The secret anti-gansta rap movement Part 3 - 4.30.2007.5

Continued from The secret anti-gansta rap movement Part 2 - 4.30.2007.4 Part 2...

On March 7th Mr. John Gibson of Fox News discussed the issue of rap and it’s images and words with Mr. Chuck Creekmur. I point out Fox News directly as I watch this cable news network often and they have had multiple members of the staff do pieces on the lack of attention on the words and images used in rap since Mr. Imus was fired. “Entertainers are responsible for their actions, both on stage and in the world. They are made to be role models, and how they present themselves is their own fault. But to blame the thoughtless actions of random people to these entertainers, on the sole basis that they are African American and there are drugs involved in this situation is wrong and insulting – to me. As Mr. Creekmur mentioned, where is the outcry about the virtual elimination of any form of rap or hip-hop that conveys a positive message? Where are the investigations why record studio executives consistently stereotype the Black community, or why there is active censorship of the formats availablke to the public?”

These are just a few recent items on the point. There has long been controversy and discussion of gansta rap. The commentary started long before this one-time sub-genre became the prevelant form in the industry. Many entertainers, celebrities, educators and commentators have spoken about this for years. The news media just turned a blind eye to it. Obviously their lack of attention led to the lack of knowledge among many Americans. Even the voice of Mr. Bill Cosby had no affect on news organizations in drawing attention to this subject.

“Recently Mr. Cosby has gone to Los Angeles and took to task the educators and parents of young African American students. As well he should, because it is the responsibility of both these groups to do more than just provide the minimum to children. It is not enough to expect rote memorization to provide the knowledge needed to do well in life. It is not enough to promote a dream of athletic prowess, without any thought of a back-up plan. It is far too little to believe that stardom in a mostly talentless industry will be the cure to all ills. Worse yet, acceptance of underperforming and allowance of a lifestyle that involves drug-use and misogyny and lack of self-responsibility are a plague in my view.”

So when the news media ask why nothing has been done I have to ask, “why didn’t you open your eyes?”

This is what I think, what do you think?

The secret anti-ganst rap movement Part 2 - 4.30.2007.4

Continued from Part 1 The secret anti-ganst rap movement - 4.30.2007.3 ...

The fact that many do try to use that argument, which fails, brings up the question why hasn’t anything ever been done if such language is so bad. The media has been a huge proponent of highlighting the apparent blasé attitude among Black Americans on the language and imagery used in rap hip hop. I have watched literally dozens of news programs where pundits and talking heads pose the question, “So why hasn’t anything ever been done?” I’ve seen multiple African American interviewees get this question presented to them almost everyday since the firing. I have to ask in response, “Why did it take so long for you to open your eyes?”

I ask that question to the news media. They act today as if there has never been a single person speaking out against the gansta rap genre. They present statements by Rev. Al Sharpton and Rev. Jesse Jackson against modern rap as if they are making a sudden noise to grandstand and serve their own interests. The Media poses questions to entertainers and celebrities as if the fault for inaction laid upon them. That is a horrible lie, and a misrepresentation of enormous, perhaps epic, proportions.

Reverends Jackson and Sharpton may be placed in the public spotlight by the media on various issues, but only those the media wants to cover. There is no question on the fact that both have rallied against the language in rap music for quite some time now. And they were far from the first. The battle against gansta rap has been ongoing for over a decade now. There have been dozens, perhaps hundreds of articles that have been written, seminars and lectures made, and blog posts against gansta rap since 1992. I’ll say that timeframe again, 15 years. Yet the news media and various pundits seem to be shocked that there has been no action made. They should say there has been no action they chose to hear.

For whatever the reason the media has chosen to ignore the growing number of voices demanding change. The corporations have ignored the consumers asking for diversity in a music genre that started off with multiple sub-genres; each one basically killed off to make room for only one style. Let me make a couple of examples.

The national media focused on the Mr. Don Imus story on April 9th. On March 22nd Blackplanet.com had a poll I commented on, which dealt with negative stereotypes in the media.

“The Internet and Film both hit the bottom of the list at 3%, followed in order by Newspapers at 8%, Movies at 9%, TV 25% and the big leader is Music at 53%. I have no doubt that Music leads this group due to music videos, especially those of rappers that feature the ladies barely clothed and gyrating. Of course those with the ridiculous (my opinion) stuff on their teeth, or those incapable of speaking their native language are no less unattractive.”

On March 8th New York City banned the use of one word in particular. It was an empty act and I criticised it,

“Obviously the City Council of NYC agrees with the view held by me, as does Mr. Michael Richards [doesn’t that prove the point right there?]. Their ban on this word was passed, and you may wonder why less time was spent reporting this than Ms. Rosie O’Donnell’s depression. Because it was a bunch of hot air. The usefulness of the ban rates on par with releasing known illegal immigrant child molesters on bail and expecting them to show up to court (as happened in Vermont not long ago).”

Concluded in Part 3...

The secret anti-ganst rap movement - 4.30.2007.3

I’ve noticed something lately. Since the well publicized departure of Mr. Don Imus the gansta rap genre has been the focus of a lot of attention. I can’t say that this intense review of the medium is unwarranted. Yet, part of the arguments being posed are completely unfair and disproportionate.

On the one hand we have the use of defamatory, derogatory words by multiple rap hip-hop artists for well over a decade now. There is no question, in my mind at least, that there is no excuse for this. I have yet to hear an argument that justifies the use of words like n-word, hoes, and their ilk. That is except one. The only thing that can justify the use of these words if the fact that the First Amendment allows any citizen to utter virtually any comment. Note that I said virtually any.

I do not believe in censorship. Artists should be able to express themselves. All music genres should have the opportunity to reach the portion of fans that exist for the genre. Even if part of it is objectionable. If a government can help fund an artist that hugs a dead pig as art, gansta rap can be made. But it’s exclusive existence, and the daily ramming of its objectionable material (to me) goes beyond mere protected speech. It’s widespread availability to minors is detrimental, and unnecessary. The argument can be made that it deserves to exist, but it can’t be said for proliferation like a virus without a thought to containment. In addition, just as a person does not have the right to yell fire in a crowded room for no reason, some words incite violence and should be limited if not worse.

Mr. Imus tried to state that his use of the now famous statement was inspired by rap music, and that it was no different than words found in music videos everyday. I’ve heard various pundits and regular people try to float that same thought. They are partially correct. Music videos today do convey words and images that portray ALL African Americans in the worst type of light. The emphasis on ignorance, drug addiction and criminal behavior is primary. The terminology used is no less insulting than that used by Mr. Imus. The difference is that Mr. Imus, without provocation and without comical context, attacked a group of unknown young women and compounded that act by making the attack racial while on national airwaves. I’ve spoken about this in depth in my posts Imus, Rutgers basketball, and Rev. Al Sharpton - 4.9.2007.1, Don Imus vs Rap music - 4.11.2007.1, Now that Imus is gone - 4.12.2007.1 among others.

But that does not excuse the language in rap today. Nor does it give Black Americans the opportunity to play both sides of the fence. The language and imagery is wrong. It does not become more or less appropriate depending on the color of the skin of the speaker.

Continued in Part 2...

Random items - 4.30.2007.1

So it was another week of surprising events. Mr. Alec Baldwin captured the attention of the nation. Whether it was the anti-spanking crowd or father rights groups, virtually all of the pundits seemed to have a comment. Perhaps the surprising talking head was that of Ms. Rosie O’Donnell who surprisingly was on Mr. Baldwin’s side. That was unexpected.

The announcement by Ms. O’Donnell that she would be leaving the View was hardly a surprise though. I think most non-extreme left of center individuals were expecting this, and obviously Disney was considering this on almost a daily basis. I can truly say I won’t miss her often unfounded rants. And just for the record it seems obvious to me that she was fired.

In more entertaining news, Star Wars fans take note. Mr. George Lucas, and Mr. Mark Hamill have agreed to work on an adaptation of the Star Wars storyline for a special episode of Robot Chicken. For those not familiar with the Robot Chicken series, it’s on Cartoon Network’s Adult Swim program block. The series parodies everything from movies to television shows to everyday events or unique items from the surprisingly inventive minds of co-creators Mr. Seth Green and Mr. Matthew Senreich. Fans of the show have seen several parody skits of the Star Wars movies, but this new project will be a full half-hour and will also include the actual Chewbacca and R2D2 soundfiles. Isn’t that interesting. What may happen is really anyone’s guess but I have no doubt it will be funny and very different. Keep an eye out for this one.

I have to ask, is NASCAR really that big a deal? I hadn’t known a single person who ever watched more than a highlight of this before I moved to this small town of Binghamton. Now I see many who ask about people I’ve never heard about. To be honest 90% of those who discuss NASCAR scare me, and it’s not because of their sports preference. Anyway, the reason for even mentioning racing is that Mr. Tony Stewart likened NASCAR to pro wrestling. In essence he stated that a portion of the caution flags that have been used in races were staged thus altering the outcomes. This is similar to the massively staged wrestling programs that seem to have infectiously propagated cable television in recent years. The suggestion by Mr. Stewart is that this use of flags somehow intensifies the enjoyment of racing fans. I don’t get it.

