Phoenix Airport - Homeward bound, eventually

The time in Las Vegas has been great. I was able to speak with a few teams from across the country, saw the Chris Angel show, had a great meal in the Cat House in Luxor (review coming soon), saw various sites and got a bit of a tan.

Then my team and I headed home.

Some 2 1/2 months ago we were told by our APA league operator that our flight home was the best he could do. Chris W. had scheduled my team to go home via Las Vegas to Phoenix, to Detroit, to Wilkes Barre from which we could drive almost 2 hours to get home. When we were at the Las Vegas Airport we were told by a ticket agent

"Whoever got you these tickets really doesn't like you."

That was said because we were on the last flight out of Las Vegas to Phoenix. It meant that we would be in the airport some 7 1/2 hours before continuing our flight. This is how grand an experience Phoenix is at 12:30am



Now at the time of the video I have been up some 16 hours and was wearing a hat earlier - so forgive my look. Were there a place to sleep in Phoenix I wouldn't be writing this. Or if there was a bar, a newstand, a television, a comfortable chair. Anything. But there isn't, especially since everything closes at 8pm reportedly.

How bad does it seem that Chris W. feels about my team?

Well our sister team from Central New York (Endicott) left Las Vegas 3 hours after us, and will arrive home some 8 to 10 hours before us. This is a team who flew to Las Vegas with us on 2 of the 3 flights we took to Vegas. Somehow, as we were told at the time, there was no way to get from Las Vegas to anywhere near home without taking 17 hours with 8 people on the same flights. Though our tickets were booked 2 1/2 months in advance. And there was obviously another way to get the other team home sooner. And we are taking an entirely differnt route than we took to get here.

Even worse is the fact that the ticket agents in Las Vegas let us know that there was a flight roughly 3 hours earlier that had the seats we needed and would have gotten us home the same night.

To be fair, our flight was set this way (we were told) in case we made it to the finals of the competition. Of course we did not know that if we did, it would have meant that we would have had to win the competition in less than 2 1/2 hours, get paid, get team photos, get into a cab/limo, race thru Saturday evening Las Vegas traffic, get our tickets, rush through security and make the plane with a spare 5 minutes before departure. And that's the best case scenario. Suffice to say that doesn't work any better than the other facts I have learned.

So with that wonderful news I sit in Phoenix, while my team is sleeping on the floors and chairs in an airport that is closed, without access to anything until 4am at the earliest. It's 90 degrees outside and humid. There are major restrictions on where you can smoke, the place is empty of everyone but TSA guards (especially one woman with an attitude and an aversion to questions about the airport) cleaning crews, and 5 people besides my team (2 of which are on last minute flight changes).

Is this return home spoiling the experience of the APA National 8-ball competition? Oh yeah. Do I personally think that better could have been done? On several levels I have come to the conclusion that it seems so.

These are of course my thoughts. They are not those of my team. And the fact that I have another 15 hours of traveling is not improving my thoughts about this matter.

More coverage of the good parts of the Las Vegas trip and competition some time after this journey ends. (Hey, do you know if it took this long for Lewis and Clark to find Mississippi?)

Las Vegas: Bellaggio Water Show

One of the sites in Las Vegas that I would reccomend is the Bellaggio Water Show. If you have seen the Ocean's Eleven remake (with Brad Pitt, George Clooney, Matt Damon, and Don CCheadle et al) then you saw part of the show at the end of the movie.

At 10 pm, and roughly every 15 minutes there after, there is a different display of the water jets in front of the Bellaggio Hotel Casino. It is a mix of lights, water sprayed jets, and music. Generally they last about 3 - 5 minutes each. I saw a show to Frank Sinatra, a classical piece of music and the theme to the Good The Bad and The Ugly.

Here is a video of the show to the latter of the shows I watched. It's the best video I could take at the time, but I think it is a great display. And if you are wondering the major water blasts get up about 50 feet or more and are awesome so see. It all sounds like a fireworks show or cannons when the jets go off.

Las Vegas review: Circus Circus

So, let me talk a bit about the accomodations in Las Vegas. For people unfamiliar, the APA (American Poolplayers Association) has hundreds of regional leagues. At the end of each sesaon the top team(s) qualify to go to Las Vegas for the National copmetion. The APA pays for the airfare and lodging.

I won't speak about the airfare (other than the fact that my team will spend 17 hours to get home, while another Endicott team will be home in about half that time). The hotel used by the APA is Circus Circus. Every team I am aware of in the competition gets to stay at the Manor group of rooms. Players can upgrade to other rooms at their own cost.

All of my team except myself stayed in the Manor, buildings A & C, and our sister team from Endicott was in building E. The rooms are large compared to most hotels. I would say they are about the size of 2 single rooms. This is likely due to the fact that Circus Circus has roughly 40% more families with young children than any other hotel in Vegas.

Though the rooms are larger, that does not mean better. The look of the rooms is slightly better than say a Motel 6. The carpets look faded and worn, as do the walls. The beds are ok, but you just get a sense of things being drab here. Plus several people I met here found the rooms at the Manor to have a slight odor. It won't kill you, but it's not the top end of Vegas. Then again the prices of these rooms are hardly over the top. Great for a family on a budget.

The rooms in the Skyview Tower are far better. Still spacious, though not as much as the Manor rooms. The carpets, bedding, and decor look far newer and less worn. The bathrooms are larger and look much cleaner.

Either rooms will easily fit 4 adults.

Throughout the Circus Circus hotel there is decorations that are circus themed. Some of the paintings are nice, but most are very post-modern or abstract. I personally did not like them, especially in the buffett area. But I imagine they are very kid friendly and thus families would enjoy them.

In fact, compared to the Riviera, Luxor, or Mandalay Bay Circus Circus is the best option to a family with young (under 18) kids. For more adult experiences, and less interaction with children other Casino/Resorts are the choice.

The gaming area is relatively smaller, with lower ceilings than found in newer Casinos. It also has a far smaller gaming area. So if you enjoy table games you may prefer to play at a differnt Casino. They do have a huge slots area. But the table games tend to have lower minimum bets, even over the weekend, than in other Casinos.

Also, directly in front of Circus Circus is Slots O' Fun. This is a very small selection of mostly slot machines. Again this focuses on the lower priced games. It also has $3 minimum Blackjack tables and a $3 minimum Craps table.

I would not recommend the Craps table at Slots O' Fun as it is always very crowed, filled with people unfamiliar with the game and thus plays slow, and has inexperienced or comparatively poor dealers. If you do play the Craps table, it helps if you know the bets and the payouts, as occasional mistakes do happen, especially as the crowd gets less experienced.

In front of Slots O' Fun is an automated ticket booth and a stop for the city bus. This will allow you to buy a 24-hour ticket to take you along the main strip and most every major casino. The tickets cost $7 for 24-hours and $3 one way. I recommend the $7 ticket, but beware. The bus often is crowded in any direction and you may have to wait for more than one bus to come by to get on, so plan for the time. Plus traffic can make a trip take longer than you would expect. But it is worth it, especially in a week like this one past where the temperature topped 105 every day.

Circus Circus also has a pool area, like most casino/resorts. There are 2 pools and 2 hot tub areas. They all are of decent size. The pool goes from 3" to 6" gradually, with 2 lifeguards available at all times it is open (9 - 8). The hot tub is about 3 1/2" with a shelf seat. As with the rest of the hotel at Circus circus, expect lots of children running around.

Overall I found the stay at Circus Circus to be decent. It's accomodations are fair compared to it's price. If you can afford the Tower rooms I advise them. If you can deal with lots of kids around, or if you have kids, this is one of the better places to take them.

Preview of 8-ball tournament play in Las Vegas

I'm still in Las Vegas for a while more, but I decided to put together a quick little video of the Endicott team (playing for the Guys & Dolls pool hall) arriving at Circus Circus, and playing at the APA National 8-ball Pool Tournament held in the Riviera.

This is a quick video, I will have several more once I have a chance to edit all the videos and pictures I have taken.

This video features several members of the team, including:

Gregg Cordero
Bob 'Panama' Grabow
Gary Hinckley
Gage Majka
Zachary Majka
John Miller
Robert 'Coty' Miller
Michael Vass

Video highlights - Team arriving in a stretch limo, Zach Majka finishing off a game, Panama in a match. (video taken by Claudia Miller in visitor stands)

Video of APA Las Vegas National Pool Tournament

Here is the promised video of Round 2 of the Guys and Dolls 8-ball team at the Las Vegas 2009 APA National Pool Tournament. The quality is not perfect but it is the best that we could make without disrupting the other teams.



Vegas has been fun so far. The tournament is still going forward. More videos, soon.

Live from Las Vegas 2009 APA National Pool Tournament

Hey everyone. Well I arrived in Las Vegas Monday afternoon. A bit of jetlag and tired from the 3 planes we had to take to get here(the plane and room was paid for by the APA). The entire Guys and Dolls team from Edicott NY arrived safe and sound.

We got lucky and did not have to play until 8am today (tuesday). So I went out and played some craps in Circus Circus. So far I have been down, even, and back down a little. Which isn't too bad considering how fast craps can go. Hope to get comped and rated by the time we leave.

Enjoyed a nice buffett at Circus Circus, though the rooms in the manor are pretty poor - though large. I have a room (seperate of what was paid for) in the Sky Tower, which is far nicer.

The weather is great. About 105, dry, and sunny.

As for how things are going in the APA National Pool Tournament of 2009, things are even better. I played in the first match and won my games against a 6. It was a strong showing, 4 - 2, and helped my team win our first 3 games and thus the match. Gary Hinkley and Zach Majka also won their matches in the same manner.

Our next match will be at 6pm. We plan on continuing our winning streak.

