There seems to be no end to the concerns for those in California. First there is the Oscar Grant shooting (murder). Now there is something perhaps equally as disturbing, Michael Jackson.
Jackson has returned to California, moving into Bel-Air. I'd advise any parents out there with young boys to be very afraid. Not that anything has been proven against Jackson. It's just that he is creepy as hell and there is a mountain of questions about him and what he does behind closed doors.
Still you have to wonder how he can afford this new home. Considering he lost Neverland Ranch - much to the dismay of R Kelly I would imagine - got sued by is Arabic friends, had to leave the Middle East rather suddenly, and will be auctioning off many of his possessions in the spring I am bewildered at where his money comes from.
The even greater question at hand though is where are his kids? Has anyone seen them, or even heard about them in years now? Given that Jako is super famous even among celebrities (or is it infamous now) and the fact that he is a bit of a wacko when it comes to his privacy, I am concerned. And if any aspect of the thought of Michael Jackson being a pedophile is correct, people really need to ask this.
Even is his new record album he is planning is better than every song ever made, that does not mean the public should not be concerned about his kids. And why has no one in the media asked how they are doing? Or the paparazzi not taken a picture of them? Come on, the paparazzi invade every celebrities privacy, snapping shot in the most inappropriate place without concern for family, children or occasion.
Yet they are showing civility to Jackson's rarely mentioned children?
And if I were a parent in Bel Air, and Jackson brought his kids over to play with my own kids, I'd have video cameras rolling every second that he was there. Just to be safe I wouldn't leave any of the kids alone. Because by now, Jackson's kids are at least as socially messed up as he is. And that's imagining the best scenario.
It makes me shake my head.
3 comments:
You sy Michael hurts children then what are you doing to his children? Putting a lable on them and using your imagination to say their messed up. When do people take PERSONAL responsibility for what they say and how it affects others? These are children. Don't be a hypocrite and say a person hurts children then with a few clicks of your fingers you try to destroy them with your opinions.
Anonymous,
First thank you for assuming that my blog is big enough and powerful enough to affect the life of Michael Jackson and his offspring. I'm complimented.
But more directly, I am doing nothing but bringing up a logical question based on facts and my interpretation. It is known that children that are abused grow up and abuse. Isolation, apparently, from the public in the care of a highly debatable pedophile raises concern in me. The chances of those children becoming abusers are high if only half the allegations made against Jackson are correct. Add to that the troubled lives of many children of celebrities that live in a quirky and hardly normal (even by celebrity standards) lives, and things look worse.
So if I bring a question and it causes the authorities, or concerned parents, to pay extra attention that may benefit the children, I have no problem. I am responsible for what I say. I do not believe I damaged anyone with my post, and am willing to say these things - like every word I have written ever - directly to those it was aimed at. And given the facts at hand I believe what I said is a probable outcome.
It does sound unpleasant. But what is more unpleasant is if my postulations are correct. I would love to make an apology publicly because Jackson's children are mentally and physically healthy. I hope that I will have to. But I stand by what I have said until that time.
I notice you are not concerned about the rest of my post. You are focusing on the last paragraph, why is that? Do you believe Jackson is a pedophile? That he is socially ill-equipped, and raises his children in potentially unhealthy ways?
Lastly I am no a hypocrite. I made a postulation, and the conclusion of that is both unpleasant and possible. I presented a means to determine if I am correct or not - either answer would lead to the health of the children. You do not like the potential I discussed. Neither do I. But that does not mean I will shy away from it. This needs to be said, because no one will say it. It's not PC, it not nice. But neither is life, especially when it could be a maladjusted one.
Mr. Vass, you are full of it, for sometime Michael Jackson was in Las Vegas, I don't recall you saying hide your boys, MJ is in town. Am I wrong? The parents in Bel-Air don't have anything to be concern about. I have never heard of MJ snatching one child off the street. And if a parent let there child go over to MJ's place, then what kind of parent are they? As far as MJ's kids go, I too wonder how they are doing? What kind of education are they recieving? I have seen recent pictures of the kids. But Mr. Vass, if this concern you that much, why don't you try to fine out some answers to your concerns. And while I am at it don't be just concern with MJ's kids, what about all the others who are out there and there father's name don't happen to be Michael Jackson? You are concern about them too, aren't you?
Post a Comment