So I was having a conversation with the young son of a friend yesterday. We were speaking about Mind of Mencia which was on at the time. Mr. Carlos Mencia was having another good show, cracking up everyone in the room and then he mentioned that there are no love songs in rap, “except if you count ‘smack my ho’.” Truer words are rarely said.
But the part that caught my interest was what my friends’ son said. “Yeah, that why they created R&B.” Now that got the attention of both his mom and myself. We corrected him that R&B existed long before rap was even a concept in parties in the Bronx. [For those that have no idea, rap was created at house parties in the Bronx back around the late 70’s – early 80’s. In addition, rap was upbeat and about having fun not the current curse-laden repetitive trash.] But it had me wondering. Do kids today really think that R&B is a new form of music. That it’s an offshoot of rap meant to emphasize love songs and the like?
Could it be that the youth now have been so inundated with gansta rap that they have no appreciation or understanding of other forms of music? If that is true, then it’s a severely sad situation. The lack of school music programs seems to have helped limit the exposure kids get today, which equates to limiting the imagination and growth of the next couple of generations of kids. That is never a good thing for any nation.
Or am I just old now? I never equated 39 with ancient, as least not since I was 20. Perhaps this is a normal view and I just don’t get it anymore. I’m sure there are parents about my age out there, with kids around the early teens. What do your kids say?
This is what I think, what do you think?
Thursday, May 31, 2007
Tuesday, May 29, 2007
Vote who gets to die on 'reality' tv - 5.29.2007.1
What’s going on in the minds of some people? I can accept that my dislike of ‘reality’ television programs is not a universal feeling. Obviously it’s quite the minority of thought in the US and the world. I can live with that. But I thought American Idol and Fear factor were about as low as this would go. I was wrong.
There is a saying, ‘Never underestimate the idiocy of people’. I always have believed that. I don’t mean individuals are fools, but often crowds are. The need for the term mob mentality proves that clearly I think. That same mass mentality affects television programming as well. Thus we have had more insipid and low-brow shows year after year. Don’t get me wrong, low-brow can be funny and interesting – in small doses I think.
The reason I have shared these thoughts is because I feel that the bottom of the barrel just got a bit lower. Hard to believe but it has happened. We, as a species, have taken on step down on the collective ladder of life. This happened, in my humble opinion, as soon as someone pitched the idea of a ‘reality’ show where the winner gets an organ donation.
This is reality alright. It’s like the Running Man, or various depictions of the future where contestants that lose are killed. Only we won’t show anyone dying, yet. Best of all, the public gets to watch the equivalent of families begging for their loved ones life. In addition they get to vote for whichever catches their attention, for a small fee for the text message vote. Isn’t that entertaining.
No civilized nation would allow the buying of organs, they all have a lottery system for viable organs. Every year hundreds if not thousands per country in the world die because of lack of organ donations. Yet the thrill, apparently, of watching both a donor and their potential recipients die on television is something someone decided needed to get a greenlight. I’m sure it will be a rating coup. And nothing is more sad.
What is worse, that a life can be bought at a price or that it can be lost because of something as trivial as a text message vote? I have to wonder how wretched a person’s life must be to sit and see a show like this. Yes, it’s not on television now, but the concept is deplorable. It lowers the value of life to nothing.
The ramifications are immense as well. Think about it, children will watch this family programming and learn – as all children do by watching and emulating what they see – that one life is not worth what another is. That condemning someone to death (which may happen to the ‘contestants’ that don’t get the donation) is ok.
If this does gather viewers, and thus both promotes a follow-up program and inspires competitors to create similar television programs [maybe there can be a ‘reality’ competition for euthanasia?], how different is it than the crowds that gathered to watch a hanging or the guillotine from the dark ages. If we can accept winning a part of a person, how long until we accept winning the person? How long until someone gets a media company to back the sale of a person as a prize, bringing back slavery with a ‘fun, family friendly’ prime-time television format?
What corporate executive thought this was a good idea? Are public shareholders, if there are any, that demanding of a profit that this is the only option to improve the bottom line? That would be one hell of a shareholder meeting, or quarterly earnings report to hear. Somehow I don’t see the stock price of this corporation rising. Or at least I would hope not. But I have to remember ‘Never underestimate the idiocy of people’.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Oh, by the way. This program is not on American television, its on in the Netherlands. But if I didn’t mention it, and you didn’t check the link, did you envision a channel it would be on? Were you thinking of watching it?
There is a saying, ‘Never underestimate the idiocy of people’. I always have believed that. I don’t mean individuals are fools, but often crowds are. The need for the term mob mentality proves that clearly I think. That same mass mentality affects television programming as well. Thus we have had more insipid and low-brow shows year after year. Don’t get me wrong, low-brow can be funny and interesting – in small doses I think.
The reason I have shared these thoughts is because I feel that the bottom of the barrel just got a bit lower. Hard to believe but it has happened. We, as a species, have taken on step down on the collective ladder of life. This happened, in my humble opinion, as soon as someone pitched the idea of a ‘reality’ show where the winner gets an organ donation.
This is reality alright. It’s like the Running Man, or various depictions of the future where contestants that lose are killed. Only we won’t show anyone dying, yet. Best of all, the public gets to watch the equivalent of families begging for their loved ones life. In addition they get to vote for whichever catches their attention, for a small fee for the text message vote. Isn’t that entertaining.
No civilized nation would allow the buying of organs, they all have a lottery system for viable organs. Every year hundreds if not thousands per country in the world die because of lack of organ donations. Yet the thrill, apparently, of watching both a donor and their potential recipients die on television is something someone decided needed to get a greenlight. I’m sure it will be a rating coup. And nothing is more sad.
What is worse, that a life can be bought at a price or that it can be lost because of something as trivial as a text message vote? I have to wonder how wretched a person’s life must be to sit and see a show like this. Yes, it’s not on television now, but the concept is deplorable. It lowers the value of life to nothing.
The ramifications are immense as well. Think about it, children will watch this family programming and learn – as all children do by watching and emulating what they see – that one life is not worth what another is. That condemning someone to death (which may happen to the ‘contestants’ that don’t get the donation) is ok.
If this does gather viewers, and thus both promotes a follow-up program and inspires competitors to create similar television programs [maybe there can be a ‘reality’ competition for euthanasia?], how different is it than the crowds that gathered to watch a hanging or the guillotine from the dark ages. If we can accept winning a part of a person, how long until we accept winning the person? How long until someone gets a media company to back the sale of a person as a prize, bringing back slavery with a ‘fun, family friendly’ prime-time television format?
What corporate executive thought this was a good idea? Are public shareholders, if there are any, that demanding of a profit that this is the only option to improve the bottom line? That would be one hell of a shareholder meeting, or quarterly earnings report to hear. Somehow I don’t see the stock price of this corporation rising. Or at least I would hope not. But I have to remember ‘Never underestimate the idiocy of people’.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Oh, by the way. This program is not on American television, its on in the Netherlands. But if I didn’t mention it, and you didn’t check the link, did you envision a channel it would be on? Were you thinking of watching it?
Book Giveaway Contest
Mr. Michael Vass, President of M V Consulting, Inc. and author of Black Entertainment USA (www.blackentertainmentblog.com) has announced a book giveaway of the book by Ms. Robin Roberts - From the Heart. Ms. Roberts is an Emmy Award winning sportscaster and co-host of Good Morning America. From the Heart is her first book, released this year.
Recently Ms. Roberts's book was reviewed by Mr. Vass on the Black Entertainment USA site. In conjunction with the book review, M V Consulting has joined with Authorsontheweb.com and Hyperion books to provide a 5 book giveaway. The contest is open to all United States residents, age 18 and above. Terms of the contest are as follows:
I am happy for the opportunity to share Ms. Robin Roberts's book with visitors to the sites of M V Consulting, Inc. This book provides inspiration and motivation for everyone, and to be involved in this book giveaway is quite gratifying.
1. Contestants need to answer the following question - Name all the stations that Ms. Roberts has worked for.
2. Answers to the abovementioned question should be emailed to e-mail protected from spam bots with a valid email address. A first name (at least) should be included with the answer. The title of the email should be "From the Heart book contest"
3. Only one response per household will be allowed.
4. 5 winners will be randomly drawn from the pool of successful answers.
5. Winners give consent to M V Consulting, Inc., and its divisions, use of their names in conjunction with this contest and all rights relevant to this contest.
6. Winners will be notified via email, and posted on the various sites of M V Consulting, Inc. at the discretion of the Company.
7. Contest will start on May 29, 2007 and will end June 10, 2007.
Mr. Vass stated, "I am happy for the opportunity to share Ms. Robin Roberts's book with visitors to the sites of M V Consulting, Inc. This book provides inspiration and motivation for everyone, and to be involved in this book giveaway is quite gratifying."
About M V Consulting, Inc. and Michael Vass
Mr. Michael Vass is a former securities industry account executive of good standing, and currently works in the field of investor relations. He has served in the US Marine Corps Reserves, as well as worked and studied in such diverse fields as entertainment, communications, philosophy and chemistry. He has lived abroad, in Moscow and Tbilisi, as well as in various cities throughout the United States.
Mr. Vass is President of M V Consulting, Inc. a diversified private company that maintains divisions in search engine optimization, an online store, political and entertainment celebrity blogs. It is the combinations of these unique experiences that have led Mr. Vass to the creation of M V Consulting, Inc. The Company owns Black Entertainment USA, VASS (www.mvass.com), a corporate website (www.vassconsult.com), and an online store (cafepress.com/nova68).
About Hyperion:
Hyperion publishes general-interest fiction and nonfiction books for adults. For more information on FROM THE HEART as well as our other titles, please visit us at: hyperionbooks.com
Recently Ms. Roberts's book was reviewed by Mr. Vass on the Black Entertainment USA site. In conjunction with the book review, M V Consulting has joined with Authorsontheweb.com and Hyperion books to provide a 5 book giveaway. The contest is open to all United States residents, age 18 and above. Terms of the contest are as follows:
I am happy for the opportunity to share Ms. Robin Roberts's book with visitors to the sites of M V Consulting, Inc. This book provides inspiration and motivation for everyone, and to be involved in this book giveaway is quite gratifying.