First of all it’s a bunch of guys going around making left turns. For hours. While I can understand the need for endurance, I wouldn’t call it athletic. While it is difficult driving at such high speeds, I hardly equate it with the levels of skill needed to play professional football, soceer, or other such sports. F-1 racing at least has some right turns. What can I say, I find it slightly more mind-numbing than wrestling. That is a hard thing to be. But maybe some of the readers will be glad to know this news, if they don’t already. I’m sure it will be a big controversy in racing.

But since I’m on the subjects of gratuitous violence and numbing minds, I should also mention I noticed a bit dealing with the FCC. The Federal Communication Commision seems to want to influence the violent programs on TV, something they don’t currently have regulation over. I fear if they get the authority to do this. Besides the schizophrenic attitudes that the FCC has, as seen by the amount of flesh shown in various soap operas and primetime television shows for decades now yet the insane freakout that the FCC has after 5 seconds of Ms. Janet Jackson’s breast being exposed, the First Amendment is at issue. That goes without saying that parents need to be involved with what their kids see, and lack of viewers will determine what stays on television. Even if that means the public chooses programs like WWE Raw, American Idol, The Apprentice and their ilk. In my opinion.

Seriously, name one thing the government regulates well. Ma Bell (the old AT&T) was broken up to lower telephone costs and the cost went up. The FDA screws up medications on a regular basis. The Department of Education hasn’t done well for 40 years and the DMV speaks for itself (ok, that’s on the states but you get the point). If the FCC regulates any more on television kiss NFL footage good-bye.

Pay attention. It’s like what I say about Presidential candidates, ask questions or you’ll get stuck with something you can’t do anything about. Just a few late night thoughts.

This is what I think, what do you think?

Alec Baldwin part 2 - 4.25.2007.2

Continued from Alec Baldwin Part 1...

I’ll give you an example from my own life. When I was a young teen I decided to cut school with a friend on a Friday. I was a good student, a smart kid, and respectful of my elders. But when a friend suggested cutting school on a really nice weather day, I did it. I also got caught. When my father found out I was scolded in a similar manner to what Mr. Alec Baldwin did to his child. Perhaps not as harsh, but to many these days that think spanking a child is a vile act I’m sure it was no less intense. I was not ‘altered for life’ nor was anything else other than understanding that I failed to respect my mother and do what expected of me.

Being a smart kid, my logic told me on the following Monday, that I could cut school again. Who would ask after the threat of a beating given on Friday? Smart as I was, my logic was flawed. I was caught again. When my mother awakened me and my siblings she had only one thing to say, “Your father is in the living room.” I was justifiably fearful. After my father explained in detail the travails he had to endure to reach me and my siblings that Monday night, with a few expletives included, he hauled me into a room and proceeded to “straighten my ass out” on the concept of listening to my mother and respecting the words both of them had said to me. It was a vigorous lesson that involved few words. Again I was not scarred for life. I was reminded that respect of my parents and elders was an obligation that actions have consequences, and decisions may not always have the outcomes you expect or want. Pretty good life lessons I think. I also learned that if I’m going to do something I need to plan well. Sorry mom, but I did cut school again, in my later teens, but I learned to be smart enough about it to make sure I didn’t get caught. Another lesson of sorts, depending on how it is applied.

The point of this is simply that parents have outburst. Some are justified, some not. A child that has been cared for directly by their parents (or grand-parents) with discipline, involvement, and physical punishments when needed (and in moderation) turn out as often as not to be well adjusted adults. But as more parents that can afford to do so use therapists, drugs, and the latest books’ theory on child-raising the kids seem to be more screwed up than ever. No system is perfect as is no parent. But I have found more parents acting like my own in the Black and Hispanic communities than in others.

But in listening to Mr. Baldwin I am reminded to an extent of my parents. Not perfect, he was over the top, but similar. He was obviously frustrated because he loves his child. IF you’ve heard the full call you will know that. He knew he was wrong and apologized long before anyone else in the world heard word one. He has never been accused of any abuse to his child ever.

What has been horribly abusive is that a private conversation was released to the world. His daughter has been embarrassed in front of her peers and the world. Somehow, someone let this private call get out to the public. IF it was Mrs. Kim Bassinger, that was an abusive act.

This is what I think, what do you think?

Alec Baldwin voicemail - 4.25.2007.1

Well I mentioned that I would discuss this so hear it is. Most should have heard about Mr. Alec Baldwin’s taped message to his daughter. I have heard a great deal about the reactions various talking heads have had about the tape, but of the ones I’ve heard talking about this I noticed not one was African American and I presume that more than a few believe in the ‘time-out’ and nanny philosophies in raising children. I will admit I have no direct evidence for my beliefs but it is based on my observations of their comments in various items dealing with children, and I may well be wrong.

There is a reason I directly mention the apparent lack of commentators that are African American (on the news programs I have seen). Of the black families I am aware of, spoken to, and was raised in this is not such a big deal. Yes Mr. Baldwin went overboard. He went too far, and significantly less reported was the fact that he recognized this and apologized to his daughter. That apology was before this voice mail was released by ‘someone’ to the public.

But I don’t think it was that big a deal. I have no doubt that similar outbursts have occurred in virtually every family in the world since probably the dawn of time. Many may not have been as harsh, and probably an equal number were worse. Unlike the pundits and talking heads I don’t see this as a “traumatic life altering event.” That is until the entire world was given access to this private matter. Normally I don’t comment on private matters of entertainers and celebrities but this one I will.

Every Black family has had a moment like this, to my knowledge. It happens. It doesn’t ruin the child nor is it abuse. The term abuse is so overused these days as to minimize what is the real damage actual abuse can cause. Perhaps if there were fewer parents that let television raise their kids, fewer time-outs, and fewer nannies raising children there would be fewer Virginia Tech and Columbine events. Being a parent isn’t about being the best friend of your child first, or following some rulebook that was created in the last 30 years, or never looking in your kids room. In the multiple millenniums of parents raising children, it’s only been the last maybe 40 years where books were necessary. Interesting how in that same timeframe the incidence of child violence (like Columbine, and child on child violence in all its forms) has grown; becoming a recurring tragedy now as opposed to a rare atrocity previously.

That is except in poor, non-white, inner city areas. There are no fewer guns today than in the last century probably. Gangs are as prevalent as ever. Drugs are prolific. Yet the overwhelming predominance of mass murderers, serial killers and other vile fiends are not found in inner cities. Shouldn’t someone ask why?

I think it’s because African American, Latino/Hispanic, and other minority families believe in the child having fear and respect for their parents, friendship is reserved for after the child being a grown adult. Notice that fear is the first part of the combination. That does not mean I condone terrorizing, or abusing a child. It does mean that a rod should not be spared, and over the top reactions to minor actions should cease.

Continued in part 2...

Summer movies, bulldogs and Forest Whitaker - 4.24.2007.1

Well just a little hodgepodge of things I noticed lately. First I want to send out congratulations to Mr. Forest Whitaker on his Star on the Walk of Fame. While this honor has lost some of it’s status, there is no question that it is still a status symbol that is desired by all entertainers. Mr. Whitaker has come into his own and this just continues to cement his place in Hollywood. I’m glad to hear of this further step into the history books.

Looking into the future, I know I’ve mentioned it but this is going to be quite the summer movie season. 14 sequels are planned to come out. There are several I’m looking forward to. I’ve talked about Pirates 3, Spiderman 3, Die Hard 4 and others. I recently saw the trailer for the Bourne Ultimatum and I think this may be the best movie of the season. Of course there are the less inspired sequels that will be out as well. Shrek 3 is only a money grab, though it might be good, while Fantastic Four 2 is just to give teen boys another chance to stare and dream about the invisible parts of Ms. Jessica Alba. But the bigger question is where are the original ideas? What happens when the final Harry Potter installment is done, and all the good comic books have been translated to film? I’ll take the good with the bad, but if there are these many sequels coming out shortly I have to wonder if there is anything original and compelling anywhere in the Hollywood pipeline.

Oh a reminder, boycott Georgia Rules. Hanoi Jane should not profit from anything again, and hopefully if yet another film she stars in flops directors and exec will stop putting her in movies.

And for the dog lovers out there, the most beautiful Bulldog has now been crowned. The winner is Riggs. I realize not everyone can appreciate the beauty of a bulldog, but I am sure their character shines brightly. I think they are the most charismatic dogs ever. Riggs of course leads the pack on this point.

Well I just wanted to get up a little bit before I go and discuss the Mr. Alec Baldwin situation, and Mr. Russell Simmons comments.

This is what I think, what do you think?

Dark brown means... Part 2 - 4.19.2007.3

Continued from Dark Brown means... Part 1

I would bet that the controversy over Mr. Imus makes no sense in most countries, if the story was covered at all. In countries where commercials that contain Black Americans (or just Blacks) are called the N-word, I would guess the controversy never was covered. And don’t delude yourself to think that I’m speaking of 3rd world nations. In my opinion overseas, Germans, Italians, Belgians, Arabs, and so on all hold similarly negative views. In each case, in my experience, they all point to music videos as well as news footage to confirm their reasoning.

So I’m not surprised that a Chinese translation (given that it was old, but still used) would define dark brown as it did. I’m not surprised that foreigners fear and shun Black Americans on sight. I’m not surprised that the words N-word, felon, criminal, drug addict, and Black American can be often used interchangeably. We use it in this manner in music videos and conversation, why shouldn’t they.

