game is the same as then, only the players and their egos have changed. And how much money they make. There is no excuse.
And yes I left out the players names; I’m disgusted with their actions and chose not to speak of them by name.
I’ll mention the second item from the weekend in a little bit.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Wednesday, December 13, 2006
Miami Vice insight - 12.13.2006.1
I recently was watching the Miami Vice movie (starring Mr. Jamie Fox and Mr. Colin Farrell) with a friend. Let me mention a bit about the movie first. It’s not the version you might expect if you were a fan of the television series. While both men look the roles and mesh with each other mostly believably, little else from the television series survives to be in this movie. Most notable are the fact that the pace and music are far off.
The music of the show was catchy, somewhat in your face and upbeat. It matched the show perfectly and in every episode it helped to set the mood as much as the visuals of Miami did. In this movie the visuals are fantastic. The music is downbeat and virtually numbing. But it must be said that it fits the pace exactly. If you were hoping to hear the theme or even a version of Mr. Phil Collins song – In the Air – you will be disappointed. It doesn’t happen. If they crept it in there at any point I missed it. And I was looking for it.
As I’ve mentioned the pace is more reminiscent of the movie Grand Canyon than what you would think for Miami Vice. The focus of the majority of the film is the unlikely and sudden love story between Sonny Crochet and the Columbian crime bosses girl. This relationship feels forced and stupid. I mean as a supposed drug runner for a huge and vicious drug cartel, would you want to date the wife of the boss behind his back (and yet without regard in front of his various guards and frontman)? Not a smart move if you expect a long life. At least Tubbs relationship makes sense. But if you recall this is not supposed to be a romantic love story, it’s supposed to be an action/police drama movie. Someone forgot to mention this to the director and writers.
So I think you can tell I didn’t enjoy the movie. Were it titled something else and accurately promoted, I might have. But as a film that was supposed to live up to and pay homage to a popular 80’s action police drama it failed, badly.
Now there was something else that caught my attention. Not really about the movie, but caused by it. Early in the movie, Crochet and Tubbs are after a dealer, and he is speaking with a pimp in a trendy club. One of the girls being offered to the dealer seems to be upset [gee I can’t imagine why] and the pimp is not happy. He has her dragged to a secluded area in the club and begins to beat her. Tubbs thankfully has seen this, but is pulled away before he can get to the girl and do something about it.
My friend, from the small town I live in now, mentioned, “What is he doing? Do pimps act like that?” To which I stated of course. I then went on to mention what a real pimp acts like. That beating the women he derives his income from is a regular act and part of how he retains control. (I do realize that all pimps are not just men, but they all do act in the same manner) My friend was surprised. I was surprised that this wasn’t either known or obvious. It also made me think.
These days kids like to go around calling themselves pimps and pimpettes. They have no clue what they are talking about. Rappers and some entertainers say the same and are generally just as lost in the meaning. I think only Ice-T really understands the meaning, as he actually was doing this (by his own admission) long before he ever was interested in rap.
Movies, music videos and general ignorance on the meaning of words have lead to the illusion that such a lifestyle is in anyway glamorous or positive. Kids, or anyone who uses the term, should take a look at the hospital wards that these women frequent after being beaten by their pimp. I wish a film could be made that shows how a pimp really acts, not the censored scripted generic image given in most movies or the hyped glamorized version of videos. The reality just in that one scene, and the realization that the truth is far worse had a serious impact on my friend. I wish it had for everyone who saw the movie and misuses this term.
This is what I think, what do you think?
The music of the show was catchy, somewhat in your face and upbeat. It matched the show perfectly and in every episode it helped to set the mood as much as the visuals of Miami did. In this movie the visuals are fantastic. The music is downbeat and virtually numbing. But it must be said that it fits the pace exactly. If you were hoping to hear the theme or even a version of Mr. Phil Collins song – In the Air – you will be disappointed. It doesn’t happen. If they crept it in there at any point I missed it. And I was looking for it.
As I’ve mentioned the pace is more reminiscent of the movie Grand Canyon than what you would think for Miami Vice. The focus of the majority of the film is the unlikely and sudden love story between Sonny Crochet and the Columbian crime bosses girl. This relationship feels forced and stupid. I mean as a supposed drug runner for a huge and vicious drug cartel, would you want to date the wife of the boss behind his back (and yet without regard in front of his various guards and frontman)? Not a smart move if you expect a long life. At least Tubbs relationship makes sense. But if you recall this is not supposed to be a romantic love story, it’s supposed to be an action/police drama movie. Someone forgot to mention this to the director and writers.
So I think you can tell I didn’t enjoy the movie. Were it titled something else and accurately promoted, I might have. But as a film that was supposed to live up to and pay homage to a popular 80’s action police drama it failed, badly.
Now there was something else that caught my attention. Not really about the movie, but caused by it. Early in the movie, Crochet and Tubbs are after a dealer, and he is speaking with a pimp in a trendy club. One of the girls being offered to the dealer seems to be upset [gee I can’t imagine why] and the pimp is not happy. He has her dragged to a secluded area in the club and begins to beat her. Tubbs thankfully has seen this, but is pulled away before he can get to the girl and do something about it.
My friend, from the small town I live in now, mentioned, “What is he doing? Do pimps act like that?” To which I stated of course. I then went on to mention what a real pimp acts like. That beating the women he derives his income from is a regular act and part of how he retains control. (I do realize that all pimps are not just men, but they all do act in the same manner) My friend was surprised. I was surprised that this wasn’t either known or obvious. It also made me think.
These days kids like to go around calling themselves pimps and pimpettes. They have no clue what they are talking about. Rappers and some entertainers say the same and are generally just as lost in the meaning. I think only Ice-T really understands the meaning, as he actually was doing this (by his own admission) long before he ever was interested in rap.
Movies, music videos and general ignorance on the meaning of words have lead to the illusion that such a lifestyle is in anyway glamorous or positive. Kids, or anyone who uses the term, should take a look at the hospital wards that these women frequent after being beaten by their pimp. I wish a film could be made that shows how a pimp really acts, not the censored scripted generic image given in most movies or the hyped glamorized version of videos. The reality just in that one scene, and the realization that the truth is far worse had a serious impact on my friend. I wish it had for everyone who saw the movie and misuses this term.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Tuesday, December 12, 2006
Classical music to music video ripoffs - 12.12.2006.1
Well here are a few thoughts for the music lovers out there. For those who follow Kayne West, the latest news is about his Touch the Sky music video. Now some may be upset over this video failing to win the MTV European Awards. Mr. West was obviously upset about it as he threw a childish tantrum live on stage much to everyone’s surprise. But the fun did not end there.
The video has drawn a bit more attention though probably not what was intended. It seems the music video has a portrayal that rips off Mr. Evel Knievel. For the younger readers he is not some rock star, rapper, or character from a horror/slasher film. Mr. Knievel is a professional daredevil. He’s had a career that went from the 1960’s to the late 70’s. He has broken over 40 bones in his body due to failed attempts to jump the water fountain at Caesar’s Palace, 13 Pepsi delivery trucks, 13 British single decker buses and many others. Mr. Knievel set a world record for jumping 19 cars, and for selling over 100,000 tickets to consecutive shows at the Houston Astrodome. He’s been featured by ABC television’s Wide World of Sports program numerous times, the most famous ones being the Caesar’s Palace crash and his attempt to jump Snake River Canyon in a ‘motorcycle’ built by a NASA engineer. He has been inducted into the Motorcycle Hall of Fame, and had 2 movies made about his life and had toy sales reported to be around 350 million dollars. Not bad for a former thief, minor league hockey player, poacher, Army man and supporter of Elk wildlife.
So Kanye West sought to use this real-life bad boy and thrill-seeker to emulate in his music video. Too bad he didn’t ask first. It seems that Mr. Knievel is no fan of Kanye West or his portrayal. Actually Mr. Knievel is quoted as saying “That video that Kanye West put out is the most worthless piece of crap I've ever seen in my life, and he uses my image to catapult himself on the public “ and “The guy just went too far using me to promote his filth to the world .“ Considering his thoughts it’s no surprise that his is suing Kanye. I take it that he too wouldn’t have voted for the music video at the MTV Awards show. Doesn’t your heart just break for this apparently temperamental egomaniac?