I plan to have video of one of the games in my match up once Youtube loads the video. Quality is a bit low, but you can watch the whole game.

I also got to meet Jeanette Lee. I will have a picture of her shortly. She is great. There was a mentally disabled young man that came to have her sign a picture for her. He mentioned that she was his favorite. And Lee decided to do something special. She got one of her personal gloves, (which were not available for sale or signing) and signed it for the young man. Then took a photo with him. It was really swwet and everyone there cheered afterwards. She is really sweet, was talking to her fans and being very generous to us all.

Obviously I'm having a great time. I expect to speak with a few players, and have interviews for you soon. Most of it all will be after I get back.

Look for the video later. Need to eat and then go to my next match.

Vegas bound

Well in just a few short hours My 8-ball pool team will be off to the APA 8-ball National Pool Tournament. I will strive to provide updates and video through out the week.

More as soon as possible

Bill Cosby to receive the Mark Twain Prize for American Humor

There is no doubt that Bill Cosby is a standout among his peers. For nearly 5 decades he has made people laugh across the globe. He created the beloved cartoon Fat Albert, he broke racial barriers in television, and he created and starred in one of the most beloved shows on television since the 1980's (The Cosby Show). He is so well loved that he is often referred to as "America's Dad".

So there really should be no surprise that he will be receiving the 2009 Mark Twain Prize for American Humor. In 2002 he received the highest civillian award possible, the Presidential Medal of Freedom. And then there are the three consecutive Emmy Awards for Outstanding Lead Actor in a Drama Series he received for I Spy in the 1960's (a breakthru for the racial attitudes of the nation at the time), 2003 Bob Hope Humanitarian Award.

How well loved is Bill Cosby? Here is the announced list of enertainers that will appear at the awards ceremony:

Dick Gregory, Sinbad, Carl Reiner, George Lopez, Wynton Marsalis, Jimmy Heath, Willie Nelson, Len Chandler, symphonic orchestra conductor James DePreist, Phylicia Rashad, Malcolm-Jamal Warner, Rita Moreno, Danny Glover, Jerry Seinfeld, and Chris Rock.

Talk about a line-up of the who's who in entertainment.

Of course Dr. Cosby (it is often forgotten that he did drop out of school, but returned and earned a doctotrate) is not without his own controversies. Most notable is his outspoken stance on "problems prevalent in underprivileged urban communities such as taking part in illegal drugs, teenage pregnancy, Black Entertainment Television, high school dropouts, anti-intellectualism, gangsta rap, vulgarity, thievery, offensive clothing, vanity, parental alienation, single parenting and failing to live up to the ideals of Frederick Douglass, Martin Luther King, Jr. and the African American ancestors that preceded Generation X".

I personally find most of his views dead-on.

So I suggest that everyone keep an eye on PBS in November. The award will be televized Nov 4th 2009, though the ceremony will happen on October 26th.

From Right and Left, the media gets Hillsboro town hall wrong

On August 18th, Bill O’Reilly discussed the charges of racism at a Missouri town hall. This is a news item that first surfaced on CNN, and has since risen in controversy. O’Reilly, and Dr. Marc Hill went over several of the facts of this case.



The problems though are many. Foremost is the fact that it seems all the details of what happened have yet to be accurately described. Yes, the White male was arrested for assault. Yes, signs are not allowed at that town hall meeting. Yes, the woman was in violation, and it is unclear what was in the mind of either individual involved.

The fact that the poster was of Rosa Parks does not instantly mean anyone knew who she was on the poster. I bet many of my readers wouldn’t be able to pick out Rosa Parks picture without help. Still that does not give anyone else a right to assault someone for the poster either. Even if they disagree with the poster. But that doesn’t make it an outright racial event. Especially at a highly heated debate as the health care reform issue is.

Based on those facts, CNN is wrong in allowing a depiction of this being a racist act. But O’Reilly is wrong to dismiss the accusations of signs with the N-word. It is something that is being reported, though not visually backed up, and thus is questionable as to veracity. So Dr. Hill should have stood stronger on that point.

But when Dr. Hill makes the claim that the town halls, across the nation as he implies, are all racist – I think he is channeling Speaker Nancy Pelosi. There is no proof of this. There is no way to even make a credible argument for this. So in effect all he is doing is fanning racial flames. Which is wrong.

But O’Reilly goes off the deep end when he assumes that the only possible way a person can find there to be racial animus at a town hall is if a White opposes President Obama’s health care reform – and thus must be assumed a racist by anyone Black. It is illogical and fallacious and insulting. Such reasoning is as bad as the claims of Dr. Hill. If this is not what O’Reilly meant, he did a supremely poor job of making his position clear.

But there is more to this, as I found on Youtube.



Given the additional video evidence, the question of racial discord seems far more credible. To a degree.

There is the fact that the initial incident looked to be approaching an explosion point. Which would mandate the separation of both parties. But if the excuse for the removal of the Black woman is the fact that she had a sign, why were the others with signs and flags allowed to stay? Why were police so forceful with the Black woman, once she was separated from the man assaulting her, and adamant in expelling her? Why were police so uncaring in dealing with other sign holders in the crowd?

And from the evidence I was able to find, I did not once see anything that included the N-word. Nor am I aware of any credible source stating that. Still there was a remarked difference, which should be addressed.

Was this event a blatant racially biased event? I think not. Though there was plenty of insensitivity and more than enough emotion – for various reasons. And I think that CNN, Tim Wise, Fox News, O’Reilly and Dr. Hill are all equally at blame for sensationalizing what happened at Hillsboro. Which just makes it that much harder to really address obvious issues when they appear in the media.

In all honesty, the major media can kiss my buttock when it comes to covering racial bias in this nation. The major media has a blind eye to what really should be discussed, and a knack for sensationalizing the more trivial events. I mean I still have yet to watch coverage of the Oscar Grant case, or Adolph Grimes and Robbie Tolan, which took place this year. Yet there was no end to coverage of OJ, and the spin on that was anything but a witch hunt.

This event is a tough call. It is obvious that there is a disparity. Much like the systemic disparity I have often spoken about. But if we only get to see the edited versions the major media provides we are left with an equally biased and unfair view of events from either side.

Perhaps that is the most important thing to keep in mind. Today the problem is not only the systemic problems that we as a nation have carried forward over centuries, but the overreactions of media in (rarely) both directions when they do choose to hype a situation. Ultimately neither helps resolve anything. And everyone loses.

I don’t think all town halls are like this. I don’t think everyone is like this. But until we deal with the underlying issues, and the ideological propaganda of the major media, it will only get worse.

Sen. Schumer responds to Michael Vass - repost from Mvass.com

***Due to the critical nature of this proposal, and how it will affect every American, I felt it important to post this here as well as at my political blog, VASS***

On August 11, 2009 I sent email and written letters to Senator Gillibrand, Senator Schumer, Representative Hinchey, and President Obama about the proposed Health Care Reform Bill currently in Congress. To date there has been only 1 response, from Senator Charles Schumer.

The entire email from Senator Schumer can be seen in the comments section of the post Asking Sen. Gillibrand, Sen. Schumer, Rep. Hinchey about the Healthcare Bill. This post is a commentary on the response I have received compared to what I asked.

First I want to thank Senator Schumer for responding. On an issue that is so critical to the nation, and so hotly debated, information is critical. I am happy to be able to share his response with all my readers, and the constituents of New York State that Sen. Schumer represents.

As to what I asked Sen. Schumer, I detailed 22 questions that I have found to be among the top questions Americans have about the health Care Reform and how it will affect American lives. Senator Schumer provided me what I believe is a form letter response. That response did not answer even the most simple question I asked,

“Have you personally read and understood all 1000+ pages of the proposed Health Care Reform Bill?”

Worse, the letter sent to me by Sen. Schumer assumes I support the Health Care Reform being proposed, and the public option.

“Thank you for contacting me and expressing your support for increasing access and coverage in health care reform.”

To be clear, I took a neutral stance in my letter asking that he provide answers to questions only.

Sen. Schumer further stated

“I also strongly support the establishment of a public health insurance option which would create a not-for-profit insurance plan, started by the government, which would compete on a level playing field with existing private health insurance plans. Because the public health insurance option would be not-for-profit, it would help to lower premiums and, therefore, exert downward pressure on the premiums of existing insurance plans. This change is pro-consumer because it adds competition to insurance markets, allowing New Yorkers and all Americans one more choice of affordable and comprehensive health insurance.”

It’s a nice pat response. But it does not address the question of why alternatives are not on the table. Like increasing competition by allowing Americans to pick ANY insurance plan in the nation and not just those in their state. Or the question of why any employer would continue to pay increased costs to maintain a healthcare plan (that workers may be happy with) when they can increase funds by dropping healthcare and forcing workers onto the Government plan (which they may not like or want). Or other questions that I directly asked about

“2) Does the current Health Care Reform Bill (HCRB) require any Americans to switch existing coverage to a Government plan? If so how many Americans are estimated to be required to change and where does that estimate come from?

7) Is there a punitive cost to the HCRB? To clarify, it has been stated that those electing not to take the Government plan will incur a 2.5% penalty assessed in their taxes. Is that correct? Is there any additional cost beyond that?

11) Will the American Government have access to private patient information that is currently restricted by law from the Government database?

12) What incentive will private insurers (who employ tens of thousands of Americans) have to compete with a Government plan that is paid for by taxpayers and thus can be run at an annual loss?
15) Will Congress and/or any elected official be mandated to be covered by the exact same Government program as the general public? If not why?

19) Why is there a need to pass the HCRB before the 4th quarter? Already we have seen that immediate passage of the Obama Stimulus package created unforeseen problems, as one example. Why is taking more time to review all aspects of the 1100 page Bill, and it’s most likely effects, counter-productive to the American public?