1. Contestants need to answer the following question - Name all the stations that Ms. Roberts has worked for.
2. Answers to the abovementioned question should be emailed to e-mail protected from spam bots with a valid email address. A first name (at least) should be included with the answer. The title of the email should be "From the Heart book contest"
3. Only one response per household will be allowed.
4. 5 winners will be randomly drawn from the pool of successful answers.
5. Winners give consent to M V Consulting, Inc., and its divisions, use of their names in conjunction with this contest and all rights relevant to this contest.
6. Winners will be notified via email, and posted on the various sites of M V Consulting, Inc. at the discretion of the Company.
7. Contest will start on May 29, 2007 and will end June 10, 2007.
Mr. Vass stated, "I am happy for the opportunity to share Ms. Robin Roberts's book with visitors to the sites of M V Consulting, Inc. This book provides inspiration and motivation for everyone, and to be involved in this book giveaway is quite gratifying."
About M V Consulting, Inc. and Michael Vass
Mr. Michael Vass is a former securities industry account executive of good standing, and currently works in the field of investor relations. He has served in the US Marine Corps Reserves, as well as worked and studied in such diverse fields as entertainment, communications, philosophy and chemistry. He has lived abroad, in Moscow and Tbilisi, as well as in various cities throughout the United States.
Mr. Vass is President of M V Consulting, Inc. a diversified private company that maintains divisions in search engine optimization, an online store, political and entertainment celebrity blogs. It is the combinations of these unique experiences that have led Mr. Vass to the creation of M V Consulting, Inc. The Company owns Black Entertainment USA, VASS (www.mvass.com), a corporate website (www.vassconsult.com), and an online store (cafepress.com/nova68).
About Hyperion:
Hyperion publishes general-interest fiction and nonfiction books for adults. For more information on FROM THE HEART as well as our other titles, please visit us at: hyperionbooks.com
Friday, May 25, 2007
The Wicked Witch is Dead - 5.26.2007.1
How could I not comment on the joyous news of the day? You may wonder what the news is, what could please me so? It's no less than the news that Ms. Rosie O'Donnell will no longer be on television. She has officially run away from The View after her self-destructive fight with one of her co-hosts.
Now the fact that there was a mere 3 weeks left in Ms. O'Donnell's contract
seems to indicate that the arguement was a critical factor in her departure. If this is all it took, I wish her co-hosts would have gotten angry some time ago. Anything that keeps Ms. O'Donnell's presence off th airwaves. Don't misunderstand, this is not about censorship. Ms. O'Donnell has every right to spew whatever ill-conceived thought she wishes, so long as it's not racially inflamatory or explicative laden.
The fact that Ms. O'Donnell has used the View as a format to expouse extreme left-wing propoganda, and has diminished the United States to the world, is fine as that is free speech. The very military that Ms. O'Donnell likens to terrorists, are the ones that ensure her ability to do this. If no one else were to shout from the rafters their respect of the American solider, she absolutely should; and among others proclaiming their admiration she should be one of the loudest.
Let me clarify, stating that '652,000 Iraqi people are dead, and who's the terrorist' or '[building 7] was the first time in history that fire melted steel' is anti-American in my view. It shows no support for our troops, no love of country, no respect on any level - to me. I support her ability to state as fact obvious contradictions to science that any 8th grader should understand better. I believe, and have previously volunteered to, defending her right to accuse her homeland of acts that are being engaged against us is absolute. But I in NO WAY agree, nor have I wished her continued success in making further statements.
If she were never to be on any televised, filmed, recorded device that is available to the public again, I would lose no sleep. Further I will suggest that if Ms. O'Donnell truely feels America has acted in a manner so dispicable, and is led by individuals so despotic, then perhaps she should give up her birthright and go to a more free, open, and fair nation in the world. Perhaps Ms. O'Donnell would find more joy and liberal freedom in another land, one where there is no persecution of gays, and where women are the equal to any person, where the color of skin determines nothing more than a good suntan.
Since such a nation does not exist, I suggest she give up her birthright and live in a nation that comes as close to those ideals as possible. Wait, THIS IS THAT NATION.
Disney, via ABC, should have removed this woman long ago. Ratings are not worth the damage and insult inflicted by this woman, in my opinion. Just because people are drawn to painful events, like trainwrecks - whether personal or not, this is not a reason to televise them. Judas gained 30 pieces of silver, and a Greek shepard gained a place in the Persian kingdom, each at the cost of their souls. Somethings are just not worth the price, somethings should never be sold.
Liberals and consrvatives are good, Left- and Right-wings are needed, questions must be asked. These things balance America, and we hope they lead us to a greater nation. Yet all rights are tempered, all freedoms come with responsibility. Power corrupts and abuse is the visual expression of that corruption.
Ms. Rosie O'Donnell is gone from the View, her choice or not it doesn't matter. This is a gift to our servicemen, those that have sacrificed everything and those that have volunteered to fight for us to that ultimate price today. If only it can stay that way.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Now the fact that there was a mere 3 weeks left in Ms. O'Donnell's contract
seems to indicate that the arguement was a critical factor in her departure. If this is all it took, I wish her co-hosts would have gotten angry some time ago. Anything that keeps Ms. O'Donnell's presence off th airwaves. Don't misunderstand, this is not about censorship. Ms. O'Donnell has every right to spew whatever ill-conceived thought she wishes, so long as it's not racially inflamatory or explicative laden. The fact that Ms. O'Donnell has used the View as a format to expouse extreme left-wing propoganda, and has diminished the United States to the world, is fine as that is free speech. The very military that Ms. O'Donnell likens to terrorists, are the ones that ensure her ability to do this. If no one else were to shout from the rafters their respect of the American solider, she absolutely should; and among others proclaiming their admiration she should be one of the loudest.
Let me clarify, stating that '652,000 Iraqi people are dead, and who's the terrorist' or '[building 7] was the first time in history that fire melted steel' is anti-American in my view. It shows no support for our troops, no love of country, no respect on any level - to me. I support her ability to state as fact obvious contradictions to science that any 8th grader should understand better. I believe, and have previously volunteered to, defending her right to accuse her homeland of acts that are being engaged against us is absolute. But I in NO WAY agree, nor have I wished her continued success in making further statements.
If she were never to be on any televised, filmed, recorded device that is available to the public again, I would lose no sleep. Further I will suggest that if Ms. O'Donnell truely feels America has acted in a manner so dispicable, and is led by individuals so despotic, then perhaps she should give up her birthright and go to a more free, open, and fair nation in the world. Perhaps Ms. O'Donnell would find more joy and liberal freedom in another land, one where there is no persecution of gays, and where women are the equal to any person, where the color of skin determines nothing more than a good suntan.
Since such a nation does not exist, I suggest she give up her birthright and live in a nation that comes as close to those ideals as possible. Wait, THIS IS THAT NATION.
Disney, via ABC, should have removed this woman long ago. Ratings are not worth the damage and insult inflicted by this woman, in my opinion. Just because people are drawn to painful events, like trainwrecks - whether personal or not, this is not a reason to televise them. Judas gained 30 pieces of silver, and a Greek shepard gained a place in the Persian kingdom, each at the cost of their souls. Somethings are just not worth the price, somethings should never be sold.
Liberals and consrvatives are good, Left- and Right-wings are needed, questions must be asked. These things balance America, and we hope they lead us to a greater nation. Yet all rights are tempered, all freedoms come with responsibility. Power corrupts and abuse is the visual expression of that corruption.
Ms. Rosie O'Donnell is gone from the View, her choice or not it doesn't matter. This is a gift to our servicemen, those that have sacrificed everything and those that have volunteered to fight for us to that ultimate price today. If only it can stay that way.
This is what I think, what do you think?
This Memorial Weekend - 5.25.2007.1
Let’s talk movies and icons as we enter this Memorial Day weekend. In terms of movies there is only one to discuss, Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End. I saw the movie, and it was great. There is a lot going on, everywhere in this movie. There are few scenes that slow down in any respect. That’s a bit of a shame as the scenery is phenomenal. I’m not a big fan of CGI, but it’s used so well and believably in this film that you forget its computer made.
Then again, you also forget that you are watching actors. It feels like these are living personalities we are glimpsing, as they spin in a vortex of chaos. Often you will ask the same question as several characters, ‘Does Jack have a plan, or is he winging it?’ There is no way to be sure, but he’s obviously influenced the thinking of every major character in the film. I don’t know if it’s in the Pirates Codex, and I won’t ask Captain Tigue, but everyone is out to do what’s right for them. The chaos and double-dealing this causes is remarkable.
Don’t worry about following it all, there is too much to catch it all. But then again you’ll have too much fun watching the action to really care. And there are enough questions left at the end to easily justify another movie. My guess, and this may seem like a bit of a spoiler, is that Hector [his first name is mentioned only once] will be going after Jack as Jack goes after a treasure to fulfill his new goal.
See the movie, its well worth the money to see it on the big screen.
As I mention the big screen, I want to mention someone that has filled it for decades and is still revered decades after his death. I mean no other than Mr. John Wayne. Yesterday was the anniversary of what would have been his 100th birthday.
There are few movie icons that reach the stature that this one man holds. I am a fan, and unlike Public Enemy, I do feel he is an American hero. Mr. Wayne embodied an image of direct honesty and determination, a purity of action that few ever match. Without flash or ego, Mr. Wayne became a symbol of America that endures today as much as 50 years ago.
He was the spirit of the American soldier, refusing to give up the fight and more than capable of winning. He stood as tall as the American flag, and was unwavering in the pursuit of justice. In many ways he was the best image of what America could be. And he highlighted our flaws without shoving them down our throats.
Some may not like Mr. Wayne. Some could disagree with the image he portrayed. Yes, there were many African Americans in the old west [where do you think the term cowboy comes from?] and very few in his films. Yet there were some, which is more than most movies of this type. And real Indians played their roles, as often as not friends of his character and highly respected for their beliefs. Few movies of the old west portrayed American Indians as anything more than a caricature, and several of the ones that did starred Mr. Wayne.
But it’s Memorial Day weekend. We seek to salute our servicemen and women. We remember that they have given their lives and limbs to provide us the life we have today. As flawed as America may be, or has been, it still is the greatest nation in the world. There is no other nation in the world with the degree of freedom and privileges we enjoy here. And we can only have that because of those that fought, bled and died before us and today.