Words are power. The meaning and the understood meaning affect action intimately. They affect potential business transactions, reinforce cultural beliefs, and personal attitudes. If you think that how the world views African Americans isn’t important then you don’t understand how the world works. What may be a misguided greeting to you is a reason for a CEO not to build a store or factory in Detroit or in D.C. or other parts of the country, thus preventing jobs or giving opportunities to improve the lives of some people. Bling may be an impressive word to you, but to an overseas corporation it’s a reason to sell sub-prime loans in an area, or to market over-priced clothing, or sub-standard goods. Presumed ignorant, drug-addled, poor with one of the strongest currencies in the world are always a good target for profit without consideration of morality. I mean why should a corporation care if it is gouging prices or selling inferior goods to people who refer to their mothers and children with terms worse than used to describe a dog?

And that’s how a couch gets labeled the N-word in Canada. By the way, when was the last time you checked the label on anything that has a dark brown or black color in your home or possession? If you just wondered about checking them, maybe the disparaging words, like N-word, don’t mean what you think or want them to.

This is what I think, what do you think?

Dark Brown means ... - 4.19.2007.2

Some people have wondered why I have such a crusade against the N-word. I’ve been asked why it’s a big deal, I’ve been told that the meaning has changed. Some claim the word is now empowering, when used by African Americans and those in the hip-hop/rap community. Yet, I feel that there has been no difference in the word in my lifetime, and never will be. Any other thought or excuse is just ignorance of the facts.

Since the events involving Mr. Don Imus and the Rutgers women’s basketball team renewed attention has been placed on the disparaging terms used in this nation casually. But I feel most people have no concept of what these disrespectful terms mean to, or how they affect, the rest of the world. As Americans we have a very isolated view of the rest of the world, but our actions have great impact. Having lived overseas for a time, I have gotten an understanding of this that exceeds that of the norm.

A case in point is the description found on a couch in Canada. There may not be a lot of news on this but it seems that a mother purchased a new couch whose description referred to its color as “N-word brown.” As the furniture store that sold the couch, the supplier, and a software company that designed the tag all point a finger of blame at anyone but themselves the damage is done. The international insult has been made and no one would have notice if not for a child asking her mother what the N-word meant.

Why was the color of the couch described in such a manner? Because a 10 year old translation dictionary equated the words dark brown with the N-word in Chinese. Not 100 or 50 years old, just 10. The definition was so accepted that when the dictionary was updated, no change was made to the software. But why should it?

Across the world music videos and songs proliferate the use of the N-word, and other inflammatory comments, to describe and talk among African Americans. Non-native English speakers seek out tools to define this word, and many have a description that is without any context of the harm of the word. Of course the context is then supplied by the media that the word came from.

You might say so what. Think about it. The N-word does not convey a meaning of just color, but a negative context as well. In the eyes of the world it means criminal, drug dealer/addict, prostitute, and violent savage animal as presented by gansta rap and hi-hop. Almost 15 years ago when I was in Moscow you cannot imagine the surprise when Russians learned I was an American. In their eyes it could not be possible. Black Americans were not smart enough to learn their own language let alone another, we could not understand business or hold jobs, where we went random violence follows as does rampant drug use. In essence we were the N-word. Since I could not fit any part of that description I had to be from Cuba, or Africa, or South America. I was even asked if I was originally from any other country and then became a U.S. citizen. Resolving the image they had in their head of the word and image in the media, and me in person was too extreme to be the same thing. Simply put, since I was not the N-word I could not be African American.

Continued in Part 2

Beware Hanoi Jane Fonda - 4.19.2007.1

Well the summer season of movies is nearly upon us and there is good news and bad news. Let me deal with the bad news first. I’m sad to say, and frustrated as well, that Hanoi Jane Fonda has another movie coming out shortly. It is my absolute desire that no one ever go to this movie, Georgia Rules.

Due to open May 11th, the film co-stars Mrs. Felicity Huffman, Ms. Lindsey Lohan, Mr. Dermot Mulroney as well as the despicable Hanoi Jane. I have nothing against any of the other actors, in fact I think Mr. Mulroney and Mrs. Huffman are quite good. I have a lot against Hanoi Jane. I don’t know her personally and hope to never meet her. I will not watch anything she is in, and hope every endeavor she takes part in fails. While I would not wish ill to any person, this is one that gives such a thought pause.

I have mentioned before that I dislike this woman. I feel she is a traitor and has the worst interests of the nation in her heart, whether she acknowledges it or not. Let me be clear, I don’t mind leftist political views or the people that have them. I don’t agree, but I respect that they have these views. It helps to keep the nation balanced, and ideally creates an atmosphere where the best for the nation is possible. Even the extreme left, as whacky as they can be (and yes I realize the extreme right can be just as whacky). I draw the line at traitors.

I think I summed up my thoughts best here,

“As for Hanoi Jane, I agree with Mr. Danny Bonaduce in that I would be happy to have seen her shot for treason years ago. Protest all you want, but aiding the enemy of our nation and our troops is treason. I have no respect for the woman. Her (what I feel are) false and half-hearted apologies do not sway me. Some 30+ years later she has admitted remorse. Am I stupid? That is a political and economic response, timed perfectly to match a book and a movie release. I do not forget, nor will I forgive her. She had decades to apologize, or explain her thoughts. She was a grown woman, aware of her actions and their impact when she made them in the 70’s. Her hope, I feel, that the youth of the nation would not remember and thus forgive does not work with me. I am repulsed by violence against women, but I would pay to have a woman give Jane ‘Hanoi’ Fonda a beat down. I feel that strongly about her actions.”

So again I state, when Georgia Rules comes out go see anything else.

As for other news which is good, the upcoming movie by Mr. Nicholas Cage seems interesting. It’s been an interesting year so far for him. The Ghost Rider film has made 153 million so far, had decent reviews, and was another hit for Marvel. This movie, NEXT, looks to do similarly well.

The storyline appears direct enough. A man can see all probabilities he is involved with before they happen, a limited amount of time into the future. This has caused him a great deal of difficulty in his early years and he avoids situations that could draw attention to him. But there is a terrorist plot that causes the government to seek him out and so goes the story. There is a lot that can be done with this storyline and the effects look decent. I just they paid attention to the plot along with the special effects. There is one point I don’t understand and needs to be explained well, how do they catch someone that will see everything they might do to catch him? The only other possible problem the movie might have is a lame ending where after a lifetime of having this ability it suddenly goes away and Mr. Cage’s character can finally be as oblivious as the rest of us about the future. That would be lame and weak.

This is what I think, what do you think?

Say What????? - 4.17.2207.1

By guest author Audrey B.

The recent statement and subsequent firing of Imus brings to light a major issue. Are women, particularly black women, getting the respect they deserve? The young ladies at Rutgers certainly did not deserve the derogatory statement from Imus. What he said was not only insulting to African American women but to all women. These are young ladies who are in pursuit of higher education and also athletics. It takes a great deal of talent and intelligence to manage both a college schedule and an athletic schedule. These are women who have made a conscientious choice to do something positive with their lives, and yet a disc jockey thinks that he could use his freedom of speech to degrade them.

I have heard theories that he is a racist. I have heard another theory that he forgot his race for a moment. He thought that he had the ability to talk about African-American women as though he was part of the race.

Let’s explore the second theory. Why would it be acceptable to call young ladies “Nappy-headed Hoes”? When would it be acceptable? Would it be more acceptable if these were sisters shaking it on a rap video? Would it have been more acceptable if Imus was a rapper?

I say it is never acceptable. Women and men must be respected regardless of race, color, religion, or culture. This brings me to the whole of issue rappers. It is never acceptable to refer to women as B……. and Who………
All of us were given life and delivered into this world by a woman. It makes you wonder, would these individuals care if someone was calling their mother or grandmother by the terms above?

As women we can not allow this degradation to continue. We must teach out daughters, sisters, nieces etc that they are precious jewels and always deserve to conduct themselves with respect and be treated respectfully. Our ancestors fought hard to ensure that we receive that respect. We must therefore uphold that respect.

Audrey B.
CEO of FLY-Fostering Leadership in You

Introducing guest blog writer Audrey B.

I’m happy to introduce the first of several guest writers to Black Entertainment USA. The following is the bio for Audrey B. You will be able to read the posts of Audrey from time to time here, and I hope you will find her comments interesting and useful just as you do mine.

I continue to keep an eye out for other guest writers for Black Entertainment USA and Vass. If you are interested in becoming a writer for either blog, please contact me for further information.

The submissions by Audrey B. are not edited for content, though they may be changed for the purpose of style or to otherwise conform to the format found on the site currently.



Born on July 23, 1963 in Richmond, Virginia and raised in the ‘low country and midland’ regions of South Carolina, Audrey B. considers herself a ‘Southern Lady,’ with a personal philosophy and presentation style that is influenced by her experiences of life in the south.

Audrey B. is a graduate of the University of South Carolina where she holds a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Psychology (1985) and a Master of Public Health Degree (M.P.H.) in Health Administration (1998). She began her career as a Social Worker at the Department of Social Services in 1985. Audrey B. has also worked at the University of South Carolina’s School of Medicine (1989-1992) and the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (1992-1998). After receiving her M.P.H. in 1998, Audrey B. was hired at Palmetto Health to create public health outreach programs for teens, mothers and infants of which ‘Teen Talk’ programs were created to help the youth in various community organizations and middle school and high schools make significant life choices.