For those interested in music, in particular the works of one Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart are now available online. Mozart was one of the original stars of music, not only for the volume of his works but also for their quality. Much like Mr. Michael Jackson in the 70’s Mozart started composing at age 5, and was already capable of playing several instruments at 4. By the time of his death he was making the equivalent of $42,000 a year (that put him in the top 5% of Europe at the time – Madonna, Michael and Janet Jackson combined don’t match that.)
Now I know some may not find this to be interesting. Some may even have never heard a single piece by the composer. But I feel if you haven’t learned to appreciate the classics you cannot truly appreciate the music that has come afterwards. Music is powerful and moving, when done right. Mozart is one of the greatest (though I do love Beethoven more) and it shows.
The scores of the actual music may not bring out how the music flows, or how it can make you feel, but it is the first step to that. If you can read the music, then maybe you can play it. If you play it you will know what I mean. I have to thank all my music teachers over the years, especially Mr. Seltzer, for giving me that insight. They expanded my music and helped to expand my mind. I can only hope to do a little of that for you.
This is what I think, what do you think?
The video has drawn a bit more attention though probably not what was intended. It seems the music video has a portrayal that rips off Mr. Evel Knievel. For the younger readers he is not some rock star, rapper, or character from a horror/slasher film. Mr. Knievel is a professional daredevil. He’s had a career that went from the 1960’s to the late 70’s. He has broken over 40 bones in his body due to failed attempts to jump the water fountain at Caesar’s Palace, 13 Pepsi delivery trucks, 13 British single decker buses and many others. Mr. Knievel set a world record for jumping 19 cars, and for selling over 100,000 tickets to consecutive shows at the Houston Astrodome. He’s been featured by ABC television’s Wide World of Sports program numerous times, the most famous ones being the Caesar’s Palace crash and his attempt to jump Snake River Canyon in a ‘motorcycle’ built by a NASA engineer. He has been inducted into the Motorcycle Hall of Fame, and had 2 movies made about his life and had toy sales reported to be around 350 million dollars. Not bad for a former thief, minor league hockey player, poacher, Army man and supporter of Elk wildlife.
So Kanye West sought to use this real-life bad boy and thrill-seeker to emulate in his music video. Too bad he didn’t ask first. It seems that Mr. Knievel is no fan of Kanye West or his portrayal. Actually Mr. Knievel is quoted as saying “That video that Kanye West put out is the most worthless piece of crap I've ever seen in my life, and he uses my image to catapult himself on the public “ and “The guy just went too far using me to promote his filth to the world .“ Considering his thoughts it’s no surprise that his is suing Kanye. I take it that he too wouldn’t have voted for the music video at the MTV Awards show. Doesn’t your heart just break for this apparently temperamental egomaniac?
For those interested in music, in particular the works of one Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart are now available online. Mozart was one of the original stars of music, not only for the volume of his works but also for their quality. Much like Mr. Michael Jackson in the 70’s Mozart started composing at age 5, and was already capable of playing several instruments at 4. By the time of his death he was making the equivalent of $42,000 a year (that put him in the top 5% of Europe at the time – Madonna, Michael and Janet Jackson combined don’t match that.)
Now I know some may not find this to be interesting. Some may even have never heard a single piece by the composer. But I feel if you haven’t learned to appreciate the classics you cannot truly appreciate the music that has come afterwards. Music is powerful and moving, when done right. Mozart is one of the greatest (though I do love Beethoven more) and it shows.
The scores of the actual music may not bring out how the music flows, or how it can make you feel, but it is the first step to that. If you can read the music, then maybe you can play it. If you play it you will know what I mean. I have to thank all my music teachers over the years, especially Mr. Seltzer, for giving me that insight. They expanded my music and helped to expand my mind. I can only hope to do a little of that for you.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Sunday, December 10, 2006
Will Smith as Chris Gardner - 12.10.2006.1
You may have noticed commercials for the latest movie by Mr. Will Smith on television lately. Like many people (myself included) you may not know what exactly the movie is about, or more importantly who. The movie is about Mr. Chris Gardner, and what he accomplished. The story is well worth having portrayed as a movie and deserves attention.
We have all heard the complaints some make for how their lives have turned out. You know, ‘If it weren’t for the white man I’d be better off’ or ‘a black man can’t get a break in a white world,’ or ‘it’s a conspiracy to hold us down,’ and so on. There is often a reason why someone else is preventing a person from doing better. Maybe in some cases that’s true. And there is no question that the odds are not in favor of an African American. That said, there is always a chance and a choice. If it is taken, the sky can open up. I don’t believe the saying that “The sky’s the limit, unless you are black and then the limit is the sky.” [I forget if the comedian that said this was Mr. D.L. Hughley or someone else – let me know if you are aware of who said it.] It seems Mr. Gardner feels the same.
Mr. Gardner is African American. He grew up without wealth, or well positioned family and friends. His childhood was not perfect nor what most would enjoy. He graduated high school without notice, and there was no college in his future. He joined the Navy and was stuck stateside as a proctology assistant. No glamour, no money, almost poor even by standards of the 80’s. Add to these apparent impediments the fact that his girlfriend left with his son, only to appear some time later and leave is son with him.
Yet with all these things Mr. Gardner became a stockbroker, no easy task and much harder for a Black man in the 80’s. The $1000 he made a month was almost the same I made as a trainee in the industry, considering the hours and difficulty of the work I can’t imagine doing it as a father with his young son. From this point he worked hard to become not only a successful broker, but eventually the owner of his own brokerage industry.
This is a story of someone not waiting for someone to give him anything. He earned every step he took. He overcame every obstacle. And if he could do it then, I can only imagine it to be that much easier for most everyone else. I applaud Mr. Gardner in his success.
And for those obsessed with what successful African Americans do to give back, Mr. Gardner has been a strong supporter of the Glide Memorial Church and its soup kitchen. He has provided money and clothing to those who are where he once was. I think his visage in film may be the greatest thing to give back to the community at large. Too few are known as successes, and too many because they can play a game well or because they can rhyme a few non-words to a piece of someone else’s music. It’s about time that we pay attention to the lessons that hard work, dedication and a mind can bring. If this story doesn’t inspire I can’t imagine anything that might.
This is what I think, what do you think?
We have all heard the complaints some make for how their lives have turned out. You know, ‘If it weren’t for the white man I’d be better off’ or ‘a black man can’t get a break in a white world,’ or ‘it’s a conspiracy to hold us down,’ and so on. There is often a reason why someone else is preventing a person from doing better. Maybe in some cases that’s true. And there is no question that the odds are not in favor of an African American. That said, there is always a chance and a choice. If it is taken, the sky can open up. I don’t believe the saying that “The sky’s the limit, unless you are black and then the limit is the sky.” [I forget if the comedian that said this was Mr. D.L. Hughley or someone else – let me know if you are aware of who said it.] It seems Mr. Gardner feels the same.
Mr. Gardner is African American. He grew up without wealth, or well positioned family and friends. His childhood was not perfect nor what most would enjoy. He graduated high school without notice, and there was no college in his future. He joined the Navy and was stuck stateside as a proctology assistant. No glamour, no money, almost poor even by standards of the 80’s. Add to these apparent impediments the fact that his girlfriend left with his son, only to appear some time later and leave is son with him.
Yet with all these things Mr. Gardner became a stockbroker, no easy task and much harder for a Black man in the 80’s. The $1000 he made a month was almost the same I made as a trainee in the industry, considering the hours and difficulty of the work I can’t imagine doing it as a father with his young son. From this point he worked hard to become not only a successful broker, but eventually the owner of his own brokerage industry.
This is a story of someone not waiting for someone to give him anything. He earned every step he took. He overcame every obstacle. And if he could do it then, I can only imagine it to be that much easier for most everyone else. I applaud Mr. Gardner in his success.