21) How many of the estimated 47 million people (roughly 12% of all Americans) without healthcare will remain without coverage based on the HCRB, if any?”

Notice that not one of my questions, and there are more, is answered. Not one of the issues that Americans across the globe have raised is covered. Not one reason other than Sen. Schumer says it’s a good idea and that he is working hard is provided.

Now I will not make a conclusion about the response of Sen. Schumer, beyond what observations I have already made. I leave that to you my reader.

Is his response to my 22 questions good enough? Is his answer enough of a reason for you to support the Health Care Reform? Are your questions answered?

I do not know if, or when, any other elected official will respond to my 22 questions on Health Care Reform. I do know that when the mid-term elections of 2010 come up, I will make sure that the several hundred thousand voting Americans that read my posts are reminded of the verbatim response (or lack thereof) our elected officials felt was worthy of giving the public.

In addition, I will be sending another letter to Sen. Schumer. In that letter, which I will provide to my readers on this blog, I will remind the Senator that he failed to address a single concern I mentioned. And that as a voting New York State resident, as well as member of the press, I am deserving of a bit more than what seems to be a form letter that fails to provide any direct or indirect information on one of the admittedly most important issues of our day.

Perhaps Sen. Schumer will respond better on the second try. In addition, I will attempt to contact the Senator via phone.

More as I have details.

Would you call Michael Vass a racist?

Recently I received a comment from my discussion of the upcoming Disney film The Princess and the Frog, that made several claims and challenges that I though would be best to deal with in total as a post. You can see the comment from Logan Calder at http://www.blackandwhiteblog.net/2009/04/22/movie-preview-the-princess-and-the-frog/ and in quotes below.

“Ok, fair enough. I want to add that I have no problem with your issues of unfair treatment of Blacks in this country. My issues and responses are based on what I see as your Afrocentrism, which basically is racism against Whites in a costume - why you need to concentrate on diminishing Whites can be understood if you are a racist Black person, but is no different than a racist White person.”

Ok, I am confused. Are there people in America that believe this? That they can state that they understand that African Americans have, and continue, to be treated with bias and prejudice; but if you identify such abuses, and are Black (or Black Puerto Rican in my case), then it is Afrocentrism and racist?

Let’s be clear. I am Black and Latino. I am an American. I love my country, and my heritages. But neither stops me from pointing out that in the greatest nation on the planet – a country I would readily die for as is – there is systemic abuses and problems in regards to people of color. Being American, of any color, does not preclude facts.

By the way Afrocentrism is defined as

“a world view which emphasizes the importance of African people, taken as a single group and often equated with "Black people", in culture, philosophy, and history.[2] The roots of Afrocentrism lay in a reaction to the repression of Black people throughout the Western world in the 19th century and as a backlash against the scientific racism of the period, which tended to attribute any advanced civilization to the immigration of Proto-Indo-Europeans and their descendants.[3] Part of this reaction involved reviewing history to document the contributions that Black people made to world civilization.”

I do not see myself as such, though aspects of this are surely part of me. As it should be for anyone of any particular group. I am proud of who I am, and what I do, and my ancestors. I will never apologize for that.

And I see no reason not to note the contributions of African Americans in this nation. Something that is all but ignored in basic educations, the media, entertainment, and general life in this nation. America tends to ignore people of color, especially African Americans, because to not do so means the nation has to deal with past and current biases. Which America is unwilling to do.

But is it racist? Am I racist?

Over the years of my writing I have had a multitude of people I know across the world, of most every nationality and background, read my writing. Only in America has anyone found my writing, about race relations, even somewhat disturbing. And of those in America, only those that don’t know me have ever made accusations of racism. Generally after reading just one post, instead of the thousands I have written. And generally they have taken a statement out of context or reinterpeted my words to fit a pre-existing view they have.

Still I wonder about this. When I discuss the fact that a photo of a Black man wading through post-Katrina waters with a bag is called a looter by national media, and an exactly the same photo of a White man doing the same thing is called foraging to stay alive, am I being racist? When I discussed the fact that repeatedly African American males are shot by police, across the country, in a hail of dozens of bullets while unarmed, and that I am unaware of there ever being similar treatment to White males, is that racist? When I note that some 90%+ of all media ignores completely people of color, or that specific and often insulting references are made just for people of color, is that too racist?

Or am I just commenting on a racial bias that is so ingrained in the society that most people ignore it as commonplace. Am I hoping to note the inequality and systemic problem that prevents true respect and societal bonding, or is it just one guy screaming Black Power?

“Ultimately I still dont know why any of this matters, pointing out who is Black and who is White. Blacks and Whites both want to claim king Tut, Jesus, and Bob Marley as theirs, as if they would justify that the race they belong to is the better. It is still a racist thought that is driving the force, to need to claim someone of mixed race is theirs. Do you get it?. Do you need to claim that “we are Gods first” if you are Black?? you are really saying “we are Gods real children and are therefore better than you” and then that same person gets mad if a White person is a racist.”

First off, Jesus, Bob Marley, and with some question King Tut are all Negroid (which I will call Black to simplify). Why is that important? Because in American society, where almost all positive actions and contributions of history and the nation’s development have been either ignored or rewritten, the truth is necessary. In fact the truth is always important. Because lies always lead to a problem down the road.

Plus I think that correcting misconceptions is important. Queen Nefertiti never looked like Elizabeth Taylor. To assume as much steals away the history of my ancestors and perverts history. It diminishes people when you relegate them to nothing. And any people that are nothing can be treated as less than human. Which American history is rife with. Such was the excuses to justify slavery and the invasion of “savage” people across the world. Not to mention the “saving” of Native American Indians. I don’t think it’s racist to correct that.

Though I have never claimed anyone was God’s first. I dare anyone to find such a comment on any post or comment I have ever made. To say that I have is to totally misunderstand everything I have ever written and to place words in my mouth I have never spoken. It is insulting.

“I simply get tired of a racial debate, that continually attacks White people in a racist and/or degrading manner for being racist. It is my belief that racism is absolutely equal among races, and that 80% of us dont really care too much, but do have racial or prejudcial views. The other 10% of radicals are at both ends - one hates their own race and the other hates everyone else. It is definetly NOT a White only thing. In fact, Whites are the only race taught (by the same media you claim is so racist) to be ashamed of being proud of who they are!!. If it were equal we wouldnt have Obama or Sotomayor in office.”

I don’t agree with attacking anyone, without cause. I am as willing to take on the Government, racists, corporations, global warming, political lies, and bad entertainment. The question is not the color, but the content. But I will not back away from critiquing President Obama because he is Black, just as I have no problem taking on ex-officer Mehserle because he is White.

But it is not racist to point out the systemic problems in the nation. Problems that benefit some, and hinder others. Generally those that are people of color. Is it racist to ask why the nation is so focused on Mexico and the potential threat from terrorists, when all terrorists that have entered the nation have come from Canada which is ignored? That’s not an attack on White people, but it does bring up the question of what factors are involved in such a mentality.

Is racism really equal among all people? I don’t know. But in America, my experience says that it is not. Partially that is because there are so many things taken as commonplace that it is not recognized as bias. But there are indeed those that are prejudiced. And it’s not 10%. If you recall the polls done before the election of 2008, fully 20% of those polled directly stated they could not vote for a Black man. And that’s those (in both political parties) that were willing to answer the question.

Because America has not move that far forward since the 1960’s, as much as we try to imagine so. We just generally prefer to avoid the questions or answers. It’s more PC and no one will feel socially awkward. This is not the same thing.

But you are right. Racism is not solely a White thing. While not nearly as common it does exist in some people of color in this nation. And I don’t support that either. But that is not the same as being willing to address the issues in this nation. Black or White or whatever, the issues exist – pointing them out is not racist.

As for Whites being ashamed, where do you see that? Maybe I missed it. Which you might understand as 95% of all characters in movies and television are White. 97% of all commentators and pundits are White. I believe that some 80% of all politicians are White. 97% of all major CEO’s are White. And on and on.

So where is the media saying it’s bad to be White? Considering that most people of color are not addressed in almost every form of media, except when a negative is expressed, how are we being lifted above anyone?

As for President Obama, and Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor, they are political and I have addressed my thoughts of both at my political site VASS. Though I will ask, how was a bias of their color created to benefit them? If every African American, hell every person of color in America voted for President Obama (which they did not) he would still need an overwhelming number of Whites to be elected (as he was). And Judge Sotomayor got nominated because she is a woman and liberal, not due to some benefit of her race.

“Lets say we all wake up tomorrow and agree with you, on the absolutely ridiculous notion that America is here because of Africans and would never have made it into the greatest country on earth without slave labor - a completely absurd notion and belief but it is yours, and based on a need outlined above.

Does anything change??? No!! - why not stick to current and the future instead of using the past to make wounds?? I have never yet met anyone, who has told me that their family had been on American soil long enough to have been a slave owner.”

First, you do wake up in that reality. Without slave labor America could not exist. That’s not opinion, that’s fact. Do the math, check the population numbers (where African Americans were counted). Add up the money that the labor of slaves should have made. Remove the manpower they provided and see what would have been left of the nation at the time. To deny the facts is absurd and revisionist dreaming. Thus my need is for people to accept nothing more than what has happened. Because less is insulting, and something that most Americans would not stand for if it were them.

As for families that were slave owners, you are either being obtuse or uninformed. Millions have traced back their lineages to find they were either slaves or slave owners. My family line goes back to about 1860, and the records end because the slave owners before that did not see a need to document their “property”. But I do have that slave owners name in 1860. So do a lot of people.

It’s just that a majority of people don’t want to face that truth. They don’t want to know. Just as they don’t want to know about racism, or prejudice, or bias. Because they feel bad. Because the system helps Whites and hurts people of color. And who wants to have to have that on their back – since the system is not being changed.