Audrey B. has enjoyed working with teens and young adults, and the chance to inspire them to reach their full potential. She is a motivational speaker and has made presentations at the National Black Family Summit, community graduation ceremonies and numerous other events. In addition, she has made radio and television appearances in promotion of various programs.

In addition Audrey B. has written and directed several skits and plays and is the author of the soon to be released book “Falling In Love With M.E. (Mutual Enhancement)”. She also enjoys writing poems and articles. The abovementioned book is a compilation of years of personal experiences and advice given to others. Audrey B. believes that the best way to help others is to share the lessons learned so that others will not make the same mistakes. Audrey B states, “Life brings each of us unique experiences that will not only benefit our lives but also the lives of others.”

Audrey B. currently lives in Columbus, Ohio where she is a Health Planning Administrator and is the mother of two sons ages 22 and 15 that she loves dearly.

Movies yet to come - 4.16.2007.1

Now that the debate over Mr. Don Imus has ended with his loss of employment, and renewed attention is placed on the gansta rap music genre, I will get back to the somewhat more mundane discussion of the other things happening in the world.

Before I start with the items that have caught my attention I want to give an update on the polls I have running at www.vassconsult.com . According to the poll on Presidential candidates, if the election were held today Senator Obama would win. Some might say that the nature of the blog, and/or myself, would affect those voting; but considering the fact that Senators McCain and Clinton are both close behind (tied in second) I don’t feel that is accurate.

For those that wonder, the polls are open to anyone, and I don’t ask or care about race. But there has been a near even distribution between men and women (52 vs 48%) as well as a similar breakdown for those 18-35 vs. 35-65 (48 vs 52%). It’s getting interesting. I will run this poll until the end of the year, so vote and let your friends know about it as well. [If you are interested in learning more about my coverage of the various candidates visit www.vassconsult.com/politics/election2008.html]

There were 2 movies that may be of interest that made announcements last week. The first is a sequel (like what movie is not a sequel these days) of a good film. If you saw 28 Days Later [absolutely not the Ms. Sandra Bullock film of similar name] and enjoyed the hyper-kinetic zombies of the movie, the next part of the story is 28 Weeks Later. Literally they continue the storyline with what are the continuing effects of the England destroying virus. It’s not quite Shaun of the Dead, but I’m sure it will catch the attention of many U.S. fans. My guess right now is that it’s worth seeing in the movies instead of DVD.

Moving onto action movies, what could have more action than a film with Mr. Jackie Chan AND Mr. Jet Li? I know, Mr. Li said he wasn’t going to make any more films after Fearless, but this should have already started production. It should be quite the film considering both are the top names in the martial arts genre, and have been for over a decade or 2. It should be quite the combination, the stunts of Mr. Chan and the wire-work of Mr. Li. There is no doubt that the quality should be top of the line for this film. You won’t have to wait too long for this film, it should be out in 2008. Do I really need to say more?

On the more esoteric front, a blast from the past is on the horizon. I’m not talking about the remake of Dolemite again, I mean real old. Fans of animation may recall the cartoon Speed Racer. (Younger readers may recall the techno remix of the theme song - which is nice) Yes the adventures of the Mach 5 will be coming to life with a strong cast. Mr. John Goodman will be Pops, Mrs Susan Sarandon is set for Mom, and the best part is Ms. Christina Ricci has joined on to be Trixxie. I’m sure those who never saw the classic cartoon have no idea who these people are. The best I can offer to those readers is that the car is the real star. The Mach 5 is fast, stylish, and has as many gadgets as a whole James Bond film. (I still can’t imagine why it needed 2 buzzsaws but that could look great if they keep it). The lead role of Speed is going to Mr. Emile Hirsh, I have no idea who the kid is. The last thing that makes this concept interesting, the Wachowski brothers are directing and writing it. I’d expect quite the homage to old Japanese cartoons, manga and anime in general. We shall see.

This is what I think, what do you think?

Concluding Now that Imus is gone - 4.12.2007.3

Concluding Now that Imus is gone...

Any institution that serves the public has a responsibility and morale imperative to not disparage the public. Commentators are not allowed to say anything they wish in a discussion, television broadcasters (public and cable alike) cannot show movies and films of any content at any time to every viewer without discretion, news media cannot report anything they cannot justifyably confirm. There are limits to what can be done, as there should be. Even in the 1950’s and 60’s when parents were outraged by Rock ‘n Roll, with its mantra of sex and drugs there was still limits. There were boundaries that the society and the corporations abided by. In breaking those boundaries record companies, media corporations and entertainers have violated a trust the public has placed in them. Rather than rewarding this breach of unwritten laws with our money we should protest and deny them our funds.

The good and bad must be taken when appropriate. The Black community has failed its children, just as the record companies, radio stations, and gansta rappers have failed the public. This is not something that cannot be resolved, in fact it must be. We have shown the fact we have power, and we need to use it. We must use it in a positive manner. We need to change the Black culture from the commodity it has become to something greater. We are born Black, to sell that off as a cheap triffle is no different than shooting ourselves in the foot. It’s just stupid.

We must also recognize the failures and positives of some of our more recognized figureheads. I say figureheads and not leaders as at this moment there are no leaders of the Black community. There has been no leader since Mr. Malcolm X and Dr. Martin Luther King, with perhaps some argument made for Minister Louis Farakhan or Rev. Jesse Jackson for a segment of the community. While Rev. Al Sharpton was helpful, as was Rev. Jackson, in bringing this recent incident to public attention neither are leaders in my mind. They bring baggage and questionable motives to every arena they enter.

Rev. Sharpton is particularly in question. He has a long history of inflammatory actions who’s main motive seems to have been the promotion of Rev. Sharpton primarily. We need to accept that those that would claim to be leaders of the Black community are accountable for what they have said, positive and negative, and when they are in the wrong they admit to this. I say this as the credibility of serious issues that plague the entire community are lessened and placed in question when public figures of questionable motive jump into the limelight. As an example I pose the fact that several of the pundits on television questioned the seriousness of the demand for the removal of Mr. Imus on the sole basis that Rev. Al Sharpton was asking for it. Leaders are followed because they are credible, because they bring a somber tone to the subjects they deal with. To accept less is to weaken the causes, no matter how worthy, that are being pursued.

Again I say that we must change the nature of rap music as it stands today. In doing this we bring ourselves into full accountability for our community and the Black culture as a whole. We are more than just pimps, ho’s, drug dealers, ganstas and other riffraff. In reclaiming and redirecting one of the most popular and prevalent formats that the society and world views us by, we gain in all aspects of our lives and futures.

This is what I think, what do you think?

Imus is gone part 2 - 4.12.2007.2

Continued from Part 1...

It’s time that such deragatory comments stop being uttered by anyone. The meaning doesn’t change when a person of color says it, nor when it is put to song. These oppresive words are a poison in the Black culture without regard to who the person stating them is. The fact that they have become somewhat commonplace is similar, to me, to an ebola-like virus eating away at it’s host without any attempt to end the destruction.

We cannot demand that Mr. Imus be held to a standard we do not hold ourselves to. The reason that Mr. Imus had to go is that as a figure of influence he espoused hatred and racism to millions across the country. Gansta rap music entertainers are figures of influence that attempt to entertain millions with the promotion of hatred, racism, drug addiction, and criminality. If we have anger with Mr. Imus, and obviously we have, then we can have no less anger at the current state of rap music.

This does not just end with rappers. They must accept the responsibility for their comments, as has Mr. Imus, and there should be a change. I will not demand that gansta rap should be removed, though I think that would be best, as I do not agree with censorship. Entertainers, as well as all people, deserve the right to the First Amendment, given that their use of this right does not inflict harm to other individuals. You cannot scream fire in a movie theater, you cannot call non-public individuals prostitues and racial slurs just because. Comedians and singers and entertainers deserve the right to ridicule and caricature the society in general and in its parts. But the blatant use of offensive, inflammatory words who’s only purpose is to lessen the humanity of an individual is hurtful in my mind.

But as I stated, rappers are not the final part of this equation. The record companies and radio station owners are equally at fault, if not more so. Before 1992, there were several sub-genres of rap music. Some were more political, some more playful, others with mixed meanings. All during this time rap was considered a fad, and was barely promoted or given significant radio airplay as well as being virtually non-existent in music video airplay. With the emergence of N.W.A. and other gansta rappers there was a decision made by executives that has affected millions since that day. Rap became an official music category, and promotion of this singluar sub-genre became all encompassing. Music videos glorifying violence, the de-humanizing of women, massive drug use, and criminal activity hit the masses in a volume never before seen.

I’ve mentioned before that there are words (particularly the N-word) that these executives could not say without losing everything, but they have made tens of millions promoting music that let others say this for them. The responsibility for morality that every media outlet maintains was thrown to the wind for the sake of money. That is insulting. That so many would do these things for mere money is also troubling and insulting. And this insult was compounded with the almost complete exclusion of any other form of rap. Because of that the record companies are responsible as much as those entertainers that utter these words.

Concluding in Part 3...

