Video games still under the gun - 6.22.2007.1

The entire video game industry just got very lucky. They nearly took a big hit, and the proponents of videoholics nearly got a huge boost. How did this all quietly happen? When and where?

The how and when is the final Virginia Tech report, made by Health & Human Services Secretary Michael Leavitt, Education Secretary Margaret Spellings and Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez and given to President Bush, which made no comment on videogames though critics Jack Thompson and Lyndon LaRouche tried hard to make the connection. This could have been devastating to the industry to be linked to a deranged mass murderer like the shooter at V-Tech.

There have been constant critiques of video games, usually timed with tragic events or political elections, and the violence some games contain. Now there is the AMA. I think it’s just silly. There is no connection to either of these things in my opinion. To make a connection is a false premise, and only benefits lawyers and psychiatrists.

The fact is sick people do sick things. That’s not the fault of a video game or game manufacturers, but the sick individuals themselves. Looking to find an excuse beyond that is just a way to give lawyers another defense in court that shouldn’t exist, I think. Mark my words, this push by the American Medical Association to make videoholics a reality is probably tied to a court case of some sort, probably a class action lawsuit, against some gaming company.

I’m not against lawyers making money, or defending their clients as best they can. I hate when quasi-scientific ‘diseases’ are used to excuse why someone does something they know is morally and/or legally wrong. I feel similar with respect to psychiatrists. They can definitely help people, but not with crap like this, that will no doubt lead to extended sessions for parents who can’t ‘control’ their child. The kid will get plenty of medication to cure or control his ‘addition’ and the parents will lose tons of money.

This sounds so much like what happened when I discussed the Sexsomniac court case,

“I speculated that the research being done in October was a precursor to some legal case an attorney was preparing for. Lo and behold I was not wrong. On the 23rd of May, Mr. Scott Axelburg used this defense to justify placing his hands down the pants of a 16-year-old babysitter.”

Just wait and not only will there be a court case on this, I’d expect the usual political hounddogs to come out and get their pictures taken as they claim they will do something about this ‘epidemic’. It’s the same argument that came out after the GTA (Grand Theft Auto) Hot Coffee fiasco. Given all the senators and politicians that were making soundbites on all the cable news media, I’m surprised that nothing has changed and the issue was dropped for the next watercooler outrage.

Then again, I’m happy it didn’t go anywhere. I may not like GTA, or let my nieces and nephews play that or other violent games, but I won’t say that such games can’t be made. It’s not the kids buying these games, it’s the parents. Congress can’t make anyone buy anything, nor should they. This is a free speech issue [a favorite topic of mine] and a parenting one. The government has no place in it.

I’m sure this isn’t over yet, but at least on more hurdle is past.

This is what I think, what do you think?