So the past is the present. To address one is to address the other. To fix one is to start on fixing it all. And to do nothing is to bask in the benefits some have at the cost of others. Which I do not agree with.

Am I a racist? No, I don’t think so. Those that know me across the world don’t think so. I’m just upfront about addressing what is and is not really going on in America. Which is not an accusation, just a reality. And for some such honesty is too harsh to deal with. And thus I must be at fault since their worldview cannot be so corrupt.

It still doesn’t make me a racist, but I understand why I absolutely have to be for some people.

Oliver Stone wants to tell you his story in Secret History

Are you a fan of Oliver Stone? I used to be, for a while. Like most people I loved several of his films. He made a visual impact that allowed the viewer to get a serious sense of the world he portrayed on film. Then he decided to get preachy, and showcased his own political beliefs. Which is when he lost me and many others.

Stone is probably best known for his film, Platoon. It was a serious and mostly honest view of aspects of fighting in Viet Nam. Many vets I know appreciated the feel of the film, something that Stone knows well as a decorated (Purple Heart and Bronze Star) Viet Nam-era Army soldier.

He also made Wall Street, a huge film that hit big. It showcased the 1980’s drive for success at all costs. It also gave us a hint at his own views of Wall Street. In his visual depiction it was a place of greed and corruption, filled with the morally corrupt. A view that I personally found insulting once I became a stockbroker and learned the reality of what that important tool of the economy is really about.

He has also made Natural Born Killers (a film originally written by Quentin Tarrantino – who disliked the film enough to ask his name be removed from it) and Any Given Sunday – which really gave Jamie Foxx a chance to breakout in Hollywood.

But those are his successful films. Each was a good film with an interesting view of life. It’s what’s kept him working and his name high in Hollywood circles (besides Stone’s political views). It is his flops, or less successful films that has lost him the fanbase that he once commanded.

Oliver Stone is a Liberal. There is no question or shame in that. It’s just that he has emphasized that in his growing body of work. And he has basked in the Hollywood liberal mentality while audiences have generally shunned him.

His film JFK was a slanted and biased depiction that fed the conspiracy theorists in the nation. His film Nixon insulted the memory of a controversial President under the guise as a search for the truth. His film World Trade Center, while honoring the efforts of many on 9/11, was factually incorrect to the point of changing a major real life hero from Black to White. That film did ok, but was no great success. I won’t mention his Comandante – a documentary about Fidel Castro. And with the film W., Stone completely disgraced the Office of the Presidency, the sitting President, and America in my opinion.

At the time I stated

“What I care about is the power and prestige of the American Presidency and thus America. America is the President on an international level, whether we love or hate any particular President. And Oliver Stone is so obsessed with his personal hate that he doesn’t seem to care what damage he does. He seems willing to do anything to place a(nother) blemish on President Bush, even if it means hurting every American and every American President to come.

… Could I be wrong about the film? … sure, and it is mathematically probable that I can fly, piss on the sun and put it out, and/or suddenly have a stroke and thus believe that Code Pink and San Francisco know what they are doing. But back in the real world, Oliver Stone is doing a wretched thing.”

Obviously, Stone is not the only one to have strong views about America.

But I say all this because Oliver Stone will be providing America with what he calls “Oliver Stone's Secret History of America”.

In this televised series America will be provided the truth, according to Stone, about actions behind the scenes in American History. Considering the flawed, biased, political views that Stone provides in his movies it is likely to be about as accurate as my describing the benefits of Socialism. Or perhaps the fun of hammering a nail through your own genitals.

Can Oliver Stone be a great director? When he gets out of the way of his ego and personal political views, sure. But as time moves on, it seems that Stone is more interested in highlighting his own political agenda on the big screen for Moveon.org and Code Pink than caring what an audience might find entertaining.

So I advise avoiding Stone’s “History” because I believe it will be his-story. Rather I suggest reading a good fiction novel if that’s what you want to be entertained by.

White Chicks 2 - a reality you never wanted

It’s amazing to see Hollywood in action sometimes. Not because of the glamour or the impressive style that is normally splashed about. I’m talking about the business mentality (or arguably lack thereof).

Only Hollywood execs could look at a film that was clearly not a fan favorite and decide that it is deserving of a sequel. Based solely on the profit margin that they see the film capable of making. It is the same reason that reality television is so popular, and why conversion films (books or cartoons or comic books to movies are the latest trend) dominate the screens.

Quality is no longer a motivating force. Originality is far from the minds of those that decide what gets made. Rather the though of having a film with lots of fast action, a few explosions, and a couple of cute chicks is preferred over a plot, acting ability, or visual imagery.

Thus news of the sequel to the boring, poorly done, Wayans production – White Chicks – has hit the air waves. Yes we will get another chance to see Marlon and Shawn Wayans in White-face and gender bending. I know that everyone is just drooling to pre-order their tickets.

Was the film White Chicks funny? Not really. The acting good? Sorry to say it but Marlon has improved to now be considered a B-actor, Shawn has yet to get that far. So no, the acting wasn’t stand-out. Was it original or different? Again, no. So is there any reason for this film to have a sequel? Yes, just one. The film doubled its cost. So it is a success and that is plenty of reason for a Hollywood exec.

I like the Wayans family. I think they are one of the most talented families in Hollywood. They have several siblings that have grown in ability and have been able to make some decent films, with a couple that were really good. I love the fact that they involve every member of the family in their movies, from directing to writing to cameras to acting. They cover it all with family and friends.

But that is not reason enough to promote the sub-standard fare that has been hitting theaters for years now. Obviously Damon and Keenan have made their names. Many others in the family are secure in their efforts as well. The big push has been for the younger Wayans to get their chances at the brass ring. Which is why Marlon and Shawn have gotten so many chances. Too bad there is so little to push.

Seriously, think about it. The Wayans family has found and promoted several great artists. They found Jim Carrey, Jaime Foxx, Jennifer Lopez, and a few others. But they all had talent. They had something to build on. Marlon and Shawn, Shawn especially, just don’t deserve the big push. They just aren’t that good. They are supporting characters at best, which is no small achievement and will keep them well paid all their lives.

The fact that White Chicks is getting a second shot gives me a chill. Because films like Little Man might also get that option as well. And audiences need that kind of torture about as much as we need to be forced to see Soul Plane.

But the law of returns and no thought movie making is what Hollywood loves these days. I almost would be surprised if a transforming robot were in the film, along with lots of CGI scenes. It wouldn’t make sense to be in the film, but it would get attention and raise ticket sales. And that really is all that matters these days.

It’s a waste of time. It is a sad departure for the Wayans family, and the continuation of a trend for Hollywood. At least the Wayans have the excuse that they are supporting family and helping one another. Hollywood is just trying to scrape a couple of pennies together to get a third.

John Q and the Health Care Reform Bill

I was just watching cable when I saw that the film John Q was on. I started to watch the show when I was struck by something. Isn’t it odd that this film, discussing the ills of the health system and starring Denzel Washington, happened to be on TV now?

I know, some will say that it’s just a coincidence. And maybe it is. But it does seem odd that right now, as the national debate is raging over how our health care system will change that this film pops back up. It is an old film, made in 1998. And it wasn’t a massive hit when it first came out. And of the many films that deal with health care in some form, this particular film alone was selected.

I’ve seen this on television a few times since it hit cable. Maybe 4 times in the past 4 or so years. Nothing overly special and not really timed to anything specific that I can recall. One of the times might have been in conjunction with and award for Denzel Washington, I’m not sure.

But considering the love affair that the general media has with President Obama, the pressure from Democrats to pass a health care Bill as quickly as possible, and the fact that over 50% of the nation opposes the Bill in Congress right now, the math adds up. It looks like a coordinated assault on the public. A subtle attempt to sway citizens to think of the Bill as a positive by reinforcing our dislike of the medical health insurance industry. As if we needed one.

There is no questions that health care in America can be better. No one of reasonable mind argues that the system needs to change. But how that change is enacted is the real question. What system and the quality of care it provides is what we need to resolve.

Is the film John Q being used to create a partisan wave of support? Maybe not. But I also noted that at this time there are huge ads running for the current health care proposals, and constant attacks from news media like MSNBC against those that oppose the current proposal. Even the Democrat leadership has maligned those that question the Bill, labeling them Nazi’s and un-American.

So seeing this film today seems far less innocent that it may well be. Then again, the fact that the White House is asking Americans to turn in fellow Americans that have a dissenting view of the Health Care Reform Bill, the fact that the White House has sent emails to various Americans that never contacted the Government – from an unknown and undisclosed list, and the fact that many elected officials refuse to discuss this with their constituents (I still have yet to hear from either of my Senators or House Representative), I perhaps am in a more guarded view of what is on television.

I do believe that ANY President faced with massive opposition to a program, Bill, or action they feel is necessary would use every means possible to them. I recall all the war films that held America in praise after 9/11. I also recall the films attacking the war, and President Bush just as the 2008 election cycle began. To say none of that affected the public even subliminally is a bit naïve, I think.

So take this with a pound of salt. And consider that perhaps, if this isn’t just coincidence, what it does mean. That someone (not necessarily the Government or any elected official – maybe just Hollywood executives that have a political preference) wants you to accept without question. That they want you to resist asking question or gaining more information. If that is true, then planting seeds while you are unguarded and on your couch is a prefect place to strike.

Or I could just be wrong. But what if I’m not?

Movie Preview: Ong Bak 2

You just knew there had to be a sequel. Tony Jaa became too much of a hit to not get another crack at this film. But this new film takes a very different direction indeed.

Unlike most sequels, Ong Bak 2 is jumping right to a prequel stage. Instead of going forward with the storyline the movie goes back in time to present us with a historical and perhaps more epic view of Thailand. Think of it as a kind of Braveheart with martial arts. The movie trailers are definitely giving it that kind of a feel.