Now that Imus is gone - 4.12.2007.1

Don Imus has been fired. A simple statement of fact that carries a huge amount of power. It’s a statement that is important, and it deserves to be understood completely. There is more to this than just his removal for his racist and derogatory statements.


The commentary has been fast and furious since Monday when I think the nation at large became aware of the incident from the previous Wednesday. I have been part of the media that has spoken on this subject, and its ramifications, since Monday having written about 10 posts so far. To say I was outraged is an understatement of massive proportions. But I have also discussed this with many people of all colors and ages and sex. I have read the comments on the blog posts, and I have read other blogs, and watched the many experts and figureheads debate the matter.

I said, “While I am in favor of severe actions against Mr. Imus, I feel Mr. McGuirk cannot be left out either.” I stand by that commentary. I asume he will be losing his position along with Mr. Imus, and that is a good thing. Comments about jigaboos and wannabes are hardly funny, especially in the context that both men presented them. [For those unfamiliar, while the news media has not presented this, later in the same discussion of the Rutger’s womens basketball team these terms were bandied about in addition to the other vile comments.]

I had asked in that same post, “What I would like to hear Mr. Imus, and Mr. McGuirk, explain is what makes the Black women of the Rutgers basketball team hos. Then I want to hear what makes their hair nappy. And then perhaps I can hear how either of these comments have anything to do with basketball or the abilities of these women. I would listen to Mr. Imus explain that, and I’d like him to do this in front of the women that he has nationally demeaned. And then he should still be fired. Not resign, fired. He has given up his right to save face in this matter.” It has now come to pass that all the things I had hoped for have come to pass in one manner or another. I am greatful for that. But this is not the end of this matter.

Ms. C. Dolores Tucker started a movement that rings as true today as when she started it in the 1990’s. Gansta rap “is a crime that we are promoting these kind of messages. The whole gangster rap industry is drug-driven, race-driven, and greed-driven.” The comments by rappers like Mr. Calvin Broadus (Snoop Dogg) in trying to justify and re-define terms like ‘ho’ exemplify that Ms. Dolores was correct in her comments. As I translated the comment of Mr. Broadus into an intelligible wording the potential for damage becomes clear I think, “…he states that any Black woman that is not in or graduated from college, that is living in a predominantly African American neighborhood, that is not earning a middle class income is a ho. If these same African American (actually he does not limit this to only African Americans) women seek a successful Black man [though he does indicate their search is based solely on the economic status of the Black man] and have not achieved equal status on their own, then these women are ho’s….”

Continued in Part 2...

Imus vs. Rap justification conclusion - 4.11.2007.3

Concluding Imus vs Rap ...

But in looking at the comment made by Mr. Broadus I come to understand that he states that any Black woman that is not in or graduated from college, that is living in a predominantly African American neighborhood, that is not earning a middle class income is a ho. If these same African American (actually he does not limit this to only African Americans) women seek a successful Black man [though he does indicate their search is based solely on the economic status of the Black man] and have not achieved equal status on their own, then these women are ho’s. That is what I understand as his statements meaning in English, a language that must be translated into from the disjointed words of Mr. Broadus. It may be obvious but I do not agree. Perhaps I am too old at 39 to get it, but a ho is a prostitute as I understood it. No more, no less. Any other derivation of the meaning is just a colloquialism, or a lack of knowledge [of which I feel the latter may apply to Mr. Broadus]. It appears that according to the English translation of Mr. Broadus (Snoop Dogg) the majority of women, married or not, fall into this category to some degree. If Mr. Broadus would like to clarify his jumbled definition, I invite him to contact me or place a response on this blog.

Again, the logic does not justify why rappers (which could include White, or Asian, or any rappers) can use offensive language and other people cannot. It does not explain why any woman, regardless of her financial success, location, style of living, love interest, or education level deserves to be regarded as a prostitute unless she in fact employs herself in that work. It does not justify why rappers should be held to a standard above anyone.

I directly ask Mr. Broadus, and any other renown rap entertainer that may choose to respond, why he can insult my mother, my sister, my family [and those of you my readers] in such a degrading manner, and not be held to the same standard as Mr. Imus or any other person. I ask, what difference is there if I went to Mr. Broadus’ wife, mother, daughter and told them they were ho’s or other equally offensive language that he uses in his records and songs? If he feels that such actions are wrong, how does he justify the use of these words? What provides Mr. Broadus, or any rapper, a higher level of morality than myself [or you]?

I will say it again. I want Mr. Imus fired, and it seems that Procter & Gamble, Staples, and now MSNBC [they just cancelled the simulcast of the show] agree. So would Mr. Broadus, Mr. Creekmur, Fatman Scoop and virtually everyone I am aware of. But if Mr. Imus has made a vicious attack, a racial slur, an insulting and degrading commentary, it must be accepted that so has the current gansta rap industry. In the same reasoning why it is disgusting for one to make such comments, it is wrong for all. I will say that I want Mr. Imus gone, and I equally wish gansta rap to be removed from the airwaves.

I will further state, this is not the end of this story. This is still just symptoms of a larger issue. I restate that I feel the source, or at least one source, of this anger and animosity is truly the failure of America to apologize and make reparations for slavery.

This is what I think, what do you think?

Justifying rap music Part 2 - 4.11.2007.2

With due respect to Fatman Scoop, whom I have never heard on the radio, his logic is incredulous and inane. Words have meanings, and while meanings do change over time (which is a slow process) that change in meaning is universal. Blue does not mean ‘light my cigarette’ just because illiterate, or uneducated, or trend-followers chose to accept it as so when the majority of the WORLD does not. If the meanings of the words used by Mr. Imus, or any person, have changed in meaning then everyone should be ok with them and there should be no debate over it. This is not the case. Words and their meanings are not dependant on the artificial prejudice of the color of the skin of the person using it. If it were then how is it possible for Eminem (Mr. Marshall Mathers) to be able to use the same words as Mr. Imus without insult?? The meaning has not changed, the prejudice has. To try to justify this prejudice is to look foolish in my opinion.

As I mentioned above Mr. Creekmur tried to shore up the obvious fallacy of Fatman Scoop. Mr. Creekmur stated that it was offensive for Mr. Imus to use these words as their meaning has not changed. But he further added that the use of these words is an internal matter for the Black community to resolve. While this is a better argument it also fails. African Americans do not exist in a bubble, separate of all other Americans [even if we feel unfairly treated by the government and/or the society]. We have commoditized our culture, and placed for sale our speech, preference for clothing, and other aspects of life. In doing that we have invited the use of the words we use to be used by others, even if that usage is not the same as what is desired. That is part of the deal in making this sale, you lose the choice of how what you sold is used.

But I do agree that this is something that must be address by the Black community. I have said from virtually day one of this website that I disagree with the sub-genre of gansta rap music. I still maintain that it needs to be removed, or at the least not promoted at the exclusion of all other forms of rap. Rappers need to take responsibility for their words, no different than Mr. Imus does. Look through the posts, I’ve always said that. So have many others, this is not a new argument, but it has taken a new impetus due to this situation.

Of those that need to take responsibility there is Mr. Broadus and his comments. Mr. Broadus announced his definition of the term ‘ho’ and it exemplifies, for me, the need of education among African Americans. Beyond the fact that the statement by Mr. Broadus is ill-formed, horribly articulated and obscenity-laden, it tried to justify his career while attacking others for using the same terms his career is built upon. [I must interject that I strongly feel that use of obscenities in place of thoughts is a direct communication of the lack of intelligence of the person using the obscenities.] Mr. Broadus has placed himself as the high-arbiter of the English language and its use by the Black community. That alone makes him delusional. I will never accept an uneducated, drug addicted, low class criminal and former gang member as an authority on a language that he displays a clear lack of mastery for.

Cocluded in part 3...

Don Imus vs Rap music - 4.11.2007.1

As I expected the debate over the comments by Mr. Don Imus continues to expand. Inevitably the question of rappers use of similar terms as those used by Mr. Imus has been broached. It’s a subject I have long targeted, but now comments are being made by Fatman Scoop and Snoop Dogg, in addition to Rev. Sharpton and Jackson. The comparison is not only fair, it is necessary.

As we watch Mr. Imus fight for his career, as sponsors abandon his show which may be the key to his dismissal, attention is moving to rap music. While the hypocrisy of the corporations that fund and promote the current version of rap have remained untouched questions are being asked of the artists and entertainers in this field. And in the case of Mr. Calvin Broadus (Snoop) he has graciously offered his ill-worded and obscenity-laced position. I will discuss the failures of his argument in a moment.

Rap is about to face the biggest challenge to its existence ever. Let me correct that, gansta rap is challenged. There is a blatant difference. While there has been no other form of rap music promoted since roughly 1992 other than gansta rap, it is not what the music genre is comprised of. Public Ememy, Grandmaster Flash, KRS-1 and may others are not the same as 50 cent, Snoop Dogg, or the others in the current crop of ‘street prophets.’ Given this distinction, this form of rap is being asked to justify its existence and I personally don’t think it can be done.