And for those obsessed with what successful African Americans do to give back, Mr. Gardner has been a strong supporter of the Glide Memorial Church and its soup kitchen. He has provided money and clothing to those who are where he once was. I think his visage in film may be the greatest thing to give back to the community at large. Too few are known as successes, and too many because they can play a game well or because they can rhyme a few non-words to a piece of someone else’s music. It’s about time that we pay attention to the lessons that hard work, dedication and a mind can bring. If this story doesn’t inspire I can’t imagine anything that might.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Friday, December 08, 2006
How we all supposedly measure up - 12.8.2006.3
Following my weekend odd news, here is some less than great news for women in India. Size may or may not be everything, but in this case at least it makes a difference. What I am referring to is a report out of Mumbai that states that condoms made to international standards are just too big for roughly 90% of Indian men. I’m just not sure how to continue to comment.
The international standards are 150-180mm (roughly 6.25 – 7.5 inches if my math is right) and Indian men – as per this 2 year study of 1400 men – were in the range of 100-156mm (about 4.2 – 6.5 inches) predominantly. I have to say that personally I feel bad for both groups if that is the standard. The numbers don’t apply to me. But beyond that this has to be embarrassing to the ego of millions of Indian men. The ramifications are more serious than just a deflated ego though, as India has the world’s largest caseload of HIV positives. The fact that condoms are not able to work properly is not just disconcerting, it has the potential for enormous health consequences. Either non-international standards need to be adopted or Bob – the Enzyte spokesman – needs to start doing commercials in Indo-Aryan and Dravidian.
On a side note, take heart men of India. I had to do some research on this subject and found that according to internet results the average size is 6.1 – 6.4 inches. According to varying information the average is 6.2 inches, with Caucasians having 6.22”, Blacks at 6.89”, Hispanics at 6.15” and Asians at 5.33”. I have no idea where this data was complied or how. I’m just happy I don’t fit anywhere near these categories.
This is just the tip of the iceberg [I know, what an obvious pun] in terms of what data is available. I have seen a report of how Black American and African men are preferred in Asia and Southeast Asia over any other group of men because of the ‘legend’ or presumed superiority of size. Of course there are also sites that counter the above data, with Caucasians having a mean of 6.5”, African Americans at 6.1”, Hispanics at 5.9” and East Asians at 5.5”. And for a dose of reality there is the mention of how inexact this all is at yet another site.
A Google search of the terms “American penis sizes” returns 1.2 million responses. Anyone in America, at least, knows that much of the spam mail is dedicated to trying to help improve whatever nature has provided. Obviously we can conclude from the various Viagra and Enzyte (and other similar drugs) commercials all men are somewhat insecure in this arena.
So if you are from India, or anywhere else, don’t worry. No matter the report, or condom, there is information (and products) to tell you that you are ok. Bottom line, if it works don’t worry.
I can’t believe I wrote about this.
This is what I think, what do you think?
The international standards are 150-180mm (roughly 6.25 – 7.5 inches if my math is right) and Indian men – as per this 2 year study of 1400 men – were in the range of 100-156mm (about 4.2 – 6.5 inches) predominantly. I have to say that personally I feel bad for both groups if that is the standard. The numbers don’t apply to me. But beyond that this has to be embarrassing to the ego of millions of Indian men. The ramifications are more serious than just a deflated ego though, as India has the world’s largest caseload of HIV positives. The fact that condoms are not able to work properly is not just disconcerting, it has the potential for enormous health consequences. Either non-international standards need to be adopted or Bob – the Enzyte spokesman – needs to start doing commercials in Indo-Aryan and Dravidian.
On a side note, take heart men of India. I had to do some research on this subject and found that according to internet results the average size is 6.1 – 6.4 inches. According to varying information the average is 6.2 inches, with Caucasians having 6.22”, Blacks at 6.89”, Hispanics at 6.15” and Asians at 5.33”. I have no idea where this data was complied or how. I’m just happy I don’t fit anywhere near these categories.
This is just the tip of the iceberg [I know, what an obvious pun] in terms of what data is available. I have seen a report of how Black American and African men are preferred in Asia and Southeast Asia over any other group of men because of the ‘legend’ or presumed superiority of size. Of course there are also sites that counter the above data, with Caucasians having a mean of 6.5”, African Americans at 6.1”, Hispanics at 5.9” and East Asians at 5.5”. And for a dose of reality there is the mention of how inexact this all is at yet another site.
A Google search of the terms “American penis sizes” returns 1.2 million responses. Anyone in America, at least, knows that much of the spam mail is dedicated to trying to help improve whatever nature has provided. Obviously we can conclude from the various Viagra and Enzyte (and other similar drugs) commercials all men are somewhat insecure in this arena.
So if you are from India, or anywhere else, don’t worry. No matter the report, or condom, there is information (and products) to tell you that you are ok. Bottom line, if it works don’t worry.
I can’t believe I wrote about this.
This is what I think, what do you think?
For a PS3, Clooney and Bollywood, a more 'real' COPS - 12.8.2006.2
In odd news, have you heard that a radio station offered a unique exchange. In return for a PS3 parents would receive a babysitter – a 24 year old bachelor with no experience with children, who stated he might take the kids to a bar with him. The station received 61 calls, only one from a man, to take up the offer. Why do these people who wanted the offer have kids? How can anyone be so, in my opinion, stupid? To give their child to a stranger, one that openly admits his inability to provide for the welfare of a child, for a minor material gain – that is to me a definition of bad parenting and insanity. By the way, according to Fox News on Friday the 8th @ 11.27am, those parents that sought the deal were reported to child welfare services. Who knows if that will have an effect, but one can only hope there will be a positive one.
Going further into the odd and perhaps stupid is news of the latest reality television show. (Why are they still making this crap?) This one doesn’t take place on an island or exotic landscapes across the country. This is based in Muncie, Indiana. Five B-list entertainers and celebrities have become part of the Muncie Police Department, and will be followed by cameras as they help to protect and serve the populace there. If I lived in Muncie I’d be scared.
While Mr. Eric Estrada may have the benefit that he is best known for his role as a California police officer, I cannot see the same potential respect going to Ms. Latoya Jackson. While each of the entertainers and celebrities were required to pass the same tests as a regular officer (Which seem insanely simple to me. Anyone should be able to run a mile and a half in 16 minutes, 30 sit-up in a minute, and 25 push-ups.) they will not be allowed to go off on their own. Each is accompanied by a regular officer. Still with the potential for danger that any confrontation with the law may provide this sounds like a bad idea. Muncie may feel that this will highlight their police force but I feel this diminishes the role and respect the police play in any community. Perhaps I will be wrong, and if so I will be happy to learn of that. Anyone who watches this television program is welcome to let me know what happens, but I will not be one of the viewers.
Continuing with the weekend of odd things, there is news that Mr. George Clooney desires to perform in a Bollywood movie. For those unfamiliar with Bollywood it is the Hindi film industry that features song and dance in it’s movies. I have seen some movies, the names of which I don’t recall now, and found it interesting though I don’t understand the language. Seeing a film in a foreign language is not a bad thing though as for me it allows me to focus on the acting and forces me to be immersed in the world the film creates. It works well for watching a play in Russian or Bollywood films, for me, and not as well when watching a film like Soul Plane. Yet to see Mr. Clooney in such a film would be interesting. Good actors should be good in any language, as are good movies. Passion of the Christ, classics like The Good, The Bad and The Ugly and others have long ago proven that. We’ll see what happens.
Going further into the odd and perhaps stupid is news of the latest reality television show. (Why are they still making this crap?) This one doesn’t take place on an island or exotic landscapes across the country. This is based in Muncie, Indiana. Five B-list entertainers and celebrities have become part of the Muncie Police Department, and will be followed by cameras as they help to protect and serve the populace there. If I lived in Muncie I’d be scared.