I love the music choice in this trailer. The fight scenes definitely look like the Tony Jaa that took America by storm. But if you recall the first film you will also note that something is different. The direction and storytelling is not the same pace or style. It really shows in this imperfect trailer of a fight scene.



The reason that it has such a different look and feel is because the director has changed. This time out it is Tony Jaa himself that is taking the helm. And from what I can see he does a good job. Though the above scene is a bit slow in pace for American audiences it is good in defining the narrative and motivations of Tien (Jaa). Also keep an eye out for Dan Chupong (Crow Ghost) in this film.

I think this will be a hit in America. It has already done very well in Thailand. But it has one potential problem. This story ends in a less than happy American movie way. That is because there is a 3rd film that continues this story. Which I would expect to be just as good, though I can’t imagine the reported “boneless” fighting it contains.

This is a good film from what I can tell. It has all the elements of what you might expect from Jaa and a martial arts film. It adds to the growing trend of Thai martial arts films that are growing in recognition in this genre. I’m looking forward to this, and Ong Bak 3 next year or so.

The Cylons are coming - again

You just have to love Hollywood. Because the only thing better than a hit original idea is someone else’s hit original idea that you can copy and revision over and over again. Like Halloween, The Brady Bunch, Dukes of Hazzard, Alien Vs. Predator (2 different great movies, one horrible waste of time), Mission Impossible, Invasion of the Body Snatchers (redone 4x now), Star Trek, and Battlestar Galactica. Every single one of these examples has been remade from generally a better original. Some remakes and revisioned films have even been done over 2x or more.

That is the motivation to the just announced Battlestar Galactica movie. Revisioning the original classic sci-fi television show. Again.

This time Bryan Singer will be at the helm of the movie. Which bodes better for the film since he is very successful at making conversion movies (he made the original X-Men movie and the sequel X-2). Plus he is just a good director. The Usual Suspects and Apt Pupil are great examples of a job well done.

Of course he has had his mistakes too. There was Valkyrie (mostly Tom Cruise’s fault – is an even British accent that hard for an actor?) and Superman Returns. Though the Superman series has been run into the ground long before Singer got to it.

Still I can’t imagine this next version of Battlestar Galactica being worse than the television series made by SyFy Channel. Back when they were still playing with the concept that they were a scifi channel (ie Sci-Fi). In that fiasco of a series, the entire story was butchered.

The SyFy version took every concept of the original and threw it out. About the only thing it had in common with the original was the name of the ship and some of the characters. The major Black characters were eliminated as were several female characters, the gender of the main characters was switched, the bad guys were given a convoluted and incomprehensible motivation, and the ultimate outcome was dumb. The sub-plots were almost all boring, the main plot took twists that were generally illogical, and all but 2 of the characters were worthless.

Such is the path of a revisioned product 9 out of 10 times. So what is Bryan Singer planning for his movie version? Revisioning.

The good news is that the movie will have nothing to do with the SyFy television series. Which is very good news. The bad news is that it may well have little to do with the original series either. My expectation is that the latest version will strongly influence much of this new movie version.



I’m hoping that a few things from the original stick. Like the main characters, the mythology of the original, the motivations of the original, and the relationships of the original. From the new series I think that the graphical upgrades can be interesting. That’s about it.

Overall I tend to find that remakes are miserable these days in Hollywood. They may be cheaper and/or an easier bet than an original film but less than 2 out of 10 are actually worth seeing, even on cable let alone a movie theater. When the film is revisioned, the chances of a good film drop exponentially. So at least Singer will be starting off with really abysmally low expectations.

Will this film be a Dukes of Hazard? Unlikely since Singer is a good director and decent writer. The chance of an utter disgrace is pretty small. Will the film be a Mission Impossible? Most likely. A decent film that has little to do with the source material, but gives enough of a distraction to be worth seeing in a theater. Could it be a Fly? Few remakes ever equal, in quality, the original they are based on. Even less attain a better standing than the source material.

But there is always the potential when great actors, great writing, and a great director combine – without the influence of Hollywood execs involved. Still I don’t expect that at all.

Correction to statements made by Michael Vass

As many of you are aware, I write about political matters at my other blog VASS. Recently I have discussed the Health Care Reform - even sending out letters to Sen. Schumer, Sen. Gillibrand, Representative Hinchey, and President Obama to get answers. But at the same time I was challenged to prove a statement about President Obama's campaign promises.

I have now answered that challenge, and can state that I was wrong in my thoughts. You can find out exactly how I was wrong, and about what at I was wrong about President Obama.

For those of you that could care less about politics or health care, or even President Obama, I'm sorry for the interuption.

I would invite you to check out the great fashionable designer clothing lines at my online store World of VASS, see the models I have used in photo shoots with the clothing lines (nothing like seeing how good real people look in these fashion statements) at Fashion Models, click on one of my advertisers to the left, or just check out some of the other nearly 1500 posts here on this site.

What’s funny about abortion?

Well that was a question that was addressed by the one television show that could possibly find a funny angle to such a controversial topic. Family Guy. Of course the general public will never be able to see this on television, unless it comes out in a DVD (yeah, that won’t happen).

For those that somehow have missed this long running, 2x resurrected, animated comedy show you have no idea what you are missing. Don’t let the fact that this is animated beguile you into thinking this is just some kiddie entertainment. This even isn’t on the level of The Simpsons. No this is often high-brow, adult focused, risqué, pusing the edge comedy. With a bit of slapstick thrown in.

Some of the topics the show has dealt with are infidelity, swinging, gay lifestyles, nuclear holocaust, sex, BDSM, race relations, divorce, disabilities, pedophilia, various Rights and Liberties (taken to extreme), and television programming to name just the tip of the iceberg. To say this show often offends some viewers, on either side of the political scale, is to say that air is a nice thing to have.

Here are 2 examples of what I mean (though the video clip I wanted I can't find)





But the show hit a new point when they took on the abortion issue. Whatever actually happens in the show must have really sent the censors running as FOX will NEVER air the episodes on broadcast television. But they did provide this episode to the Academy of Television Arts & Sciences that will be voting for the Emmy for a comedic series. Family Guy is nominated in this category, the first time since 1961 that an animated show since The Flinstones has been nominated.

What I do know of the story is the following:

“Most of the episode dealt with matriarch Lois (played by Borstein) deciding to become a surrogate mother for her infertile friend — against Peter's wishes. After her friend is killed in a car crash, the Griffins are left with the difficult decision of what to do about the pregnancy.

At one point, Peter watches an anti-abortion video, which proclaims several people would be alive if abortion wasn't legal, including a fourth Stooge, the guy who would have killed Adolf Hitler and Osama bin Laden's America-loving brother, who could have prevented 9/11.”

According to the AP the viewers were in stitches, thus answering the question posed in the headline of this post. Which makes me all the more curious about what they did in this episode. But until the DVD comes out, or someone makes a bootleg on the internet – neither of which will happen anytime soon – we will never know.

Still, somehow, I expect that those for and against abortion will waste no time in attacking this episode of Family Guy, and/or anyone speaking about it.

Best Buy owes you a 52" flatscreen television for $9.99

Perhaps it's me, but I expect that when a company makes an offer that I accept they are bound to the deal. IF I try to back out of it, they will sue me and/or get bill collectors bugging my every move. Basic economics right?

Well Best Buy seems to think otherwise.

Now I understand mistakes happen. And I feel really bad for the guy who used to be the webmaster for Best Buy. But an offer is an offer. And if you made a deal with the company, it's a contract.

In fact, I recall that back in the 1950's nearly the same exact problem happened. I believe it was Sears that had an ad for a Black and White television for $13.99 in Sunday papers. It was supposed to be $139 or something like that. They tried to back out of the offer, and got sued.

If I am recalling this correctly, the Courts found that Sears (if it was them) was in the wrong and was obligated to provide the televisions at the advertised price. I think it was called the truth in advertising case. (If anyone knows for sure, please correct me where needed). And it was this case that created all the little disclaimers you see in every printed and most televised ads.

The question here is if Best Buy had such a disclaimer on their site and/or online ad. And that disclaimer had to be on the site at the time of the promotion. If they did not, they don't get an option. Like in the 1950's case they will have to provide the televisions at the offered price until they sell out of them.

Because they made a contract with the public. And even in these days of the Government breaking contract law, Joe Average and regular businesses of all sizes are still bound by that.

If Best Buy continues to balk at living up to it's words, and they did not have the disclaimer (if anyone has proof of this please do let me know) they need to be sued and forced to live to their word. Making other deals and refunds or whatever just doesn't cut it. And they know it.

There are rules out there, and sometimes people try to take advantage of the younger computer savvy generation with old laws they do not know, or the older less savvy generations with their lack of knowhow with the internet. Which I find distasteful.

No wonder the stock price was down. I think Wall Street smells blood in the water.

2009 Medal of Freedom recipients

Today President Obama awarded 16 Medals of Freedom. It is the highest honor that can be bestowed on a civilian. As such it is something that is not taken lightly.

I won’t address the slight controversy of Mary Robinson, the somewhat blatant political pandering in regard to Jack Kemp, Ted Kennedy,and Sandra Day O’Connor. At least I won’t comment on them here (see my political blog – VASS).

What I do find interesting is the awards going to Sidney Poitier, Desmond Tutu, Chita Rivera, Joe Medicine Crow - High Bird , and Rev. Joseph Lowery. I find their selections to be both interesting and about time.