The current trend in rap is similar to the trend in movies; copy what others did well and just pump out volumes of it and see what sticks. Originality is widely missing in this sub-genre. To my knowledge [which I will state is somewhat limited as I do not actively listen to, and never buy, the current gansta rap music offerings] the sum total of virtually every entertainer today is to state that they are some form of criminal (pimp, drug dealer, thief are the most common) that is an addict (smoking marijuana, possibly also using other drugs in combination with, or instead of) and uses women in a manner similar to tissue paper. They seem to state that they are the best at these 3 actions, as opposed to their counterparts who are less than men since they don’t match up. I think that sums up 85% of all the rap songs made in the last decade or so. In my opinion that is so pitiful that I do not have the words for it.

Given the limited mental expenditure used to create these less than expansive ‘social’ comments, the question is what is the difference between anyone using the same corrupted terminology as these predominately Black ‘artists?’ During the Big Story on Fox News at 5:35 today, Fatman Scoop tried to justify that there is a difference. His argument was perhaps one of the weakest ones I have heard. Mr. Chuck Creemur tried to help shore up Fatman Scoop’s argument but it still fell flat. In essence the argument made by Scoop was that the meaning of the words used by rappers and the youth of the nation today [I believe he means specifically African American youth but that is a guess] is separate of the meaning that has endured for centuries of use and is still maintained today. This logic is dizzying in its fallacy. In effect Fatman Scoop is saying that if kids start calling cellphones pineapples, then the meaning of the word pineapple is now changed. Does that make sense? He further clarified that the “old people” just need to get used to this as we are the ones most offended by these words.

Continued in Part 2...

Don Imus the symptom, is there a cure - 4.10.2007.6

Concluding from part 3...

This may be the single widest known and acknowledge fact that is completely taboo in this nation. We can make movies about it, we can see read books, but the discussion of it inflames those involved and the thought of an apology is fiercely refuted. I have rarely had a conversation about this that has not exploded due to the emotion held by both sides and I’m 39. Imagine the emotion held within the nation over 400 years.

The next step is reparations. I’ve discussed it several times. There are many ways it can be done. I’ll offer this as a suggestion, for every Black American that can prove a genealogy going back to slavery, a tax credit of X dollars that once used up is done, that includes the 10 years after the reparation is accepted. It works like this; if reparations are passed an African American would get a family history made. If the family tree reaches to 1865 they qualify for the tax credit. The family tree is submitted along with a W-2 or 1099 and a percentage of the income is credited. Let’s say the credit is worth $3000, so 10% is used each year until the total is used up. In addition any Black American that is qualified from say 2008 (if it were made law that year) until 2018 or before then is eligible for the credit. So if you qualified, and were filing taxes for the first time in 2018 you get in, in 2019 you don’t. Everyone that qualified prior to that time is eligible. It’s a simple solution. It cost nothing to anyone, it benefits the economy, it helps set the stage to continue the healing made from an apology, and it removes the question of when does this end.

Discussion on race, and other issues affecting race, still need to be done but perhaps the festering violence will have a salve to remove it. Is it a perfect answer? No, but it is an answer and it’s a way to move forward. Without an answer and movement forward Mr. Imus will hardly be the last time an entertainer or celebrity makes incendiary comments. There will be more racially motivated riots and crimes, and the nation will eventually consume itself. That’s how I see it.

This is what I think, what do you think?

Looking at a cure not the symptom - 4.10.2007.5

Continued from part 2...

Slavery in America was unlike that forms found of nations throughout the world. Unlike other forms human beings were made equivalent to mere property. This is a fact. After ending slavery [which was not a priority of the nation though it is promoted as a critical factor for the Civil War – that’s just romanticizing of the true historical facts] Black Americans were restricted, and isolated with Jim Crow laws and segregation. The nation made no apologies, and tried to hide from what happened to those who were integral to creating the foundation of the nation, by ignoring and shunning those individuals. That too is a fact. That lasted until the 1960’s. And during this entire time anger festered in the belly of the nation. The result of that festering appeared in violence and inequality on all levels.

Today we still suffer from these effects. Yes there is Affirmative Action and other laws that attempt to level the playing field. Of course if equality was actually being espoused there would be no need for such laws, minority or not, man or woman. The fact that I as a Black Puerto Rican have laws that seek to help me gain employment or adjust my ability to get a greater education exist proves that it is not. That is to say nothing of my experiences, which have required me to be better than necessary just to be considered equal to my peers.

But an infection that is let alone does not just stay in one place. It affects the whole in the same destructive manner. While the nation hid from its responsibility in the same way Mr. Imus has, African Americans have hidden from it as well. Drugs have become so prevalent that they are commonplace in the community. Children are born into single parent households in numbers never seen before. Young men are more likely to be killed, on drugs, jailed, or a combination of the above than to graduate high school or live to 25. The legal system is so biased that it creates flashpoints of anger that has decimated cities, and virtually guarantees a conviction and harsh sentence to a person of color, even if they are innocent. Politicians throw away money to undeserving individuals to keep them docile and placated, and as an unspoken penance for past actions. It’s a system that is corrupting everything from the inside out. And corporations feed the fuel by promoting blatant criminals with minimal vocabularies as stars spouting bile.

We need to heal as a nation. I had a good friend who asked me, “what can be done, and where does it end?” I’ve thought about that for decades and I have one answer. You may have seen parts of it in my posts, I’m sure you will see it in future posts. The most important thing and the first step is an apology. We must look in the face of the past, directly, and tell those of us that are the descendants of the builders of all we see and use today that we are sorry for what was done. It may sound simple but it is hardly that. Even in the last several months there continues to be vehement refusals by State governments to even agree to expressing regret for the past.

Finished in part 4...

Sympton and the cure, Part 2 - 4.10.2007.4

Continued from part 1 ...

But there have been calls for acceptance of the apologies made by Mr. Imus. While many politicians have made no comment so far, Senator McCain has expressed a willingness to accept the apology made by Mr. Imus and appear on his show. The President has accepted the apology made and reserved further comment. Basically there is a lot of waiting happening.

Yet the double standard of this situation remains. I mean the fact that while everyone is focused on the comments of Mr. Imus, and should be aware of the words of Mr. McGuirk, they have missed the fact that this is a symptom and not an end result. Mr. Imus is not the source of why women are called hos, nor why calling an African American “nappy-haired” is an insult. He is not the cause of the status of Black culture today. And we cannot be upset by what he has said without being angered by others that say equally offensive words.

If the action of Mr. Imus calling women, specifically Black women, hos is abhorrent so must be rappers when they do so. There is no difference. There should be lo lessening of our anger. When a rapper defames women, they defame all women. When they use the n-word, they insult all African Americans. And again I say that that word is insulting no matter who uses it. There is no difference in the word, because like all words, its meaning is exactly that.

We cannot be upset because one person says a thing and not when another does it as well. That’s hypocritical and stupid. The fact that various aspects of life in America are skewed against minorities is not a release from the bounds of decency or language use. We cannot demand that a music and/or radio entertainment corporation punish an employee and allow them to profit and promote music that contains the same language and defamatory comments that the firing entailed. Equality requires the same reaction to the same inflammatory source.

But why is virtually every African American that hears of this event upset? Why is this so inflammatory? Why are words spoken by one person more vile than another saying the same thing? Because Black Americans were slaves in this nation, and then persecuted for over 100 years after that, and no one wants to talk about that.

It’s that simple. In my opinion almost all the problems that face African Americans, and race relation in America, are connected to the fact that slavery of the most dehumanizing nature. I’ve spoken about this several times. We have not healed, and we cannot until we resolve the pain that has festered in this nation for 400 years. Let me show you the connection.

Continue part 3...

Don Imus is a symptom - 4.10.2007.3

What a day. There has been a lot of discussion on Mr. Don Imus and his comments against the women’s basketball team for Rutgers University. I’ve written a bit about it as well. I’ve also had, and continue to have several conversations on this with men and women, Whites, Hispanic/Latinos, and African Americans of ages from mid-twenties to the mid-forties. While there is no one that supports Mr. Imus, that I have been in touch with, there are differences in what should be done.

Every woman I have spoken too has been amazed that Mr. Imus would make such a statement. Each has been shocked and outraged by his words. To say that they took his words as offensive is to say the least. Every one of them has been absolute in their decision to see him fired.

As for the men, there are different takes on what the outcome should be. I’ve seen a guy bowled over by the comments, just stunned. I’ve seen a young man that felt it should be shrugged off. I’ve discussed this with a man that felt resignation or firing would be too harsh a punishment. And there have been calls for him to be gone.

So I have absorbed it all. And I have been challenged to explain why I felt the need for Mr. Imus to be fired. I want to share part of my reasoning, because the fact is this goes far deeper to the national psyche than anyone seems to be addressing right now.


Mr. Imus attacked innocent women that never gave a reason for this attack. They did not deserve or engender any reason for it. I doubt that any woman could. But I will give the point that were this a public figure, a politician or comedian or some such, then perhaps there could have been some sliver of humor. Had this been a response to an attack against Mr. Imus, then perhaps there could be some understanding of his words. In either of those cases perhaps there could be room for him keeping his job after an apology. But that is not the case.

I commented yesterday that I felt the decision to suspend Mr. Imus was a vacation being forced on him. I still stand by that thought. My fear was that this was something the corporations behind his radio station wanted to just wait out the storm and go back to business as usual. The fact that the suspension would not take place for a week was puzzling and seemingly confirmation of this. I have heard that the reason for the delay is due to fundraising for charities this week by Mr. Imus. I cannot confirm that right now, though it could explain why the controversy was created, though not excuse it. Obviously NBC and CBS have been evaluating the situation and seeing how the sponsors react, because that is the defining factor for them, money. Were there any other reasons that the corporations cared about action would have been immediate and far sterner.

