Monday, July 28, 2008

Janet Jackson: Intelligence, success, and fame are not enough

Over the weekend I noticed something and I doubt many have spoken on it. Janet Jackson was in the news again about her Super Bowl costume issue. It seems that after years of comments and threats by the FCC, the whole thing is now passed over as if it never happened.

Isn’t that interesting. CBS will receive no fine

“This is an important win for the entire broadcasting industry because it recognizes that there are rare instances, particularly during live programming, when it may not be possible to block unfortunate fleeting material, despite best efforts," the CBS Network, which had the misfortune of unwittingly broadcasting the Super Bowl debacle, issued in a statement.”


Justin Timberlake, who committed the act of infamy, has walked away from this scandal without ever being touched by it. The fact that he may have caused the problem in the manner he removed the cloth was never his fault. His career, whatever you may think of it, has continued unabated.
Photo found at http://filmgordon.wordpress.com/2008/03/
But Janet Jackson has been mired with this scandal. She has effectively become blackballed by the media and entertainment industries. Did anyone notice that she had an album out recently? Now Janet Jackson has had so-so albums, and mega-hits, but in her entire career I have never known her to release an album and not hear any of the songs, nor see/read commentary about it. Her worst album (before the latest) sold more records than most entertainers on a good day.

The media just can’t let go of less than 15 seconds of footage. The mostly bare single breast of this Black woman is just that powerful I suppose. I have to imagine that were both breasts to have been bared, half the population of America would have died. I mean that’s the way the media and a few fringe fanatical groups seem to act.

But is that fair?

Hmmm, CBS promotes the UFC – which is a violent sport. Unlike boxing it has no elegance, it’s just about raw power. That has to be good for the kids. I'm sure the soap operas that were the staple of CBS and broadcast television, with more breasts and ass appearing than some soft-core porn, really has to be good for kids in the afternoon.

And the entertainment media loves women. I mean look at the attention poured all over Britney Spears as she has desperately tried to implode. She went to rehab for as long as it take me to piss, then cuts off her hair. Mega-news story. I’m sure it inspired many drug addicts, and more than a few young girls, to try a new fashion design. That’s positive.
Paris Hilton going to jail, hurrah!

There is the insanely untalented Paris Hilton. Bad porno tape, can’t act, can’t sing, can’t even open her glove box to see the letter telling her she can’t drive. But she is insanely rich. So rich that she almost pulled off a get out of jail card. If she has a positive to impart on the American public I am still unaware of it.
Anna Nicole Smith - sexy but dim

Anna Nicole Smith, drug addict (possibly while pregnant), promiscuous, arguably lecherous, with a sole talent being she had a great body. Months were devoted to her death at the near exclusion of all other news and facts at the time. Literally I do not recall another story that has been on the news that much – hours of news hours dedicated to a woman that was about as important as wet paper. Seriously, even Britney Spears has more talent. Message to kids – if you have the right curves you can get money and no one will care how many drugs you take. If you are a guy, either make a lot of money for this kind of girl to take, or be sleazy enough to leech money from her drug-addled ass.
Lindsey Lohan - model of sobreity

Lindsey Lohan, the drunken party girl that was desperately trying to end her movie career. After years of building up a host of fans that were not old enough to appreciate talent, Lohan was more than happy to drink herself into oblivion. Her quick trips to rehab were only slightly longer than Spears, but thankfully she had her mom to lean on while she drank and did drugs.

Amy Winehouse, the reported crack addict with a voice. So deep into drugs and alcoholism that she couldn’t perform and has been arrested multiple times. And she doesn’t care what anyone thinks because she told us that. At least her man is just as deranged and besodden as her, so it’s a match set in love and not money.

I could go on, but what are the similarities of these women?

They are all White, they all are being promoted and covered by the media (thus making them all money), and they all have been filmed, photographed and discussed ad nausea since Janet Jackson was at the Super Bowl.

So was the outrage that Janet Jackson’s accidental exposure occurred, or was it something else. None of the women I mentioned have half her talent or longevity in entertainment. Janet is not on drugs, does not cover magazines drunk or in scandals (other than the one event). She has never been linked to anything negative that I can recall. And no one questions her ability to think and do business – she broke all records for an artist contract that even her brother did not match at one time.

In fact she should be a role model for young women, proving that women (especially Black women) beside Oprah and Maya Angelou can succeed on their own doing what they are best at. Yet she his blacklisted and blackout by the media in favor of women who are such messes I can’t imagine most of them surviving to be 35.

So what’s wrong with the major media? What’s going on in the entertainment industry? What the hell are Hollywood and music execs thinking?

I tell you what, if I had a daughter – or were it one of my nieces – and the worst moment in a career she made that garnered her tens of millions of dollars, fame, and comfort over decades was the momentary equivalent of her dress slipping I’d be happy for her. No drugs, no scandals, no court taking away her children because she is unfit as a mother, no drunken binges and car accidents that could kill innocents, no crimes, no whispers of anorexia, never selling her body for money.

Seriously ask yourself this question, which woman would you want your daughter, sister, niece, or mother to emulate? Then ask why being Black, successful, talented, and intelligent is worthy of a media excommunication?

3 comments:

M. Vass said...

The Following comments came from 1800blogger where I am a contributing writer.

Brittany

I agree 150%. But this issue is as simple as race relations in America. America is not a fair country when it comes to gov’t, class and especially race. The American Media is no different. It’s extremely sad, but you know for all of us who are aware of all that Janet has accomplished (including Janet herself), not only in music but also as a humanitarian, we know that she has nothing to be ashamed of and nothing to feel bad about. She’s going to come out on top no matter what, it’s in the genes.


Dawn

I couldn’t agree with you more. It’s a shame how the media has turned their backs against one of the most talented icons of our day. Just like there can never be another Elvis, Michael Jackson, or Frank Sinatra, there can never be another Janet. One minute everybody’s kissing Janet’s ass and then a split second of Janet’s exposed breast and radio refuses to play her songs when fans request it, stations refuse to play her music video, she’s uninvited to the Grammys, and is cut from a role that she already was given to play Lena Horn. All the while, Justin Timberlake goes on with his career unscathed. Isn’t America such a hypocrite? It doesn’t make any sense to me. Janet is so much more classy, gracious, and elegant, yet the media portrays her as a conniving celebrity who pulled a media stunt. I’m sure Janet will have the last laugh though. This has only made her stronger.

M. Vass said...

The following comments can be seen at Topix where roboblogger posted my story.

BahamutsKingdom,

I have to say a great story, and I agree with it 100%
A misfortune with a mishap of clothing that lasted 2.3 seconds, and she is all but over. But we will push the drug addicts, and wino's in everyone's face, and make them the role models for the world. What exactly is wrong with this picture? If I did have a daughter, or such as that, i would hope their choice of someone to emulate would be Janet as well. I am not saying that because I am a fan, but because who she is compared to the other ladies out there.


chinaboi76,

well said. luv ya

M. Vass said...

Michael Vass,

First I want to thank Roboblogger for posting my story at Topix for more people to read.

I also want to than those that have taken the time to make comment.

Everyone above is correct when it was said that being a fan is not a factor and that 2.3 seconds cannot justify what has happened. Especially in light of the other women I made comparisons too.

It's nice to know others agree with my view. Now if we could only get the entertainment and news media industries to comne to the same realization I have to imagine things would be at least a little better.