While Mr. Eric Estrada may have the benefit that he is best known for his role as a California police officer, I cannot see the same potential respect going to Ms. Latoya Jackson. While each of the entertainers and celebrities were required to pass the same tests as a regular officer (Which seem insanely simple to me. Anyone should be able to run a mile and a half in 16 minutes, 30 sit-up in a minute, and 25 push-ups.) they will not be allowed to go off on their own. Each is accompanied by a regular officer. Still with the potential for danger that any confrontation with the law may provide this sounds like a bad idea. Muncie may feel that this will highlight their police force but I feel this diminishes the role and respect the police play in any community. Perhaps I will be wrong, and if so I will be happy to learn of that. Anyone who watches this television program is welcome to let me know what happens, but I will not be one of the viewers.
Continuing with the weekend of odd things, there is news that Mr. George Clooney desires to perform in a Bollywood movie. For those unfamiliar with Bollywood it is the Hindi film industry that features song and dance in it’s movies. I have seen some movies, the names of which I don’t recall now, and found it interesting though I don’t understand the language. Seeing a film in a foreign language is not a bad thing though as for me it allows me to focus on the acting and forces me to be immersed in the world the film creates. It works well for watching a play in Russian or Bollywood films, for me, and not as well when watching a film like Soul Plane. Yet to see Mr. Clooney in such a film would be interesting. Good actors should be good in any language, as are good movies. Passion of the Christ, classics like The Good, The Bad and The Ugly and others have long ago proven that. We’ll see what happens.
Wesley Snipes arrives, CSI proves me wrong - 12.8.2006.1
First of all, I must say that I was wrong. I didn’t get it right at all. If you are wondering what I am referring to I mean my guess at the serial killer in the broadcast television show CSI: Crime Scene Investigation (as stated in my post Thoughts on this season of CSI - 11.4.2006.1). I had run through the various members of the CSI team, and had thought there could be a strong case made that Grissom, Sarah, or Greg were in fact the killer. This was proven to be completely incorrect.
In last nights episode the actual killer was revealed. The killer had nothing to do with the CSI team. My speculation missed on every point, except the exasperation that Grissom seems to be feeling. The weight of dealing with the worst of what human beings can do to each other is showing on Grissom, as Katherine and Sarah have noticed clearly last night. I think both might have some concern, to a degree. Considering the fact that Grissom is so quiet and internalized leads me to think that if he loses it, it will be an explosive event.
I hope that this part of the storyline is not an indication that Mr. William Petersen is planning on leaving the show. While I think the show could continue for a time, it’s Mr. Petersen’s Grissom that holds everything together. Grissom is the heart of the team, and its strength. Mr. Petersen has done a fantastic job of giving depth to an intellectual, deep thinking, cautious, and emotionally reserved character for several seasons now. Almost from the first episode it was this character that caused many to come back each week. The intensity of the character, the fear of being hurt, the desire to bring justice and truth, the potential girlfriends, and the evolving connection to Sarah have all been critical in the television shows success. I cannot see today how the program could continue long-term without him. But as we have all see, this is a program that is well written and not always going in the direction that we might expect or hope for (like the potential romance between Katherine and Warrick – which could have been interesting).
In current news, why is it that news media agencies are molding the voluntary surrender to authorities of Mr. Wesley Snipes as the cops actively moving in and arresting him? Mr. Snipes has returned from his work in Namibia, and as worked out surrendered to authorities peaceably. Yet if you listen to the soundbites on the news stations it sounds as if Mr. Snipes came back, got off a plane and authorities swooped in and arrested him like an episode of the television show COPS. This is untrue and unfair.
Mr. Snipes has not evaded arrest, has not resisted, nor hindered the authorities. Mr. Snipes was doing his job when authorities indicted him, and his work happened to place him overseas at the time. I have no doubt that the Government knew this fact, or could have known it if they chose to. To create a media event by claiming to be unaware of Mr. Snipe whereabouts, to structure this matter as if there was negative intent, is almost conspiratory. It just pisses me off. I hope Mr. Snipes is vindicated, and I’d love it if he were to see damages for the public charade that these irresponsible actions have created.
This is what I think, what do you think?
In last nights episode the actual killer was revealed. The killer had nothing to do with the CSI team. My speculation missed on every point, except the exasperation that Grissom seems to be feeling. The weight of dealing with the worst of what human beings can do to each other is showing on Grissom, as Katherine and Sarah have noticed clearly last night. I think both might have some concern, to a degree. Considering the fact that Grissom is so quiet and internalized leads me to think that if he loses it, it will be an explosive event.
I hope that this part of the storyline is not an indication that Mr. William Petersen is planning on leaving the show. While I think the show could continue for a time, it’s Mr. Petersen’s Grissom that holds everything together. Grissom is the heart of the team, and its strength. Mr. Petersen has done a fantastic job of giving depth to an intellectual, deep thinking, cautious, and emotionally reserved character for several seasons now. Almost from the first episode it was this character that caused many to come back each week. The intensity of the character, the fear of being hurt, the desire to bring justice and truth, the potential girlfriends, and the evolving connection to Sarah have all been critical in the television shows success. I cannot see today how the program could continue long-term without him. But as we have all see, this is a program that is well written and not always going in the direction that we might expect or hope for (like the potential romance between Katherine and Warrick – which could have been interesting).
In current news, why is it that news media agencies are molding the voluntary surrender to authorities of Mr. Wesley Snipes as the cops actively moving in and arresting him? Mr. Snipes has returned from his work in Namibia, and as worked out surrendered to authorities peaceably. Yet if you listen to the soundbites on the news stations it sounds as if Mr. Snipes came back, got off a plane and authorities swooped in and arrested him like an episode of the television show COPS. This is untrue and unfair.
Mr. Snipes has not evaded arrest, has not resisted, nor hindered the authorities. Mr. Snipes was doing his job when authorities indicted him, and his work happened to place him overseas at the time. I have no doubt that the Government knew this fact, or could have known it if they chose to. To create a media event by claiming to be unaware of Mr. Snipe whereabouts, to structure this matter as if there was negative intent, is almost conspiratory. It just pisses me off. I hope Mr. Snipes is vindicated, and I’d love it if he were to see damages for the public charade that these irresponsible actions have created.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Thursday, December 07, 2006
2006 an early review - 12.7.2006.2
Continued from Early thoughts about 2006 part 1 ...
We have lost many people this year. Far too many to name and their impact has been felt all to hard. In ways this has been a normal year, but then again not. It’s interesting that in writing this blog I have noticed that the years pass more quickly now as I am approaching 40, yet the days can drag on far longer than when I was in my 20’s.
Personally there has been a lot that has happened. I learned how deceptive some people can be, even when I thought I knew how to spot that nature in a person. I’ve come a step closer to attaining my lifelong goals in the material sense; and have come to terms with not attaining some of the more grand non-material ones. I’ve improved my writing (I think) and with it regained the deep thought I had in my erratic youth. I remember that looking at the world from the top down is not always the best answer and that others may not see it that way. Maybe most important for me I have found a way to give back something to the world at large and the Black African American and Latino/Hispanic communities that have given me so much so far in my life.
This blog, and my other sites, are not about wealth. It would be nice, but if it never comes I lose nothing. It’s about sharing the knowledge I have and continue to gain. But if the Buddha were to speak in a cave and nothing was around the wisdom would be lost to the wind. [Not a proverb, just something I thought up]
I hope to expand the visitors to the blogs and my online store in 2007. I hope that the upcoming year will be one filled with positive events, or at least more positve than negative. Perhaps this new year will signal the end of beligerent terms used as casual language, the end of wars of words and bullets started in the particular name of God, and maybe this new year will see the emergence of celebrities and entertainers recoginzing the impact they have on the youth – especially those of Black African American and Latino/Hispanic heritage.
I’ll speak more about the year 2006 has been in the days to come. Until then…
This is what I think, what do you think?
We have lost many people this year. Far too many to name and their impact has been felt all to hard. In ways this has been a normal year, but then again not. It’s interesting that in writing this blog I have noticed that the years pass more quickly now as I am approaching 40, yet the days can drag on far longer than when I was in my 20’s.