Regardless if you agree with our current wars, our Commander-and-Chief, or our reason to start fighting [this though questionable is moot as we are fighting now. The focus on how we got here is just a political stump point that does not advance our position today] the fact is that without those brave and dedicated individuals standing in the face of evil and anti-America forces, we could not have anything we take for granted today. That includes this blog, movies like Pirates of the Caribbean, the SUV or Hummer you might want or drive, the home you live in, and the quality of everything else that is here.
So take a moment this weekend, see a John Wayne film [especially those when he is shown as a serviceman] and remember the indomitable spirit that is America and our servicemen and women. Then go see the fruit of those sacrifices in the image of Mr. Johnny Depp as Captain Jack Sparrow.
To my fellow Marines, Semper Fidelis. To all veterans, thank you. To those volunteers in the military today, bless you and be well.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Then again, you also forget that you are watching actors. It feels like these are living personalities we are glimpsing, as they spin in a vortex of chaos. Often you will ask the same question as several characters, ‘Does Jack have a plan, or is he winging it?’ There is no way to be sure, but he’s obviously influenced the thinking of every major character in the film. I don’t know if it’s in the Pirates Codex, and I won’t ask Captain Tigue, but everyone is out to do what’s right for them. The chaos and double-dealing this causes is remarkable.
Don’t worry about following it all, there is too much to catch it all. But then again you’ll have too much fun watching the action to really care. And there are enough questions left at the end to easily justify another movie. My guess, and this may seem like a bit of a spoiler, is that Hector [his first name is mentioned only once] will be going after Jack as Jack goes after a treasure to fulfill his new goal.
See the movie, its well worth the money to see it on the big screen.
As I mention the big screen, I want to mention someone that has filled it for decades and is still revered decades after his death. I mean no other than Mr. John Wayne. Yesterday was the anniversary of what would have been his 100th birthday.
There are few movie icons that reach the stature that this one man holds. I am a fan, and unlike Public Enemy, I do feel he is an American hero. Mr. Wayne embodied an image of direct honesty and determination, a purity of action that few ever match. Without flash or ego, Mr. Wayne became a symbol of America that endures today as much as 50 years ago.
He was the spirit of the American soldier, refusing to give up the fight and more than capable of winning. He stood as tall as the American flag, and was unwavering in the pursuit of justice. In many ways he was the best image of what America could be. And he highlighted our flaws without shoving them down our throats.
Some may not like Mr. Wayne. Some could disagree with the image he portrayed. Yes, there were many African Americans in the old west [where do you think the term cowboy comes from?] and very few in his films. Yet there were some, which is more than most movies of this type. And real Indians played their roles, as often as not friends of his character and highly respected for their beliefs. Few movies of the old west portrayed American Indians as anything more than a caricature, and several of the ones that did starred Mr. Wayne.
But it’s Memorial Day weekend. We seek to salute our servicemen and women. We remember that they have given their lives and limbs to provide us the life we have today. As flawed as America may be, or has been, it still is the greatest nation in the world. There is no other nation in the world with the degree of freedom and privileges we enjoy here. And we can only have that because of those that fought, bled and died before us and today.
Regardless if you agree with our current wars, our Commander-and-Chief, or our reason to start fighting [this though questionable is moot as we are fighting now. The focus on how we got here is just a political stump point that does not advance our position today] the fact is that without those brave and dedicated individuals standing in the face of evil and anti-America forces, we could not have anything we take for granted today. That includes this blog, movies like Pirates of the Caribbean, the SUV or Hummer you might want or drive, the home you live in, and the quality of everything else that is here.
So take a moment this weekend, see a John Wayne film [especially those when he is shown as a serviceman] and remember the indomitable spirit that is America and our servicemen and women. Then go see the fruit of those sacrifices in the image of Mr. Johnny Depp as Captain Jack Sparrow.
To my fellow Marines, Semper Fidelis. To all veterans, thank you. To those volunteers in the military today, bless you and be well.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Wednesday, May 23, 2007
Rebirth of the swashbuckler - 5.23.2007.2
Tomorrow is the premiere of the blockbuster hit Pirates of the Caribbean : At World’s End. Obviously it will be a blockbuster, I’m going to see it tomorrow along with millions of people across the country and world. Mr. Johnny Depp 
is phenomenal as Captain Jack Sparrow. He makes the movie work. The rest of the cast are no slouches either, but his character stands out. Of course I expect little else for an actor that has made a career of taking highly unusual characters and making them inviting to watch.
Because of this performance many are announcing the return of the pirate and swashbuckling movie. I’m sure movie studios are itching for next year or after that to come out with their own high seas adventure. Nothing is copied as often as a successful movie genre. Airplane led to disaster movies, Jaws to beast attacks, Halloween to the current horror fest (and of course a remake). But there is one thing I wanted to mention. Mr. Johnny Depp did not bring back swashbucklers, Mr. Cary Elwes did.
Some of you may be saying who? You may recall him from Oxford Blues with Mr. Rob Lowe, or Days of Thunder with Mr. Tom Cruise. Not ringing a bell, hmm? What about Glory with Mr. Morgan Freeman, Mr. Denzel Washington, and Mr. Mathew Broderick? Well if you have ever seen The Princess Bride I know you recall the Dread Pirate Wesley.
Better than Mr. Johnny Depp and the Pirates films? Inconceivable! Not really. You can’t compare the 2, but both are amazing works filled with great actors and memorable imagery. The Princess Bride
is a classic film in the style of the original swashbuckler (or me at least) Robin Hood. Not the crappy remake by Mr. Kevin Costner, but the movie starring Mr. Errol Flynn. That movie defined what a swashbuckling/pirate movie is supposed to be, and every movie before The Princess Bride failed miserably to fulfill that image. Of course if you watched Mr. Elwes go you can see why Hollywood was dying for a good script to carry on the concept. Humor, romance, a touch of drama in the background and of course the hero dies – sound like anything you’ve seen of late?
I am a fan of Mr. Depp. I enjoyed the Pirates series as much as anyone, and I’m anticipating a wonderful time at the 3rd film. Still I can realize that it wasn’t the reason that swashbucklers are back. As the countless films come out in the near future that rip-off this concept, as you watch the DVD’s and Video on Demand, take a moment to recall that there was a pirate in the past as famous as Captain Jack. Hey, who knows, you might even take a moment to watch the movie and see what I mean. I don’t think you’ll be disappointed.
This is what I think, what do you think?
is phenomenal as Captain Jack Sparrow. He makes the movie work. The rest of the cast are no slouches either, but his character stands out. Of course I expect little else for an actor that has made a career of taking highly unusual characters and making them inviting to watch. Because of this performance many are announcing the return of the pirate and swashbuckling movie. I’m sure movie studios are itching for next year or after that to come out with their own high seas adventure. Nothing is copied as often as a successful movie genre. Airplane led to disaster movies, Jaws to beast attacks, Halloween to the current horror fest (and of course a remake). But there is one thing I wanted to mention. Mr. Johnny Depp did not bring back swashbucklers, Mr. Cary Elwes did.
Some of you may be saying who? You may recall him from Oxford Blues with Mr. Rob Lowe, or Days of Thunder with Mr. Tom Cruise. Not ringing a bell, hmm? What about Glory with Mr. Morgan Freeman, Mr. Denzel Washington, and Mr. Mathew Broderick? Well if you have ever seen The Princess Bride I know you recall the Dread Pirate Wesley.
Better than Mr. Johnny Depp and the Pirates films? Inconceivable! Not really. You can’t compare the 2, but both are amazing works filled with great actors and memorable imagery. The Princess Bride
is a classic film in the style of the original swashbuckler (or me at least) Robin Hood. Not the crappy remake by Mr. Kevin Costner, but the movie starring Mr. Errol Flynn. That movie defined what a swashbuckling/pirate movie is supposed to be, and every movie before The Princess Bride failed miserably to fulfill that image. Of course if you watched Mr. Elwes go you can see why Hollywood was dying for a good script to carry on the concept. Humor, romance, a touch of drama in the background and of course the hero dies – sound like anything you’ve seen of late?I am a fan of Mr. Depp. I enjoyed the Pirates series as much as anyone, and I’m anticipating a wonderful time at the 3rd film. Still I can realize that it wasn’t the reason that swashbucklers are back. As the countless films come out in the near future that rip-off this concept, as you watch the DVD’s and Video on Demand, take a moment to recall that there was a pirate in the past as famous as Captain Jack. Hey, who knows, you might even take a moment to watch the movie and see what I mean. I don’t think you’ll be disappointed.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Odd, Addams, and I'm out - 5.23.2007.1
Time for a few bits of the odd and little covered. Now there was a story out of Germany recently that amused me. It seems that a man in a wheelchair was pulled over for… wait for it… drunk driving. Let me clarify, he was not in a car. Literally the man was in the road and the police pulled him over. They then decided to test him for alcohol levels and he was 10x over the limit. Now I have to imagine that this was incredibly funny to watch. I wish there was a video to this. Can you imagine the police, lights flashing, pulling this guy over? I suppose he was asked to roll his wheelchair in a straight line before they gave him the breathalyzer. Ok, that may be crude, but the mental image made me laugh.
Speaking of the odd, how can I not write about the Addams Family? Now why would I write about them? If you have seen the television show, or the first movie (the second wasn’t as good sadly) I’m sure you can understand. I’ve wanted Gomez Addams explosive train set since the first time I saw it on TV. But alas, I am far from his wealth, so I will have to settle for re-runs, DVD, and a Broadway play. That’s right; there will be a new play that is drawn from these most unique New Yorkers. We can only hope that it will fare far better than Suessical, a good dose of exploding trains may help. Too bad we can go back in time and have Mr. Raul Julia, or even better Mr. John Austin, play their roles again. [Yes I’m a Fan of his work, and no he isn’t dead. He’s still working too. As for Ms. Carolyn Jones, she was a babe few today can match.]
And on the tail end of this post is the real trash of the day. The good news, there will be several months without the incessant talk about American Idol. The bad news, at least a week of conversation about who won the ‘reality’ program. The worst news, it will be back again next year. Obviously I’m no fan of the program. It bores me. I find it about as interesting as plodding through hot lead. Face it folks, it’s the mental nutritional equivalent of crack. If you think it’s too harsh a comparison, just look at how much time is wasted in the media to discuss this useless program. But since I often pick my winners in various contests I pick the girl, Jordan I think her name is. Never heard the show, seen a couple of soundbites, and she looks good.