Rev. Lowery was a critical component for the Civil Rights Movement. Like many at the time, he stood up when he was being shouted at to sit down. He worked hard to change the blatant and rampant racist attitudes in America just some 40 years ago. He may not be a famous as Dr. Martin Luther King or Malcolm X, but he represents the fact that far more people were involved and just as important in changing America for the better. Too bad schoolbooks, and the annual Black History Month tributes to Dr. King, don’t take the time to mention him or most anyone else.

Desmond Tutu is known for his efforts to free the majority of people in South Africa from Apartheid. He was a champion of Civil Rights in a nation far from our own, with even more extreme racist attitudes. It was that perseverance in the face of overwhelming odds that helped bring American support to his efforts, along with the rest of the world. It is that kind of attention that America refuses to give other parts of the world, including Darfur, which is a shame for us and not Archbishop Tutu who continues in efforts to bring peace and freedom to people all over the world.

Joe Medicine Crow - High Bird is the last living War Chief of the Crow Nation. He is also a recipient of the Bronze Star, and the Chevalier Légion d'honneur and is a noted author and historian. He has a Masters degree (a first among the Crow Tribe), and was the first among his tribe to go to college (as stated by President Obama). He is a symbol of how any American can succeed in the face of any adversity – even that of the Government and its caretaking of Native American Indians on reservations.

Chita Rivera, born Dolores Conchita Figueroa del Rivero, is a favorite of mine. A Puerto Rican woman, she is an outstanding entertainer. She is the first Hispanic woman to receive a Kennedy Center Honors award in 2002. She got her start through chance, and made her career due to talent, perseverance, and a willingness to take on the Hollywood mentality head on. She has been in 17 plays, and over 10 movies and television shows in a career that has spanned some 50 years.

Sidney Poitier is perhaps the best known of all the recipients of the Medal of Freedom today. He is the first African American male to win an Academy Award for Best Actor – something not repeated for 4 decades. He was a symbol of change during a time when America was color-blind. He broke through barriers that every entertainer of color today no longer even know existed. He was the leading box office star in 1967, which is significant as it was also a time where in many place segregation was commonplace and African Americans were considered incapable of success.

He is a Knight Commander of the Order of the British Empire – not honorary but actual. He is the Bahamian Ambassador to Japan, since ’97. He directed the one-time highest grossing film by a Black director, Stir Crazy.

All in all he has been the symbol of success and dignity and intellect for over 40 years. He has been criticized, but there is no doubt that he contributed directly and massively in changing attitudes in America and across the globe.

Do each of these people rise to the order of

“especially meritorious contribution to the security or national interests of the United States, world peace, cultural or other significant public or private endeavors”

?

I believe so. Each helped change America, and in many cases the world. Each has helped make the worlds a better place. And every one of the abovementioned people did so for decades.

I don’t question why they have received the Medal of Freedom, I question why it took so long for it to be given to them.

Andy Lau helps victims of Typhoon Morakot

Often I have spoken about various celebrity donations. Whether its opening a children’s hospital wing, building houses in New Orleans, donating funds to relief efforts in Darfur, or numerous other causes (though each of the previous can always use more help). But in general I have tended to focus on American celebrities.

Which is a bit unfair. There are many celebrities from around the world that make a point of giving back to those who are in need. Often we forget that America is not the only country with mega-stars and big hearts.

One of the celebrities from outside the U.S. that I think needs to be commended is Andy Lau. Not an overly familiar name here in the U.S., but he is a huge star in Asia.

Andy Lau may be familiar to audiences for House of Flying Daggers (Captain Leo), but he has been in over 100 films and 300 mini-series. That is besides his singing career that spans more than 20 years, 180 concerts, 292 awards and a listing in the Guinness Book of Records (Most Awards Won By A Canto-Pop Male Artist), suffice to say the man is A-list celebrity.

But Lau is also a humanitarian. He is noted for his work with the disabled for more than a decade. In 2008 he was the Goodwill Ambassador to the Summer Paralympic Games.

So it is no surprise that Andy Lau is in the front line of celebrities working phones and helping to raise donations to help victims of Typhoon Morakot. Already private donations have reached 7 million Taiwan dollars. I am sure that the influence that Lau brings will help add to that total – which is being matched by the Taiwan government.

I always enjoy hearing of celebrities donating their time, money, and fame to just causes. When they do this it deserves to be mentioned. And there is no reason to limit such recognition to just the celebrities in the U.S.

Machete - the 2010 film you aren't expecting

So I have been a bit busy covering the Health Care Reform debate over at my political blog (VASS). But now its time to get back to more simple and pleasant things.

Though I’m not sure that Machete is simple, or pleasant. This is a film that you will likely be hearing a lot about as 2010 approaches. And there will be no lack of coverage by critics big and small. (and if you are wondering, the film has nothing to do with the character from the Spy Kid’s films.)

The reason is that the film is directed by Robert Rodriguez. The cast for this action film will include: Lindesy Lohan, Jessica Alba, Don Johnson, Steven Segal, Cheech Marin, Danny Trejo, Michelle Rodriguez (no relation), and Robert DeNiro (in roughly order of their acting ability). Talk about a wild mix.

The star of this film is also quite different from what most Americans would expect. It’s Trejo as a former Mexican Federales. The bad guy is pretty much everyone, but basically DeNiro as a corrupt elected official (as if there are non-corrupt ones). Everyone else is in and out of the film adding their own flair and crashes, bashes and explosions to the story.

The big question is if this can work. Can a film starring a Mexican, with an American bad guy, hold up? The fact that there will be some martial arts fighting, a couple of young starlets likely in tight nothing, and lots of gunfights will not hurt a bit.

I say that the film will work. Director Rodriguez has more than proven that films starring, and entirely comprised of Hispanic/Latino characters (other than the bad guys) can be huge hits. He has also proven his ability to do a decent film with a good helping of explosions and adult fare (think Sin City). The only place I would worry about this film would be the writing.

Simply put, if you see this film hit in January 2010, it will likely be a horrible flop. If it comes out in April, which I think it will, then that means it all came together great. A mid-summer release means they really nailed it.

Personally I hope it is a good film. Danny Trejo has put in his dues over the decades and having a leading role that works would be a nice feather in his cap. And if you are wondering who he is, well you have seen him. He was the original driver with DeNiro in Heat, he was the uncle in all 3 Spy Kid’s movies, he is Enrique on King of the Hill, he is a bartender on the Young and the Restless.

He has been in 69 movies and television show over the past 25 years. Many actors never even get to do that many films in a lifetime. Not to bad for a former drug addict, ex-con, and prison welterweight boxing champ. Like I said, he has paid his dues, worked hard, and earned the shot at a leading role. So I want to see him do well in this chance.

Drugs and celebrity - where is the justice

In other entertainment news it seems that the son of Michael Douglas, Cameron Douglas, was arrested last week on drug charges. Cameron Douglas, who has done some acting, faces mandatory 10 years to life for selling crystal meth.

I can understand that the Douglas family is likely very troubled by this turn of events. At the same time there is something I want to note.

There is nothing good about selling drugs. Nor should any celebrity or family member of a celebrity be allowed to trade that fame for reduced sentences. It’s an abuse that the legal system needs to end.

How many times have we heard about this celebrity or that getting away with possession of drug, guns, and various other infractions of the law? How many times has the fame of a celebrity extended to their family – especially the children of well known celebs?

I don’t limit this to just Cameron Douglas. I mean all the celebs out there. Paris Hilton, Chris Brown, Lil Wayne, Snoop Dogg, Amy Winehouse, Lindsey Lohan, and on and on. They all need to go to jail. They did the crimes and need to do the time. Because if it was you or me, rest assured that we would have been locked up and the key thrown away a long time ago.

I don’t feel bad for Cameron Douglas. He made his choice. But I will be insanely upset if he is guilty and somehow doesn’t receive the mandatory 10 years his crime is required to receive by law.

Tiger Woods: more than just a winning golfer

I was thinking about Tiger Woods win Sunday at the Bridgestone Open. It’s not the fact that he now has 70 career wins and 14 majors that impressed me. It isn’t the fact that he has been rated the number 1 player in the world longer and more consistently than any golfer ever before. It has nothing to do with the fact that he is the best paid player in the world. He is humble.

More than any other athlete I can recall since Michael Jordan and Muhammad Ali, Tiger Woods is a pinnicale of respect. When talking about his win on Sunday he stated

“I think I hit a good shot that put a little heat him [at the 16th hole]. But also, I think the worst he would have made would have been bogey."

He didn’t need to say anything about Padraig Harrington. He could have boasted about his record of 14 wins every time he leads a tournament after 54 holes. He could have even insulted Harrington about the triple boogey he shot once the stopwatch came out. But he didn’t.

Not that this is a new thing. Back when he first became a pro and won the Masters, Fuzzy Zoeller made the infamous comment

“That little boy [Tiger Woods] is driving it well and he's putting well. He's doing everything it takes to win. So you know what you guys do when he gets back in here? You pat him on the back and say, 'Congratulations' and 'Enjoy it' and tell him not to serve fried chicken next year. Got it?", and walking away, he returned to add the infamous postscript: "or collard greens, or what every the hell they serve.”

Woods was diplomatic in his response. Which I could have never done.

When the controversy over lynching Woods was started by Kelly Tilghman

“Which brings me to the comments against Tiger Woods. As some are aware during the recent Mercedes-Benz Championship tournament Kelly Tilghman, an announcer for the Golf Channel, suggested that Tiger Woods be lynched. The conversation surrounding that comment was in terms of what could be done by up-coming players to take on Tiger. One announcer suggested they gang up on Tiger, to which Ms. Tilghman stated

“Lynch him in a back alley”

“

Woods again took the high road. Again I could not in the same situation. Nor can I recall another athlete in most any sport that has done so in equally infuriating circumstances in the past 2 decades.

It is this that separates Tiger Woods from other athletes. This is what drives fans to his competitions and cheer him to victory. This is what is missing in most every other major sport in America (at least).