But the pressure has run up quickly. Mr. Al Roker, who works at NBC, has called for dismissal, along with many others. I have heard that 3 sponsors have left his show, most notably Staples, but again I cannot confirm this. There has been a small protest at CBS corporate offices, and coverage in most news media (except the local Binghamton newspaper). At least one interviewee has canceled so far.

Continued in part 2...

Helluva continued - 4.10.2007.2

Continued from Part 1...

But back to the point at hand. Mr. Imus and McGuirk insulted more than just a basketball team. They defamed women all world wide. They called your family and women of importance nothing better than prostitutes. That is a ho. That’s what he said without a moment of hesitation. That was his deep thought brought out in a moment of casual flippancy. At least it seems as such to me. And the mega-corporation that allows him to be on air believed that was harsh enough to give him a vacation. Wow.

I do not doubt that this could be the thoughts of many people around the world. I’m not foolish enough to believe that if Mr. Imus is fired this will end comments like this being uttered. I equally understand that not every person feels this way. These comments do not reflect everyone, but they do reflect some. But there are consequences for the actions we take. Mr. Imus has mentioned he recognizes this, even as he refuses to take responsibility.

While I feel Mr. Imus should take responsibility for his comments, I must also consider another part of this that is just as critical. Mr. Imus did not make calling women, particularly African American women, hos a common occurrence. The degradation of Black women has been promoted for decades by rappers in a manner that never existed before. This continuous insult, promoted by corporations, has helped to usher in moments like this I feel.

But where does this all end? How many times must people feel like they can say anything and be unpunished, no matter how offensive they are? In recent months we have heard of the actions by Mr. Mel Gibson, Mr. Michael Richards and Kenneth Eng. We have seen a Presidential hopeful make comments that are specifically targeted to lessen the accomplishments and importance of success in African Americans. Blatant attacks against Black men have occurred, with barely a comment from the news media, while felonies are made by white teen girls and the charges are reduced without cause. Yet while this all happens the fight over an apology to African Americans is heatedly rejected.

Don Imus and his comments are only a symptom of a bigger issue. I don’t agree with the thought that we need incidents like this to address the underlying issues. The issues are apparent, prolonged and ingrained in this nation. The number of incidents that any Black person (or any minority for that fact) in America can name in their life to date proves that. Perhaps it’s time that we address this at its root. Perhaps we need to take responsibility for the music lyrics, music videos, ebonics, lack of education, unjust legal system, economic disparity, addictions, and failure to apologize for the actions that helped to build the nation we all share.

Part of that acceptance of responsibility can start with Mr. Imus being fired. But whether he is or not, it should not be our only action.

This is what I think, what do you think?

You are a helluva B***h - 4.10.2007.1

So how many women feel complimented by that headline? How many people feel that this comment was humorous? This isn’t targeted to any one race. It could be your mother I’m speaking about. Or your daughter, sister or girlfriend. Or just you. Yes, how much joy do you have now that you know this was directed personally?

The fact is that it isn’t personal. I don’t intend to insult anyone. But what is the difference between my headline comment that can be insulting to any woman on the planet and the words of Mr. Don Imus and Mr. Bernard McGuirk? Obviously I’m not as famous, though the fact that this blog is read by people in over 50 countries in the world and coast to coast in the United States makes me more than unknown. Beyond that what is the difference?

I’ll tell you what I think it is. I run the risk, with that headline, of alienating readers forever. I could be losing my base for life and thus crushing my business to make a point. Mr. Imus though got a 2 week vacation. Yes, he was suspended. But he is keeping his job and not, as far as I’ve seen, losing any pay. That is a vacation in my opinion. Just enough time for the media to find a new subject to pump up. Probably the Anna Nicole Smith case, with who is the daddy. You know really substantial news that affects the lives of millions.

Think about that for a moment though. I am risking everything to make a point; Mr. Imus lost nothing (beyond temporary embarrassment that he has gone through before) for saying far worse comments. Does that make any sense?

I’m sure Mr. Imus, and Mr. McGuirk, understand that they are paid to be confrontational. I’m sure that the comments felt completely natural, and/or funny, when they were said. Obviously neither thought this would get as much attention as it has. But I think they, and NBC or General Electric, never were worried about how it may affect them and the current “punishment” reflects that they still don’t think this is an issue.

I know, some will say “But Rev Jesse Jackson held a protest,” or, “Rev Al Sharpton took him to task on the radio.” Well with all due respect that just makes it somewhat farcical. The inclusion of both these men in this matter just makes this less serious, not more. If President Bush made comment, or both Senators for New York, or any number of other legislators were critical of this punishment and the comments that would be serious. I say that because neither man is representative of Black culture or the majority of the Black community. Both do grab the headlines though.

I’ll detract a moment more. Mr. Malcolm X was a leader. Dr. Martin Luther King was a leader. Mr. Bill Cosby has assumed a position of influence. Senator Barak Obama, Representative Keith Ellison, Secretary of State Condolezza Rice and her predecessor Mr. Colin Powell are persons of influence and leadership. But there is no leader of the Black Community today. There is no one person that speaks for all African Americans. There is no one person or group that is recognized. Both the reverends are far from the levels the abovementioned are at. They just get a lot of media attention. So does Anna Nicole Smith, but that doesn’t mean it’s justified or worthwhile.

Continued in Part 2...

Imus, Rutgers basketball, and Rev. Al Sharpton - 4.9.2007.1

Ok, I’m a bit behind on this event. What can I say, I don’t like basketball and I don’t listen to either the Imus radio show or the show of Rev. Al Sharpton. As such I only recently found out about the disparaging comments made last Wednesday by Mr. Don Imus. To say I am upset is an understatement.

For those that may be in a similar situation as myself, Mr. Imus called the Rutgers women’s basketball, “…some nappy-headed hos”. This was in response to Mr. Bernard McGuirk’s comment, “some hardcore hos.” By the way, no one has asked for the resignation of Mr. McGuirk, though his comments are no less insulting. Obviously there are a lot of problems here.

Let me start with Mr. McGuirk. The fact that he calls Black women hos is despicable. I understand the argument that calling women as such is common because rappers and hip-hop entertainers do so, but that does not make it proper. I have discussed rappers using such insulting terms to describe women, I disagree with that and I disagree with this. He provided the fuel by which the far better known Mr. Imus created this furor. While I am in favor of severe actions against Mr. Imus, I feel Mr. McGuirk cannot be left out either.


As for Imus, well I’m not surprised. There has been a long history of ill-toned comments against African Americans by him. This is just another example, and furthers the viability of his being removed from the air. I find his apologies half-hearted, motivated by fear of losing his position more than his own true feelings.

Mr. Imus has tried to excuse his commentary, when speaking to Rev. Sharpton, by referring to the fact that other African Americans entertainers and people use this term often. That did not fly with Rev. Sharpton, nor does it with me. That seems to remind me of the comment my mother used to say, “If everyone jumped of a bridge, would you do it to?” To claim that one person should be excused because of the infantile actions of another, when both are acting badly, assumes that everyone involved and everyone listening is stupid. I am not, nor do I believe you my readers are either.

I understand that at 66, Mr. Imus is part of a culture that believe calling Black Americans “colored” or the n-word was a commonplace act. He grew up and was taught that African Americans were second-class citizens at best, and that the need to be separated from them socially and economically was an imperative. I understand that that was the truth of the time of his formative years. Yet that does not excuse his actions. As a seemingly intelligent man, who has worked for decades in entertainment and has lived in the probably most diversified city in the nation, he should know better. He should be capable of understanding that individuals are not stereotypes, and that stereotypes invariably target the worst aspects of any group of people.

An intelligent man does not need to demean women. An intelligent man does not need to comment on a group of sports players based on their hair or its style. An intelligent man does not need to make back-handed “compliments” to be humorous. Most importantly an intelligent man accepts the responsibility and repercussions of their actions and comments, even when this is a detrimental result. That is part of my expectation of any intelligent man.

Pleas that Mr. Imus is a good man are irrelevant. Even less relevant by the fact that it is Mr. Imus making the plea. To speak about the acts of kindness he does for a few does not excuse the damage he does to millions. I don’t care if Mr. Imus despises African Americans. That’s his choice. I do care how he speaks about us in a public forum.

I don’t agree with anyone referring to someone’s hair/hairstyle in a discussion that pertains to anything but that. Hair does not define a person any more than skin color. Does the fact that Mr. Donald Trump may have a hairpiece change anything about him? Does that mean that all men that might have a toupee share his exact qualities? If such an argument sounds ludicrous then the words of Mr. Imus are no less so. What I would like to hear Mr. Imus, and Mr. McGuirk, explain is what makes the Black women of the Rutgers basketball team hos. Then I want to hear what makes their hair nappy. And then perhaps I can hear how either of these comments have anything to do with basketball or the abilities of these women. I would listen to Mr. Imus explain that, and I’d like him to do this in front of the women that he has nationally demeaned. And then he should still be fired. Not resign, fired. He has given up his right to save face in this matter.

I do not often agree with Rev. Al Sharpton, but I find his one comment to be correct, “I accept his apology, just as I want his bosses to accept his resignation.”