If I’m wrong on the American Idol thing, it’s ok. I’ll get over it. Matter of fact I already did.
That’s what I think, what do you think?
Speaking of the odd, how can I not write about the Addams Family? Now why would I write about them? If you have seen the television show, or the first movie (the second wasn’t as good sadly) I’m sure you can understand. I’ve wanted Gomez Addams explosive train set since the first time I saw it on TV. But alas, I am far from his wealth, so I will have to settle for re-runs, DVD, and a Broadway play. That’s right; there will be a new play that is drawn from these most unique New Yorkers. We can only hope that it will fare far better than Suessical, a good dose of exploding trains may help. Too bad we can go back in time and have Mr. Raul Julia, or even better Mr. John Austin, play their roles again. [Yes I’m a Fan of his work, and no he isn’t dead. He’s still working too. As for Ms. Carolyn Jones, she was a babe few today can match.]
And on the tail end of this post is the real trash of the day. The good news, there will be several months without the incessant talk about American Idol. The bad news, at least a week of conversation about who won the ‘reality’ program. The worst news, it will be back again next year. Obviously I’m no fan of the program. It bores me. I find it about as interesting as plodding through hot lead. Face it folks, it’s the mental nutritional equivalent of crack. If you think it’s too harsh a comparison, just look at how much time is wasted in the media to discuss this useless program. But since I often pick my winners in various contests I pick the girl, Jordan I think her name is. Never heard the show, seen a couple of soundbites, and she looks good.
If I’m wrong on the American Idol thing, it’s ok. I’ll get over it. Matter of fact I already did.
That’s what I think, what do you think?
Tuesday, May 22, 2007
Possible connection from oral sex to cancer - 5.22.2007.2
As I promised something far more serious is an item I mentioned I’d speak about. Oral sex can possibly give you throat cancer. Seriously. This isn’t some story that parents tell their kids, like you can go blind or grow hair on your palms.
A recent study in the New England Journal of Medicine has shown that human papillomavirus or HPV can be transmitted and cause a rare form of cancer. HPV is believed to be responsible for some types of cervical cancer, and vaccines are being worked on currently. Another study, from Johns Hopkins University, found around 72% of those with this rare form of throat cancer, oropharyngeal cancer, also had a type of HPV. They also found that prior HPV infection or more than 6 oral sex partners increased the chance of contracting the cancer.
I’d love to crack jokes about this. I have no doubt that some guy reading this will be pissed. Guaranteed this post will spoil the fun of a few people, but this is serious. I’m not advocating pre-marital sex, nor am I saying abstinence is the only other choice. I’m just highlighting a health concern that everyone should be aware of. Maybe researchers will find that this is incorrect, then again maybe not.
I recall reading a report about 2 years ago stating that oral sex among teens was up dramatically. That same report stated that young girls did not consider this sex. It is of course, and while pregnancy may not be a consequence there are other factors to be aware of. This is just one concern, and it is a recent finding that is getting more attention. Various STD’s [Sexually Transmitted Diseases] can be caught, carried, and passed on via oral sex. If you aren’t careful and chose to have sex, be aware there could be a negative outcome.
Call this post a PSA (Public Service Announcement). Just something I saw and wanted to pass on. Take it as you will. But if you are upset because I just ruined an evening of fun, save me the email. I already have an idea how that feels.
This is what I think, what do you think?
A recent study in the New England Journal of Medicine has shown that human papillomavirus or HPV can be transmitted and cause a rare form of cancer. HPV is believed to be responsible for some types of cervical cancer, and vaccines are being worked on currently. Another study, from Johns Hopkins University, found around 72% of those with this rare form of throat cancer, oropharyngeal cancer, also had a type of HPV. They also found that prior HPV infection or more than 6 oral sex partners increased the chance of contracting the cancer.
I’d love to crack jokes about this. I have no doubt that some guy reading this will be pissed. Guaranteed this post will spoil the fun of a few people, but this is serious. I’m not advocating pre-marital sex, nor am I saying abstinence is the only other choice. I’m just highlighting a health concern that everyone should be aware of. Maybe researchers will find that this is incorrect, then again maybe not.
I recall reading a report about 2 years ago stating that oral sex among teens was up dramatically. That same report stated that young girls did not consider this sex. It is of course, and while pregnancy may not be a consequence there are other factors to be aware of. This is just one concern, and it is a recent finding that is getting more attention. Various STD’s [Sexually Transmitted Diseases] can be caught, carried, and passed on via oral sex. If you aren’t careful and chose to have sex, be aware there could be a negative outcome.
Call this post a PSA (Public Service Announcement). Just something I saw and wanted to pass on. Take it as you will. But if you are upset because I just ruined an evening of fun, save me the email. I already have an idea how that feels.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Beer, Spice Girls and T4 - which do you want? - 5.22.2007.1
While traveling for meetings, my recent book review, and an upcoming giveaway contest have all kept me quite busy, there has been no lack of noticing the news. [Did I just mention the giveaway?] The odd and serious news has kept on coming, and now I will try to catch up on a couple of things I noticed.
One shameful act was the disposal of 196,000 beers in Malaysia. Yes that is a lot of beer, and sadly there was no party. Smugglers got caught preparing to sell the duty-free stash, and since that much beer would kill the local markets, down the drain they went. That is truly alcohol abuse. I mean that is easily a 3 maybe 4 day party for a college somewhere, if they made a donation they could start their own version of spring break. A very American idea I am sure, but come on. Well the fish were having a huge toga party at least.
For those trying to figure out what to do over Christmas this year, rejoice. The Spice girls are reputed to be getting back together. I know that far too many fans have been depressed since the girl band broke up, but here is a gift just for you. Yep all 5 of you. Ok, so there must be more fans than 5 since they are getting $2 million a piece, but I don’t think I know any of them. Can anyone name 3 top songs by the Spice Girls without using Google or Limewire? I mean the Police are in Atlantic City. Now that is a reunion that works. Sometimes I just think promoters put together old bands just to see if they can. What’s next, the adult members of Menudo doing a concert? [Yes Ricky Martin is a good singer, I just don’t like the band since my girlfriend at the time loved them. A 20 year old grudge, what can I say.]
Speaking of comebacks, have you heard about T4? I mean Terminator 4, which should be out in theaters in the not so far future of 2009. The saga continues, sans Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. Some might be upset about this but if the storyline is anything like the old Dark Horse comic books I recall it will be fine. [If you don’t know who Dark Horse is, you aren’t a real comic book fan – or geek. They had a great line of comic books dealing with storylines for several good movies, and a few that became movies. If you ever saw their version of Aliens Vs. Predator you could never sit through the awful movie of the same name.] Hint to the executives working this Terminator concept, read some of the Dark Horse books, then get their writers to make your movie. Otherwise, I give the odds of the movie being worth seeing about 7-2 against. Now watch them get a great movie and someone making me eat my words in 2 years.
More soon I promise.
One shameful act was the disposal of 196,000 beers in Malaysia. Yes that is a lot of beer, and sadly there was no party. Smugglers got caught preparing to sell the duty-free stash, and since that much beer would kill the local markets, down the drain they went. That is truly alcohol abuse. I mean that is easily a 3 maybe 4 day party for a college somewhere, if they made a donation they could start their own version of spring break. A very American idea I am sure, but come on. Well the fish were having a huge toga party at least.
For those trying to figure out what to do over Christmas this year, rejoice. The Spice girls are reputed to be getting back together. I know that far too many fans have been depressed since the girl band broke up, but here is a gift just for you. Yep all 5 of you. Ok, so there must be more fans than 5 since they are getting $2 million a piece, but I don’t think I know any of them. Can anyone name 3 top songs by the Spice Girls without using Google or Limewire? I mean the Police are in Atlantic City. Now that is a reunion that works. Sometimes I just think promoters put together old bands just to see if they can. What’s next, the adult members of Menudo doing a concert? [Yes Ricky Martin is a good singer, I just don’t like the band since my girlfriend at the time loved them. A 20 year old grudge, what can I say.]
Speaking of comebacks, have you heard about T4? I mean Terminator 4, which should be out in theaters in the not so far future of 2009. The saga continues, sans Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. Some might be upset about this but if the storyline is anything like the old Dark Horse comic books I recall it will be fine. [If you don’t know who Dark Horse is, you aren’t a real comic book fan – or geek. They had a great line of comic books dealing with storylines for several good movies, and a few that became movies. If you ever saw their version of Aliens Vs. Predator you could never sit through the awful movie of the same name.] Hint to the executives working this Terminator concept, read some of the Dark Horse books, then get their writers to make your movie. Otherwise, I give the odds of the movie being worth seeing about 7-2 against. Now watch them get a great movie and someone making me eat my words in 2 years.
More soon I promise.
Monday, May 21, 2007
Reviewing Robin Roberts book From the Heart - 5.21.2007.1
I have recently finished reading the book, From the Heart by Ms. Robin Roberts, and I must say it was quite interesting. The book reads well, its 170 pages having the feel of a warm conversation more than anything else. Ms. Roberts comes off as genuine and caring, her re-telling of tales in her life adding a perspective most books of this genre don’t seem to convey well. At least to me.
Ms. Roberts’s book covers a great deal of her life, from early youth to recent times. The focus includes her life from high school to working at Good Morning America. There may be many Americans, and people across the globe, that might be familiar with Ms. Roberts from her time at ESPN. I can honestly say that I am not one of them. Being a fan of football, golf, and soccer I rarely watch ESPN. Even rarer is the number of times I’ve watched Good Morning America. As a result Ms. Roberts name was unfamiliar to me. Yet once I finished this book I felt as if I knew her for quite some time.
This book is not so much a “how to” book, as Mr. Napoleon Hill’s Think and Grow Rich can be, nor would I say the rules are exactly that. Rather this is an understanding being passed on that some may get.
Those that may get the most out of this book might be women, Black White or otherwise. That is not to say that men would feel left out when reading the book, I felt that sections of the chapters were targeted to, and could hold deeper meaning for, a woman reader. To the credit of Ms. Roberts even those sections were enjoyable for me to read. I think a similar statement could be made about sports fans. There are multiple sports events and personages mentioned through the book. While a fan might gain greater impact from them, the casual observer will not be overwhelmed.