Today there are several great athletes. Some are intelligent, some are talented, many are wealthy. Few though have even a touch of the international appeal of Woods. None have his grace under fire and public humility.

When was the last time you heard a baseball, or basketball, or hockey player stand up and defend the ability of their competition. I mean sincerely doing so? You never hear it in boxing, or the MMA, nor dare I say wrestling.

Tiger Woods is the greatest golfer in my lifetime, and in my opinion ever. That’s just the raw talent and dedication he maintains. But it is his humility and thoughtfulness (that I sometimes disagree with) that really impresses me.

He isn’t about ‘bling’ or other ghettofabulous insanity that the media proclaims to be the only definition of Black in America. He is educated. He is a phenomenal businessman. He is a good father. He does make great effort to donate time, money, and his fame to help children. He is a role model.

As much as everyone will laud his many sporting accomplishments, I think that is the real impact and importance of Tiger Woods. I just wish that the major news media might highlight that from time to time as well as his winning streak.

Movie Review: GI Joe

The summer movies of 2009 have been a series of letdowns. Which is not to be confused with the amount of money that the films have generated. When all you have is the equivalent of sand instead of the water of entertainment, well many go and spend their money anyway. Add in the cost of going to a movie and the numbers look astounding.

GI Joe was a film that some hoped would defeat that trend. And having seen the film I can honestly say that such hopes are completely dashed. GI Joe is almost exactly what it seems. A waste of time and less entertaining than the Saturday Morning cartoon.

Let's start with the basics. The visual looks of the film are decent. Not great, not wonderful, just ok. Part of that is due to the constant use of massive amounts of CGI throughout the film. It just takes a bunch of the realisim the film was hoping to attain in live action, and throws it off a roof. Seperate of the CGI, well it's just not visually compelling.

The acting is another thing. If the visuals are just average, the acting takes the film to a new low. In thinking about the whole cast, I cannot name a single actor that sttod above the others. With the exception of Snake Eyes (Ray Park) and the 2 child actors portraying Snake Eyes and Storm Shadow (Leo Howard and Brandon Soo Hoo, respectively).

Snake Eyes stands out for one main reason. He never spoke in the whole film. All he had to do was move around. We didn't even get to see his face, not even his eyes, once in the film. Which made this the standout role in the film. Literally this was the best acting and character simply because that role had the least problems.

The worst acting would likely be Marlon Wayans, or Joseph Gordon-Levitt as Cobra Commander. Followed closely by every other character in the film. There isn't a single character you could care about, nor that you might believe. Not one had any spark that would make you root for or against them.

But if you were wondering about the plot - perhaps it provides a reason to still see the film - don't worry. It too is as bad as every other element in the film. Obviously the writers were lost between making a kid's film and something for adults.

Start with the fact that the film rewrote the entire team. GI Joe is supposed to be an all American military force. But to make the film sell overseas they have been changed to a secret NATO force. So already the film revisions its source material.

Considering the intelligence of all the military forces involved, I would be surprised if the Boy Scouts wouldn't be a better choice for defending the nation. Not a single writer was probably involved in the military, nor the director or producers or the Hollywood execs.

***Spoiler Alert***

Destro (Christopher Eccleston) is a multi-national arms dealer that sells 70% of all the arms and defenses used in the world. Which is just dumb to start with. But he sells NATO, and the GI Joe team, all their equipment. So why is any of their gear equal to the COBRA troops? Or how about having a failsafe that prevents their weapons from working against his guys? Or why not just hack into their systems to find out what they know and when? Besides the fact that he should know where their secret bases are since he could track each and every item they have?

Then there are the accelerator suits. Really useless. Which is why they are unused throughout 90% of the film. Other than the big scene in the trailer. Because if they used the suits they should mop up the COBRA guys in minutes. Not that COBRA had any equivalent outfits, which they should since DESTRO sold them.

I won't even get into the nanobot issue.

***SPOILER END***

So back to the plot. GI Joe is so secret that the whole outfit is exposed some 7 minutes into the film. They are so good that all of 4 people handle 90% of all the work.

The one thing the team seems really good at is creating massive destruction as they go about their jobs. What they do in France is a contruction workers paradise. The cost in money and lives is enough to make you wonder why any nation would want these guys protecting anything. So much for never failing at anything.

Oh, and the "love story" or whatever is going on with Ripcord (Wayans) and Scarlett (Rachel Nichols) fits better for kids in elementary school than anything else.

How dumb is the plot? Well unless you believe fire burns underwater, and that ice doesn't float in water, the plot is incredibly stupid. Even a 5 year old will see the plot holes and illogic.

I'd go into more detail but I don't want to spoil it more. If such a thing is possible.

I wouldn't take young kids to this film. As I mentioned earlier there is lots of collateral damage. You don't see the hordes that get killed, but it is obvious that they die. A lot.

Perhaps the one great thing is the fact that the battles between Storm Shadow (Byung-hun Lee) and Snake Eyes is interesting. Short but decent.

So would I advise anyone to see this film? No. There is a reason why the film was not shown to critics (except a couple of guaranteed extra positive reviews). I honestly can't understand why this film was marketed to anyone over the age of 5. And that might be an insult to 5 year olds.

Don't see this film. Watch the cartoon version instead and at least enjoy you money.

Bill o'Reilly discusses Black man shot 43 times by police

Tonight Bill O’Reilly will be discussing the shooting of a Black man by police. He was shot 43 times. It’s about time such cases get attention.

I decided to check out which case of shooting O’Reilly might be investigating. Considering the time and number of shots involved I know it was not the Oscar Grant case (which O’Reilly did not cover), Robbie Tolan, Adolph Grimes (the last 3 being all at the start of the year 2009), Sean Bell, or several other more recent actions. So I decided to google it.

Under the term police shooting black man 43 shots there are 221,000 responses. On the first page of Google the time frame covers 2009 – 2001. That’s a hell of a lot of time. But it denotes the number of cases that never get national attention.

I have long stated that there is a national epidemic on-going. That young Black males are the target of police abuse and overreaction. In fact studies have found that the darker the skin, the more likely police are of reacting with violence, where or not the individual is armed.

So which case might Bill O’Reilly be discussing?

As I said before, it’s not the 1 shot in the back of an unarmed Black male in Oakland. Its not the shot against the unarmed Black male in his driveway in Texas as his mother was assaulted by police. But there is no scarcity of incidents across the country where an African American male has been shot by police officers several dozen times.

In fact, when was the last time that an armed White male was shot by police more than 3 times? Seriously. I can name at least a half dozen times where an unarmed African American male was shot by police at least 12 times or more in the last year and a half. But I cannot recall a single instance where even an armed and dangerous White male was shot by police more than 3 times. Not in a decade. Maybe more. Anywhere in the country.

So what will Bill O’Reilly say tonight at 8pm? Do you think it will be a highlight of the national response of police forces towards people of color? Or will it justify a singular case of police action?

No matter which it is, the ultimate truth remains. Police are prone to overreaction towards people of color. They react as if young Black males are the most dangerous people in America (which is factually White males 18 – 30, proven in another post). And that same reaction is also the consistent call of White violent crime criminals trying to obfuscate their own actions (how many times have we heard a supposed White victim claim that some ambiguous Black male did it?). Hell, almost even in the most extreme cases White actively dangerous armed criminals are treated with more care and firing restrictions than people of color – armed or not.

What do I want to hear O’Reilly say? That there is a problem. That the justice system is skewed in the nation. That across the country there is a predisposition towards violence against people of color, and that this needs to be addressed.

Will I hear that? Not likely. Not from O’Reilly, NPR, the New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC, or any other major news organization.

And that is the key point that sticks out in my mind. What about you?

Alien movie prequel: what will Hollywood deliver

In Hollywood these days there is nothing better than re-working something that someone else has already done. It cuts the cost of writing, set design, and often entertainment value. Examples of this are rampant in the last decade.

Sequels are the current big thing. Why tough out a new idea when you can ride the dead horse of something that already worked? Take the Transformers, X-Men, Terminator, Highlander, Hellboy and countless other film sequels. Some are worth the time. Most are rubbish.

But that is just not enough for Hollywood. You can only go so far forward in some long running series. And for that problem is the answer of a prequel. Taking a proven cash making concept and jumping back in time to before the films started. Examples include: Wolverine, Star Trek, and of course Star Wars (episodes 1,2,and 3).

The real fun with a prequel, by Hollywood standards, is that you generally don’t need the stars that created the initial story – saving huge bucks; and you can often redo the entire storyline. This happens because many of the original fans of whatever movie are older and thus not as valuable to Hollywood. Plus it allows a film to have the latest popular movie actor/actress in it. Besides the fact that Hollywood execs often don’t know the original storyline and/or assume that young movie-goers don’t either.

Thus we get crap like the revisioned timeline of Star Trek. Going forward dozens of new films can be made with a cast and characters that have nothing to do with what made the series popular and timeless in the first place.

So when I heard that Alien will be introduced to the prequel machine, you can imagine I was not very excited. There is a host of things that could be screwed up. The near prequel films of Alien vs. Preadator and that film’s sequel displayed the utter disrespect and lazy writing that passes for entertainment in Hollywood these days.

But a ray of hope hit when Ridley Scott signed onto the production. He was the mastermind that created the vision of minimalist fear that blossomed into 3 additional films. It was his dark, mysterious and utterly disturbing direction that gave the film a quality few films match. It is why of the series, the first remains the best.

So I thought there was a chance that this could be more than a b-rate sci-fi horror film. More than the alien-as-slasher-killer that AVP presented. Far better than the drawn out and over the top visions seen in the subsequent films (though Aliens was done well).

Of course the next question is, what about Ripley – Sigourney Weaver? Will she have a role in this film? How could she have a role in the film?