Personally there has been a lot that has happened. I learned how deceptive some people can be, even when I thought I knew how to spot that nature in a person. I’ve come a step closer to attaining my lifelong goals in the material sense; and have come to terms with not attaining some of the more grand non-material ones. I’ve improved my writing (I think) and with it regained the deep thought I had in my erratic youth. I remember that looking at the world from the top down is not always the best answer and that others may not see it that way. Maybe most important for me I have found a way to give back something to the world at large and the Black African American and Latino/Hispanic communities that have given me so much so far in my life.
This blog, and my other sites, are not about wealth. It would be nice, but if it never comes I lose nothing. It’s about sharing the knowledge I have and continue to gain. But if the Buddha were to speak in a cave and nothing was around the wisdom would be lost to the wind. [Not a proverb, just something I thought up]
I hope to expand the visitors to the blogs and my online store in 2007. I hope that the upcoming year will be one filled with positive events, or at least more positve than negative. Perhaps this new year will signal the end of beligerent terms used as casual language, the end of wars of words and bullets started in the particular name of God, and maybe this new year will see the emergence of celebrities and entertainers recoginzing the impact they have on the youth – especially those of Black African American and Latino/Hispanic heritage.
I’ll speak more about the year 2006 has been in the days to come. Until then…
This is what I think, what do you think?
Early thoughts about 2006 - 12.7.2006.1
Here we are at the end of 2006. What a year it has been. Beyond the usual celebrity hook-ups and break-ups there have been events that have caught the attention for a moment and there have been those that have had an impact. Black Entertainment USA has captured some of those moments, I hope. I know that it has caught tens of thousands of visitors attention, and for that I am very thankful. Personally it has been a year of challenges growth and potential. I suppose in a way the site reflects me directly on a level beyond my writing.
So far this year I have spoken about television commercials, rappers, theatrical movies, world cup soccer, cable television and broadcast television programs, efforts by celebrities to support causes, reviews of books and movies, comments on entertainers and being a watchdog of the media to name just a few things. 2006 has marked the passing of several memorable figures and the birth of a couple of very popular new celebrities-to-be. There have been losses of life that should never have happened and the continuation of conflicts that seem to have no end. At several points the year has been marked by absolute idiocy, in my opinion, and many times there have been events that the word odd seems to barely describe.
Through all these events many of you, my readers, have stuck around to hear my perhaps opinionated and overly-sensitive comments on it all. That has been one of the best things to happen for me all year. Because of you, I have been able to launch www.mvass.com (formerly http:vasandtheworld.blogspot.com) and create M V Consulting, Inc. In addition I have been able to create the www.cafepress.com/nova68 online store which features some of my poetry and various sayings. If success is measured by the things we are able to attempt, I have had enormous success this year. I am no fool, I know that it is due to your interest and not my ability alone.
I have tried to highlight the events and celebrities that have made a difference this year. Some have been positive like Ice cube (FX television shows and quality TV), Dave Chappelle (What Dave Chappelle and James Lipton gave me), Bill Cosby (Musings based on Mr. Bill Cosby's words), and several others. Some have been horrendous like Mel Gibson (Mel Gibson, strip poker, MTV and Harold Scott), Michael Richards (Michael Richards - 11.21.2006.2), and others. Yet more have just been cotroversial like Madonna, OJ Simpson, Snoop Dogg, and Michael J. Fox. In all I have tried to cover the items of impact. I think I’ve done well for just one man.
Continued in part 2...
So far this year I have spoken about television commercials, rappers, theatrical movies, world cup soccer, cable television and broadcast television programs, efforts by celebrities to support causes, reviews of books and movies, comments on entertainers and being a watchdog of the media to name just a few things. 2006 has marked the passing of several memorable figures and the birth of a couple of very popular new celebrities-to-be. There have been losses of life that should never have happened and the continuation of conflicts that seem to have no end. At several points the year has been marked by absolute idiocy, in my opinion, and many times there have been events that the word odd seems to barely describe.
Through all these events many of you, my readers, have stuck around to hear my perhaps opinionated and overly-sensitive comments on it all. That has been one of the best things to happen for me all year. Because of you, I have been able to launch www.mvass.com (formerly http:vasandtheworld.blogspot.com) and create M V Consulting, Inc. In addition I have been able to create the www.cafepress.com/nova68 online store which features some of my poetry and various sayings. If success is measured by the things we are able to attempt, I have had enormous success this year. I am no fool, I know that it is due to your interest and not my ability alone.
I have tried to highlight the events and celebrities that have made a difference this year. Some have been positive like Ice cube (FX television shows and quality TV), Dave Chappelle (What Dave Chappelle and James Lipton gave me), Bill Cosby (Musings based on Mr. Bill Cosby's words), and several others. Some have been horrendous like Mel Gibson (Mel Gibson, strip poker, MTV and Harold Scott), Michael Richards (Michael Richards - 11.21.2006.2), and others. Yet more have just been cotroversial like Madonna, OJ Simpson, Snoop Dogg, and Michael J. Fox. In all I have tried to cover the items of impact. I think I’ve done well for just one man.
Continued in part 2...
Wednesday, December 06, 2006
What I feel about Andy Dick - 12.6.2006.2
In different thoughts, a seriously annoying thing was reported today. Comedian Mr. Andy Dick has followed in the footsteps of Mr. Michael Richards, including an apology announced today. Now I need to mention that I do not find Mr. Dick to be funny at all. Other than is role on NewsRadio nothing I have seen him in has worked for me. So given that, hearing about this incident is no surprise.
What happened is that Mr. Dick was heckling a comedian and then joined him onstage in discussing (or making fun of – it’s not clear) Mr. Richards. Once this was finished Mr. Dick left the stage, but not before shouting at the crowd “You’re all a bunch of ----!”
Well isn’t that nice. It seems that the intent was to make a joke on what happened. Kind of a political commentary. Of course it didn’t work. Again I am amazed that Mr. Dick left the area unscathed, much like my surprise with Mr. Richards. Perhaps these men, and others need to double check the meaning of this term [I spoke about that in More old thoughts among other places] or just stick to using it in practiced material. It’s not a race thing, anyone can fall flat with this term, it’s an ugly offensive term that most use because they either don’t fully understand its meaning or because they do.
Up until 1992 this term has always had a derogatory meaning. Even the best comedian, using this term in the best application during his routine, acknowledged that. Mr. Richard Pryor stated in one of his last performances on-stage that no one should be called that. Mr. Pryor mentioned that he was sorry to have used the term. But when he did so, it was not as casual as it may have seemed on the surface, like much of his comedy. I’d venture to say that even Mr. Dave Chappelle has the full meaning strongly in mind when he has used it. To casually bandy it about, or to use it without understanding invites the anger it incites.
Perhaps I am wrong though. This may simply have been an attempt to garner attention by Mr. Andy Dick. Perhaps this was seen as a means to get the public’s attention, under the thought “There is no bad publicity.” Generally that may be true, but if this was merely a scheme to get media coverage then Mr. Dick needs to seek a new profession in my opinion.
This is what I think, what do you think?
What happened is that Mr. Dick was heckling a comedian and then joined him onstage in discussing (or making fun of – it’s not clear) Mr. Richards. Once this was finished Mr. Dick left the stage, but not before shouting at the crowd “You’re all a bunch of ----!”
Well isn’t that nice. It seems that the intent was to make a joke on what happened. Kind of a political commentary. Of course it didn’t work. Again I am amazed that Mr. Dick left the area unscathed, much like my surprise with Mr. Richards. Perhaps these men, and others need to double check the meaning of this term [I spoke about that in More old thoughts among other places] or just stick to using it in practiced material. It’s not a race thing, anyone can fall flat with this term, it’s an ugly offensive term that most use because they either don’t fully understand its meaning or because they do.