Speaking of sports, Ms. Roberts has had a lot of contact with various noted sports figures in addition to celebrities and world renowned individuals. Ms. Roberts has no problem dropping their names either. I will say that though there are several names dropped; most are relevant to what is being discussed. I never felt overwhelmed or distracted by this.
The most prevalent names in the book are not celebrities or athletes though; they are in fact the family of Ms. Roberts. Her connection to her family is obvious and strong. Many of her examples circle around her mother, grandmother, and father. Their influence on her life and choices are apparent.
I want to detract for a moment. Ms. Roberts’s father was one of the Tuskegee Airmen. I have great respect for all military personnel, especially those that served in a war. The Tuskegee Airmen stand out for me though, and I suggest anyone not familiar with them to learn more about of what they did.
Going back to the book, I’ve mentioned I enjoyed it. I consider myself moderately successful and have no lack of self-motivation. So in a manner I lose some of the impact that the book provides. Equally I don’t agree with a few thoughts mentioned. We all have different experiences and goals, so that is to be expected. Of the points I agree with, I feel strongly on them. One such thought is that I think more parents should behave more like Ms. Roberts's, and my own.
So depending on how you live and where you are (internally) Ms. Roberts words may mean more or less to you. Given that I still feel this book should be read.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Ms. Roberts’s book covers a great deal of her life, from early youth to recent times. The focus includes her life from high school to working at Good Morning America. There may be many Americans, and people across the globe, that might be familiar with Ms. Roberts from her time at ESPN. I can honestly say that I am not one of them. Being a fan of football, golf, and soccer I rarely watch ESPN. Even rarer is the number of times I’ve watched Good Morning America. As a result Ms. Roberts name was unfamiliar to me. Yet once I finished this book I felt as if I knew her for quite some time.
This book is not so much a “how to” book, as Mr. Napoleon Hill’s Think and Grow Rich can be, nor would I say the rules are exactly that. Rather this is an understanding being passed on that some may get.
Those that may get the most out of this book might be women, Black White or otherwise. That is not to say that men would feel left out when reading the book, I felt that sections of the chapters were targeted to, and could hold deeper meaning for, a woman reader. To the credit of Ms. Roberts even those sections were enjoyable for me to read. I think a similar statement could be made about sports fans. There are multiple sports events and personages mentioned through the book. While a fan might gain greater impact from them, the casual observer will not be overwhelmed.
Speaking of sports, Ms. Roberts has had a lot of contact with various noted sports figures in addition to celebrities and world renowned individuals. Ms. Roberts has no problem dropping their names either. I will say that though there are several names dropped; most are relevant to what is being discussed. I never felt overwhelmed or distracted by this.
The most prevalent names in the book are not celebrities or athletes though; they are in fact the family of Ms. Roberts. Her connection to her family is obvious and strong. Many of her examples circle around her mother, grandmother, and father. Their influence on her life and choices are apparent.
I want to detract for a moment. Ms. Roberts’s father was one of the Tuskegee Airmen. I have great respect for all military personnel, especially those that served in a war. The Tuskegee Airmen stand out for me though, and I suggest anyone not familiar with them to learn more about of what they did.
Going back to the book, I’ve mentioned I enjoyed it. I consider myself moderately successful and have no lack of self-motivation. So in a manner I lose some of the impact that the book provides. Equally I don’t agree with a few thoughts mentioned. We all have different experiences and goals, so that is to be expected. Of the points I agree with, I feel strongly on them. One such thought is that I think more parents should behave more like Ms. Roberts's, and my own.
So depending on how you live and where you are (internally) Ms. Roberts words may mean more or less to you. Given that I still feel this book should be read.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Tuesday, May 15, 2007
JP Morgan Chase on Slavery apology Part 2 - 5.15.2007.2
Continued from JP Morgan Chase sharholders vote on Slavery apology - 5.15.2007.1 Part 1...
Similar thoughts were held by Pete Flaherty, President of National Legal and Policy Center, who said,
For its part JP Morgan did not back down. The company sought to have this resolution blocked by the SEC. That failed, but the JP Morgan Chase held the position issued in 2005 as stated in its proxy. The vote took place today during the Annual Meeting which started at 10am.
As stated by Mr. Joe Evangelisti, representative of JP Morgan Chase, to me directly via phone, the resolution only garnered approximately 2 ½% of votes. This resolution failed, and I commend both JP Morgan and its shareholders for that fact.
At a time in the nation where we are rightly punishing individuals that use the public airwaves to attack innocent citizens with crude racial slurs, and are taking to task entertainers that are using that same public radio medium (along with ringtones, music videos, and other mediums) to spew equally offensive comments under the pretext of artistic expression, we must stay aware. While some 97 ½% of votes stood behind JP Morgan Chase, the balance of the voters did not. Politicians continue to reject the thought of an apology or reparation. Legislation continues to be stagnant on addressing the past. The United States government still has never made a public apology, while apologies and reparations to Native American Indians and Japanese Americans have been.
This is the quiet, seldom spoken fact of American history. It is a lesson in humanity that we cannot learn from since we refuse to even address it. Some of us, from every creed and race, have looked in the mirror and come to terms with the past. But as seen in the need for a vote at JP Morgan Chase today, some have not.
The cost for a lack of vigilance is more than mere words, in my opinion. The stakes have not changed. Racism and the means to divide our citizens continue to exist, merely waiting for a time when few are watching to take root and prosper. In a world of soundbites and 30 second news clips it’s easy to lose sight of what is happening. But if we do lose sight, if resolutions are brought and commendable acts are rescinded, we travel a path to repeat history. That path is painful and detrimental to everyone, not just those targeted initially with injustice.
I’m happy to state that JP Morgan Chase stood their ground, that the shareholders in majority agreed, and that the apology and scholarship continue to exist. This is another step to a better, greater America in my opinion. Now let’s take another step.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Similar thoughts were held by Pete Flaherty, President of National Legal and Policy Center, who said,
“If JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon were alive 200 years ago and owned slaves, the apology would be appropriate. Otherwise it is about as cynical and as hollow as you can get.”
For its part JP Morgan did not back down. The company sought to have this resolution blocked by the SEC. That failed, but the JP Morgan Chase held the position issued in 2005 as stated in its proxy. The vote took place today during the Annual Meeting which started at 10am.
As stated by Mr. Joe Evangelisti, representative of JP Morgan Chase, to me directly via phone, the resolution only garnered approximately 2 ½% of votes. This resolution failed, and I commend both JP Morgan and its shareholders for that fact.
At a time in the nation where we are rightly punishing individuals that use the public airwaves to attack innocent citizens with crude racial slurs, and are taking to task entertainers that are using that same public radio medium (along with ringtones, music videos, and other mediums) to spew equally offensive comments under the pretext of artistic expression, we must stay aware. While some 97 ½% of votes stood behind JP Morgan Chase, the balance of the voters did not. Politicians continue to reject the thought of an apology or reparation. Legislation continues to be stagnant on addressing the past. The United States government still has never made a public apology, while apologies and reparations to Native American Indians and Japanese Americans have been.
This is the quiet, seldom spoken fact of American history. It is a lesson in humanity that we cannot learn from since we refuse to even address it. Some of us, from every creed and race, have looked in the mirror and come to terms with the past. But as seen in the need for a vote at JP Morgan Chase today, some have not.
The cost for a lack of vigilance is more than mere words, in my opinion. The stakes have not changed. Racism and the means to divide our citizens continue to exist, merely waiting for a time when few are watching to take root and prosper. In a world of soundbites and 30 second news clips it’s easy to lose sight of what is happening. But if we do lose sight, if resolutions are brought and commendable acts are rescinded, we travel a path to repeat history. That path is painful and detrimental to everyone, not just those targeted initially with injustice.
I’m happy to state that JP Morgan Chase stood their ground, that the shareholders in majority agreed, and that the apology and scholarship continue to exist. This is another step to a better, greater America in my opinion. Now let’s take another step.
This is what I think, what do you think?
JP Morgan Chase sharholders vote on Slavery apology - 5.15.2007.1
It’s amazing what a couple of years will bring. The public and investors alike are quick to forget so many items in this world of instant news, viral videos, Youtube and 24/7 cable network news. So many items are glanced over, missed, or forgotten in the attempt to get to the next thing that the impact of what’s happening rarely touches us. But some of those items come back and the impact continues to reverberate.
One such case is on subjects that I have discussed often in various posts in my Vass and Black Entertainment USA blogs. Reparations and apologies for slavery in America. The various posts [What Georgia House Speaker Richardson should apologize for - 3.9.2007.1, The surprise about broadcast television - 3.14.2007.2, ect.] reflect my views, and I think the views of many – whether Black Americans, Latino/Hispanic, White or purple for that matter. Many believe that the wounds inflicted to create this nation cannot ever heal if we ignore and hide from the past. Those wounds affect this nation to this day, whether it pops to the surface as the Rodney King riots, the Civil Rights Movement, the murders of Sean Bell and others, or the comments by Mr. Don Imus and other radio DJ’s.
Today the conversation of Reparations and apology took another step forward at JP Morgan Chase. Actually what happened today started in 2005, as a result of actions from 1831 – 1865, so I will recap that information. On January 20, 2005 JP Morgan issued an apology, in compliance with Chicago ordinances requiring the disclosure of slave ownership, for their predecessor banks from the abovementioned time period where slaves were taken as collateral on loans. The predecessor banks, Citizens Bank and Canal Bank in Louisiana, did take ownership of 1250 slaves.
A memo on this was released by ten-Chairman William Harrison and then-President James Dimon,
In addition to the apology, JP Morgan created a $5 million scholarship for African Americans in Louisiana.
This commendable act by JP Morgan Chase should be the end of that story. It also should have been the motivation for other companies and states. Sadly this was not the case as lawmakers like Frank Hargrove, and Georgia House Speaker Richardson believe that no such action is either needed or justified. In addition it would seem that a portion of the shareholders at JP Morgan felt the same.
Deneen Borelli led a charge to have the apology, and the scholarship, rescinded in the 2007 Annual Sharholder meeting today. According to Deneen Borelli,
Continued in Part 2...
One such case is on subjects that I have discussed often in various posts in my Vass and Black Entertainment USA blogs. Reparations and apologies for slavery in America. The various posts [What Georgia House Speaker Richardson should apologize for - 3.9.2007.1, The surprise about broadcast television - 3.14.2007.2, ect.] reflect my views, and I think the views of many – whether Black Americans, Latino/Hispanic, White or purple for that matter. Many believe that the wounds inflicted to create this nation cannot ever heal if we ignore and hide from the past. Those wounds affect this nation to this day, whether it pops to the surface as the Rodney King riots, the Civil Rights Movement, the murders of Sean Bell and others, or the comments by Mr. Don Imus and other radio DJ’s.