This is what I think, what do you think?

Letter to Rudy Giuliani - 4.5.2007.1

This is an unaltered copy of a letter sent to Mr. Rudy Giuliani. Any response made will be posted, unaltered, when recieved.

To see other letters sent to Presidential candidates, visit M V Consulting, Inc.

April 5, 2007

Mr. Giuliani,

I am writing you in regard to your current attempt to gain the Republican nomination for the race for President of the United States in 2008. I am a native New Yorker and lived in the city during your time as Mayor of that city. I am also President of M V Consulting, Inc., a non-partisan corporation that has not contributed to any politician or political group, which maintains several internet businesses including blogs. I add that I have not contributed to any politician or party, nor have any of my sites advocated any individual or party in regard to the upcoming Presidential election.

I say all of this because I would like to ask you some questions on why you feel you should be President of the United States. It is my goal to post your response, as well as this letter, unaltered on my blogs for my readers to evaluate. I feel that the 2008 election is a critical point for the United States and its future. As such I believe it is important for as wide an audience of the public as possible to be informed in their voting choices. In addition I feel it important that I inform you that no changes to any response you provide will be made.

I add that I have already sent a similar letter to several other candidates of both parties. If you wish to review the letters that were sent previously, and where any response you make will be placed, please go to:

www.blackentertainmentblog.com
www.mvass.com
www.vassconsult.com/politics/election2008.html

I thank you in advance for your co-operation in answering these questions for my readers and myself.

For many Americans the first time you came to national attention was after the attacks of September 11. What many may not realize is that you started your political career as a Democrat. What led you to change your political affiliation? What changed in your political ideology that caused this move?

Many may not recall that in 1989 you ran for Mayor of New York City and lost to Mr. David Dinkins. What did you attribute to this loss and what did you learn from it?

During your time as Mayor of New York City you implemented several programs that had mixed results. One of those actions was the renovation of the West 42nd street area. Many native New Yorkers feel that the area was sold out to major corporations, in particular Disney, and the soul of the area was lost as well as multiple mom-and-pop business owners. To those detractors, what would you say were your reasons and what benefits were gained by the average New Yorker?

Another matter that was received in a mixed manner was your choice of police commissioner and the law enforcement policies during your term of office. During your time as Mayor, Mr. Amidou Diallo and Mr. Patrick Dorismond were murdered by police officers in a disturbing manner and Mr. Abner Louima was tortured by police officers which was then attempted to be covered up. These policies and your defense of the police department created a significant atmosphere of anger and cries of racism among the African American, Hispanic/Latino and other minority groups in the city; that was not covered significantly across the nation. For those African American and minority voters in the nation, what are your views on law enforcement? Where do you stand on Affirmative Action and other reforms that address racial inequality?

Considering the strong stance against organized crime and for law enforcement, as seen from your actions mentioned above and in your work as a U.S. Attorney, what stance do you believe America should take under your potential leadership towards countries such as Iran, and towards terrorist groups such as Al Quida?

Considering the record number of drop-outs that are African American, and the problems in education nationally in general, what efforts would you emphasize to improve the situation?

Of late there has been a great deal of discussion regarding a national healthcare program. Are you in favor of such a program and if so how would you fund this program? One of the arguments against such a program involves the question of whether the quality of healthcare could be maintained, and what motivation or incentive would pharmaceutical companies have to continue to research new medicines. What are your thoughts on this?

A current focus point of debate is the War in Iraq. Many Americans are upset about the status of the war, and others seek to retreat from this engagement entirely. Repercussions from any decision in this matter are probable to have ramifications for some time in the future of this nation. Where do you stand on this debate? What path do you intend to follow if you are elected? What do you see as potential outcomes of your proposed actions in the next 5 years?

It is well known that you are a cancer survivor. The health of the future President of the nation is a concern for many Americans. To that end I ask what your current health status is. In addition, I would never wish cancer on anyone, but if your cancer were to return and you had been elected President how do you believe you will react? Based on your experience initially, how do you feel this could affect you actions and responsibilities as President?

In recent media interviews you mentioned that your wife could be involved in non-policy meetings, if you are elected. Many may have heard this comment and the flurry of comments about it. Not as many may have heard your subsequent explanation on this matter. Could you explain that for my readers?

I want to thank you for taking the time to read this letter. I look forward to your response. I again mention that this letter and any response will be posted without any alteration.

Sincerely,
Michael Vass

President - M V Consulting, Inc.
Author - Black Entertainment USA and Vass
vass@vassconsult.com
718-344-6921

Concluding 39 years of reflection - 4.3.2007.3

Continued from Part 2...

Perhaps I can sum it up by saying this, the culture today believes in dying like you live. I, and many that are my age, believe in living until I die. The difference is hardly subtle.

I think that the Black community shares my view. I think many want to strive for more. I think we can be more. But I think far too many are stuck on distractions. There is a desire to have bling, and other such nonsense, because someone else has it. There is a desire for a leader to arrive and make things better. There is a desire for justice to take hold. In 38 years it hasn’t happened, and I don’t see that attitude helping it get there.

A cell phone, cable tv, designer clothes and high priced sneakers will not get you a better life. It won’t make you smarter, give you healthy children, or improve your job. Waiting for someone to lead will only make you sheep. Following the trend because that’s what you see around you just makes you a lemming. Doing drugs because they are available and cool only makes you an addict.

There is no excuse for not increasing your knowledge. The computer this is on is a gateway for that. You can gain anything you want; you just have to go after it. I can attest to that fact, I am doing it now. Don’t wait for someone to lead you, lead others if they will follow. Don’t accept less than you are worth. If you would pay for better clothes, what would you pay for a better life? Why accept less? Don’t settle for what you are given. You get what you pay for and if it’s free it’s not worth much. Don’t get caught up with what the Jones’ have, it’s not yours. Everyone wants something someone else has, someone wants what you have. Accept what you do have, plan for what you don’t, and then strive to get to the level above that. Do that and you will be the Jones’. How do you think they got there?

If parts of this upset you, good. It’s not meant to be nice. It’s a wake up call. It’s a slap in the face of complacency. It’s a call to action, and only you can answer it. I’ve spent almost 39 years going for what I think I want and deserve. In ways I’ve succeeded, others not. Yet I’m pleased that I can get where I want to be. I’m hopeful I can get others to follow my lead, and if not I won’t stop going. I have knowledge and that fuels my life, but I’m not special.

The difference between me and you is perhaps that I’m going to be 39 and you are not. The difference is that I don’t care about bling, because I have lived without it with no complaint. The difference is that I made a choice, and accepted the responsibility and consequences of that choice. I am a MAN, 39, African American Puerto Rican and my own.

Maybe, just maybe, when you are my age you can say similar things. But perhaps you will say far more.

This is what I think, what do you think?

Over 30 years of thought - 4.3.2007.2

Continued from part 1 ...

I have noticed how many kids are having children at younger ages, and how few married couples exist now. Divorce was a major taboo, even in the 80’s. Today it’s expected after 5 years. Marriage is just a thing to do, and is a correctable decision without consequence. In fact many ‘men’ think its better to have children without accepting the obligation they have to them. Rather than being ostracized they are glamorized, called baby-daddies and the like. That is just stupid.

Children are not some badge of honor, to be toted around to signify importance. Only a fool would consider them such. Only a fool would think that they have no need to be involved with their own offspring. Only such a fool would think this makes them a man. Yet the influx of fools seems to be on the rise.

Partially at fault are the women that allow men to do this. That any woman who would be with someone that has done such an act in the past, thinking that their child will make the difference or that this child will grant them access to the money or status they desire is obtuse. Equally to accept the status equal to that of a pedigree dog is below the realm of an individual with a brain. If you would want to be a HO, or hoochie, or other equally eloquent terminology then you should not complain about the life that status provides you. But there is so much more available.

I’ve watched as the status of Black men has become more criminal, in the media and in the courtroom, and the reaction of many women is not only to accept this as fact but to support it. Men are simple creatures, and perhaps lazy in a manner. We all do what it takes to gain the women we want in our lives. If our women accept less, the men try less. It’s a vicious cycle.

In my life I came to understand that the guys on the corner will still be there in 10 years, if they live that long. I have known friends to die for a plethora of reasons, each of them linked inextricably to the lifestyle they have chosen. I have watched women have several children, each with a different father; each child growing up with inferior social skills and less of a drive for intelligence than the last. I’ve seen these things spread like a disease, an infection transferred not by blood or germs or even genetics but by an active choice. I compare it to suicide, of the most slow and brutal manner.

And I realize it doesn’t have to be like this.

I have seen people on both coasts of this nation, as well as overseas. I have had wealth and lived homeless. I’ve learned other languages, while I’ve grown my ability to speak my native tongue. I’ve gained knowledge, from books and experience; that no one can ever buy or steal or remove from me. I have prospered for decades and so can you.

I’m not that special. I grew up poor, without the technology that is abundant now, or other creature comforts of the time. I went to public schools with books older than me. I worked from age 13 to help with the family bills. I had the same clothes through all of high school. I grew up knowing drug dealers and had the chance to become one. I’ve known gangs of all sizes and many friends were in them. People around me did not speak high English, some through no fault of their own. Yet I have persevered.

Finished in part 3...