Up until 1992 this term has always had a derogatory meaning. Even the best comedian, using this term in the best application during his routine, acknowledged that. Mr. Richard Pryor stated in one of his last performances on-stage that no one should be called that. Mr. Pryor mentioned that he was sorry to have used the term. But when he did so, it was not as casual as it may have seemed on the surface, like much of his comedy. I’d venture to say that even Mr. Dave Chappelle has the full meaning strongly in mind when he has used it. To casually bandy it about, or to use it without understanding invites the anger it incites.
Perhaps I am wrong though. This may simply have been an attempt to garner attention by Mr. Andy Dick. Perhaps this was seen as a means to get the public’s attention, under the thought “There is no bad publicity.” Generally that may be true, but if this was merely a scheme to get media coverage then Mr. Dick needs to seek a new profession in my opinion.
This is what I think, what do you think?
ESPN magazine commercial - 12.6.2006.1
Has anyone seen the ESPN Magazine commercial? I saw it for the first time Monday night at 12:43am on ESPN. To say the least I was not amused, but perhaps I am too sensitive. I’ve been told that some of my television commercial evaluations are far too subjective. So tell me what you think.
The commercial goes as follows. An agent and a young player come into an office where an owner is standing. After everyone takes their seats the owner says ‘so how do you like the deal?’ The agent responds , ’56 million dollars right? That sounds like a great deal to me. I think it’s a great deal for us.’ The player complains ’56 million is ok but what about the subscription. I told you there was no deal without a subscription to ESPN Magazine.’ The owner states, ‘You want my subscription to ESPN? I don’t know if I can do that.’ The player says, ‘I can’t do the deal without it.’ Then the television commercial breaks to commentary about the magazine and the complementary MP3 player. When we return to the scenario the player agent and owner are all standing by the door. The owner says, ‘Alright I’ll give you my subscription to ESPN Magazine, but can I get the MP3 player? Maybe use it every other week?’ The player takes the MP3 saying, ‘We’ll think about it’ and then walks out the door. End of commercial.
Obviously there is a Black male in this television commercial. Now take a moment. Imagine that everyone was white. Does this commercial seem particularly stupid? Given that sports magazine commercials are extremely far from logical or coherent, this one seems even further. So who in the commercial is the Black male?
If you instantly assumed even before this point that the athlete was African American, well that says something about the culture and society today. The answer is the athlete. And thus I am highly aggravated. The young Black man seems incredibly stupid. Even for a ridiculous commercial this seems stupid. Maybe it’s me but it annoyed me. How about you?
This is what I think, what do you think?
The commercial goes as follows. An agent and a young player come into an office where an owner is standing. After everyone takes their seats the owner says ‘so how do you like the deal?’ The agent responds , ’56 million dollars right? That sounds like a great deal to me. I think it’s a great deal for us.’ The player complains ’56 million is ok but what about the subscription. I told you there was no deal without a subscription to ESPN Magazine.’ The owner states, ‘You want my subscription to ESPN? I don’t know if I can do that.’ The player says, ‘I can’t do the deal without it.’ Then the television commercial breaks to commentary about the magazine and the complementary MP3 player. When we return to the scenario the player agent and owner are all standing by the door. The owner says, ‘Alright I’ll give you my subscription to ESPN Magazine, but can I get the MP3 player? Maybe use it every other week?’ The player takes the MP3 saying, ‘We’ll think about it’ and then walks out the door. End of commercial.
Obviously there is a Black male in this television commercial. Now take a moment. Imagine that everyone was white. Does this commercial seem particularly stupid? Given that sports magazine commercials are extremely far from logical or coherent, this one seems even further. So who in the commercial is the Black male?
If you instantly assumed even before this point that the athlete was African American, well that says something about the culture and society today. The answer is the athlete. And thus I am highly aggravated. The young Black man seems incredibly stupid. Even for a ridiculous commercial this seems stupid. Maybe it’s me but it annoyed me. How about you?
This is what I think, what do you think?
Tuesday, December 05, 2006
Jackie Chan hurt, Stephen Colbert challenge - 12.5.2006.2
Ok, the gauntlet has been raised. Yes a challenge has been leveled and I think we must rally to it. Now the challenge has not been placed upon me or this site. But for those of us who are familiar with Mr. Stephen Colbert and his show it’s a challenge only the fans can take up. Some may recall the greenscreen challenge that Mr. Colbert made for his fans. In essence it was Mr. Colbert fighting with a lightsaber with a greenscreen background that would allow fans to place whatever they wished around Mr. Colbert. There were many submissions, which were quite good. Even Mr. George Lucas provided one, which took 2nd place if you can believe it.
Like with most things that are original, a copycat has appeared. In this case it is the Decemberists, a band of some sort (I am not familiar with them), that has asked its fans to also use their greenscreen effect in creating a new music video for the band. Originality in music videos is a long forgotten art, so I’m not surprised. But when the band was called on this copycat action, they responded by challenging Mr. Colbert to a guitar solo greenscreen.
Now fans of Mr. Colbert have already proved their abilities. I think this second opportunity will equally be dramatic and pleasing. The Decemberists are in for more than they expected on this one. Rally I say. Let the creative juices flow. And to Mr. George Lucas I ask for a second try. You are a first-rate director and visionary and it is time to redeem yourself. Plus I would love to see what Mr. Lucas would do with a music video.
As for fans of Mr. Jackie Chan, like myself, take heart in the news that Mr. Chan is ok. It seems that a recent injury was further aggravated during filming of Rush Hour 3. [Why is there going to be a 3rd movie I have no idea.] I find it amazing that this 52 year-old man is capable of still performing his own stunts. Other so called action stars take note; at 52 Mr. Chan still can whoop your butts. I have no doubt that Mr. Chan is the guy I’d want on my side in a bar fight. Heck, I’d think he could take on the bar fight by himself. The fact is that the man is a master of EVERY martial arts form out there. And when you see him in action in a movie it shows.
Still fans worry every time there is news of an injury. I mean how many times can Mr. Chan be hit by a steel reinforced table, or jump off a 3-story roof to a 2nd story ledge breaking his leg, or get run over by a hovercraft without injury? I love watching Mr. Chan, but the fact is that as he is getting older these past injuries are bound to have an effect. Especially since he does not use wire effects, like some good but retired movie martial artists.
Enjoy the movies we do get to see him in. I feel that we may not see him making these movies much longer. Because of retirement and only that reason I hope. Bruce Lee was a tragic loss, and sudden. I have no desire to relive that, nor do fans I think.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Like with most things that are original, a copycat has appeared. In this case it is the Decemberists, a band of some sort (I am not familiar with them), that has asked its fans to also use their greenscreen effect in creating a new music video for the band. Originality in music videos is a long forgotten art, so I’m not surprised. But when the band was called on this copycat action, they responded by challenging Mr. Colbert to a guitar solo greenscreen.
Now fans of Mr. Colbert have already proved their abilities. I think this second opportunity will equally be dramatic and pleasing. The Decemberists are in for more than they expected on this one. Rally I say. Let the creative juices flow. And to Mr. George Lucas I ask for a second try. You are a first-rate director and visionary and it is time to redeem yourself. Plus I would love to see what Mr. Lucas would do with a music video.
As for fans of Mr. Jackie Chan, like myself, take heart in the news that Mr. Chan is ok. It seems that a recent injury was further aggravated during filming of Rush Hour 3. [Why is there going to be a 3rd movie I have no idea.] I find it amazing that this 52 year-old man is capable of still performing his own stunts. Other so called action stars take note; at 52 Mr. Chan still can whoop your butts. I have no doubt that Mr. Chan is the guy I’d want on my side in a bar fight. Heck, I’d think he could take on the bar fight by himself. The fact is that the man is a master of EVERY martial arts form out there. And when you see him in action in a movie it shows.
Still fans worry every time there is news of an injury. I mean how many times can Mr. Chan be hit by a steel reinforced table, or jump off a 3-story roof to a 2nd story ledge breaking his leg, or get run over by a hovercraft without injury? I love watching Mr. Chan, but the fact is that as he is getting older these past injuries are bound to have an effect. Especially since he does not use wire effects, like some good but retired movie martial artists.