Today the conversation of Reparations and apology took another step forward at JP Morgan Chase. Actually what happened today started in 2005, as a result of actions from 1831 – 1865, so I will recap that information. On January 20, 2005 JP Morgan issued an apology, in compliance with Chicago ordinances requiring the disclosure of slave ownership, for their predecessor banks from the abovementioned time period where slaves were taken as collateral on loans. The predecessor banks, Citizens Bank and Canal Bank in Louisiana, did take ownership of 1250 slaves.
A memo on this was released by ten-Chairman William Harrison and then-President James Dimon,
“We apologize to the American public, and particularly to African-Americans, for the role that Citizens Bank and Canal Bank played during that period," said the company on its website. "Although we cannot change the past, we are committed to learning from and emerging stronger because of it.”
In addition to the apology, JP Morgan created a $5 million scholarship for African Americans in Louisiana.
This commendable act by JP Morgan Chase should be the end of that story. It also should have been the motivation for other companies and states. Sadly this was not the case as lawmakers like Frank Hargrove, and Georgia House Speaker Richardson believe that no such action is either needed or justified. In addition it would seem that a portion of the shareholders at JP Morgan felt the same.
Deneen Borelli led a charge to have the apology, and the scholarship, rescinded in the 2007 Annual Sharholder meeting today. According to Deneen Borelli,
“It's absurd for someone to apologize for the transgressions of others committed hundreds of years ago. Slavery was an abomination and blemish on our Nation's history. JPMorgan Chase's apology for slavery, along with a $5 million donation for a scholarship fund, are the fruits of a shakedown. It is the looting of shareholder assets and sets a terrible precedent.”
Continued in Part 2...
Monday, May 14, 2007
David Hasselhoff tape can inspire - 5.14.2007.2
Well now on to some serious thoughts. Last week there was a lot of noise made about the video tape of Mr. David Hasselhoff during a drunken binge. Many criticized him about his actions and the supposed potential danger he posed to his children.
Who are these people to make such statements? I sometimes have to wonder what the motivations of the various pundits and cable news networks are when items like this are released. The point being that while Mr. Hasselhoff was drunk, the tape was made for a purpose. It’s no secret that Mr. Hasselhoff is an alcoholic, and has tried to stay sober on and off for years. Like any other addict he has moments of relapse. Like any other addict he cannot see fully how he is behaving, or it’s affect on his family, while he is under the influence.
Knowing this and understanding that he is no less human and prone to weakness, than anyone else Mr. Hasselhoff asked his kids to make the video tape if he ever fell of the wagon. Unlike the laughable Public Service Announcements that often fill the airwaves, this tape provides a real look at what alcoholism can be. It’s a personal motivation for Mr. Hasselhoff, helping him see the effect he has on those most close to him. One more reason to stay sober for one more day.
The reaction by the media at large was not filled with intent to educate the public or to motivate others about the demons alcoholism can pose. The media just showcased a story of the moment, highlighting a low point in the life of a public figure. It was a cheap grab at ratings, and it could have been far more.
I’m sure that some where helped by seeing the tape. Mr. Hasselhoff has said it was eye-opening for him to see how he was acting. Presented in the light of inspiration, this personal moment could have helped millions. I feel that it was maybe one of the best PSA’s in years, perhaps decades. It’s rare when we get to see the honest downside of alcohol abuse especially in the form of entertainers and celebrities. Far too often the various news media instead present us stories of drunken celebrities and entertainers as fun ‘who saw who’ soundbite clips. How many times have you seen a news clip talking about this famous person seen in a nightclub drunken, or an actress/singer/public figure seen kissing a woman or without underwear on?
The media showers these moments of loss of self-control at us like they were eye candy, and mostly it’s framed as a joke. Yet the fact is there is a significant dark tunnel that many, famous or not, travel through often. Yes we all have had a bit much to drink on an occasion or 2. Yes it can be funny when a star is caught acting like our friends on a rare Saturday night. But beating up on someone using the means available to them to inspire their sobriety is not beneficial to anyone.
News media have a responsibility to present us facts, not to interpret them for us. They have a responsibility that when an item of news is found that can help or hinder millions, they should err towards the greatest good. Picking on the self-admitted failures of a man with a problem may get ratings for a night or 2, but how does that help the greater good?
I’m no fan of Mr. Hasselhoff; Baywatch was only good because of how the women’s bikinis were being filled. Still I feel he deserved a fair shake on the videotape. It had a purpose, which reportedly has helped him get perspective and strength. I just can’t forget that it probably could have done the same for so many more.
I feel Mr. Hasselhoff’s words apply equally as well to the various media that used this tape for their own profit, as to the person that released it to the public.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Who are these people to make such statements? I sometimes have to wonder what the motivations of the various pundits and cable news networks are when items like this are released. The point being that while Mr. Hasselhoff was drunk, the tape was made for a purpose. It’s no secret that Mr. Hasselhoff is an alcoholic, and has tried to stay sober on and off for years. Like any other addict he has moments of relapse. Like any other addict he cannot see fully how he is behaving, or it’s affect on his family, while he is under the influence.
Knowing this and understanding that he is no less human and prone to weakness, than anyone else Mr. Hasselhoff asked his kids to make the video tape if he ever fell of the wagon. Unlike the laughable Public Service Announcements that often fill the airwaves, this tape provides a real look at what alcoholism can be. It’s a personal motivation for Mr. Hasselhoff, helping him see the effect he has on those most close to him. One more reason to stay sober for one more day.
The reaction by the media at large was not filled with intent to educate the public or to motivate others about the demons alcoholism can pose. The media just showcased a story of the moment, highlighting a low point in the life of a public figure. It was a cheap grab at ratings, and it could have been far more.
I’m sure that some where helped by seeing the tape. Mr. Hasselhoff has said it was eye-opening for him to see how he was acting. Presented in the light of inspiration, this personal moment could have helped millions. I feel that it was maybe one of the best PSA’s in years, perhaps decades. It’s rare when we get to see the honest downside of alcohol abuse especially in the form of entertainers and celebrities. Far too often the various news media instead present us stories of drunken celebrities and entertainers as fun ‘who saw who’ soundbite clips. How many times have you seen a news clip talking about this famous person seen in a nightclub drunken, or an actress/singer/public figure seen kissing a woman or without underwear on?
The media showers these moments of loss of self-control at us like they were eye candy, and mostly it’s framed as a joke. Yet the fact is there is a significant dark tunnel that many, famous or not, travel through often. Yes we all have had a bit much to drink on an occasion or 2. Yes it can be funny when a star is caught acting like our friends on a rare Saturday night. But beating up on someone using the means available to them to inspire their sobriety is not beneficial to anyone.
News media have a responsibility to present us facts, not to interpret them for us. They have a responsibility that when an item of news is found that can help or hinder millions, they should err towards the greatest good. Picking on the self-admitted failures of a man with a problem may get ratings for a night or 2, but how does that help the greater good?
I’m no fan of Mr. Hasselhoff; Baywatch was only good because of how the women’s bikinis were being filled. Still I feel he deserved a fair shake on the videotape. It had a purpose, which reportedly has helped him get perspective and strength. I just can’t forget that it probably could have done the same for so many more.
I feel Mr. Hasselhoff’s words apply equally as well to the various media that used this tape for their own profit, as to the person that released it to the public.
“The tape was never meant to become public, but got into the hands of individuals who are not worthy of mentioning, who maliciously released the tape for their own self purpose. I hope that someone else will learn from the tape, as I have.”
This is what I think, what do you think?
How to sell German adult toys - 5.14.2007.1
Here is just a quick little something to lighten the mood of things. Considering all the righteous outrage in recent weeks I just wanted to take a moment to look at some odd bits in the news of late.
One item that caught my attention deals with the world’s most popular sport. No it’s not baseball, basketball or football (at least not American style football). I’m talking about soccer (futbol). As famous and popular as our star athletes are, I’ve never heard of a defamation/trademark lawsuit quite like this. Obviously the name of a famous athlete as an endorsement can make a brand, and that is as true for an energy drink as it is for a sex toy it seems.
Beate Ushe, a German company, definitely thought that the names of 2 futbol players would make the difference in sales. They named 2 of their sex toy products after Mr. Michael Ballack and Mr. Oliver Kahn. They even timed the launch to start prior to the latest World Cup that was played in Germany.
One thing that was not revealed in this whole case was what the sales were like. I just wonder if use of their names really made a difference. I can’t help it, but it’s an odd curiosity to me if the name on these vibrators made a difference in their sale. I equally wonder what would sell better, an item of this nature named after Mr. Michael Jordan, Mr. Tiger Woods, wrestler HHH, wrestler the Undertaker, or international futbol stars Mr. Michael Beckham, Pele, Maradonna, or Ronaldihno. There is a competition of U.S. and international sports you just won’t see.
Like I said, it was an odd bit of news.
This is what I think, what do you think?
One item that caught my attention deals with the world’s most popular sport. No it’s not baseball, basketball or football (at least not American style football). I’m talking about soccer (futbol). As famous and popular as our star athletes are, I’ve never heard of a defamation/trademark lawsuit quite like this. Obviously the name of a famous athlete as an endorsement can make a brand, and that is as true for an energy drink as it is for a sex toy it seems.
Beate Ushe, a German company, definitely thought that the names of 2 futbol players would make the difference in sales. They named 2 of their sex toy products after Mr. Michael Ballack and Mr. Oliver Kahn. They even timed the launch to start prior to the latest World Cup that was played in Germany.
[Sadly my team did not win, and you can see my various thoughts about that World Cup at Both my countries won the opening World Cup matches, USA vs. Czech Rep. - What happened there?, USA vs, Italy - we were robbed by the referee, Red cards, shades of color onscreens, and inscribed original products, Reflections on World Cup 2006, Who gets the Golden Ball and get your poker on]This did not go over well with these soccer stars. They sued to have the products removed from stores and their name usage stopped, and won their case.