That recently was answered by Weaver herself. She too found it illogical to be in the film. Which is a loss as she is the driving force of the films, but at the same time a confirmation that some thought might have to be introduced to the film.

Which still leaves the question of what they will do in this film. Will they ignore the series as AVP did to both the Alien and Predator series? How can the storyline be preserved and still be filled with the wanton explosions and cute girls that today’s audiences seem more than willing to pay for (ie. Transformers 2)?

Perhaps this is an idea. Have a small group of exploratory geologists, with one or 2 military scouts, working for Weyland-Yutani. They stumble on a barren planet, that is scarred from an ancient battle. They find skeletal remains of Aliens, and perhaps Predators?, in remnants of long ago cities. They conclude that a planet-wide war erupted with both sides being annihilated.

While searching, they fall through a floor of an old ruin, into a pit of Alien eggs. And thus begins their drama. All of this is being reported back regularly via android to the Company. In the end, after the last of the scouting crew dies in a suicidal blast destroying the Aliens and their egg cache, only portions of the Android survive long enough to state that there must be other eggs in the solar system, as a warning. But the Board of Directors at Weyland-Yutani have other ideas involving a deep-space mining vessel not too far from the now dead geologists.

Now that I would want to see.

They could even have the last scene where we see the Nostromo flying through space, go into the ship, and come upon the sleeping crew as a message beacon transmits orders to ship’s computer, and Ripley’s eyes open.

Perhaps Ridley Scott has a similar vision. Maybe we will get a coherent film with a plot, and scares, and things going bump in the night. Plus the occasional explosion. They can even put in a couple of gorgeous actresses just to ensure the hormonally challenged have something to drool about.

Then again, we might get a mix of Alien Vs. Preadator mixed with Transformers. Which I would need to get paid to see.

Author Steven Van Patten interviewed by Michael Vass

About a year ago I had the opportunity to review a novel by author Steven Van Patten. The book was Brookwater’s Curse, a vampire novel that stands out among the genre on many levels. I found the story to be engaging, the characters unique and a refreshing change.

Since that time, Steven Van Patten has come out with the follow-up book to Brookwater’s Curse. I am currently reading that, and will be providing a review for that as well. But I took the time before finishing the second book to interview Steven.

Michael Vass: Congratulations on the second book being published. It must be a thrill to continue to see your work being in published form and accepted so well across the world.

Steven Van Patten: Thanks Michael. It has been exhilarating to hear the responses I've been getting. I mean, when this whole thing started, it was just me, a laptop and my overactive imagination. Now, it's non-stop e-mails and praise and I'm still very much an underground hit. I'm very grateful for whatever happens from this point on.

Michael Vass: For my readers that are unfamiliar with you, please tell us a bit about yourself.

Steven Van Patten: Well, I'm a Brooklynite -- born and raised. I went to Long Island University, where I majored in Media Arts and Minored in English. Grew up in Fort Greene but I'm currently living in Crown Heights. When I'm not our trying to grow the Brookwater's Curse franchise, or home writing feverishly, I'm usually out stage managing any number of TV shows. I've worked regularly on shows like Total Request Live, and BET Tonight with Ed Gordon, but I also done countless concerts, major sports events and things like that.

Michael Vass: Did you always imagine that you would be a writer?

Steven Van Patten: Well I always had a knack for it. In school, the grades spoke for themselves. And I always had this imagination thing. It's definitely my blessing and my curse. It's a blessing because it's definitely a gift from God. It's a curse because sometimes I can't control it.

Michael Vass: Was your education a major factor in your desire to be a writer? What did you take in school?

Steven Van Patten: Honestly, school was only part of it. I don't think my teachers expected what I was capable of, so many of them let me be. My mother pushed me pretty hard to broaden my learning scope past school. So I read voraciously as a kid and still would be if not for the fact that I've been too busy writing my own stuff to get into anything new these days.

Michael Vass: What were early influences for you? Are there specific books that inspired you?

Steven Van Patten: Aside from the million comic books currently living in a closet at my mother's, Stephen King, James Baldwin, Walter Mosley were big literary influences. So, Dracula, Frankenstein and Interview with a Vampire all got same time and attention as Go Tell It On the Mountain and Devil in A Blue Dress and The Fire Next Time.

I should also mention that movies were another big influence -- and the movie Blacula left an indelible mark on me -- no pun intended. From a special effects standpoint it certainly has not stood the test of time, but it is one of the first examples of a person of color maintaining a high level of dignity during a horror movie.

Michael Vass: What made you decide to pick a vampire story for your book?

Steven Van Patten: I wanted to explore how the world we currently inhabit would seem to a black man who had been around during the slavery era. So for me it was the matter of my taking two things I love -- vampires and black history -- and meshing them in a compelling way.

Michael Vass: What was your motivation to have almost all the major characters in the books to be African American, Hispanic, and Asian?

Steven Van Patten: I'm big on leaving stereotypes behind, and I wanted to create something new. The world is full of flavors -- so to speak -- so why not use them all? How often do we get to see or read about a black woman turning into a werewolf? Or an Vampire Samurai Lord? I mean, I look out my window and I see everyone, so why not put everyone in my story?

Michael Vass: How long did it take you to write the book? And your second novel?

Steven Van Patten: The first book, what with the trip to Africa and all the research involved, took 7 years. This is also during the time I was working at MTV almost full time. The second book took 3 and a half, because there was less historical stuff to double check.

Michael Vass: Was it hard to get the book published? Did you get any requests to change the characters or storyline?

Steven Van Patten: I'm self-published, so as far as all that goes, the decision making stops here.

Michael Vass: Often writers include a bit of themselves inside the stories they write. Is there any character that reflects a bit of you in these books? Do any reflect other people you know, or are famous?

Steven Van Patten: I'd say they all do, but none more than Christian Brookwater. He is my mouthpiece and my gauge. He is my Darth Vader, my Kermit the Frog, my Mickey Mouse, my Spider-man. He's the cornerstone of the franchise and I feel a certain kinship to him, even though he only exists in my head.

Some of his romantic exploits may mirror a few of my own in a vague sense, but I was careful to stay away from specifics. No one character in my stories is one person in particular exclusively. There is a lot of mix and match.

Michael Vass: How much has the works of Bram Stoker and/or Anne Rice, or the multitude of films about vampires affected your writing. You seem to have included some parts of the mythology and excluded others, how did you come to that conclusion?

Steven Van Patten: Every person who dabbles in this genre plays with the rules a little. From silver, to stakes to sunlight. No two writers agree completely. I decided that I wanted to be logical. I wanted to come up with some ways that vampires could have been around and just undetected. So yes, for example, my vamps cast reflections and eat real food, and therefore don't give themselves away to the general public so easily. When Bram Stoker and Anne Rice put their stories together, they did what made sense to them and ultimately, their belief in what they were doing helped the books resonant. I can only hope the same holds true for me.

Michael Vass: Your books have strong influences from Africa , werewolves, and Asia. How did that come about?

Steven Van Patten: My love of history, whether it be African-American, American, or Asian is a large part of who I am. I enjoyed Bruce Lee flicks as a child just like everybody else. The only thing is, Bruce Lee inadvertently led me -- thanks to a film festival, to the work of Akira Kurosawa... which led to a host of things, including me studying Kendo for two years. And of course, the birth of one of my other main characters, Lord Ebichara Tanata.

As far as werewolves go, they are just as fascinating as vampires, because they are part-time monsters who have to reconcile the two sides of themselves. It's the ultimate analogy for the addictive personality. I love it. The possibilities are endless.

Michael Vass: Taking a peek into the future do you see yourself continuing to write about the supernatural characters found in your first 2 books? Is there another genre that you want to delve into?

Steven Van Patten: I am going to draw the line with Volume III as far as Christian Brookwater goes. I may do a spin off book at some point featuring Jeremiah the new werewolf, maybe, but I feel this part of my work is over soon. The 2nd book really burned me out. Also, to be honest, the creation of the villain Emmanuel took me somewhere I don't normally go. Not sure how many times I can stare into that abyss, coming up with what motivates these evil creatures while I sit alone in the middle of the night.

Of course, I'll contradict that now by announcing that I have plans to do a serial killer story. As with the BC series, it will be unusually multi-cultural. But there will only be one of those. After that, I have a comedic side that I intend to start exploring soon.

Michael Vass: How has the publishing experience been?

Steven Van Patten: Like anything else, it has it's ups and downs. The hardest lesson for me has been that coming up with the story and selling the story involve two completely different sets of skills.

Michael Vass: Do you have any book signing or other appearances coming up that my readers might be able to see you at?

Steven Van Patten: I will be attending Wagfest in Atlanta the week of October 2-4. There may be some other stuff before that, but that's the big one.

Michael Vass: I like to ask in all my interviews if there is a cause or organization that you champion. I always like to help promote a good cause whenever possible. Is there any organization or cause you would like to present to my readers?

Steven Van Patten: Ever since the Iraq War started, I've made it my business to send a few bucks to Disabled Veterans of America as often as I can.

No matter what your stance on the war is, the troops deserve our love and respect.

Michael Vass: Speaking directly to my younger readers in the world, is there something you would like to share with them?

Steven Van Patten: Pull Your Pants Up. That and there is more to the world than just Hip-Hop. Not everyone is going to be a rapper, so let's get some other skill sets going.

Michael Vass: Where can my reader purchase a copy of your books?

Steven Van Patten: The easiest way would probably be Amazon.com, but if you want an autographed copy you can hit me up at www.brookwaterscurse.com.

I thank Steven for the interview. I hope that it has inspired future writers and given my readers the desire to check out Brookwater’s Curse and the follow-up book. I look forward to speaking with Steven more in the future as his next book is ready for the public.