Enjoy the movies we do get to see him in. I feel that we may not see him making these movies much longer. Because of retirement and only that reason I hope. Bruce Lee was a tragic loss, and sudden. I have no desire to relive that, nor do fans I think.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Cops as rap producers, broadway to movie serious talent - 12.5.2006.1
What is going on in America these days? Actually I should say for some time now. I mean the presumption that Black men, and Black culture, are defined in a specific manner. Far too many believe that ALL African American men live the ‘thug’ life, or wish to be nothing more than rappers and basketball players. That is those who don’t chose to be drug dealers, pimps or addicts.
For those that doubt this take a look at what happened recently in Tempe, Arizona. A police officer recently pulled over a car with 2 Black men in it. He had pulled them over to give them a littering ticket, but gave them the option to not get the ticket if they would perform a rap for him. They did so and the whole thing was captured on tape and played on the cable channel show Tempe StreetBeat.
Now some may disagree, but I find that insulting and infuriating. Why is it that the assumption is that I MUST be into rap just because of my skin color? What gives anyone the right to act on that assumption, especially to my detriment, and assume as this officer and whoever Ok’d the program did that this was normal behavior? It’s not just this one incident, because the culture gave precedent to the act. Still I would expect common sense to say this was not right. Obviously that was not the case.
But in other news there are some interesting things going on. The upcoming movie Dreamgirls, an adaptation of the Broadway play, is soon to hit the screens. The play was phenomenal and eye-opening. If you don’t feel for Effie then you must be emotionally stunted, I think. I’m not very emotional or expressive and it got me. I have no doubt the movie will be just as good considering that Mr. Jamie Foxx, Mr. Eddie Murphy, Ms. Beyonce Knowles and Ms. Jennifer Hudson are all in it.
While Ms. Knowles may be the weak link, having almost the least experience, it’s the least experienced that is getting Oscar buzz. Ms. Hudson is getting noticed for the portrayal and singing in her role of Effie White. It’s a great thing that this character and actress are being noticed as that’s exactly what is not happening in the story line. It’s about time that women of talent, that don’t match the ‘twiggy’ ‘wanna-be-anorexic’ blonde theme are recognized for their abilities. Talent is never limited to a transitory societal image of beauty; whether that image is confined to color, size, ethnic or other variables. And that is one of the themes of the how thing.
Just a few things to think about.
This is what I think, what do you think?
For those that doubt this take a look at what happened recently in Tempe, Arizona. A police officer recently pulled over a car with 2 Black men in it. He had pulled them over to give them a littering ticket, but gave them the option to not get the ticket if they would perform a rap for him. They did so and the whole thing was captured on tape and played on the cable channel show Tempe StreetBeat.
Now some may disagree, but I find that insulting and infuriating. Why is it that the assumption is that I MUST be into rap just because of my skin color? What gives anyone the right to act on that assumption, especially to my detriment, and assume as this officer and whoever Ok’d the program did that this was normal behavior? It’s not just this one incident, because the culture gave precedent to the act. Still I would expect common sense to say this was not right. Obviously that was not the case.
But in other news there are some interesting things going on. The upcoming movie Dreamgirls, an adaptation of the Broadway play, is soon to hit the screens. The play was phenomenal and eye-opening. If you don’t feel for Effie then you must be emotionally stunted, I think. I’m not very emotional or expressive and it got me. I have no doubt the movie will be just as good considering that Mr. Jamie Foxx, Mr. Eddie Murphy, Ms. Beyonce Knowles and Ms. Jennifer Hudson are all in it.
While Ms. Knowles may be the weak link, having almost the least experience, it’s the least experienced that is getting Oscar buzz. Ms. Hudson is getting noticed for the portrayal and singing in her role of Effie White. It’s a great thing that this character and actress are being noticed as that’s exactly what is not happening in the story line. It’s about time that women of talent, that don’t match the ‘twiggy’ ‘wanna-be-anorexic’ blonde theme are recognized for their abilities. Talent is never limited to a transitory societal image of beauty; whether that image is confined to color, size, ethnic or other variables. And that is one of the themes of the how thing.
Just a few things to think about.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Sunday, December 03, 2006
The Librarian on TNT - 12.3.2006.1
Did anyone see the Librarian telemovie on TNT tonight? I saw the first movie because I think that actor Mr. Noah Wyle is quite good. If you saw his work on the live broadcast of Fail Safe (reprising the role played originally by Mr. Larry Hagman) I think you would agree with my assessment. The first Librarian movie was also a confirmation of his abilities to convey a different character than that of Dr. Carter, yet no less enjoyable.
In the first movie we got to see the character, Flynn, as he realized what his life’s goal truly was. Being THE librarian. Protector and collector of various legendary, religious, and mythological items. A nice job if you can handle it. In this the second movie we see that he continues to do his work well. Though not without a few incidents of turmoil, which is good because James Bond the character isn’t. Still he’s better than your average geek, thanks to Judson and Excalibur.
The second story focuses on King Solomon but this is no Mel Gibson Christianity storyline. It’s more in the line of Indiana Jones, not taking a theological look but using it as fodder for the plot. If you look carefully you may see a secondary character from the first Mummy movie. It’s a nice flow to the movie. The confidence of the Flynn character has grown dramatically.
The movie is fun. And much like the Indiana Jones movies, Flynn has a new love interest. I don’t like her. Ms. Emily Davenport is Gabrielle, an equally nerdish uber-geek. As much as Flynn may know Gabrielle is insistent that she knows more. Score one for the feminist movement. Gabrielle does help out in several situations, though none that are so critical that Flynn couldn’t have figured it out (except once at the end, but that feels a bit contrived and justifying why she was there anyway). Ms. Davenport does a decent job, but I for one just can’t accept the love interest and thus her work is reduced for me. It’s because she looks anorexic and I can’t see how anyone would find that attractive.
Yes, anorexic. In several scenes where her femininity is supposed to shine through we get to see her exposed back; the outline of her shoulder blades and spine are glaringly apparent. I’ve known many petite and slender women, this was far more extreme. There are no curves that would make such a bony woman attractive. But that is my preference.
And why they replaced the original love interest I don’t know. There was a strong appeal to Ms. Sonya Walger’s Nicole. Nicole was shapely, physically strong, intelligent, and had a valuable purpose to the storyline. Gabrielle really doesn’t have any of those traits. [Gabrielle may be intelligent, but as I said it never really appears as a factor and so means nothing really] The connection between Nicole and Flynn was believable and fun. Losing her was not worth having another chance to watch Mrs. Olympia Dukakis try to set up Flynn with a girlfriend again. [Especially since it’s with his 3rd cousin whom he seem to know marginally – creepy] And there was not a single mention of what happened to Nicole or why she was not still dating Flynn. I spent the first ½ hour or so waiting for her to appear or hear an explanation. If you expect to find out anything or see her, sorry you will lose on that.
Beyond that, the traps and tricks are a bit toned down. The pace a bit slower. And many aspects are borrowed from other films (Casablanca, the Jones films, Tomb Raider and others) some of which will be lost on younger viewers. One nice thing is the expression of honor shown by Mr. Hakeem Kae-Kazim. It’s nice to see characters fulfilling their oaths. Mr. Bob Newhart’s Judson reminds me more and more of Mr. Ricardo Montalban’s Roarke.
Overall it’s a good movie; as good as anything you probably would have paid 8-10 dollars to see in the movie theatre in the last several months.
This is what I think, what do you think?
In the first movie we got to see the character, Flynn, as he realized what his life’s goal truly was. Being THE librarian. Protector and collector of various legendary, religious, and mythological items. A nice job if you can handle it. In this the second movie we see that he continues to do his work well. Though not without a few incidents of turmoil, which is good because James Bond the character isn’t. Still he’s better than your average geek, thanks to Judson and Excalibur.
The second story focuses on King Solomon but this is no Mel Gibson Christianity storyline. It’s more in the line of Indiana Jones, not taking a theological look but using it as fodder for the plot. If you look carefully you may see a secondary character from the first Mummy movie. It’s a nice flow to the movie. The confidence of the Flynn character has grown dramatically.