One thing that was not revealed in this whole case was what the sales were like. I just wonder if use of their names really made a difference. I can’t help it, but it’s an odd curiosity to me if the name on these vibrators made a difference in their sale. I equally wonder what would sell better, an item of this nature named after Mr. Michael Jordan, Mr. Tiger Woods, wrestler HHH, wrestler the Undertaker, or international futbol stars Mr. Michael Beckham, Pele, Maradonna, or Ronaldihno. There is a competition of U.S. and international sports you just won’t see.
Like I said, it was an odd bit of news.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Friday, May 11, 2007
Why Opie & Anthony won't be fired - 5.11.2007.1
Many may have heard about the outrageous actions of Opie & Anthony, radio DJ’s on XM satellite radio. If you have not it can be summed up as the following: The DJ’s had a man (who I believe was homeless) on air and cajoled him as he commented on raping Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, First Lady Laura Bush, and the Queen of England. This was an explicative laden, graphic, tirade that the 2 DJ’s commented and laughed along with. Obviously they seem to find the rape of women funny.
Considering the recent uproar against Mr. Don Imus, Rev. Al Sharpton (for comments about the religion of Presidential hopeful Mr. Mitt Romney), and the rap hip-hop music genre for their insulting use of language, and disrespect of women, many are upset by this ‘comedy’ skit. While I find it vile and reprehensible, I cannot ask for their being fired. It’s not the same situation. Though it is sad that anyone would find humor on this subject, or would want to derive their income from promoting such commentary, I have to say that it is just my opinion.
I do not see any positive reason to encourage anyone to rape ANY woman, ever. I equally can’t imagine that the mothers of these 2 men are please with them. What a way to start the Mother’s Day weekend. I have to believe that both of these men are single, and likely to stay that way. But they should not be fired.
The fact is that they are not on public airwaves, they are dealing with public figures, and there is freedom of speech. The First Amendment allows for almost any comment, no matter how offensive. That is with the exception of directly causing or inciting harm against another individual. This is the reason that neo-nazi’s and klu klux klan members can have meeting. It’s also why you can’t scream fire in a crowded theater. As upsetting as it makes me, they have the right to say what they did; though it’s a close call.
The bigger reasons working for them are in part that all of the women are public figures. This is not an excuse for what was done. What it does mean is that they have venues and opportunities to respond in kind to these comments, if they chose to dignify them with a comment at all. There is no doubt that if any of these powerful and respected women chose to say something about this, it would be covered internationally in a second. There is no shortage of individuals and groups that will respond on their behalf and will have that covered as well. In a manner this is like Ms. Rosie O’Donnell picking a fight with Mr. Donald Trump, both took opportunities to respond publicly. Of course their spat never rose to the same level as this, but at points it was close.
But the most solid reason why they won’t be fired is because it was no a comment made to the public. Unlike Mr. Don Imus, this event happened on essentially closed airspace. Individuals subscribe to XM radio to receive this particular channel. There is full disclosure of how derogatory and perhaps insipid these 2 men can be. Only those who have paid for the satellite service, and chosen to listen to this channel out of the 100 available to them, are affected. That effectively makes it a conversation among willing participants. If a participant finds themselves in a conversation with a racist, or misogynist, or other individual I would call mentally deficient, you can just walk away. In this case perhaps that means changing the channel, turning the satellite radio off, or canceling your service (possibly with a letter addressed to the CEO of this publicly traded company). Some might even go so far as to sell their shares in the stock (the symbol being XMSR).
Though it’s given that Opie & Anthony can do what they did, and that they won’t be fired for it, there is something to consider. The women they have picked on are some of the most powerful in the world. I wouldn’t suggest either of these radio DJ’s go to England anytime in the near future. Britons are noted for their love of the Royal family. Picking on the wife of the President of the United States is hardly a smart career move. With a mere negative public comment the stock of XM radio could be cut in half in a second, and I guarantee they would be out the door immediately afterwards. [It can happen. I saw the President do this to several stocks when I was a stockbroker. It must be said that they were manipulated stocks, but the power to move the market instantly is unquestionable.] Secretary of State Rice is no less powerful and there isn’t a corporation in the world that would want to bring down her wrath or that of her office, just as many nations fear and respect her for the same reasons. I can’t say I’d be upset to see a backlash against these ‘men’.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Considering the recent uproar against Mr. Don Imus, Rev. Al Sharpton (for comments about the religion of Presidential hopeful Mr. Mitt Romney), and the rap hip-hop music genre for their insulting use of language, and disrespect of women, many are upset by this ‘comedy’ skit. While I find it vile and reprehensible, I cannot ask for their being fired. It’s not the same situation. Though it is sad that anyone would find humor on this subject, or would want to derive their income from promoting such commentary, I have to say that it is just my opinion.
I do not see any positive reason to encourage anyone to rape ANY woman, ever. I equally can’t imagine that the mothers of these 2 men are please with them. What a way to start the Mother’s Day weekend. I have to believe that both of these men are single, and likely to stay that way. But they should not be fired.
The fact is that they are not on public airwaves, they are dealing with public figures, and there is freedom of speech. The First Amendment allows for almost any comment, no matter how offensive. That is with the exception of directly causing or inciting harm against another individual. This is the reason that neo-nazi’s and klu klux klan members can have meeting. It’s also why you can’t scream fire in a crowded theater. As upsetting as it makes me, they have the right to say what they did; though it’s a close call.
The bigger reasons working for them are in part that all of the women are public figures. This is not an excuse for what was done. What it does mean is that they have venues and opportunities to respond in kind to these comments, if they chose to dignify them with a comment at all. There is no doubt that if any of these powerful and respected women chose to say something about this, it would be covered internationally in a second. There is no shortage of individuals and groups that will respond on their behalf and will have that covered as well. In a manner this is like Ms. Rosie O’Donnell picking a fight with Mr. Donald Trump, both took opportunities to respond publicly. Of course their spat never rose to the same level as this, but at points it was close.
But the most solid reason why they won’t be fired is because it was no a comment made to the public. Unlike Mr. Don Imus, this event happened on essentially closed airspace. Individuals subscribe to XM radio to receive this particular channel. There is full disclosure of how derogatory and perhaps insipid these 2 men can be. Only those who have paid for the satellite service, and chosen to listen to this channel out of the 100 available to them, are affected. That effectively makes it a conversation among willing participants. If a participant finds themselves in a conversation with a racist, or misogynist, or other individual I would call mentally deficient, you can just walk away. In this case perhaps that means changing the channel, turning the satellite radio off, or canceling your service (possibly with a letter addressed to the CEO of this publicly traded company). Some might even go so far as to sell their shares in the stock (the symbol being XMSR).
Though it’s given that Opie & Anthony can do what they did, and that they won’t be fired for it, there is something to consider. The women they have picked on are some of the most powerful in the world. I wouldn’t suggest either of these radio DJ’s go to England anytime in the near future. Britons are noted for their love of the Royal family. Picking on the wife of the President of the United States is hardly a smart career move. With a mere negative public comment the stock of XM radio could be cut in half in a second, and I guarantee they would be out the door immediately afterwards. [It can happen. I saw the President do this to several stocks when I was a stockbroker. It must be said that they were manipulated stocks, but the power to move the market instantly is unquestionable.] Secretary of State Rice is no less powerful and there isn’t a corporation in the world that would want to bring down her wrath or that of her office, just as many nations fear and respect her for the same reasons. I can’t say I’d be upset to see a backlash against these ‘men’.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Thursday, May 10, 2007
Paris Hilton needs jail - 5.10.2007.2
Let me deal with the apparent idiocy of Ms. Paris Hilton. This grown woman has claimed that she is about as responsible and attentive as a 5 year old, and that she should not be held to the same standards as ever other adult in the nation. Are you kidding me?
If you have not heard, and that would be hard to miss if you watch or read any news, Ms. Hilton was arrested for drunk driving on a suspended license. Since she broke probation, and was violating a law, the judge sentenced her to 45 days in prison. Going one step better the judge made sure that Ms. Hilton could not buy her way into a ‘club fed’ prison (which is something many celebrities are able to do when convicted) and will be confining her with regular inmates. It’s about time.
First of all, Ms. Paris Hilton was driving drunk. That alone can get you in jail. Second, she was driving with a suspended license, again potential jail time. Her claims that she was unaware her license was invalid are not credible because she had a ticket stating this fact in her glove compartment, and second ignorance of the law is not an excuse from being held accountable to the law. It’s just that simple.
What is happening is that Ms. Hilton is trying to have her money buy her out of a punishment she deserves. I feel she is a spoiled brat with too much money and far to little education or discipline. To claim that her publicist didn’t make her aware of her legal status is absurd. If she is enough of an adult to drive she is responsible for her ability to drive legally and sober. If she can’t be accountable without adult supervision she shouldn’t be able to drive.
If this were an average skinny White girl, there would be no uproar. If this were a Black woman again no questions. If it were a Black man, jail for a year or two and he may well have been beat down at the arrest by police officers. I don’t say the last part because I don’t like police (I’ve had many that I call my friend, including several L.A. detectives) but because there is a history of these kinds of cases leading to abuse. [I include my own experiences in this – like my being held at gunpoint by the police for the near crime of being a Black man in the passenger seat of a car driven by an Asian male, with 2 White men in the back seats, on Hollywood Blvd. on a Friday night after work while we were going to go have a drink.]
Yet there have been some 12,000 individuals that have signed a petition asking Gov. Arnold Schwartzenegger to give Ms. Hilton clemency. How stupid are these people. What makes Ms. Hilton worthy of such an act? What talent or action has she ever done that deserves such an honor? The fact that she is the poster child for tabloids, that she keeps multiple paparazzi employed, and that she has enough power from her family’s business that record companies and movie studios won’t tell her she has no talent, are not even worth her missing 1 day of her sentence.
Thankfully there is a petition that is asking to ensure that Ms. Paris Hilton goes to jail. This petition is some 42,000 signatures strong. Obviously I am not alone in thinking that this woman needs to grow up, and that her wealth does not preclude her from the law. Now if there were only a way to keep her mother from speaking to Gov. Schwartzenegger, which the family business ensures will happen.[By the way, if your mom was at a trial you were on and insulted the judge there is no question she’d get slapped with contempt of court and have a fine in the least against her. Paris Hilton’s mom should be thankful she won’t spend time in a cell next to her daughter.]
I have to say, I hope that Ms. Hilton gets a cell with ‘Shanequa’ and ‘Betty Jean Sue’. Let her think that her name will get her out of cleaning a toilet, and a couple of those rough-neck girls will straighten her out on the real facts of life. Perhaps that will help her get her act right. Or at least let us all have less chances of being forced to see and hear about her antics. Either one would be good for me.
This is what I think, what do you think?
If you have not heard, and that would be hard to miss if you watch or read any news, Ms. Hilton was arrested for drunk driving on a suspended license. Since she broke probation, and was violating a law, the judge sentenced her to 45 days in prison. Going one step better the judge made sure that Ms. Hilton could not buy her way into a ‘club fed’ prison (which is something many celebrities are able to do when convicted) and will be confining her with regular inmates. It’s about time.
First of all, Ms. Paris Hilton was driving drunk. That alone can get you in jail. Second, she was driving with a suspended license, again potential jail time. Her claims that she was unaware her license was invalid are not credible because she had a ticket stating this fact in her glove compartment, and second ignorance of the law is not an excuse from being held accountable to the law. It’s just that simple.
What is happening is that Ms. Hilton is trying to have her money buy her out of a punishment she deserves. I feel she is a spoiled brat with too much money and far to little education or discipline. To claim that her publicist didn’t make her aware of her legal status is absurd. If she is enough of an adult to drive she is responsible for her ability to drive legally and sober. If she can’t be accountable without adult supervision she shouldn’t be able to drive.
If this were an average skinny White girl, there would be no uproar. If this were a Black woman again no questions. If it were a Black man, jail for a year or two and he may well have been beat down at the arrest by police officers. I don’t say the last part because I don’t like police (I’ve had many that I call my friend, including several L.A. detectives) but because there is a history of these kinds of cases leading to abuse. [I include my own experiences in this – like my being held at gunpoint by the police for the near crime of being a Black man in the passenger seat of a car driven by an Asian male, with 2 White men in the back seats, on Hollywood Blvd. on a Friday night after work while we were going to go have a drink.]
Yet there have been some 12,000 individuals that have signed a petition asking Gov. Arnold Schwartzenegger to give Ms. Hilton clemency. How stupid are these people. What makes Ms. Hilton worthy of such an act? What talent or action has she ever done that deserves such an honor? The fact that she is the poster child for tabloids, that she keeps multiple paparazzi employed, and that she has enough power from her family’s business that record companies and movie studios won’t tell her she has no talent, are not even worth her missing 1 day of her sentence.
Thankfully there is a petition that is asking to ensure that Ms. Paris Hilton goes to jail. This petition is some 42,000 signatures strong. Obviously I am not alone in thinking that this woman needs to grow up, and that her wealth does not preclude her from the law. Now if there were only a way to keep her mother from speaking to Gov. Schwartzenegger, which the family business ensures will happen.[By the way, if your mom was at a trial you were on and insulted the judge there is no question she’d get slapped with contempt of court and have a fine in the least against her. Paris Hilton’s mom should be thankful she won’t spend time in a cell next to her daughter.]
I have to say, I hope that Ms. Hilton gets a cell with ‘Shanequa’ and ‘Betty Jean Sue’. Let her think that her name will get her out of cleaning a toilet, and a couple of those rough-neck girls will straighten her out on the real facts of life. Perhaps that will help her get her act right. Or at least let us all have less chances of being forced to see and hear about her antics. Either one would be good for me.
This is what I think, what do you think?
who I might look like - 5.10.2007.1
Yes, I know I’ve been out of touch. Lot’s of work, good weather and a golf round later here I am. And a few things have come up that may be of interest. Besides the pending jailing of Ms. Paris Hilton, the lawsuit made by Mr. OJ Simpson, and a report connecting oral sex with cancer I found a neat item matching pictures to celebrity photos.
I will be writing about the other subjects shortly, but I want to share the look-a-likes for my photos. The main thing that I will say is that while people in person mention to me that I look like Mr. Denzel Washington (particularly in his role as Malcolm X), this program seems to think not. One of my best matches was to Mr. Cuba Gooding Jr., and I even got a match to Mr. Johnny Depp. Who knew.
Tell me what you think.
and
I will be writing about the other subjects shortly, but I want to share the look-a-likes for my photos. The main thing that I will say is that while people in person mention to me that I look like Mr. Denzel Washington (particularly in his role as Malcolm X), this program seems to think not. One of my best matches was to Mr. Cuba Gooding Jr., and I even got a match to Mr. Johnny Depp. Who knew.
Tell me what you think.
and
Tuesday, May 01, 2007
Starbury sneakers from Stephon Marbury - 5.1.2007.1
I must say I am impressed. There are few basketball players I am aware of that are really worth talking about these days. I admit I am not a fan of basketball; I liken it to tennis with 12 players a side. That does not mean I don’t think they have more skill than average at the professional level. Given my lack of knowledge, I am aware of certain players. One that has recently caught my attention, Mr. Stephon Marbury, as I mentioned impressed me.
What I am impressed about has nothing to do with his ability to bounce a ball (or the more controversial aspects of his sports career), but what he is doing about his responsibility to present a positive image to children. I cannot speak about his everyday actions, but his new line of sneakers demands conversation.
I saw Mr. Marbury being interviewed by Mr. Neil Cavuto yesterday on Fox News. The reason was the conversation on his new line of sneakers, Starbury. They cost $15. I did not forget the 0 in the number. Imagine that, a line of sneakers promoted by a star athlete,
that costs what they are worth. I thought the day would never come.
Finally someone is waking up and realizing that children, often from inner cities where money can be tight, cannot and should not need to afford ridiculously overpriced goods. Every sneaker on the market costs maybe $5 to make at the most, I’d guess, and parents have long been gouged to provide their kids the latest brand at retail costs in the $100+ range. When you consider that most products that can make a 20% profit are considered goldmines by corporations across the world you start to see the rip-off.
Mr. Marbury is giving back to the Black Community, and moreso to kids in NYC high schools that play varsity basketball. That is an act of kindness and responsibility. It’s a reminder that “bling” [truly a term of absolute ignorance] is just a way to stay poor and make someone else rich for no reason. It’s a lesson in fiscal responsibility, which I hope could lead to personal responsibility. It’s an entertainer doing something for the fans and not for their bank account. And it’s about time.
I don’t fault anyone for making or endorsing a product and getting paid for it. Even better if they actually support and/or believe in the product. But ripping-off kids is wrong no matter what the reason. And it’s insulting when a multi-millionaire exploits fans, especially those in the least economically capable communities, to make another buck. Even the worst stockbrokers I worked with or knew of in the market would NEVER take money from kids and orphans. To make it blunt, profits in excess of 200% for a piece of sporting equipment that can’t survive the wear and tear of daily use beyond 6 months or so, and targeted to children and young adults, is exploitive.
I also laud Mr. Marbury for being one of the NBA leading donations for Hurricane Katrina victims and the several barbers he has at Coney Island to provide free haircuts to the youth. Are all these actions the biggest things that can be done to help the community? No. Do they make a statement? I feel they do. What might that statement be?
I feel that unlike most athletes Mr. Marbury is stating that money is not the be all of life. That his personal prosperity is not more important than those that provide him the prosperity. He seems to realize that the fans are the reason for his success, ultimately. And he presents an image that is severely lacking among entertainers and celebrities today, especially if those entertainers are African American. That image is class, pride, perhaps humility. That is what I have been able to gather.
I don’t know a lot about Mr. Marbury, and even less about his profession of choice. Yet what I have been able to divine seems worthwhile, even though there are missteps which is part of being human. That is worth talking about, more to the point it’s worth having our children emulate to an extent.
This is what I think, what do you think?
What I am impressed about has nothing to do with his ability to bounce a ball (or the more controversial aspects of his sports career), but what he is doing about his responsibility to present a positive image to children. I cannot speak about his everyday actions, but his new line of sneakers demands conversation.
I saw Mr. Marbury being interviewed by Mr. Neil Cavuto yesterday on Fox News. The reason was the conversation on his new line of sneakers, Starbury. They cost $15. I did not forget the 0 in the number. Imagine that, a line of sneakers promoted by a star athlete,
that costs what they are worth. I thought the day would never come.
Finally someone is waking up and realizing that children, often from inner cities where money can be tight, cannot and should not need to afford ridiculously overpriced goods. Every sneaker on the market costs maybe $5 to make at the most, I’d guess, and parents have long been gouged to provide their kids the latest brand at retail costs in the $100+ range. When you consider that most products that can make a 20% profit are considered goldmines by corporations across the world you start to see the rip-off.
Mr. Marbury is giving back to the Black Community, and moreso to kids in NYC high schools that play varsity basketball. That is an act of kindness and responsibility. It’s a reminder that “bling” [truly a term of absolute ignorance] is just a way to stay poor and make someone else rich for no reason. It’s a lesson in fiscal responsibility, which I hope could lead to personal responsibility. It’s an entertainer doing something for the fans and not for their bank account. And it’s about time.
I don’t fault anyone for making or endorsing a product and getting paid for it. Even better if they actually support and/or believe in the product. But ripping-off kids is wrong no matter what the reason. And it’s insulting when a multi-millionaire exploits fans, especially those in the least economically capable communities, to make another buck. Even the worst stockbrokers I worked with or knew of in the market would NEVER take money from kids and orphans. To make it blunt, profits in excess of 200% for a piece of sporting equipment that can’t survive the wear and tear of daily use beyond 6 months or so, and targeted to children and young adults, is exploitive.
I also laud Mr. Marbury for being one of the NBA leading donations for Hurricane Katrina victims and the several barbers he has at Coney Island to provide free haircuts to the youth. Are all these actions the biggest things that can be done to help the community? No. Do they make a statement? I feel they do. What might that statement be?
I feel that unlike most athletes Mr. Marbury is stating that money is not the be all of life. That his personal prosperity is not more important than those that provide him the prosperity. He seems to realize that the fans are the reason for his success, ultimately. And he presents an image that is severely lacking among entertainers and celebrities today, especially if those entertainers are African American. That image is class, pride, perhaps humility. That is what I have been able to gather.
I don’t know a lot about Mr. Marbury, and even less about his profession of choice. Yet what I have been able to divine seems worthwhile, even though there are missteps which is part of being human. That is worth talking about, more to the point it’s worth having our children emulate to an extent.
This is what I think, what do you think?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)