The movie is fun. And much like the Indiana Jones movies, Flynn has a new love interest. I don’t like her. Ms. Emily Davenport is Gabrielle, an equally nerdish uber-geek. As much as Flynn may know Gabrielle is insistent that she knows more. Score one for the feminist movement. Gabrielle does help out in several situations, though none that are so critical that Flynn couldn’t have figured it out (except once at the end, but that feels a bit contrived and justifying why she was there anyway). Ms. Davenport does a decent job, but I for one just can’t accept the love interest and thus her work is reduced for me. It’s because she looks anorexic and I can’t see how anyone would find that attractive.
Yes, anorexic. In several scenes where her femininity is supposed to shine through we get to see her exposed back; the outline of her shoulder blades and spine are glaringly apparent. I’ve known many petite and slender women, this was far more extreme. There are no curves that would make such a bony woman attractive. But that is my preference.
And why they replaced the original love interest I don’t know. There was a strong appeal to Ms. Sonya Walger’s Nicole. Nicole was shapely, physically strong, intelligent, and had a valuable purpose to the storyline. Gabrielle really doesn’t have any of those traits. [Gabrielle may be intelligent, but as I said it never really appears as a factor and so means nothing really] The connection between Nicole and Flynn was believable and fun. Losing her was not worth having another chance to watch Mrs. Olympia Dukakis try to set up Flynn with a girlfriend again. [Especially since it’s with his 3rd cousin whom he seem to know marginally – creepy] And there was not a single mention of what happened to Nicole or why she was not still dating Flynn. I spent the first ½ hour or so waiting for her to appear or hear an explanation. If you expect to find out anything or see her, sorry you will lose on that.
Beyond that, the traps and tricks are a bit toned down. The pace a bit slower. And many aspects are borrowed from other films (Casablanca, the Jones films, Tomb Raider and others) some of which will be lost on younger viewers. One nice thing is the expression of honor shown by Mr. Hakeem Kae-Kazim. It’s nice to see characters fulfilling their oaths. Mr. Bob Newhart’s Judson reminds me more and more of Mr. Ricardo Montalban’s Roarke.
Overall it’s a good movie; as good as anything you probably would have paid 8-10 dollars to see in the movie theatre in the last several months.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Saturday, December 02, 2006
A new spray for men, the things entertainers do - 12.2.2006.1
Well it’s the weekend and that means it’s time for me to discuss the weird and unusual out in the world. And there is always something weird or offbeat happening somewhere. Case in point is the latest news in STD (sexually transmitted disease) prevention. I know, it’s a fun topic that everyone is dying to talk about. Of course if you don’t it’s possible you could die these days.
This little tidbit comes from our friends in Germany. I never cease to be amazed at the ingenuity of the German people. But this new invention takes the cake. It’s a new innovation on the old condom. I’m not talking about a new color or flavor, or other such decoration. No the idea is application. While there has long been the thought that one size fits all, these German entrepreneurs have realized that it’s just not true. The solution is a spray-on condom. Yes this is not some sci-fi, Jetsons kind of thought but a real device.
Custom fit and yes there are color options too. While this could be a useful tool, and perhaps easier to use it just seems odd. Like many of these types of stories I have to wonder, where did the idea come from? What would provoke such a need, as that is where invention comes from. And how in the world have they been able to test this? That would be a funny job description indeed.
More to the entertainment side of things are the recent actions of Mr. Danny De Vito. Of late there have been several entertainers and celebrities that have made the news for their drunken actions. While some are encouraging, like the news that Ms. Lindsey Lohan is now going to AA, there is an abundance of those that are not, like Mr. Mel Gibson. [Some don’t even have the weak excuse of intoxication, like Mr. Michael Richards or Ms. Britney Spears] Considering these extremes the actions of Mr. De Vito are hardly terrifying or shocking.
Yet the trend of accepting any type of behavior that celebrities and entertainers publicly display is not great. I do not condemn Mr. De Vito or Mr. Clooney a night out of drinking. That’s human nature to have a good night out with friends. Yet appearing on television, still inebriated, and making caustic remarks in bawdy language is not. And to brush it off is not just odd, it’s irresponsible.
What is weird is that, more and more, the actions that once may have seemed odd are becoming accepted. Whether it’s a MILF in training t-shirt, or drunken insults based on faith, or a tirade of racial slurs it seems like there is no outrage or concern. Almost like the people who stand around looking at a car wreck but doing nothing to help those in it. It seems that unless you are acquitted of a murder charge, and write a book on it, everything is ok. Attempted murder, arson, potential sex with minors, drugs and so much more; yet those entertainers who commit these acts just go on and continue to work with barely a pause. Think about it, pick a sport or music genre or acting venue and you can find several people that fit the above. [If you don’t want to think about it my quick list includes Left Eye, R. Kelly, Snoop Dogg, Michael Jackson, Britney Spears, Pamela Anderson and so on.]
Another weird fact these days is the obsession with stupid facts. There are more people trying to find out about, and comment on, the lack of underwear of some entertainers than those concerned about the health of other entertainers. I’d bet that the ratio of people searching the net about the above mentioned observation vs. those finding out more about the health of the Yellow Wiggle is probably 15:1. If that doesn’t qualify as odd or weird then what does?
This is what I think, what do you think?
This little tidbit comes from our friends in Germany. I never cease to be amazed at the ingenuity of the German people. But this new invention takes the cake. It’s a new innovation on the old condom. I’m not talking about a new color or flavor, or other such decoration. No the idea is application. While there has long been the thought that one size fits all, these German entrepreneurs have realized that it’s just not true. The solution is a spray-on condom. Yes this is not some sci-fi, Jetsons kind of thought but a real device.
Custom fit and yes there are color options too. While this could be a useful tool, and perhaps easier to use it just seems odd. Like many of these types of stories I have to wonder, where did the idea come from? What would provoke such a need, as that is where invention comes from. And how in the world have they been able to test this? That would be a funny job description indeed.
More to the entertainment side of things are the recent actions of Mr. Danny De Vito. Of late there have been several entertainers and celebrities that have made the news for their drunken actions. While some are encouraging, like the news that Ms. Lindsey Lohan is now going to AA, there is an abundance of those that are not, like Mr. Mel Gibson. [Some don’t even have the weak excuse of intoxication, like Mr. Michael Richards or Ms. Britney Spears] Considering these extremes the actions of Mr. De Vito are hardly terrifying or shocking.
Yet the trend of accepting any type of behavior that celebrities and entertainers publicly display is not great. I do not condemn Mr. De Vito or Mr. Clooney a night out of drinking. That’s human nature to have a good night out with friends. Yet appearing on television, still inebriated, and making caustic remarks in bawdy language is not. And to brush it off is not just odd, it’s irresponsible.
What is weird is that, more and more, the actions that once may have seemed odd are becoming accepted. Whether it’s a MILF in training t-shirt, or drunken insults based on faith, or a tirade of racial slurs it seems like there is no outrage or concern. Almost like the people who stand around looking at a car wreck but doing nothing to help those in it. It seems that unless you are acquitted of a murder charge, and write a book on it, everything is ok. Attempted murder, arson, potential sex with minors, drugs and so much more; yet those entertainers who commit these acts just go on and continue to work with barely a pause. Think about it, pick a sport or music genre or acting venue and you can find several people that fit the above. [If you don’t want to think about it my quick list includes Left Eye, R. Kelly, Snoop Dogg, Michael Jackson, Britney Spears, Pamela Anderson and so on.]
Another weird fact these days is the obsession with stupid facts. There are more people trying to find out about, and comment on, the lack of underwear of some entertainers than those concerned about the health of other entertainers. I’d bet that the ratio of people searching the net about the above mentioned observation vs. those finding out more about the health of the Yellow Wiggle is probably 15:1. If that doesn’t qualify as odd or weird then what does?
This is what I think, what do you think?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)